Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support UPDATE Presented by the Oregon Department of Education November 19, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Training for Teachers and Specialists
INTRODUCTION TO REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS Presented at the Educator Effectiveness/CCSS Professional Learning Team Conferences April 2014.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
2025 Planning Contacts Meeting November 8, 2012 K-State 2025.
Oregon’s Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Presented by: ODE, OEA and Chalkboard Oregon Framework Oregon Framework.
State Board of Education December 2013 Revision of Instructional Materials Adoption Process and Delay for Mathematics 1.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
Artifacts 101: The Role of Artifacts in Educator Support and Evaluation Spring 2015 Webinar.
Who’s on our Team? CLASS Phoenix Design Team Classroom educators, specialists, administrators, and classified from all grade levels Association groups.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing the Accountability of Teachers to Reach all Students and their Needs Raymon J. Smith References.
Educator Effectiveness in Colorado State Policy Framework & Approach October 2014.
Educator Effectiveness and The Common Core State Standards October 20, 2013 Bend Oregon.
Session Materials  Wiki
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
OVERVIEW OF SB 290/ACTIVITIES STAFF EVALUATION: LICENSED ADMINSTRATOR CLASSIFIED WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process October 7, 2013.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
OVERVIEW OF SB 290 SOESD’S IMPLEMENTATION STAFF EVALUATION: LICENSED ADMINSTRATOR WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
E VALUATION C HANGES SB290 R EQUIREMENTS January 17, 2013.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
OVERVIEW OF SB 290 CHANGES IN LICENSED STAFF EVALUATION WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
The Use of Artifacts as Evidence in Educator Evaluation Fall 2015.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics (TOTOM) Bend, OR September 6, 2013 Mark Freed, ODE Mathematics Education Specialist ODE Update.
West Virginia Support for Improving Professional Practice (WVSIPP)
Ohio Department of Education OCTEO Conference March 19,
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
UPDATE Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation:  A Data-Informed Approach to State Program Review Presentation to the Alabama State Board of Education.
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Five Required Elements
Oregon Framework Elements One and Two.
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
State Board of Education Progress Update
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Presentation transcript:

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support UPDATE Presented by the Oregon Department of Education November 19, 2012

1.Resources Educator Effectiveness Toolkit Performance Rubrics 2.Updated Timeline Professional Development & Technical Assistance Today’s Topics

 Educator Effectiveness Website  Educator Evaluation Toolkit Resources

Performance Rubrics Posted rubrics are aligned to the INTASC and Oregon ISLLC- based standards Districts may adopt or adapt; adaptations must be aligned to the standards July 1, 2013 submission template will include check box for listed rubrics and upload for other rubrics /crosswalk District selection of their rubric (adopt/adapt/develop) must be part of the collaborative design process Resources

TeacherAdministrator Danielson’s Framework for Teaching and Evaluation Salem-Keizer School District Administrative Assessment and Evaluation Rubric Robert Marzano Teacher Evaluation Rubric Additional administrator rubrics are under review and will be added to the list by the end of December. Kim Marshall Teacher Evaluation Rubric Salem-Keizer School District Licensed Staff Assessment and Evaluation Rubric Resources Performance Rubrics

Work underway: Additional administrator rubrics will be posted by end of December 2012 ODE & Education Northwest/ Regional Comprehensive Center developing administrator rubric directly aligned to the Oregon Educational Leadership/ISLLC Standards Examples from school districts Resources

Performance Rubrics Future data will be collected based on the state adopted standards and Oregon’s Framework. ODE will work with stakeholders and technical experts to design a meaningful reporting system that takes into account rubrics that are “crosswalked” to the standards Resources

A collaborate design process is essential for adopting/adapting/developing rubrics Design Process Resources ODE Toolkit Performance Evaluation Process, Chalkboard Project Oregon Education Association Center for Great Public Schools Teacher Evaluation & Support System Guidebook Resources

A collaborate design process is essential for adopting/adapting rubrics Self-assessment questions: Do we have InTASC and Oregon ISLLC Standards already in place? What are our plans to train our teachers/administrators on using the standards to promote effective practice? Do we currently have a 4-level rubric in place that is aligned to the standards? How does our rubric compare with the ODE provided samples? Do we want to adopt/adapt these rubrics? If we adapt, what changes will we make? Are there specialists who need different indicators to more accurately describe what they do? What is our staff’s level of understanding of our rubric? What are our plans to provide professional development to teachers and administrators? Resources

By July 1, 2013, all districts will submit their new evaluation and support systems and implementation plans for the school year During the school year* – All evaluations of teachers and administrators will be under the new evaluation system (as per SB 290) – Districts will implement initial plans of their evaluation systems; utilizing this time to refine their local systems – Student learning and growth must be measured, however it does not have to be included in the summative evaluation Updated Timeline for

By July 1, 2013 all districts will submit implementation plans for their revised evaluation system During the school year – All evaluations of teachers and administrators will be under the new evaluation system to comply with SB 290 – Districts will implement initial plans for their revised evaluation and support systems and utilize this year to refine their local systems – Because it’s the first year, student learning and growth results will be not required in the summative evaluation Updated Timeline

Professional Development and Technical Assistance Educator Effectiveness Thurs Afternoon: Overview of requirements Friday All Day: District teams Support on process and guidance Work with SB252 coaches to establish process and work toward preparation for July 1, 2013 deadline Common Core State Standards/SBAC Thurs Afternoon: Overview of CCSS Friday All Day Review of standards Review of sample assessment items Plan for implementation and formative assessments Budget Narrative and Monitoring Support Friday All Day Direct district support from ODE to complete BNWSK process for school year Direct support from ODE on monitoring notebooks Oregon Association for Comprehensive Education (OACE) Conference January 24-25, Seaside Oregon

Professional Development and Technical Assistance Topics of Interest – Multiple measures: Student learning and growth – Student growth goal setting process – Standards of professional practice – Link between evaluation and professional development – Multiple measures: professional responsibilities – Conducting collaborative process/conversations Communications – FAQ Best practices/models/templates