The application 2.0 tools through PLEs in Computer Science Education: The twitter experience Miguel Ángel Conde Francisco.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eurosoil Freiburg 2004 – Education in Pedology E-Learning in Soil Science – What are the Perspectives? Ludger Herrmann University of Hohenheim.
Advertisements

Group 4 Project. Why? Scientific investigations of today involve teamwork which, like the Group 4 Project, is interdisciplinary. The underpinnings of.
Measuring social added value A model for public authorities
CONCEPTUAL WEB-BASED FRAMEWORK IN AN INTERACTIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT FOR DISTANCE LEARNING Amal Oraifige, Graham Oakes, Anthony Felton, David Heesom, Kevin.
TEL Research Projects Vladan Devedžić FON – School of Business Administration University of Belgrade, Serbia
Agent-Based Architecture for Intelligence and Collaboration in Virtual Learning Environments Punyanuch Borwarnginn 5 August 2013.
Deconstructing Moodle for better Learning Design Helen M. Lynch Senior E-learning Consultant Australia’s National VET E-learning Strategy Webinar, March.
A Department of Geographical and Life Sciences b Learning and Teaching Enhancement Unit
Centra Quick Tips Press button or Ctrl Key to speak Use button to ask questions Use button for Yes, button for No Use buttons for feedback - Step Out Text.
1 Copyright © 2010 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved. Introduction to the new specification GCSE Computer Science Paul Varey.
Learning and Teaching Conference 2012 Skill integration for students through in-class feedback and continuous assessment. Konstantinos Dimopoulos City.
HOW HIGHER EDUCATION TEACHERS ARE USING WEB TECHNOLOGY IN THEIR EDUCATION ACTIVITIES: A CASE STUDY Sandra Ribeiro
PhD Journey Started: January 2012 End: December 2015?
ECTS- the European Credit System Estela Pereira Universidade de Aveiro.
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT FORMS OF ASSESSMENT.
EDEN 2007 Naples, Italy LIFELONG LEARNING TEACHERS’ NEEDS IN VIRTUAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Josep Maria Boneu 1, Maria Galofré 2, Julià Minguillón 2 1 Centre.
Two e-Learning elective seminars in Novi Sad Putnik Z., Komlenov Ž., Budimac Z. DMI, Faculty of Science University of Novi Sad.
Visual Analysis of a Moodle-based Software Engineering Course Francisco J. García Miguel Á. Conde
Mike Sharples. Beyond mobile learning Learning-enhanced environments DREAM proposal DREAM is a new centre for groundbreaking research into Digital Reality.
Main Rearch Lines and Results Miguel Ángel Conde González This presentation has been made under the auspices of the Lifelong.
Main Rearch Lines and Results Miguel Ángel Conde González
GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca E-learning in Spain Presented by Evaristo Ovide GRIAL – University of Salamanca Salamanca,
1 Kolethra Eleni, Petrianidi Lambrini, Rapacciuolo Maria Angela, Moscha Anna NTUA - NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS Foreign Language Center – Computer.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter The Future of Training and Development.
1 Service Learning Group D Mentors  Dr. M. N. Kaumal  Dr. H. R. Perera Cooperate Partner.
For education and learning Learning Environments/ ICT in Education
ICT TEACHERS` COMPETENCIES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY
Evaluation and analysis of the application of interactive digital resources in a blended-learning methodology for a computer networks subject F.A. Candelas,
Digital identities in ePortfolios: the first-year experience in a higher educational institution Sue Murray and Susi Peacock Centre for Academic Practice.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Strathmore University Learning Management System Dr Joseph Sevilla Workshop at Kigali Institute of Science and Technology Kigali 29th November 2007.
The Influence of Blended Learning Model on Developing Leadership Skills of School Administrators Dr. Tufan AYTAÇ Dr. Tufan AYTAÇ Education Specialist The.
13 May 2006Mellange Workshop Vienna1 MeLLANGE Multilingual eLearning for Language Engineering
Jenni Parker, Dani Boase-Jelinek Jan Herrington School of Education Murdoch University Western Australia.
RECOMMENDATIONS Strand B: Validation of non-formal and informal learning.
Dr. Francisco José García Peñalvo Department of Informatics and Automatics Research Institute of Educational Sciences University of Salamanca Head of the.
Minnesota’s Changing Climate: Engaging Students In Environmental Stewardship through Adventure Learning.
FINAL RESEARCH PROJECT OF SOCIAL SCIENCES MASTER DEGREES. A PROPOSAL FOR IMPROVEMENT J.C. Cortes, R. Cervello, G. Ribes, F. García, B. De Miguel, M. De.
Institutional Considerations
ALBARRACIN MEETING - MAY 2007 Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales Universidad Nacional de La Plata - ARG E – learning experiencies. Virtual & Blended.
LEFIS Master in Legal issues for the Information Society Pilar Lasala University of Zaragoza LEFIS Postgraduate studies Rotterdam, 16 th -17 th June 2006.
8 th Grade Integers Natalie Menuau EDU Prof. R. Moroney Summer 2010.
The Use of Blogs in Learning and Teaching E-Learning Conference East London International Convention Centre 31 October – 1 November 2011 Mmampho Gogela.
1 Evaluating the Quality of the e-Learning Experience in Higher Education Anne Jelfs and Keir Thorpe, Institute of Educational Technology (IET), The Open.
Graham Attwell Web 2.0 and the changing ways we are using computers for learning - implications for pedagogy and curriculum.
Technology in Early Childhood and Elementary Education Jessica Gilboy LeKeisha Weimerskirch Laura Windels Stephanie Zimmer.
Welcome to Grade 9 Gifted Issues In Canadian Geography!
Digital Libraries1 David Rashty. Digital Libraries2 “A library is an arsenal of liberty” Anonymous.
Towards a Reference Quality Model for Digital Libraries Maristella Agosti Nicola Ferro Edward A. Fox Marcos André Gonçalves Bárbara Lagoeiro Moreira.
Enhancing e-learning experience with online social networks Published in IET Communications J.J.P.C. Rodrigues, F.M.R. Sabino, L. Zhou Reporter: Yu Chih.
Using Recommender System and Web 2.0 tools for Blended Learning
Betim ÇIÇO, South East European University (Republic of Macedonia) Marco University of Pavia (Italy)
From institutional repositories to personal collections of learning resources Julià Minguillón 1,2, Jordi Conesa 1 1 Computer Science, Multimedia and Telecommunication.
Validation & Resources for Language Learning in AIOLE Environments Dr Asuncion Sanchez-Villalon, PhD, Dr Pedro P. Sanchez Villalon,
Quality Improvement in Primary/Ambulatory Care: The new Frontier Focus on Patients Piera Poletti CEREF, Padua (Italy)-
Moodle Wiki Trial Design for Online Learning SEM
1 Service Learning Group D Mentors  Dr. M. N. Kaumal  Dr. H. R. Perera Cooperate Partner.
AQA’s GCE Science Specifications Presentation to Lancashire Heads of Science Conference 
Part One: E-learning at EGGS 2011 Part Two: 1 to 1 Netbooks – Looking forward to 2012 Presentation to PTA 8 th June 2011 Claire Amos
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Knowledge Management Edmodo. What is edmodo ? Edmodo  is a micro blogging platform created by Jeff O'Hara and Nic Borg.  is an emerging style of communication.
Ricardo T. Caicedo B. Bachelor of English and Spanish Royal institute of English.
IV – Conclusion: The performing of this investigation as well as of similar others, acquire great significance, in so far as, on one side, it will contribute.
Overview: Exam board is Edexcel
Lourdes Guàrdia, Elena Barberà Teresa Guasch and Enrique Rubio
MASSIVE OPEN ONLINE COURSES (MOOCs)
Blended learning By: Hayati Wasistya Astri Ulvi
Smart Learning concepts to enhance SMART Universities in Africa
EXAMPLES OF E-LEARNING MATERIALS EIT Meeting – Cyprus September 2007
Presentation transcript:

The application 2.0 tools through PLEs in Computer Science Education: The twitter experience Miguel Ángel Conde Francisco J. García Peñalvo Marc Alier Enric Mayol María J. Casany Alicante, Spain, June 13-15, 2012

Outline Introduction 2.0 Tools, PLEs and Computer Science Education The Application of 2.0 tools in Learning Environments Conclusions GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca SPDECE 2012

Outline Introduction 2.0 Tools, PLEs and Computer Science Education The Application of 2.0 tools in Learning Environments Conclusions GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca SPDECE 2012

Introduction (I) GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca SPDECE 2012

Introduction (and II) GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca SPDECE 2012 Institutional resistance to change regarding the introduction of certain technologies in formal environments The insistence on the technology application when it is not required or seen as a solution The need for digital literacy The lack of connection between the formal, non-formal and informal environments

Outline Introduction 2.0 Tools, PLEs and Computer Science The application of 2.0 tools in learning environments Conclusions GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca SPDECE 2012

Education must be supplemented by new paradigms and tools, leading to what has been called eLearning 2.0 eLearning 2.0 means tools that Facilitate interaction and socialization Support digital natives and digital immigrants Are Student centred Support Bologna process GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca Opportunities provided by PLEs and 2.0 Tools SPDECE 2012

PLE is a way to support these necessities The challenge is how to integrate the PLE with the LMS 3 possible scenarios No integration Opening the LMS Web services and interoperability specifications Institutional problems to allow the openness Communication is usually in one specific direction Integration of external tools Tools and contexts integration issues The user has no freedom to decide what tools to use Solutions starting from scratch GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca SPDECE 2012 LMS and PLEs integration (I)

LMS and PLEs integration (II) We propose four possible interoperability scenarios between LMSs and PLEs 1.Export of functionality from the LMS to the PLE. The exported functionality is represented in the PLE and provides information about what happens there to the PLE. It will allow the user to introduce formal activities in the informal environments, which will allow him to participate in the institutional activity even when he is learning by other ways 2.Use of external tools with external access to them. The user may use an external tool such as Flickr, Blogger, etc. in the PLE and latter the teacher must be able to evaluate student’s activity. In this scenario the teacher needs to access to the external environment to evaluate the activity and later take it into account in the LMS. In this way the informal activity performed outside the institution will be assessed and taken into account 3.Use of external tools (with evaluation support) in the PLE, and recover information the LMS. The student would perform the activity in the PLE, in different external tools that have an evaluation interface. The teacher is going to enter into the LMS and will recover automatically the results of the activity carried out on those tools. The activity must be previously auto-evaluated by the tool or should have been evaluated by the teacher. In this case the teacher leads the activity performed in the informal environment 4.Use of external tools without evaluation support into the PLE. This scenario is referred to those tools that have not an evaluation interface (i.e.: Google Docs), but could be used to perform learning activities. In this case the LMS instantiate a proxy that will provide the evaluation interface, which allows the teacher to recover the information from the external tools GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca

Second scenario is used in this work It is based on an external online tool with a light integration It enriches and opens the LMS It is easy and cheap to implement – No real integration between LMS and PLE The way in which the PLE is implemented is non-relevant GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca SPDECE 2012 LMS and PLEs integration (and III)

Outline Introduction 2.0 Tools, PLEs and Computer Science The Application of 2.0 Tools in Learning Environments Conclusions GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca SPDECE 2012

The application of 2.0 tools in learning environments (I) GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca The subject UPC Social and Environmental Aspects of Information Technology (ASAI) It can be chosen from Degree in Informatics Engineering, Diploma in Computer Software and Diploma in Computer Systems Main aim: learning the environmental, social effects and impact of information technology, its history and the legislation issues 7.5 credits (5 hours each week, during the 13 or 14 weeks of a term) Evaluation A final exam (40% of the final grade) Two surveys and presentations (30% of the final grade) Other activities regarding students’ participation (30% of the final grade) During the experience Twitter has represented the 30% of the final grade SPDECE 2012

GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca The tool Twitter It is applied to comment news related to ICT in the subject context The activity carried out with twitter and related to the subject is considered in the final grade Channelled through the tag #asaifib It is necessary to gather and analyse all twits related to the subject Twapperkeeper/Hootsuite SPDECE 2012 The application of 2.0 tools in learning environments (II)

GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca WSKS 2011 The application of 2.0 tools in learning environments (III)

The application of 2.0 tools in learning environments (IV) The teacher should access to the analysis system (hootsuite), check the activity of each student, analyse the quality of the tweets and evaluate and provide feedback to the user through the offline activity defined in Moodle The student can review the results and feedback through such activity This is an easy integration method between the LMS and the 2.0 tools (from a PLE) GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca SPDECE 2012

The application of 2.0 tools in learning environments (and V) GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca SPDECE 2012

Outline Introduction 2.0 Tools, PLEs and Computer Science The Application of 2.0 Tools in Learning Environments Conclusions GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca SPDECE 2012

Conclusions GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca Learning tools employed by teachers and learners are not only those provided by the institution Taking into account the learning activities carried out with such tools, the institutional environment can be enriched The institutional systems are like walled garden and should be open The consideration of 2.0 tools during subjects increases the student’s participation and gives them the possibility to contact with people from outside the institution such as experts in a specific issue It is necessary to carry out similar experiences in other contexts Less controlled situations Students’ and teachers’ opinions should be explored from a qualitative perspective SPDECE 2012

Acknowledgements This work is partially supported by the Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Trade of Spain (project IST ), the Ministry of Education and Science of Spain (project TIN C02) and the Government of Castilla y León through the project GR47 GRIAL – Universidad de Salamanca

The application 2.0 tools through PLEs in Computer Science Education: The twitter experience Miguel Ángel Conde Francisco J. García Peñalvo Marc Alier Enric Mayol María J. Casany Alicante, Spain, June 13-15, 2012