Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Advertisements

Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
NSSE When?Spring, 2008 Who?Freshmen and Seniors random sample How?Electronic and Snail mail follow up Respondents?30% response rate 26% freshmen.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Achievement of Educational Outcomes: Seniors’ Self- evaluations from 2004 & 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement (NSSE) Cathy Sanders Director of.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2002.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
An Equal Opportunity University Third Annual Meeting of the Provost’s Committee on Undergraduate Student Success October 22, 2009.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
Student Engagement at Northeastern Illinois Analysis and Use of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2009.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
 Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
NSSE 2005: Student Perceptions of Enriching Educational Experiences Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 18, 2006.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Ms. Leslie Croot, Analyst.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.
 NSSE Results Austin Peay State University.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American
Dissertation Findings
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
The University of Texas-Pan American
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
GGC and Student Engagement
Faculty In-Service Week
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009

NSSE Indicators of Effective Educational Practice Level of Academic Challenge Student-Faculty Interaction Active and Collaborative Learning Enriching Educational Experiences Supportive Campus Environment

Level of Academic Challenge

Student-Faculty Interaction

Active & Collabortive Learning

Enriching Educational Experiences

Supportive Campus Environment

Engaging the Institution Students aren’t the only ones who benefit from engagement. If NSSE is to be a vehicle for improvement…faculty (and staff) need to be engaged… …an engaged campus (or department or program) would be one in which everyone embraces the challenge of continually doing better for students.

Institutional Quality: A Nuanced View There is value in comparing data about institutional performance between institutions, BUT We all know that the institutional averages do not represent the experience of all students in that institution.

Institutional Quality: A Nuanced View For all NSSE benchmarks of effective educational practices, less than 10% of the total variation is attributable to institutions. The lion’s share of the variation is among students, within institutions.

Looking within Examining variation in the student experience within an institution. How do experiences differ by major or by groups of related majors. Demographic or other subgroups? Who are the least engaged students? Even high-performing institutions have work to do to improve the experience of all students.

Variation of NSSE Benchmarks

OU data by Program Group

Looking Inside Same data – different perspective How do we identify specific areas where we can improve the engagement, education and experience of OU students

Data by School/College & Peer Most OU units lower than peer for both FY & SR students on application of theories or concepts

Level of Academic Challenge (students that replied quite a bit/very much) Arts & HumanitiesSciences Social Sciences Pre- Profs Comm/ Journalism FRSRFRSRFRSRFR SR Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations 3% -1%-14%4%-5%-2%-9%5% ANALYZING basic elements of an idea/experience/theory; examining a particular case/situation in depth & considering its components 0%-1% -4%2% 6%8%7% SYNTHESIZING and organizing ideas/information/experiences into new, more complex interpretations & relationships 6%5%-10%-2%2%4%5%14%-1% MAKING JUDGMENTS about the value of information, arguments, or methods, such as examining how others gathered and interpreted data and assessing the soundness of their conclusions 0%4%-6%-11%16%-3%3%0%8% APPLYING theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations 0%-6%6%-13%7%6%4%-4%-2% MEMORIZING facts/ideas/methods from courses & readings to repeat them in much the same form -10%-9%4%10%-4%2% 4%3% Spending significant amounts of time studying and on academic work 1%-3%-11%4%-4%1%6%4%-8%

Level of Academic Challenge (students that replied quite a bit/very much) SBASEHSSHSNursingEngineeringComp Sci FRSRFRSRFRSRFRSRFRSRFRSR Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations -5%-7%-4%8% - 6% 0%10%3%1%-4%4%-10% ANALYZING basic elements of an idea/experience/theory; examining a particular case/situation in depth & considering its components 2% 0%-1% 0%-2%4%-10%2% - 3% -6% SYNTHESIZING and organizing ideas/information/experiences into new, more complex interpretations & relationships 1%-6%1%6% - 3% -13%-1% 11 % -6%-3% - 9% -20% MAKING JUDGMENTS about the value of information, arguments, or methods, such as examining how others gathered and interpreted data and assessing the soundness of their conclusions 0%2%1%5% - 5% -19%-4% 13 % 3%-11% - 2% -24% APPLYING theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations 1%4%-8%6%4%-9%7%5%-1%2% - 6% -12% MEMORIZING facts/ideas/methods from courses & readings to repeat them in much the same form -3%6%-3%-9%0%17%15% 13 % -14%-2%7%-13% Spending significant amounts of time studying and on academic work 4%-1%0%1% - 3% 1%2%3%-6%4% -3% Spending significant amounts of time studying and on academic work 4%-1%0%1% - 3% 1%2%3%-6%4% -3%

Level of Academic Challenge Arts & HumanitiesSciences Social Sciences Pre- Profs Comm/ Journalism FRSRFRSRFRSRFR SR Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book- length packs of course readings 5+6%14%2%0%12%11%3%5%-4% 11+12%22%3%0%8%10%-7%13%-6% Number of written papers or reports of 20 PAGES OR MORE 5+-1%-3%3%-4%1%0%4%2%-3% 11+0%-1%0%-1%2%0%1% -2% Number of written papers or reports BETWEEN 5 AND 19 PAGES 5+-8%5%6%-16%5%14%1%-4%7% 11+-1%2%4%-9%6%5%3%1%-3% Number of written papers or reports of FEWER THAN 5 PAGES 5+-3%-5%-4%-11%4%-3%5%15% 25 % 11+0%-2%-4%-11%12%-3%-6%-5% 25 % Hours per 7-day week spent preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities) 16+ hours -4%10%7%6%-1%-7%-3% - 13% - 18 %

Level of Academic Challenge SBASEHSSHSNursingEngineering Computer Science FRSRFRSRFRSRFRSRFRSRFRSR Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course readings 5+-5%-9%-1%0%1%-8%-2%9%-14%-13%-7%-22% 11+-3%-11%-2%-4%-1%-14%-3%13%-17%-16%-7%-19% Number of written papers or reports of 20 PAGES OR MORE 5+1%-4%-3%2%-3%-7%0%2%0%8%0% 11+3%-1%-2%1%-1%-2%-1%2% -2% 1% Number of written papers or reports BETWEEN 5 AND 19 PAGES 5+1%-4%6%3%7%-20%-2%-1%-5%5%-17%-12% 11+0%-6%-2%1%-2%-6%0%-1% 12%-1%1% Number of written papers or reports of FEWER THAN 5 PAGES 5+5%0%2%10%-9%-16%-10%0%-2%-1%15%-14% 11+4%-2%10% -3%-10%-4%-5%-6%-7%3%-5% Hours per 7-day week spent preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities) 16+ hrs -6%-9%-2%2%10%0%14%6%4%5%-6%-8%

Looking Inside Can faculty use this to help identify areas of concern for your program? Which Items are important to you? What are you surprised to see?

Data by School/College & Peer

Student-Faculty Interaction (students that replied often/very often) Arts & HumanitiesSciences Social Sciences Pre- Profs Comm./ Journalism FRSRFRSRFRSRFR SR Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor-2%5%-6%-10%9%4%11%-1%8% Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor-2%8%-6%5%-3%14%-6%0%-1% Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class 2%7%3%4%3%10%1%-2%4% Received prompt written or oral feedback from faculty on your academic performance 6%8%-5%2%-11%2%1%19%-11% Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.) 0%4% 2%5%4%1%0%2% Work on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements (done) -1%0%1%28%1%5%3%-4%8%

Student-Faculty Interaction (students that replied often/very often) SBASEHSSHSNursingEngineering Computer Science FRSRFRSRFRSRFRSRFRSRFRSR Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor8%0%-1%3%-2%-7%0%3%-5%-14%0%-17% Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor -5%-8%5%1% 6%0%-8%-1%-13%2%-4% Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class 2%-4%-3%-2%-4%-1%1%-4%-3%-14%-1%-7% Received prompt written or oral feedback from faculty on your academic performance 3%-1%1%9%-9%-6% 1%-3%-17%-2%-10% Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.) 2%-1% -3%-1%2%-1%4%0%-4%-1%-6% Work on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements -1%-6%-3%-8%-3%-1%3%2%1%4%0%1%

Data by School/College & Peer Most OU schools are below peers in making class presentations for both FY & senior students

Active & Collaborative Learning (students that replied often/very often) Differences from average Arts & HumanitiesSciencesSocial Sciences Pre- Profs Comm/Journalism FRSRFRSRFRSRFRSR Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions 15%12%4%-15%9%-3%3%8%5% Made a class presentation6%-15%-1%-29%-2%-22%-5%-34%9% Worked with other students on projects DURING CLASS -2%-4%-13%-21%6%-17%-3%-50%5% Worked with classmates OUTSIDE OF CLASS to prepare class assignments -9%-34%5%-18%0%-22%2%-32%-18% Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) 1%2%0%14%-2%-1%-3%-18%3% Participated in a community-based project (e.g., service learning) as part of a regular course -2%-7%4%-5%0%-8%-2%-14%15% Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class 2%7%3%4%3%10%1%3%4%

Active & Collaborative Learning (students that replied often/very often) Differences from average Business Administrtn Education & Human Serv Health SciencesNursingEngineering Computer Science FRSRFRSRFRSRFRSRFRSRFRSR Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions 5%-3%-9%13%-8%-12%-6%-16%4%-1%-5%-28% Made a class presentation14%13%-2%32%-5%-32%-8%-3%-6%-20%-12%-5% Worked with other students on projects DURING CLASS 7%5%4%27%0%-13%-1%-13%-8%-15%2%-1% Worked with classmates OUTSIDE OF CLASS to prepare class assignments 11%19%0%18%2%-21%0%9%4%27%3%6% Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) 1%-4%-2%1%-1% 2%-3%8%2%11%-3% Participated in a community-based project (e.g., service learning) as part of a regular course -1%-7%4%11%-1%0%3%14%-3%-10%-5%-12% Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class 2%-4%-3%-2%-4%-1%1%-4%-3%-14%-1%-7%

Data by School/College & Peer Prospective teachers and nurses are most likely to have had practical experience

Enriching Education Experiences A&HSciences Social Sciences Pre- Prof Comm/ Journalism FRSRFRSRFRSRFR SR Used an electronic medium to discuss or complete an assignment Often/ V Often 2%-8% -7%3%-11%-7%23%6% Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity than your own Often/ V Often 2%4%-4%3%6%7%16%3% Had serious conversations with students who are very different from you in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values Often/ V Often 4%10%-10%3%11%9%15%9%3% Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment Done2%-7%4%-1%-3%-12%3%-5%6% Community service or volunteer workDone-1%-7%-4%0%11%-1%-7%0%13% Participate in a learning comm. or other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together Done-4%-3%1%-10%-6%-1%-5%3%-4% Foreign (additional) language courseworkDone9%4%11%9%5%1%8%4%17% Study abroadDone0%5%-3%1% -2%5%0% Independent study or self-designed majorDone0%3%-2%9%-2%0%-2%1%0% Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.) Done0%15%-1%13%3%-3%-1% 15% Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds Quite a bit/very Much -1%5%-1%-4%0%2%-7%18%-9%

Enriching Educational Experiences SBASEHS NursingEngineerComp Sci FRSRFRSRFRSRFRSRFRSRFRSR Used an electronic medium to discuss or complete an assignment Often/ V Often -2%4% 6%-1%-23%-4%26%4%-2%0%-7% Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity than your own Often/ V Often 0%1%-5%-2%4%-13%-4%-5%18%3%-6%-18% Had serious conversations with students very different from you in terms of beliefs/opinions Often/ V Often -5%-2%-6%0%3%-14%0%-6%7%-4%0%-13% Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment Done-1%-13%-2%20%-1%-12%6%25%0%-2%-1%-6% Community service or volunteer workDone-2%-7%4%10%2%13%3%4%-9%-12%-7%-21% Partic in a learning comm/other formal program where groups take 2 or more classes together Done2%-5%11% 4%-3%7%17%-4%-5% -14% Foreign (additional) language courseworkDone-3% -12%-17%3%13%-18%11%3%6%0%4% Study abroadDone-2% -3%2%4%0% -3%11%5%-2% Independent study or self-designed majorDone-2%-6%-1%-8%3%-3%1% 0%1%-2%3% Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project/ thesis, comp. exam, etc.) Done-1%-6%-1%-12%-1%-2%2%0%-1%15%3%8% Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds Quite a bit/very Much -8%2%7%4%-1%-4%0% -8%-9%-5%-6%

Student Satisfaction Arts & HumanitiesSciences Social Sciences Pre- Profs Communicatn/J ournalism FRSRFRSRFRSRFR SR Overall, how would you evaluate the quality of academic advising you have received at your institution? Good/ Excellent -2%0%-22%3%10%6%1%-18%-4% How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution? Good /Excellent 8%-2%-10%-8%8%3%1%6%0% If you could start over again, would you go to the SAME INSTITUTION you are now attending? Probably/ Definitely yes 0%-2%-5%-9%-5% -3%-7%-10%

Student Satisfaction SBASEHSSHSNursingEngineering Computer Science FRSRFRSRFRSRFRSRFRSRFRSR Overall, how would you evaluate the quality of academic advising you have received at your institution? Good/ Excellent -2% 3%-4%3%7%0%12%-7%3%-11%-15% How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution? Good/ Excellent 3%4%1%9%-6%0%-1%-3%-16%-8%-11%-23% If you could start over again, would you go to the SAME INSTITUTION you are now attending? Probably/ Definitely yes -2%4%8%12%-1%2% -3%-9%-7%0%-17%

Looking Inside What’s next? Questions? Thank you!