Thrust III HRI Studies for Human Factors and Performance Evaluation J. A. Adams (Lead – Task A) P. Hinds (Lead – Task B) C. Breazeal J. How N. Roy MURI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review of the Incident Command System
Advertisements

Human Factors Issues in Using Micro-Uninhabited Vehicles in Urban Disasters Kyle M. Wilson, James R. Head, and William S. Helton Department of Psychology,
DELOS Highlights COSTANTINO THANOS ITALIAN NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL.
Patient Movement in the Midst of a Disaster
Module 14 Major Incident Management Module 14 Major Incident Management incident Problems in major and complex incident management Major incident management.
Fawzy Al-Alami G Term Paper.  Introduction.  Effect of Teamwork in Design-Build. Construction Contract.  Factors Can Enhance Design-Build.
Date: 1 October2013 Meeting: Concertation meeting VRA Speaker and organisation: Maarten Oonk, TNO [ Roadmap Automation in Road Transport.
Emergency Operations Activation Levels
Incident Command System
Dynamic Decision Making Lab Social and Decision Sciences Department Carnegie Mellon University 1 MODELING AND MEASURING SITUATION AWARENESS.
Visual 4.1 Incident Commander and Command Staff Functions Unit 4: General Staff Functions.
Thrust ID: Peer-to-Peer HRI Training and Learning with Humans Rod Grupen (lead) Cynthia Breazeal Nicholas Roy MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007.
The Adaptive Sampling and Prediction (ASAP) Program A Multi-University Research Initiative (MURI) Learn how to deploy, direct, and utilize autonomous vehicles.
Automation and Ability Benjamin A. Clegg Department of Psychology Colorado State University Eric D. Heggestad Department of Psychology University of North.
Técnicas de Calidad en el Software Sesión # 11. Good quality software Operations Transition Testing Portability Reusability Interoperability Maintainability.
Técnicas de Calidad en el Software Sesión # 10. Good quality software Operations Transition Testing Portability Reusability Interoperability Maintainability.
May 17, Capabilities Description of a Rapid Prototyping Capability for Earth-Sun System Sciences RPC Project Team Mississippi State University.
Web TANGO Project Melody Ivory (PhD student) Rashmi Sinha (Postdoc) Marti Hearst (Research Advisor) Undergrads - Steve Demby Anthony Lee Dave Lai HCC Retreat.
4. Interaction Design Overview 4.1. Ergonomics 4.2. Designing complex interactive systems Situated design Collaborative design: a multidisciplinary.
Modeling Capabilities and Workload in Intelligent Agents for Simulating Teamwork Thomas R. Ioerger, Linli He, Deborah Lord Dept. of Computer Science, Texas.
Dr. Sara Ann McComb and Ms. Ralitza Patrashkova Isenberg School of Management University of Massachusetts Amherst 1 It’s Not Easy Being a Team: Researching.
4. Interaction Design Overview 4.1. Ergonomics 4.2. Designing complex interactive systems Situated design Collaborative design: a multidisciplinary.
Human-Robots Interaction: Robotics Institute Focus Area Vineet Kamat (CEE) Emily Mower Provost (CSE) Nadine Sarter (IOE) Dawn Tilbury (ME)
1 User Interface Design CIS 375 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn.
User Centered Design Lecture # 5 Gabriel Spitz.
Performing User Interface Design
EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY Continuity of Operations Planning (COOP)
Evaluation IMD07101: Introduction to Human Computer Interaction Brian Davison 2010/11.
LifeSpan. Function Natural, required, or expected activity of a person based on stage of development Ability to exist with in environment Related to a.
Improving Human-Robot Interaction Jill Drury, The MITRE Corporation Improving Human-Robot Interaction Jill Drury, The MITRE Corporation Collaborators:
Intelligent Software Agents Lab The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, PA (U.S.A.)
Celebrating Nursery School Principles and Practice Margaret Edgington Independent Early years Consultant.
TEACHER FEEDBACK WEBSITE HTVN TEAM. AGENDA 1.TEAM INTRDUCTION 2.PROJECT OVERVIEW 3.PLAN 4.PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE 5.DATABASE DESIGN 6.TEST PLAN & TEST REPORT.
Development of Indicators for Integrated System Validation Leena Norros & Maaria Nuutinen & Paula Savioja VTT Industrial Systems: Work, Organisation and.
What is a Business Analyst? A Business Analyst is someone who works as a liaison among stakeholders in order to elicit, analyze, communicate and validate.
Breakout C3 Breakout leader: Cynthia Breazeal. What must researchers and NSF do to achieve measurable results Need to define metrics (technical perf,
Military Psychology: Teams and Teamwork Dr. Steven J. Kass.
Human Supervisory Control Issues in Unmanned Vehicle Operations
Situation Awareness & Levels of Automation David Kaber and Kheng-Wooi Tan Mississippi State University.
MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation 1 Dynamic Sensor Resource Management for ATE MURI.
Transitions MJ Barnes SOURCE, IMOPAT AND Robotic Collaboration ATO 6.2 HRI portion.
Introduction to Networked Robotics CS 643 Seminar on Advanced Robotics Wenzhe Li, Graduate Student Texas A&M University.
Distributed Cognitive Aid with Scheduling and Interactive Task Guidance Edmund LoPresti, AT Sciences LLC Ned Kirsch, University of Michigan Debra Schreckenghost,
Welcome to the Usability Center Tour Since 1995, the Usability Center has been a learning environment that supports and educates in the process of usability.
Attention Grounding: A New Approach to IVIS Implementation Emily Wiese Cognitive Systems Lab Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University.
March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.
1 Chapter 4: User Interface Design. 2 Introduction … Purpose of user interface design:-  Easy to learn  Easy to use  Easy to understand.
Behavior-based Multirobot Architectures. Why Behavior Based Control for Multi-Robot Teams? Multi-Robot control naturally grew out of single robot control.
Advanced Decision Architectures Collaborative Technology Alliance Five Lessons Learned in Human-Robot Interaction Patricia McDermott Alion Science and.
SAVE-IT SAfety VEhicles using adaptive Interface Technology Phase 1 Research Program Quarterly Program Review Task 4: Distraction Mitigation John D. Lee.
Thrust IIB: Dynamic Task Allocation in Remote Multi-robot HRI Jon How (lead) Nick Roy MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007.
HRI A3 - Bekey.
The Process of Developing a Mobile Device for Communication in a Safety-Critical Domain Jesper Kjeldskov and Jan Stage Mobile HCI Research Group Department.
1 Design and evaluation methods: Objectives n Design life cycle: HF input and neglect n Levels of system design: Going beyond the interface n Sources of.
Machine Reasoning and Learning Workshops III and IV Kickoff Wen Masters Office of Naval Research Code 311 (703)
A Multi-Touch Display for Robotic Team Control
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited) Hallmark Software Testbed (Hallmark-ST) Architecture to Enable Space Enterprise.
Enabling Team Supervisory Control for Teams of Unmanned Vehicles
Ubiquitous Computing and Augmented Realities
IT Tools: Their Usability and Clinical Effectiveness
Thrust IC: Action Selection in Joint-Human-Robot Teams
Thrust II: Task C Visualization and Interface for Situation Awareness
The Future: Multiple Robotic Forklift Operations
NEW IDEAS Advanced user models  based on cognitive architecture
Review of the Incident Command System
Human-Computer Interaction: Overview of User Studies
Unit 5: Planning Process, IAP, and Operations Briefs
THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION DESIGN
Unit 5: Planning Process, IAP, and Operations Briefs
THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION DESIGN
Presentation transcript:

Thrust III HRI Studies for Human Factors and Performance Evaluation J. A. Adams (Lead – Task A) P. Hinds (Lead – Task B) C. Breazeal J. How N. Roy MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007

MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 Thrust III: Objective  Empirical evaluation of remote human operator and human teammate levels of cognitive-load, situation awareness, trust, and performance related to efficient, flexible, and effective HRI, human-robot team structures, team mental models, and system scalability. MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst

MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 III.A: Task Objectives  Provide a means of empirically evaluating potential human-robot interaction and visualization options prior to full system and hardware integration. MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst

MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 III.A Existing Technology  Microsoft Robotics Studio simulation of the MDS robots  Quadrotor simulator MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst

MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 III.A Existing Evaluation Methods  A number of evaluation methods exist that will be incorporated, as appropriate, for assessing  Usability (e.g. Errors)  Workload (e.g. NASA TLX, Multiple Resources Questionnaire)  Situation Awareness (e.g. SAGAT, SART)  Team coordination (e.g. Observation, Efficiency)  HRI Metrics (e.g. Effectiveness, Fan Out) MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst

MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 III.A Technical Advances  Quantitative evaluation of visualization interaction alternatives with simulated vehicles.  Permits preliminary evaluation for cognitive limitations, situation awareness, and team performance.  Permits the narrowing of alternatives for future development. MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst

MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 III.A: Year 1 Milestones/Deliverables  Simulation based evaluations of potential UV specialist, triage officer (division chief), and incident commander.  Visualizations and interactions  Transitions with historical context MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst

MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 III.A: Year 2+ Milestones/Deliverables  Simulation based evaluations of  triage specific HRI for the UV specialist, triage officer (division chief), and incident commander.  Situation awareness drill down  HAZMAT HRI capabilities.  the integrated HRI visualizations, interactions, drill down, and transition capabilities. MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst

MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 III.B: Task Objectives  Empirical evaluation of human operator and human team member levels with real hardware.  Assessing cognitive-load, situation awareness, trust, and performance related to efficient, flexible, and effective HRI, human-robot team structures, team mental models, and system scalability. MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst

MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 III.B Existing Evaluation Methods  Trust  An elusive characteristic to measure in human-robot interaction.  Neither human-human nor trust in automation scales are effective indicators of trust in embodied and mobile robots. MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst

MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 III.B Technical Advances  Empirical results that advance the state of the art understanding of  trust by humans in robotic systems  teaming between humans and robotic systems  situation awareness and cognitive demands placed on humans  functioning as remote supervisors of robotic and human teams  transitioning between remote operator roles  maintaining common ground among the multiple user levels/roles.  when acting as a peer/teammate with robotic systems MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst

MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 III.B: Year 1 Milestones/Deliverables  Task specific evaluations of UV specialist, triage officer (division chief), and incident commander.  Visualizations and interactions  Transitions with historical context MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst

MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007 III.B: Year 2+ Milestones/Deliverables  Year 2: Continued evaluations  triage specific HRI for the UV specialist, triage officer (division chief), and incident commander.  Situation awareness drill down  HAZMAT HRI capabilities.  Peer-to-peer HRI capabilities  Year 2+:  Evaluation of integrated remote HRI visualizations, interactions, drill down, and transition capabilities.  System evaluations of overall and human-robot team performance, trust, and system capabilities.  Evaluations of distributed HRI. MIT-Vanderbilt-Stanford UW-UMASS Amherst