National Marine Sanctuaries Permits and Consultations USGC Training – Oakland, CA June 4, 2014 Vicki Wedell National Coordinator for Permitting, Consultations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Park Service Mission To preserve unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education,
Advertisements

Presented to: Minnesota Chamber of Commerce October 1, 2012.
Watershed Staff Videoconference October 17, 2012.
A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012.
Managing Development in the Coastal Zone, Federal Policy II: Coastal Zone Management Act; Slide 29.1 Session Name: Managing Development in the Coastal.
Sean Morton FKNMS Superintendent Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Marine Zoning and Regulatory Review Status and Process Overview FWC Boating Advisory.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Wildlife Hazard Management ACI-NA CONFERENCE, MARCH 16, 2004.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
Pesticide Container-Containment Regulations: FIFRA 19(f)(2) Determinations of Adequacy.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Briefing on Proposed Amendments to Endangered Species Regulations.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Overview the local, state, and federal regulatory authorities which affect the interim housing mission Identify vital stakeholders with regulatory authority.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Regulatory Program Glen Justis Chief, Policy & Administration Regulatory Division Alaska District 2010 Building.
Endangered Species Act
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
CUI Statistical: Collaborative Efforts of Federal Statistical Agencies Eve Powell-Griner National Center for Health Statistics.
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
FAR Part 2 Definitions of Words and Terms. FAR Scope of part (a)This part – (1) Defines words and terms that are frequently used in the FAR; (2)
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming.
23 June 2011Edward Johnson1 NWS Directive 1-12 Managing the Acquisition of Environmental Data from External Parties NOAA Science Advisory Board’s Data.
NOAA’s Organizational Structure for Consultations, Permits, and Authorizations Environmental Compliance Training.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
Ferries – Federal Legislative and Regulatory Outlook Edmund B. Welch Passenger Vessel Association.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Karl Morgan JUNE 2013 Karl Morgan JUNE 2013.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
1 Overview of Minerals Management Service’s Alternative Energy Program Ocean Law Conference May 22, 2008 Seattle, WA Walter D. Cruickshank Deputy Director.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary Malia Chow, PhD NOAA Sanctuary Superintendent Marine And Coastal Advisory Council March 6, 2015.
Monica L. DeAngelis Marine Mammal Biologist National Marine Fisheries Service Long Beach, CA The Marine Mammal Protection.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit Three Land Use Decisions.
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY 3/15/12. WHAT ARE THE IMPORTANT US POLICIES?  Clean Air Act  Clean water Act  Superfund/CERCLA  Endangered species Act  NEPA.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
McClain County Multi- Jurisdictional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Image from
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit Three Land Use Planning Decisions.
August 1 st Draft of Offshore Aquaculture Amendment Gulf Council Meeting August 11-15, 2008 Key Largo, FL Tab J, No. 6.
TOWARDS A COMMON GOAL Coordinating actions under the Clean Water Act (FWPCA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
MSRA Implementation Status Update. 2 Implementation Strategy Divide tasks Priority 1 – Due date specified in the Act Priority 2 – Required, but no due.
Clean Boating Act of 2008 (P.L ) Sport Fishing & Boating Partnership Council March 4, 2011.
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
Isis Johnson Environmental Protection Specialist Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs April 28, 2016.
National Flood Insurance Program ESA Consultation for Online Information Sessions May 11 th and 12 th 2016 Oregon.
Environmental Issues Update - Endangered Species 1.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
FAR Part 2 - Definitions of Words and Terms
State of Minnesota Section 404 Assumption Feasibility Study
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
PROVISIONS OF H.R
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Review of Parks Canada’s Planning Permit Process
Review of Parks Canada’s Planning Permit Process
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming
HSE Requirements for Pipeline Operations GROUP HSE GROUPE (CR-GR-HSE-414) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule defines the minimum HSE requirements related to the.
Presentation transcript:

National Marine Sanctuaries Permits and Consultations USGC Training – Oakland, CA June 4, 2014 Vicki Wedell National Coordinator for Permitting, Consultations and NEPA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries

Overview National Marine Sanctuaries US Coast Guard Actions 3 Forms of Approval –General permits –Authorizations –Special use permits Sanctuary Consultation – NMSA 304(d)

National Marine Sanctuaries “Areas of the marine environment with special conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, cultural, archeological, or esthetic qualities…” (NMSA Sec. 301)

National Marine Sanctuaries Act Primary purpose is resource protection. Comprehensive management of uses of the National Marine Sanctuary System Regulations, permitting, enforcement, research, monitoring, education and outreach.

US Coast Guard Actions Marine event permits Construction Aids to Navigation Updates to Area Contingency Plans Emergency response actions Training – e.g., live fire exercises Coast Guard regulations –Vessel routing measures –Ballast water –Marine sanitation devices

ONMS – USCG Coordination Memorandum of Understanding –e.g., Olympic Coast NMS ONMS authorization of USCG permits ONMS superintendent’s permit Regulatory coordination Response actions Consultation inquiry

National Marine Sanctuary Forms of Approval General permit Activities prohibited by ONMS regulations Permit categories All sites – except HIHW Authorization Activities prohibited by ONMS regulations Nexus to other federal, state or local permit 6 sites Special use permit Authority granted in NMSA 7 categories of activities No injury of sanctuary resources All sites – except HIHW

General Permits A general permit is required to conduct activities that are otherwise prohibited by sanctuary regulations (15 CFR Part 922). Prohibitions are sanctuary-specific, but commonly include: –disturbance of submerged lands –discharges.

Permit Criteria and Procedures Regulations establish categories of sanctuary general permits. –e.g., research, education, and management Regulations also establish permit review criteria and procedures. Permit application review primarily occurs at sanctuary.

Authorizations Six sanctuaries currently have this approval authority in ONMS regulations. To allow otherwise prohibited activities. Nexus to other federal, state, or local permits, licenses, authorizations, leases, or approvals. –FKNMS authorize USCG marine event permit for temporary buoy placement.

Authorizations Review of requests for authorizations primarily occurs at sanctuary. Consider regulatory permit review criteria. Can apply NMSA-specific terms and conditions.

ONMS Permit/Authorization Regulations Revision Proposed rule published Jan. 28, 2013 Consolidates permit regulations into system-wide section. Updates permit categories and review criteria, among other things. Estimate final will be published Sept. 2014

Special Use Permit NMSA section 310 grants the authority to issue an SUP to: 1.establish conditions of access to and use of any sanctuary resource or 2.promote public use and understanding of a sanctuary resource. Activity can not injure sanctuary resources.

SUP Categories 1.The placement and recovery of objects associated with public or private events on non-living substrate of the submerged lands. 2.The placement and recovery of objects related to commercial filming. 3.The continued presence of commercial submarine cables on or within the submerged lands. 4.The disposal of cremated human remains. 5.Recreational diving near the USS Monitor. 6.Fireworks displays. 7.The operation of aircraft below the minimum altitude in restricted zones of national marine sanctuaries.

SUP Fees 1.Administrative costs 2.Implementation and monitoring costs 3.Fair market value SUP fee guidance is currently being updated and will go out for public comment (estimated late summer 2014).

Sanctuary Permit Info on the Web For more information on sanctuary permits including FAQs, applications, and instructions, go to: permits/welcome.html

Sanctuary Consultation: NMSA Section 304(d) Requires interagency consultation on federal actions “likely to destroy, cause the loss of, or injure a sanctuary resource.” (AKA “likely to injure”) “Actions” include direct federal actions and federal authorization of private activities through licenses, leases, or permits. Also includes actions external to sanctuary. Federal agencies are also required to consult on actions that “may affect” the resources of Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary.

Sanctuary Consultation Overview Document on the Web consultations/welcome.html General information/educational purposes only.

Basic Consultation Process Work collaboratively with ONMS staff. Engage at the earliest practicable time. Identify actions that require consultation. Consider less harmful alternatives. The first points of contact for questions are the appropriate sanctuary superintendent or me.

Three General Phases

Pre-Consultation Who is required to consult? –Federal agencies When is consultation required? –Likely to injure sanctuary resource –May affect resources in SBNMS What is a sanctuary resource statement? –Describes action and potential effects

Sanctuary Resource “any living or nonliving resource of a national marine sanctuary that contributes to the conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, educational, cultural, archeological, scientific, or aesthetic value of the sanctuary” (NMSA; 16 U.S.C. § 1432(8))

Determining Injury Is likely to injure a sanctuary resource May affect a resource of the Stellwagen Bank NMS Injury must occur while sanctuary resources are inside the boundaries.

Definition of Injure To “change adversely, either in the short or long term, a chemical, biological or physical attribute of, or the viability of. This includes, but is not limited to, to cause the loss of or destroy.” (15 CFR Part 922)

NMSA and MMPA “Injure” ONMS regulatory definition of “injure” is very broad compared to other statutes. Includes both behavioral harassment (Level B) and physical harm (Level A) as defined by MMPA. MOU under development with NMFS Marine Mammal Incidental Take Program.

Initiate Consultation Agency submits sanctuary resource statement Not necessarily a separate document –Could be included in an EA or EIS

Sanctuary Resource Statement Purpose is to understand the activity and its potential impacts. –Description of the activity –Alternatives considered, including location outside sanctuaries –Analysis of the impacts

Sanctuary Resource Statement Timeframe ~45 days –Submit at the earliest practicable time –But at least 45 days before the final approval of the action –Unless agree to a different schedule

Consultation ONMS evaluation of resource statement Develop recommended alternatives –Location –Timing –Methods

Consultation Agency response to recommendations –Full or partial implementation –Complete rejection Written explanation describing rationale

Post-Consultation Monitoring the action Injured sanctuary resources –Prevent further damage –Develop and implement mitigation measures –Restore or replace resources

Integrating Permitting and Consultations Regulations –Apply to everyone –Permits may be required Consultations –Apply to federal agencies Integrate processes

Exemption from Permit Requirements Regulatory exemptions from certain prohibitions Does not exempt from sanctuary consultation.

NEPA and Other Consultations

Vicki Wedell NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries 1305 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD Phone: ext