Brief Guide to Requests Unequivocal –Increase sales by 25% –Speak on behalf of and vote for my new pricing policy at the sales meeting –By 3 pm this afternoon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 4: Managing IS Organizations Topic 9. Managing the processes of organizational behavior.
Advertisements

Social Influence and Persuasion
Negotiating for Win-Win Interest-Based Negotiation CASFAA Conference, 2008 Anaheim, CA Presented by Natasha Kobrinsky Pepperdine University Graziadio School.
© Cengage Learning – Purchasing & Supply Chain Management 4 ed ( ) Practice 16. Negotiating techniques and rules of conduct.
Negotiating and Resolving Conflict. How often do you negotiate? Often Seldom Never.
Human Resource Management Lecture-37. Summary of Lecture-36.
Negotiation Skills – 2nd Session
How to Negotiate a Successful, Profitable Close. Workshop Objectives 1. Establish personal credibility and increase individual comfort level during negotiations.
MODULE 23 CONFLICT AND NEGOTIATION
Chapter 16. Power Configuration Utilize appropriate power bases Power effectiveness enhances leadership effectiveness Changing and situational Power is.
Gaining Leverage Through Power and Persuasion
Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining
INTERVIEWING SKILLS FOR EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation Ministry of Medical Services 1.
Power Empowerment How to get it How to use it …without abusing it.
Organizational Behavior : An Experiential Approach 8/E Joyce S. Osland, David A. Kolb, Irwin M. Rubin and Marlene E. Turner 18-1 Chapter 18 Power and Influence.
© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 5-1 Chapter 5 Negotiation and Conflict Resolution.
Power and Politics Chapter 10
Chapter 13 – Influence, Power & Politics
Chapter 3 Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining
Managing Conflict, Politics, and Negotiation
Getting to Win-Win in Negotiation Government Finance Officers Association Art Hinshaw Director, Lodestar Dispute Resolution Program Sandra Day O’Connor.
Chapter 3: Verbal Communication Skills
Power And Influence Tactics. Coercive Power The target person complies in order to avoid punishments he or she believes are controlled by the agent.
Cross-cultural Communication and Negotiation
Managing Conflict, Politics, and Negotiation chapter seventeen McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Managing Conflict, Politics, and Negotiation
Northern Metropolitan Region Achievement Improvement Zones.
CHAPTER 8 Influence.
Use communication skills to influence others..  Persuasion is an important part of communication  Want others to understand your message and agree with.
Choosing Tactics. Strategic Choice Model  The lawyer should not necessarily stick with one model.  The idea that the negotiator has freedom to switch.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved ChapterChapter 10 Networking and Negotiating.
Networking and Negotiating
Ways to Manage Conflict Appreciate Conflict –Positive and negative Use Correct Conflict Management Styles –Avoid, Accommodate, Compete, Compromise, Collaborate.
Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining
Listening and Negotiations. What is the first sales skill you should learn?
Now What….. I want the last remaining orange and so do you.
Chapter 6 Strategy Strategy. Strategy versus Tactics What is the difference between strategy and tactics? What is the difference between strategy and.
Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining
How to engage in Distributive Bargaining
2-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved CHAPTER TWO Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining.
Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Negotiation Professor Robert W. Cullen Fall 2007.
Managing Negotiation Mismatches
Finding and Using Negotiation Power CHAPTER SEVEN.
CHAPTER 7 Finding and Using Negotiation Power
Main Topics Negotiating Sessions: “At the table” Critical Elements in a Negotiation Information Ethics negotiation Bargaining Strategies Distributive Bargaining.
5 - 1 © 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Negotiation Cultural Analysis Framework Salacuse 1991.
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. Power & Politics Negotiations.
8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved CHAPTER EIGHT Influence.
Influence & Leadership. Define Power and Influence Power is the ability to bring about change in one’s psychological environment. Influence is the use.
Chapter 12: Interpersonal Power and Influence
NEGOTIATION TWO TYPES OF NEGOTIATION 1.Distributive (Competitive)
협상의 요소 II.  Possible solutions to satisfy interests Interests are the building blocks of a possible agreement Options are ways to fit those building.
Managing Conflict in Relationships Unit Conflict Conflict has been defined as "an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties.
The Distributive Bargaining Situation
How To Effectively Negotiate Presenter: Shannon Welton San Diego DCSS.
ESSENTIALS OF NEGOTIATION SIXTH EDITION
POWER AND INFLUENCE.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 5: Preparing to Drive Stages of a Successful Negotiation
Negotiation Chapter 12 © Pearson 2012.
Cross-cultural Communication and Negotiation
NEGOTIATION SEVENTH EDITION
Effective Negotiations for Lawyers
How to engage in Distributive Bargaining
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Presentation transcript:

Brief Guide to Requests Unequivocal –Increase sales by 25% –Speak on behalf of and vote for my new pricing policy at the sales meeting –By 3 pm this afternoon –By the 15 th of next month Equivocal –Increase sales –Give me support at the sales meeting –ASAP –Next month Requests are speech acts that call another person into action: “I request that you __(intended result)__ by __(deadline__.” Requests should be unequivocal.

Collecting No’s Formulate and make requests intended to produce “No” as response “No” is a success –Assertive, learn to ask for things directly, discover real limits to a reasonable or unreasonable request. People generally say “yes” to requests –(6 to 1) –More and more unreasonable, short deadline –Decline requests: “maybe”, etc. Why? –What excuses are used? Accepted? How persistent must you be to get a yes? What would you have to do to get a “yes”?

Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining and Leverage

Integrative vs. Distributive Negotiation (Creating vs. Claiming Value)

Distributive Bargaining The goals of one party are in fundamental and direct conflict with goals of the other. Resources are fixed and limited. Each party wants to maximize his/her share of resources. Guard own information, get other’s information Use in a situation that is distributive in nature Use it when want to maximize value obtained in a single deal and when the relationship with the other is not important Many people use this style, so must know how to use/counter it.

Phases of Distributive Negotiation The information phase –Each tries to learn as much about the other as possible, giving as little as possible –Opening offer, Opening stance The competitive phase –Try to obtain beneficial terms –Articulate own demands, try to get the most possible –Concessions: role, initial, pattern. –Use “distributive tactics,” counter others’ tactics The cooperative phase –If multiple-item transaction, parties can enhance joint interests –Final offer

Fundamental Strategies Influence seller’s view of settlements possible by making extreme offers and small concessions. Push for settlement close to seller’s resistance point. Get seller to change (reduce) his/her resistance point by influencing sellers’ beliefs about value. If ZOA does not exist, get seller to reduce resistance point, or change own resistance point Get other to think this is the best settlement possible. Protect ego satisfaction.

General Tactics Negotiate tough –Stick to guns, let other side know you mean business, be unafraid to ask for extra concessions. Scrutinize the details –Details of final agreement point by point, try to gain an advantage. Assume nothing, ask for everything, consider no item insignificant; wear them down. Focus on the rewards –Maintain myopic view of what you want, learn to counter opponents strategies. Avoid ultimatums –Choices instead. Walk away Anything goes –Stall, cloud issues, use facial, make a mess, low chair Find your opponents’ pressure points –Take advantage of vulnerabilities, stall if deadline. Control the negotiation –Get others to follow your game plan, agenda. Working document

Typical Distributive Tactics Silence and bracketing. Limited authority Bottom line No (so you can overcome it) Expectation and control (this is negotiable, that is not) Auction Concession Rationale Message-Sending (visual or verbal cues) Good guy/Bad guy Highball/Lowball Bogey Chicken Intimidation Aggressive behavior, anger Snow Job Nibble --- Delay Deadlines (vs test)

Distributive Tactics Cont’d Best-offer-first, Take-it- or-leave-it, Boulwareism Access to agreement/ process/ agenda Conditioning/speech making Divided front Anger and emotion/clear thinking Choice of negotiator Demeaning/haranguing Negotiate with one representative Negotiation location- competitive advantage Preconditions for negotiation

Dealing with Hardball Tactics Ignore them Discuss them Respond in kind Co-opt the other party

Power in Negotiation “The ability to bring about outcomes they desire” “The ability to get things done the way they want them to be done” Sources of power--Power Bases Uses of power –How: Influence/persuasion strategies –Why: Power equalization: level the playing field, move toward integrative Power difference: take advantage, block others’ power moves, move toward distributive

Power in Negotiations Power Bases: –Information and expertise (Expert) Accumulate and present data to change person’s view or position –Control over resources (Reward and Coercive) Money, supplies, manpower, time, equipment, critical services, interpersonal support –Location in the structure: (Legitimate) Legitimate power: authority, reputation, performance Key position: centrality, criticality and relevance, flexibility, visibility –Personal (Referent) power: attractiveness and friendliness, integrity, patience and tenacity, emotion.

Influence Strategies Persuasion Exchange Legitimacy Ingratiation Praise Assertiveness Inspirational appeal Consultation Pressure Coalitions Ingratiation: compliments, attractiveness, helping the other party, perceived similarity, emotion

Persuasive Style Encourage active participation Use metaphors Incite fears Create distractions Use more intense language Violate the receiver’s expectations

Persuasion: Sender Message Content –Make the offer attractive to the other party: their interests –Frame the message so the other party will say yes, yes, YES –Make the message normative: their values –Suggest an agreement in principle Message Structure –Message order: beginning or end –One- and two-sided messages: two sided –Message components: break it up –Repetition: a few times –Conclusions: stated or unstated, stated better

Receivers of Persuasion Attend to the other –Make eye contact, adjust body position, nonverbally encourage or discourage Exploring or ignoring the other’s position –Selectively paraphrase, reinforce points you like Resisting the others influence –BATNA, public commitment, inoculate yourself against the other party’s arguments

Abandoning a Committed Position Plan a private way out, reword to indicate conditions have changed –“Given what I’ve learned from you during this, I see I am going to have to rethink my earlier position” Let the matter die silently –New proposal without mentioning other one Restate the commitment in more general terms –“10% discount” to “significant discount” If it is abandoned, minimize damage to self-esteem or constituent relationships –Public attribution to noble or higher cause