Pascal's wager ~ slide 1 Pascal’s wager zBlaise Pascal (French, ) At age 16, formulated one of the basic theorems of projective geometry, known as Pascal’s theorem invented the first mechanical adding machine proved Torricelli’s sea of air hypothesis
Pascal's wager ~ slide 2 Pascal’s wager
Pascal's wager ~ slide 3 Pascal’s wager together with Pierre de Fermat, formulated the mathematical theory of probability zThe famous wager, from the Pensées (1670) God is “infinitely incomprehensible” and completely transcendent, completely different than us.
Pascal's wager ~ slide 4 Pascal’s wager How, then, can faith in God’s existence be justified? Reason cannot decide, but we must make a choice. Refusing to choose is itself a choice with immense consequences. What choice should we make?
Pascal's wager ~ slide 5 Pascal’s wager The wager yA. If one bets that God exists, then there are two possible outcomes ä(1) God exists (one wins the bet); one gains much -- one enjoys eternal bliss. ä(2) God does not exist (one loses the bet); one loses very little.
Pascal's wager ~ slide 6 Pascal’s wager yB. If one bets that God does not exist, the outcomes are: ä(3) God does not exist (one wins the bet); one gains very little. ä(4) God does exist (one loses the bet); the consequences are immense -- eternal loss.
Pascal's wager ~ slide 7 Pascal’s wager yNow comparing A & B, we see that the choice is clear. Choose A. Final piece of advice yWhat should we advise a person who wishes to believe but cannot? äAct as if you believe, “taking the holy water, having masses said, etc.” (65).
Pascal's wager ~ slide 8 Pascal’s wager zCritical evaluation of Pascal’s wager Comment: This is not an argument for the existence of God (as a truth-claim); reason by itself cannot tell us whether God exists. yRather it is an argument for the justification of faith in the existence of God. He offers a reason why we ought to believe in God.
Pascal's wager ~ slide 9 Pascal’s wager Does the fact that the wager is practically useful mean that it is true? Claims can be useful, but false (e.g., wolves are vicious). Pascal’s conception of God -- God is so far beyond that he cannot be known & hence the need to resort to the wager. This conception of God is contrary to Judaism, Christianity, & Islam.
Pascal's wager ~ slide 10 Pascal’s wager Does Pascal’s conception of the Jewish & Christian God one-sided? Does it emphasize some attributes of God & without considering others?
Pascal's wager ~ slide 11 Pascal’s wager William James’ objection: The wager does not work without a predisposition to believe.