PTAB Trial Proceedings Tips from the Bench October 16, 2014 1 The Honorable Brian Murphy (PTAB) Louis W. Beardell, Jr. (Morgan Lewis & Bockius) Michael.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Will the AIA Change Patent Litigation in the Eastern District of Texas? November 2011.
Advertisements

By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
Webinar: Request for Comments on AIA Trial Proceedings Before the PTAB July 29, Scott Boalick, Vice Chief Judge (Acting) Patent Trial and Appeal.
America Invents Act (AIA): Overview of Key Provisions SLA Annual Conference June 10, 2013 Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator and Associate Commissioner.
What Do In-House Counsel Need to Know? AIA Proceedings Molly Kocialski, Senior Patent Counsel, Oracle Dion Messer, General Counsel - IP, Limelight Networks.
An Inside Look at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Scott Boalick Administrative Patent Judge Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
AIA Trial Roundtables 1. Welcome 2 Agenda TimeTopic 1:00 PM Welcome 1:10 PMPresentation Overview of trials, statistics, and lessons learned (30 minutes)
Speeding It Up at the USPTO July 2013 July 23, 2013.
BIPC.COM STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OF POST ISSUANCE PATENTABILITY REVIEW: THE NEW, OLD, AND NO LONGER Presented By: Todd R. Walters, Esq. B UCHANAN, I NGERSOLL.
Administrative Trials
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association CURRENT TRENDS/EFFECTS OF AIA on US Patent Practice at the US Patent.
Connecticut Intellectual Property Law Association Scott E. Kamholz, M.D., Ph.D. Administrative Patent Judge Patent Trial and Appeal Board September 25,
Standing Sentinel Over Innovation: The Importance of a Balanced and Effective IP System Andrew C. Byrnes Chief of Staff to the Under Secretary of Commerce.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Update October 22, Chief Judge James Donald Smith Patent Trial and Appeal Board United States Patent and Trademark.
© 2015 Fox Rothschild Inter Partes Review Lessons Learned Scott R. Bialecki Fox Rothschild LLP June 24, 2015.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Counseling Clients re New USPTO Post Grant Proceedings and Interplay with Litigation.
A Comparative Analysis of Patent Post-Grant Review Procedures in the U
PRESENTATION TITLE 1 America Invents Act: Creating “Rocket Docket” Patent Trials in the Patent Office.
Post-Grant Proceedings Under The America Invents Act Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association “Washington in the West” Conference January 29,
Impact of US AIA: What Really Changed? 1 © AIPLA 2015.
ITC Practice Panel Discussion Trying Your Case in the PTO: The New AIA Hearings and Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Atlanta IP American.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update on Inter Partes Disputes and the PTAB _____ John B. Pegram Fish & Richardson.
Christopher J. Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. Derivation Proceedings and Prior User Rights.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association EMERGING TRENDS IN INTER PARTES REVIEW PRACTICE TOM ENGELLENNER Pepper Hamilton, LLP.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association The Presumption of Patent Validity in the U.S. Tom Engellenner AIPLA Presentation to.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Interplay between Litigation and the AIA __________ An Overview John B. Pegram Fish.
Challenges Associated With, And Strategies For, U.S. Patent Litigation Russell E. Levine, P.C. Kirkland & Ellis LLP LES Asia.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association PTAB Update: IPR & CBM Sponsored by the Japan Patent Office Ron Harris, The Harris Firm.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Update Statistics based first three years of AIA filings 3,655 petitions –3,277 (89.7%) inter partes review (IPR) –368 (10%)
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
The New Tool for Patent Defendants - Inter Partes Review Daniel W. McDonald George C. Lewis, P.E. Merchant & Gould, P.C. April 16, 2014 © 2014 Merchant.
Nationwide Patent Litigation Statistics By Greg Upchurch, Esq. LegalMetric Director of Research J.D.-Yale Law School 1975 Adjunct Professor-Washington.
TOM ENGELLENNER Pepper Hamilton, LLP IP in Japan Committee Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, Washington D.C. October, 2015 USPTO Rule Changes and IPR Procedures.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Peter C. Schechter Vice-Chair, AIPPI-US Div. of AIPLA Partner, Osha Liang LLP Post-Issuance Review Proceedings: Update & Trends in IPR & PGR 1 © AIPLA.
Patent Fee Proposal Patent Public Advisory Committee Hearing November 19, 2015.
McDermott Will & Emery Roundtable Updates from the PTAB February 25, 2013 James Donald Smith Chief Administrative Patent Judge Patent Trial and Appeal.
IEEE Region 6 Conference on Intellectual Property, Licensing, and Capital Flow Keith D. Grzelak, Chair IEEE-USA IPC Chair IEEE-USA IP Professionals Chair.
Appeals From AIA Trials 35 U.S.C. § 141 – Final Written Decision must be appealed to the Federal Circuit File a Notice of Appeal with the Director of the.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 6 – Patent Owner Response 1.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 2 – The Petition 1. The Petition 2.
Using the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) for Post Grant Pilot Applications How to identify relevant information in AIA proceedings at the Patent.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 5 – Motions Practice, Discovery, and Trial Management Issues 1.
Recent Developments in Obtaining and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Nanocomposites Michael P. Dilworth February 28, 2012.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 3 – The Patent Owner Preliminary Response 1.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 11 – Bio/Pharma Issues 1.
Boston | Hartford | New York | Providence | Stamford | Albany | Los Angeles | Miami | New London | rc.com © 2015 Robinson & Cole LLPrc.com JIM NAULT, IP.
Omer/LES International/
The America Invents Act: Five Years Later November 10, 2016 Jessica L
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 1 – PTAB Basics and Procedure
U. S. District Court Perspective on Patent Adjudication Barbara M. G
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 12 – PTAB Popularity and Reasons
Patent Practice in View Of PTAB AIA Proceedings
Nationwide Patent Litigation Statistics
Multiple Parties and Multiple Petitions in Post-Grant Proceedings
POST Grant RevieW UPDATES
CBM/PGR Differences Differences in time periods of availability, parties who have standing, grounds of challenge available, standards of review, and.
Deputy Chief Administrative Patent Judge January 25, 2018
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Mark Wine June 6, 2014
Mark P. Wine Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP June 6, 2014
PTAB Bootcamp: Nuts and Bolts of IPRs, PGRs, and CBMs
Karl Renner Dorothy Whelan Chris Marchese
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Statistics
Update and Practical Considerations
SAS Institute v. Iancu SAS appeals arguing § 318 requires deciding patentability of all claims challenged ComlimentSoft sues SAS for patent infringement.
IPRs: Coordination & Estoppel
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 4 – The Institution Decision
Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association
PTAB Bar Association Conference—March 2, 2017
Presentation transcript:

PTAB Trial Proceedings Tips from the Bench October 16, The Honorable Brian Murphy (PTAB) Louis W. Beardell, Jr. (Morgan Lewis & Bockius) Michael F. Snyder (Volpe and Koenig)

Trial Proceeding Timeline 2

AIA Progress (as of October 2, 2014) AIA Monthly Filings Total2,094 IPR1,852 CBM 234 PGR2 DER6

AIA Progress (as of October 2, 2014) AIA Petition Technology Breakdown

AIA Progress (as of October 2, 2014) Cumulative Patent Owner Preliminary Responses FiledWaived IPR1, CBM14920

AIA Progress (as of October 2, 2014) AIA Petition Dispositions Trials Instituted Joinders Percent Instituted Denials Total No. of Decisions on Institution IPR FY %26203 FY % FY %415 CBM FY %317 FY %26104 FY %-2 DERFY14--0%33

Discovery 7 Discovery Period

AIA Progress (as of October 2, 2014) AIA Final Dispositions Settlements Adverse Judgments Final Written Decisions IPR FY FY FY CBM FY FY FY15 ---

Settlements * (As of 6/18/2014) CBMIPR 9 * Pool is taken from 169 cases that have settled since inception.

Final Written Decisions: Basis for Unpatentability (As of 6/18/2014) CBM (11 decisions) IPR (67 decisions) 10 * Multiple bases can be reported for a single Final Written Decision

Thank You 11