Learning Through SE Implementing the Revised Science and Technology Curriculum.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Consistent teaching – K-6 Science and Technology
Growing Success Overview
1 Welcome to the Session While you are waiting for the others to join the session, please work on the following activity: Please read one or more of the.
WELCOME to WELCOME to Implementation Training for: The Revised Ontario Curriculum for Canadian and World Studies Grades 9 and 10.
Teacher Librarians. Contact Information Mary Cameron Iowa Department of Education (515)
Linking the Fairs to the 2013 Ontario Curriculum Social Studies 1 to 6 and History and Geography 7 and 8.
USING BACKWARD DESIGN FOR UNIT AND LESSON PLANS * Based on the thinking that if everyone has a clear picture of where they are going before they start,
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
What do international assessments measure: PISA Raymond J. Adams Washington DC, May This paper is intended to promote the exchange of ideas among.
Orientation to the Science K to 7 IRP Part 1: What Is Science K to 7?  How was Science K to 7 developed?  How has Science K to 7 changed since.
Presented by: Laura Hines MCAS-Alt Teacher Consultant October 2014 MCAS Alternate Assessment (MCAS-Alt) Creating Portfolios that Address Access Skills.
Assessing Students’ Skills in Science & Technology Hong Kong University – May 19 th 2006 Graham Orpwood York/Seneca Institute for Mathematics, Science.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Two Generations of Success Family Engagement in Full Service Community Schools Coalition for Community Schools April, 2010.
Orientation to the Social Studies K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
UBD Backward Planning Understanding by Design - The Backward Planning Model Based on the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Plan Backwards!
Participants should work in their subject group.
INTRODUCTION TO THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION’s ACHIEVEMENT CHART Bedford Park PS September 2013.
Combined Grades Making Them Work Fall 2007 Building Classes of Combined Grades “In successful schools, classrooms are organized to meet the learning.
WELCOME to WELCOME to Implementation Training for: The Revised Ontario Curriculum for First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Studies Grades Day 1.
Global Warming Mitigation Proposed Curriculum for New Mexico Middle Schools 6 th through 8 th Marcia Bardy – ST589 Climate Change and Carbon Sequestration.
Assessment, Evaluation and Reporting for Secondary School Students Bonnie Brough and Jenny Perry Friday, May 19, 2006.
USING BACKWARD DESIGN FOR UNIT AND LESSON PLANS * Based on the thinking that if everyone has a clear picture of where they are going before they start,
Revised Science & Technology Curriculum, Grades 1-8, 2007 Implementation September 2008.
PSSA Science Fall 2008 Sunny Minelli Weiland What do you know about Science Assessment Anchors and Assessment? What are your pressing questions? Questions.
Civic and Citizenship Education in Times of Change: Curriculum and its Implementation Some Results of the IEA Studies Civic Education in Iraq: Study Tour.
Understanding MYP Criteria
PUT TITLE HERE The Ontario Curriculum Presented by: Curriculum and Assessment Policy Branch Ministry of Education.
INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION MEASUREMENTS AND SCOPE Presented By G.GOUTHAMAN PG TEACHER /TECHNICAL SUPPORT GROUP. RMSA, TIRUVARUR.
1 Welcome Implementation Training for The Revised Ontario Curriculum, Grades 1-8: Science and Technology.
Performance Based Assessment Presenters Jamee Childs Gina Mahoney Andrea Masten I am calling on our nation’s governors and state education chiefs to develop.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron Writing Learning Outcomes October 2013.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
MYP: Humanities The Criteria.
Integrator Session 1 Summer 2009 Unit Design. Integrator Enduring Understandings Integrating technology into higher order curriculum improves student.
Welcome Science 5 and Science 6 Implementation Workshop.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Maps Top tens Lecture wrap up. Allergies For our exemplar Please me if you have concerns.
Inquiry Dr. Dennis S. Kubasko, Jr. EDN 406. Position Statement Teaching through Inquiry is but one process to engage our students A powerful tool! Question.
Victorian Curriculum F–10 Familiarisation
ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING. -actively involved in their own learning; -able to judge the success of their work and set and understand targets for improvement;
2. Planning for Teaching and Learning Long Term (Course) Planning.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
The School Effectiveness Framework
METHODS PLANNING. Methods Class 4 Agenda 1. Overview of Ontario Curriculum Documents 2. Introduce lesson plan formats – GPF & APF 3. Sequence for planning.
PBL Instructional Design. PBL Instructional Design Name: Name of PBL: Grade Level: Content Area:
Pre-Session Checklist MUTE mic TEST Bridgit PRINT Handouts Sign-in sheet Alberta Assessment Consortium Winter Seminar 2010 Student Engagement.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
March 2, Learning Target We will understand the structural and conceptual changes in the NC Social Studies E ssential Standards:  Organizational.
Implementation Training
1 Science Grades “People have different beliefs about what is important for students to learn in the here and now.” Educational Leadership:
MSP Regional Meeting: NIH Resources to Support STEM Education
Intro to GETSI-Field Development Model & Guiding Principles
Education That Is Multicultural
Grade 6 Outdoor School Program Curriculum Map
Countdown to Your New Co-op
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
This is the second module of the Collaborative Backward Design series
Countdown to Your New Co-op
Suggested TALKING POINTS:
Presentation transcript:

Learning Through SE Implementing the Revised Science and Technology Curriculum

Discrepant Event A discrepant event is something that surprises, startles, puzzles or astonishes the observer. Used to engage students in inquiry Used to engage students in science processes skills Used as a mind-on warm-up to stimulate critical thinking

PISA Results PISA = Programme for International Student Assessment 57 countries participated in 2006

PISA Results Source: df_e/07/07P105e.pdf df_e/07/07P105e.pdf May 16, 2008

PISA Results Average score of Ontario students increased 15 points since 2000 Immigrant students in Ontario performed much better than immigrant students across all Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries Students in Ontario achieve a great degree of equity regardless of socio-economic status when compared to other countries

Why Science AND Technology?

What’s New? What’s Different Working in groups, flip through your curriculum document List any new features or differences that you notice Refer to the Strand Comparison Chart –Electronic version posted to BEAM S&T Folder

What’s New? What’s Different? What Brenda and Dennis came up with: –4 strands instead of 5 –Fewer expectations –Achievement chart has Thinking and Investigation –STSE Expectations

What’s New? What’s Different? –STSE expectations are ordered first –STSE and Design-Down Planning –Fundamental Concepts/Big Ideas –Expanded Glossary –Organized by grade, not by strand

What’s New? What’s Different? –Sample Issues, Sample Questions, Prompts, Lots of Examples –Detailed and Useful Front Matter with literacy/numeracy connections, connections to secondary pathways, –Action Verbs (investigate, use, assess, describe, list… mostly active, high order verbs, not “demonstrate an understanding of…”

What’s an STSE?

Mississippi Delta

Erosion

Education for Sustainable Development

Today’s Earth 50% of global population earns under $1.50 a day 10% of population has used 50% of world’s oil supply –Who will use the remaining 50%? 100 million children aged 6-11 never attend school 90% of school-aged children are in the developing world India needs to generate 40 million jobs each year, China needs to generate 30 million jobs

Best-educated nations = Greatest Ecological Footprint

What mountain range provides irrigation for 60% of the world’s population?

What role does science and technology play in education for sustainable development?

What’s in an STSE? STSE ScienceTechnology Environment Society

Grade 8 Systems in Action Overall Expectation #1: –assess the personal, social, and/or environmental impacts of a system, and evaluate improvements to a system and/or alternative ways of meeting the same needs;

Systems in Action – OE 1 Science: –What changes to a given system are needed to improve its efficiency in terms of its costs to society and/or the environment? –Conduct a fair test to determine the validity of a hypothesis

Systems in Action – OE 1 Technology –What are the working parts of this system? –How were they designed? –How can these components be improved upon? –What materials are being used for this system? –What materials are being used by the system?

Systems in Action – OE 1 Society –What are the costs and benefits of a given system to society? (e.g., health, cultural, quality of life, economic?)

Systems in Action – OE 1 Environment –What are the costs and benefits of a given system to the environment? (e.g., ecological, atmospheric, climate, water supply) –Story of single-hulled tankers

What’s in an STSE? You tell us!!

Skills of Investigation

Design-Down Planning

Backwards Design Planning Planning With The End in Mind Understanding By Design Fundamental Concepts Big Ideas Enduring Understandings Essential Questions Guiding Questions

Assessment in Science And Technology Knowledge and Understanding –What do students recall and understand? –Factual information, but also whether students comprehend the significance of facts –Danger is that Science and Technology can become a facts-only subject if this is the only lens teachers use in planning

Assessment in Science And Technology Thinking and Investigation –This category demands that science and technology be instructed with investigation skills –Science and technology cannot be taught through reading and writing alone –Students need to be critical of what they read and write –Students need to DO science and technology

Assessment in Science And Technology Application –Knowledge and Skills are applied/transferred to world outside of the classroom –Essence of STSE expectations –If your students become activists in their school, then they are applying their knowledge and skills!

Assessment in Science And Technology Communication –Can students speak, read, write, present, convince, argue, share? –Can they do this for different audiences (peers, teachers, parents…?) –Can they do so using scientific and technological terminology?