PUBLIC POWER UTILITIES IN IDAHO Presented to Legislative Generation Sub-Committee by Idaho Energy Authority (IDEA) and Idaho Consumer Owned Utilities Association.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 WECC/AESO Membership and Coordinating Operating Agreement WECC Board of Directors Meeting December 2007 Diana Pommen Director Interjurisdictional Affairs.
Advertisements

1 Energy Efficiency and Iowa Utilities Presentation to the Energy Policy Advisory Forum, convened by Governor-Elect Chet Culver January 4, 2007 Presented.
Western Interconnection Subregions for PSA Layne Brown Manager, Reliability Assessments.
CREPC Meeting November 5-6, 2007 Snapshot of Major Transmission Proposals and Status of Transmission Planning Presenters: Paul Arnold and Jeff Miller.
David H. Wiggs General Manager Los Angeles Department of Water and Power September 24, 2003.
Current Northwest Energy Issues A BPA Customer Perspective Dan James PNWA Summer Meeting June 23, 2014.
1 May 8, 2006 Briefing to Northwest Congressional Delegation Staff.
LOCAL REGULATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE QUICK TELECONFERENCE American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Climate Change, Sustainable.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
THE POWER OF POSSIBILITY Electric Transmission System Development in Alberta Neil J. Brausen, P. Eng., Director System Planning APEGGA Calgary Branch Luncheon.
NWPP MC Initiative WECC Update March 25th, 2015 Kathy Anderson
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
GDS Associates, Inc. ERCOT Reliability Operations Subcommittee June 10, 2010 Tex-La Electric Cooperative of Texas Load Forecast Methodologies.
Energy Planning and Recent Regulatory Developments Northwest Energy Systems Symposium (NWESS) University of Washington February 22, 2008 Nicolas Garcia.
ColumbiaGrid Planning Update to PCC Marv Landauer October 7, 2014.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 14 Energy Efficiency Module 14: DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
1 Overview of Allocating Revenue Requirements Based on Shares of Marginal Costs May, 2012.
The Potential for Increased Cooperation on Offshore Wind among the Northeast States Warren Leon, Executive Director.
Energy Policy Levers. 2 State as a Taxing Authority Income tax credits or deductions Income tax credits or deductions Residential Alternative Energy Tax.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Introduction to Bonneville Power Administration
Rocky Mountain Power Sub Transmission Five Year Study Findings and Kick Off Attachment K Meeting September 10, 2015.
NORTHWEST POWER POOL Reliability Update – Summer 2010 April 2010 Jerry D. Rust.
Presentation to Energy & Technology/Planning & Development Committees Considerations on Establishing Municipal Utilities Joint Informational Forum Legislative.
PJM© PJM Confidential PJM Generation Interconnection Overview Virginia Offshore Wind Conference Virginia Beach June 22, 2011 Paul McGlynn General.
NASHVILLE ELECTRIC SERVICE | Association for Financial Professionals March 2012.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Page 1 Smart grid in the Pacific Northwest – best practices from the largest demo project in.
Oregon Rural Electric Coop Directors Education Seminar The Future for BPA Jim Litchfield June 2,
WestConnect Activities Charles Reinhold WestConnect Project Manager 2008 ACC BTA Workshop Phoenix, AZ May 22, 2008.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 2009 Draft Resource Program Released: September 30, 2009 Accepting Comments until: November 30,
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N NEET Work Group 6 Update: BPA Demand Response April 21 st Karen Meadows Pam Sporborg.
1 The Sustainability Network of Washington County January 27, 2010 Jason Eisdorfer Bonneville Power Administration.
Combined Heat and Power Workshop Report and Next Steps Power Committee Briefing 7/15/03.
Richard G. Lorenz 1001 SW Fifth Ave., Suite 2000 Portland, OR (503)
Updated 1/28/2011.
Investing Our Energy In You Traverse City Light & Power Electric Generation TCL&P Study Session December 1, 2009.
The Discount Rate in the Plan Wally Gibson NWPPC Power Committee – Kah-Nee-Ta July 15, 2003.
1 Benefits of Transmission Ownership Bob Johnston CEO of MEAG Power.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Electricity Supply Adequacy in the West Daniel Nix Deputy Director California Energy Commission April 2000 Committee on Regional.
ENERGY STAR® WORKSHOP Riffe Center Columbus, Ohio April 26, 2007.
Utah Geothermal Power Generation Workshop Regulatory Issues August 17, 2005 Presented by Becky Wilson Utility Economist Utah Public Service Commission.
WFEC and Its Rural Electric Cooperative Members Solar Power October 16, 2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting.
NARUC/FERC COLLABORATIVE: DEMAND RESPONSE Paul Suskie, Chairman, Arkansas Public Service Commission July 15, 2007.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council A Look At The Council’s Conservation Planning Methodology and Assumptions A Look At The Council’s Conservation.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Overview of Draft Sixth Power Plan Council Meeting Whitefish, MT June 9-11, 2009.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Northwest Forecast – Energy Efficiency Dominates Resource Development Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation Resources.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Page 1 Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project  Largest Smart Grid Demonstration.
1 NAUSCA Summer Meeting Boston June 30, 3009 David W. Hadley Vice President State Regulatory Relations Midwest ISO.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Role of Energy Efficiency in the Northwest Power and Conservation Plan Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation Resources.
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Licking Valley Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by : East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Rocky Mountain States Sub-Regional Transmission Study December 9, 2003 Generation Additions Strawman.
Generation Subcommittee, Day Two Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho.
TRANSMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS — Current Projects — The Center for the New West “ The Sun Valley Energy Roundtables 2006” November 30 – December.
SERC Reliability Corporation 1 SERC RELIABILITY CORPORATION MID-AMERICA RELIABILITY CONFERENCE June 21, 2006 COLUMBUS, OHIO.
Draft Seventh Power Plan Meets RTF. Key Finding: Least Cost Resource Strategies Rely on Conservation and Demand Response to Meet Nearly All Forecast Growth.
Slide 1 Overview of Conservation in the Pacific Northwest Energy Efficiency Options in the Northwest Post-2011Meeting March 4, 2008.
AES NewEnergy To The Institute For Regulatory Policy Studies May 18, 2000 By David L. Townley.
2015 NARUC Winter Meeting Nick Wagner – Iowa Utilities Board 1.
PRESENTER’S NAME TITLE AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION Data from the Energy Information Administration, 2014 and Public Power Statistical Report, 2015.
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
1 Portfolio Analysis Update Power Committee Discussion August 30, 2004.
Black Start Service in New England System Operator’s Perspective Robert B. Burke ISO New England Inc. July 23, 2002 IEEE - Chicago, Illinois.
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
ABOUT PUBLIC POWER PRESENTER’S NAME TITLE AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION Data from the Energy Information Administration, 2014 and Public.
New Mexico Electricity An Industrial Perspective
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Presentation transcript:

PUBLIC POWER UTILITIES IN IDAHO Presented to Legislative Generation Sub-Committee by Idaho Energy Authority (IDEA) and Idaho Consumer Owned Utilities Association (ICUA)

Outline  An overview of current load and resource needs of Public Power in Idaho today.  The initial steps Public Power in Idaho has taken in developing Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) for future load and resource needs.

Public Power Today  Twenty-six municipally owned or cooperatively owned systems.  Regulated by governing bodies.  Subject to Idaho State law.  May own and operate generation, distribution and transmission facilities.

 Municipal utilities operate as a city department.  Subject to the city council and mayor - ultimately the voters.  Serve within city limits.  Must comply with Idaho State law, e.g. purchasing, bonding and open meetings.  May own and construct generation, distribution and transmission facilities. Municipal Utilities

 Cooperative utilities are not-for-profit corporations.  Subject to an elected board of directors.  No restrictions on service territory, except for prohibition of service to areas with existing electric providers.  Must comply with Idaho State law.  May own and construct generation, distribution and transmission facilities as well as other business, e.g. telephone and propane. Cooperative Utilities

Twenty-six Separate Municipal or Cooperative Utilities in Idaho  Northern Idaho (7) Bonners Ferry Northern Lights Kootenai Electric City of Plummer Inland Power Clearwater Power Idaho County  Central Idaho (3) Salmon River Lost River City of Weiser  East Idaho (5) Vigilante Electric Fall River Electric Lower Valley Energy City of Idaho Falls City of Soda Springs

 Burley Area (11) East End Mutual United Electric City of Rupert City of Burley City of Albion City of Declo South Side Electric  Burley Area (cont.) Farmers Electric City of Minidoka Raft River Electric Riverside Electric Lines Twenty-six Separate Municipal or Cooperative Utilities in Idaho (cont.)

 Each of these utilities has its own distinct management.  What they have in common is operation of an electric distribution system.  Most Public Power Utilities purchase all of their power needs from the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Some generate a portion of their own power One utility is an all-requirement customer of Idaho Power Company Twenty-six Separate Municipal or Cooperative Utilities in Idaho (cont.)

Idaho Energy Resources Authority (IERA)  Created by Legislature in  Empowered to finance generation and transmission facilities for Investor Owned Utility (IOU), municipal or cooperative utilities and to finance renewable energy projects.

Bonneville Power Administration  Current Role Provides and delivers wholesale power supply to its customers for all of their electrical needs at rates based on the costs of BPA’s total system. Key phrases in this statement are “all of their electrical needs” and “at rates based on the costs of BPA’s total system”. Primarily uses the transmission systems of IOUs in Idaho to deliver power.

 Future Role Provide and deliver wholesale power supply:  up to its’ existing generation capability, under rate schedules reflecting the cost of this capability (Tier 1)  provide additional wholesale power at market based rates (Tier 2) Note the new key phrase is “up to its’ existing generation capability’ and ‘additional wholesale power at market based rates”. New load growth will be the responsibility of the individual municipalities and cooperatives. Bonneville Power Administration (cont.)

Resource Plan for Public Power Utilities  Public Power Utilities have never collectively conducted a resource plan.  BPA in conjunction with the Northwest Power Planning Council have conducted regional planning.  Planning process includes Idaho Public Power Utilities.  In the past most Public Power Utilities would have said the Power Council’s plan was their plan and left it at that, but some do their own individual plans.

 The change at BPA will require Public Power Utilities to plan for their own load growth.  BPA is one option to serve Public Power Utilities load growth but at market prices – not at its blended cost of providing bulk wholesale power.  The question facing Public Power today is how will they manage Market Risk? Resource Plan for Public Power Utilities (cont.)

 In response to BPA’s initiative IDEA has taken the first steps to develop a comprehensive Resource Plan for its Members.  IDEA’ research is based on a voluntary sharing of load data.  IDEA has compiled the following load data on twenty-one of its Members.  The first chart shows what IDEA’s load would be if it were a single utility.  The peak in winter is approximately 850 MW and the summer is approximately 700 MW. Resource Plan for Public Power Utilities (cont.)

 The picture is very different when IDEA Members operate as they do today, as twenty-one stand alone utilities.  Operating independently, IDEA Members peak at almost 1,000 MW instead of the 850 MW as a single utility.  IDEA Members range in size from less than one MW to in excess of 200 MW of load. Resource Plan for Public Power Utilities (cont.)

 An alternate way to view IDEA’s load is by IOU control areas.  IOU operating load control areas are responsible for access to, maintenance and reliability of the transmission system. Resource Plan for Public Power Utilities (cont.)

 IDEA Members operate in several different load control areas: Idaho Power Company – Southern Idaho PacifiCorp (aka Rocky Mountain Power) – Eastern Idaho Avista Utilities – Northern Idaho  All IDEA Members are Transmission Dependent Utilities (TDU).  IDEA peaks and loads look very different when viewed from the load control area perspective. Resource Plan for Public Power Utilities (cont.)

 IDEA Members do not have the sophisticated econometric models to determine load forecasts of their customer loads.  Instead historical data, anticipated needs and statistical methods have been used. Resource Plan for Public Power Utilities (cont.)

 Even with modest growth there is a substantial need for new resources.  With robust growth resource needs increase considerably.  Put simply, Public Power Utilities in Idaho need more resources - both generation and transmission. Resource Plan for Public Power Utilities (cont.)

 Some IDEA Members are acquiring a portion of a new coal-fired electric plant being developed in Utah. Even those utilities are facing difficulties in the lack of transmission access.  Others Members are jointly exploring developing other resources. What are the Public Power Utilities doing to prepare to meet load needs in the future?

 Some may rely on market purchases.  Some will subscribe to BPA’s tier two offering.  Bottom line -- every Public Power Utility must do something, there is simply not enough resources in Idaho to meet our future needs.  Public Power is working closely with the IERA to facilitate transmission system expansion to allow the import of new resources. What are the Public Power Utilities doing to prepare to meet load needs in the future?

 Public Power Utilities in Idaho have participated through BPA in robust acquisition of renewable resources.  Public Power Utilities plan to continue to do so, either collectively through IDEA and ICUA or individually.  Most Public Power Utilities have net metering options.  IDEA collectively implements an aggressive conservation program for many of its Members based on an incentive rate from BPA. Public Power Utilities Renewable and Conservation Efforts

Summary  Idaho Public Power Utilities must now act to meet their own resource needs.  The IERA is working to facilitate expansion of the transmission system.  Consistent state policies needed so that utilities can plan and acquire resources compatible with the state policy.  Public power will need some legislative changes to allow its members to better plan, coordinate, operate and finance new resources.