Joint Action Plans (Art 93-98 CPR). …did we propose this new instrument? To focus more on outputs and results …do we believe it will work? Because focus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BUDGETING Training Unit 13.2 Principles and financial rules of mobility.
Advertisements

Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 EGTC regulation EGTC regulation ESF and EGTC regulations Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
Planning and use of funding instruments
Expert group on delegated and implementing acts of 3 October 2013 Models of Joint Action Plans (Art 95 CPR) 2 nd meeting.
Model of Joint Action Plans
European Union Cohesion Policy
© Shutterstock - olly Joint Action Plan: Towards a management more focused on results Annual meeting with the Managing Authorities of the European territorial.
© Shutterstock - olly Delegated Acts ESF Art 14.1 Expert Group on delegated and implementing acts 3 October 2013.
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
Management verifications Franck Sébert European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplification Cost Options Current use and perspectives June 2014.
30 th meeting of the Expert Group on DA and IA for the ESI Funds Fiche No 37 based on Fiche No 21 Article 14(1) ESF Reg. Brussels, 18 May 2015.
Reporting on financial instruments to the Commission under the Annual and Final implementation reports Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy.
1 Eligibility: Simplified costs Lump sums grants Mathieu LEFEBVRE, Laurent SENS, ESF Coordination Unit DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
Draft model for the Annual and Final implementation report under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal Marko Prijatelj Directorate General for Regional.
Simplified Cost Options. Organizational structure National Development Agency Internal Audit Cabinet Legal Affairs Communication HR Vice-president for.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
1 Management verifications Examples of good practice José FERREIRA DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities European Union Cohesion Policy.
1 The simplified cost options: Flat rate for indirect costs, standard scale of unit costs and lump sums OPEN DAYS Workshop 06D06 – Simplification of Cohesion.
EU European Territorial Cooperation Legal Package - State of play Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head.
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
Monitoring of financial instruments and provision of monitoring information to the Commission under the Annual and Final implementation reports António.
MONITORING SYSTEM OF EU STRUCTURAL FUNDS: PHYSICAL INDICATORS International Conference for New Member States February 1-2, 2012, Vilnius (Lithuania) European.
Regional Policy Management and control systems Draft Delegated Act Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 TWENTY-FOURTH.
Cross border cooperation programmes in the period Csaba Hende Körmend, 07/11/2012.
Regional Policy Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 NINETEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT.
Joint Action Plans (Art CPR). 2 Purpose of the presentation Present the “Joint Action Plan”, a potential approach on a management more focused on.
Financial Management of Rural Development Programmes DG AGRI, October 2005.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
32 nd meeting of the Expert Group on DA and IA for the ESI Funds Fiche No 37B Article 14(1) ESF Reg. Brussels, 15 January 2016.
Results orientation: audit perspective Jiri Plecity, Head of Unit H1, Relations with Control Authorities, Legal Procedures, Audit of Direct Management.
Draft model for the Annual and Final implementation report under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal 12 th meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated.
Simplified Cost Options Impatto della semplificazione sulle attività dei controlli Francisco MERCHÁN CANTOS Direttore Audit DG EMPL Firenze, 21 novembre.
S&E and BMW Regional Operational Programmes 14 – 20 Training for Local Authorities involved in DUCGS projects, 21st April 2016 REPORTING, DATA COLLECTION.
1 Cohesion policy post 2013 Jiri Svarc Head of Unit for Finland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
Indicators – intervention logic, differences ( vs programming period, ESF vs. ERDF) Piotr Wolski Marshall’s Office Zachodniopomorskie.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs) The audit point of view.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs)
Best practices related to procurement within a project (for part of the expenditure) implemented by the beneficiary itself (art. 67, par. 4 of Regulation.
Joint Action Plans (Art CPR). 2 Purpose of the presentation Present the “Joint Action Plan”, a potential approach on a management more focused on.
Simplified Cost Options: DG EMPL audit approach
Experiences from programming period Simplified costs
Administration of a FIDIC Contract - Financial Management
Evaluation : goals and principles
Mid-Term Review Package on the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF)
Activation of young people in the Podkarpacie region
ESF Technical Working Group Brussels, 10 October 2016
Performance Framework
Draft Guidance Note on management verifications
Update on (draft) implementing acts (IA)
Thomas Bender Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG
INTERREG IPA CBC “GREECE ALBANIA ”
data to be recorded and stored in computerised form (DA)
Kick-off meeting of the project UMBRELLA
Use of SCOs in the ESI funds: Survey of OPs 2017
TÓTH Gábor DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Amending the Performance Framework
Cohesion Policy Financial Management
ESF INFORMAL TWG Prague, 2-3 April 2009 Lump sums grants
Monitoring & evaluation in
ESF Committee ad’hoc group on the future of the ESF Debriefing from the focus group on proportionality (simplification) Brussels, 2 February 2010.
Model of Joint Action Plans
Future Monitoring and Evaluation: Focus on results Antonella Schulte-Braucks Ines Hartwig ESF Evaluation Partnership Brussels 17 November 2011.
DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Data collection and validation support for the management of the ESF
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
Jeannette Monier and Louise Reid
Presentation transcript:

Joint Action Plans (Art CPR)

…did we propose this new instrument? To focus more on outputs and results …do we believe it will work? Because focus on outputs and results will replace focus on inputs …would Managing Authorities decide to support a Joint Action Plan? Because there is merit in an applying a result-based approach Because they will be paid according to what they achieve: implementation is simplified Why … ?

A smartly defined goal A well-thought through intervention logic Credits: xedos4 - Danilo Rizzuti - digitalart - Stuart Miles/FreeDigitalPhotos.net What do you need to build a JAP? Agreed upon milestones, outputs and results

JAP = 1 Operation = Part of OP(s) How does it all fit together? Commission Decision BENEFICIAIRYBENEFICIAIRY OP AUTHORITIESOP AUTHORITIES Payments Milestones Outputs Results € ECEC € Payments Project 1 Project 2 Project 4 Project 3 Output & Results Output

1. The Intervention logic JAP: Key points to remember (1/3) Which (types) of projects are required to reach the JAP's goal? What does the road to success look like? Which milestones should be reached along the way? Which intermediary output and result targets should be achieved to realise the goal? Which indicators are needed to adequately monitor progress towards milestones, outputs and results?

2. Financial Management JAP: Key points to remember (2/3) Payment will depend on level of achievement! Costs to achieve milestones, outputs and results are calculated similarly to simplified cost options (also applicable to public contracts) But Lump sums are not capped, also applicable to public contracts Cost are included in payment applications like any other operations (no advances declared to the Commission)

3. Audit JAP: Key points to remember (3/3) Financial audit pertains only to the conditions of payment defined in the Commission Decision: milestones, outputs & results This presupposes reliable systems to collect & store data + common interpretation of indicators For costs incurred by the beneficiary, national accounting practices apply. They are not subject to audit by the audit authority or the Commission

JAP: Some (important) details JAP is an option Beneficiary = public law body JAP shall not support infrastructures Minimum public support: EUR 10 million or 20% of the OP (lower figure) Covered by a Commission decision Could be submitted after the start of the OP No specific duration but expected to be shorter than the OP period.

Many thanks for your attention Laurent SENS DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Unit: ESF legislation and Policy, financial engineering