www.hearingcrc.org creating sound value TM Spatial release from masking deficits in hearing-impaired people: Is inadequate audibility the problem? Helen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Considerations for the Development and Fitting of Hearing-Aids for Auditory-Visual Communication Ken W. Grant and Brian E. Walden Walter Reed Army Medical.
Advertisements

National Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney, Australia Prevalence and Remediation of Spatial Processing Disorder (SPD) in Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander.
Improving audibility as a foundation for better speech understanding Pamela Souza, PhD Northwestern University Evanston, IL.
A case study of establishing a national CAPD program for children at Australian Hearing - clinical support and clinical quality Karin Gillies 1, Alison.
Hearing matters: What stops children hearing well in the classroom? Harvey Dillon National Acoustic Laboratories.
Sounds that “move” Diphthongs, glides and liquids.
New Perspectives in Central Auditory Processing Disorder
Improving outcomes for children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder.
Hearing Aids and Hearing Impairments Part II Meena Ramani 02/23/05.
Effects of hearing loss and hearing aids on quality of life and cognitive decline Harvey Dillon, Gitte Keidser National Acoustic Laboratories and The.
Creating sound value TM The perceptibility, acceptability, and benefit of transitioning to new gain targets in experienced hearing aid wearers with moderately.
Sound source segregation Development of the ability to separate concurrent sounds into auditory objects.
The effect of advanced signal processing strategies in hearing aids on user performance and preference Gitte Keidser, Lyndal Carter, and Harvey Dillon.
Is the hearing aid always to blame when things get really noisy? Gitte Keidser 1, Elizabeth Convery 1, Jürgen Kiessling 2, and Ruth Bentler 3 1 National.
Test results and remediation outcomes for children seen through Australian Hearing’s national CAPD service. Alison King 1, Helen Glyde 2, Sharon Cameron.
Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention C.J. Darwin & R.W. Hukin.
The Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children: Assessment, Rehabilitation and Outcomes Jane Martin, Catherine.
Audiovisual benefit for stream segregation in elderly listeners Esther Janse 1,2 & Alexandra Jesse 2 1 Utrecht institute of Linguistics OTS 2 Max Planck.
Interrupted speech perception Su-Hyun Jin, Ph.D. University of Texas & Peggy B. Nelson, Ph.D. University of Minnesota.
“The Effects of Classroom Amplification Systems on Early Elementary Students’ Academic Achievement, Attending Behavior, and Their Ability to Hear Their.
Fitting Formulas Estimate amplification requirements of individual patients Maximize intelligibility of speech Provide good overall sound quality Keep.
TOPIC 4 BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT MEASURES. The Audiometer Types Clinical Screening.
Sound source segregation (determination)
Acoustical Society of America, Chicago 7 June 2001 Effect of Reverberation on Spatial Unmasking for Nearby Speech Sources Barbara Shinn-Cunningham, Lisa.
Perceptual Weighting Strategies in Normal Hearing and Hearing Impaired Children and Adults Andrea Pittman, Ph.D. Patricia Stelmachowicz, Ph.D. Dawna Lewis,
Hearing problems in school – causes and solutions
R3.6.4 Improved Hearing Assessment in Noisy Environments – Parts 1 & 2 Project Leader: Michael Fisher Principal Researcher (Part 1): the late Ben Rudzyn.
1 Improving the acoustic environment of schools for pupils and teachers Bridget Shield & Anne Carey London South Bank University Julie Dockrell & Kate.
The effect of frequency compression and high- frequency directionality on horizontal localisation and speech in noise recognition Ingrid Yeend, Anna O’Brien,
Figures for Chapter 6 Compression
Hearing Aids and Hearing Impairments
SIGNAL PROCESSING IN HEARING AIDS
Alan Kan, Corey Stoelb, Matthew Goupell, Ruth Litovsky
Vowel formant discrimination in high- fidelity speech by hearing-impaired listeners. Diane Kewley-Port, Chang Liu (also University at Buffalo,) T. Zachary.
Harvey Dillon Director, National Acoustic Laboratories Parliamentary Breakfast Hearing Awareness Week, 2012 Hearing aids – how much do they really help?
Linical & Experimental Audiology Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet; improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss Monique Leensen.
Creating sound valuewww.hearingcrc.org Kelley Graydon 1,2,, Gary Rance 1,2, Dani Tomlin 1,2 Richard Dowell 1,2 & Bram Van Dun 1,4. 1 The HEARing Cooperative.
Effects of noise on hearing and “Noise-induced hearing loss”
The audiometric threshold: measured in-situ, automated, and by the hearing aid Gitte Keidser, Harvey Dillon, Anna O’Brien, Dan Zhou, Lyndal Carter, Ingrid.
From Auditory Masking to Supervised Separation: A Tale of Improving Intelligibility of Noisy Speech for Hearing- impaired Listeners DeLiang Wang Perception.
METHODOLOGY INTRODUCTION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LITERATURE Low frequency information via a hearing aid has been shown to increase speech intelligibility in noise.
Figures for Chapter 1 Introductory concepts
DEVELOPMENT OF NAL-NL2 Harvey Dillon, Gitte Keidser, Teresa Ching,
Sounds in a reverberant room can interfere with the direct sound source. The normal hearing (NH) auditory system has a mechanism by which the echoes, or.
Hearing & Aging Or age brings wisdom and other bad news.
Hearing Problems in People with Spinocerebellar Ataxia SCA Australia Meeting, Nov 8, 2009 Gary Rance (PhD)
Need for cortical evoked potentials Assessment and determination of amplification benefit in actual hearing aid users is an issue that continues to be.
Analog vs. Digital “’A Hearing Perspective” Andy Raguskus, CEO SONIC innovations, Inc.
1 Central Auditory Processing Disorder Trish Doty + Sarah Ackerman.
Hearing Research Center
1 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Importance of FM Systems and Product Overview Evert Dijkstra, Phonak Communications, Murten, Switzerland.
A case study of program implementation and quality improvement - Establishing a national CAPD program for children at Australian Hearing Alison King 1,
Figures for Chapter 8 Candidacy Dillon (2001) Hearing Aids.
The role of reverberation in release from masking due to spatial separation of sources for speech identification Gerald Kidd, Jr. et al. Acta Acustica.
Date of download: 5/27/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: The Importance of High-Frequency Audibility in the.
What can we expect of cochlear implants for listening to speech in noisy environments? Andrew Faulkner: UCL Speech Hearing and Phonetic Sciences.
Harvey Dillon Carolyn Mee Testing hearing is child’s play John SeymourJesus Cuauhtemoc.
An innovative approach to the remediation of Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD) in children at Australian Hearing Karin Gillies 1, Sharon Cameron.
The effectiveness of using home-based auditory training programs for the remediation of Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD) Karin Gillies 1, Sharon.
Hz A A A A A A LDL for speech Aided Speech output Functional Gain: The way.
Speech and Singing Voice Enhancement via DNN
Precedence-based speech segregation in a virtual auditory environment
Consistent and inconsistent interaural cues don't differ for tone detection but do differ for speech recognition Frederick Gallun Kasey Jakien Rachel Ellinger.
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Evaluation of Classroom Audio Distribution and Personal FM Systems
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
A Smartphone App-Based
Follow-up: hearing and communication
Aging, Hearing Loss and Amplification: Beyond the Audiogram
Sensorineural Loss & Dementia
Presentation transcript:

creating sound value TM Spatial release from masking deficits in hearing-impaired people: Is inadequate audibility the problem? Helen Glyde 1,2,3, Jörg Buchholz 1,2, Lillian Nielsen 2, Virginia Best 1,2, Harvey Dillon 1,2, Sharon Cameron 1,2, & Louise Hickson 1,3 1. HEARing CRC, 2. National Acoustic Laboratories, 3. University of Queensland XXXII World Congress of Audiology, Brisbane, 2014

Spatially separating speech from distracting noise typically results in improved speech understanding. Referred to as spatial release from masking (SRM) SRM can be measured clinically using the Listening in Spatialized Noise – Sentences Test (LiSN-S) Background 2

Previous research suggested SRM declines with hearing loss. Background 3 Spatial release from masking (dB) Glyde et al (2013)

Why? 4 Poor temporal resolution? Poor frequency resolution? Inadequate audibility?

To determine whether inadequate audibility could explain the apparent relationship between SRM and hearing loss. Aim 5

Method 6 Hearing statusAmplificationParticipantsMean age (range) Simulated hearing- impairment NAL-RPn = yrs (25 – 47) NAL-RP + 25 % NAL-RP + 50 % n = yrs (18 – 53) Normal hearingn = 96 (Cameron et al. 2011) 31.9 yrs (18 – 60) Hearing impairment NAL-RPn = 16 (Glyde et al. 2013) 73.1 yrs (39 – 87) NAL-RP + 25 % NAL-RP + 50 % n = yrs (21 – 80)

Same Voice - 0° Condition Same Voice - ±90° Condition Spatial Release From Masking Method Low cue 7

Method 8

Results – Objective analysis 9

10

Results - Data 11 Sig. improvement in SRM with increase in audibility (p ranging from < to 0.047) NH performance remains sig. better than HI performance at all levels of audibility (p ranging from to 0.011) HI group Sim. HI group

Conclusion 12 Inadequate audibility explains the majority of the difference in SRM measured between NH and HI adults. Improving audibility allows HI adults to gain greater benefit from spatial separation. An amplification strategy which increases audibility but is practical for use in everyday life may improve speech understanding in noise.

Acknowledgements creating sound value TM This research was financially supported by the HEARing CRC established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program. Thanks for listening