Response to Call Back questions IETF 77 – Anaheim Stephen McCann, RIM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ecrit-unauthenticated-access IETF 75, Stockholm July 29, 2009 Hannes Tschofenig (attending virtually) Dirk Kroeselberg.
Advertisements

Premature Disconnect Brian Rosen NeuStar. Reminder of the problem Emergency Call is connected to PSAP Distressed caller hangs up before giving all information.
March 2008IETF 71 (Philadelphia) - ECRIT1 Unauthenticated emergency communications Henning Schulzrinne Gabor Bajko S. McCann Hannes Tschofenig draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access-02.
Extensions for Unauthenticated and Unauthorized Devices draft-ietf-ecrit-unauthenticated-access-01 H. Schulzrinne, S. McCann, G. Bajko, H. Tschofenig,
The current System Landline caller The emergency call process starts with a caller dialing (highly simplified) © 2011 Colorado Resource.
Additional Data related to an Emergency Call draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-00.txt Hannes Tschofenig Brian Rosen.
BRIAN ROSEN HANNES TSCHOFENIG draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-02.
IETF ECRIT SDO Emergency Services Coordination Workshop 5 & 6 Oct 2006 – New York Alain Van Gaever DG Information Society & Media European Commission.
Preparing for the Future.  Emergency calls today are primarily voice.  People expect to reach PSAP when dials 911.  People have multiple ways and devices.
Out of Jurisdiction Emergency Routing draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-01.txt James Winterbottom, Hannes Tschofenig, Laura Liess.
03/24/03 Learon Dalby GIS, Program Manager.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 4—Emergency Public Information and Warning What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
Restrictive Procedures Certification Certification required. A license holder who wishes to use a restrictive procedure with a resident must.
Risks with IP-based Emergency Services draft-ietf-ecrit-trustworthy-location.
Emergency Safety Interventions “What Practitioners Need to Know” 1.
Trustworthy Location Information draft-tschofenig-ecrit-trustworthy- location draft-tschofenig-ecrit-trustworthy- location Hannes Tschofenig, Henning Schulzrinne.
Stephen S. Yau CSE , Fall Security Strategies.
Interim Text to Information & Training for TelecommunicatorsInformation & Training for Telecommunicators Version 2 August 26, 2013.
Network security policy: best practices
FACILITATE OUTGOING PHONE CALLS
Winner Follow Me Presented by Telecom Transborder Services.
ECRIT interim meeting - May Security Threats and Requirements for Emergency Calling draft-tschofenig-ecrit-security-threats Hannes Tschofenig Henning.
GSC-19 Meeting, July 2015, Geneva Individual to Authority standardisation Chantal Bonardi, GSC-EM Task Force Convenor Document No:GSC-19_104a Source:GSC-EM.
ENP Study Group Disaster Planning Session #6 BROUGHT TO YOU BY: THE FLORIDA NENA EDUCATION COMMITTEE.
Brian Rosen Abandoned Call and Premature Disconnect.
NENA Next Generation Architecture
1 NGN Issues - Numbering and Addressing Peter Darling ACIF NGN FOG No. 3.
Building Disaster-Resilient Places STEP THREE – Determine Goals and Actions.
Overview of SIP Forum Video Relay Service (VRS) Initiative Brian Rosen Task Group Chair Spencer Dawkins SIP Forum Technical Director.
SIGNALING. To establish a telephone call, a series of signaling messages must be exchanged. There are two basic types of signal exchanges: (1) between.
MAYDAY2004 This presentation is a work in progress and has not yet been adopted as policy. It is meant as a training guide to better prepare our crews.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 3—Emergency Operations Coordination What Is It And How Will We Measure It? For sound, click on the megaphone.
Architectural Considerations for GEOPRIV/ECRIT Presentation given by Hannes Tschofenig.
Status and Development of VoIP based emergency calls Alexander Mayrhofer, nic.at GmbH The 1st European Security and Safety Summit Brussels, June 2007.
Doc.: IEEE /1119r0 Submission November 2005 Alistair Buttar, MotorolaSlide 1 Support for Emergency Calls Notice: This document has been prepared.
Netconf Monitoring IETF 70 Mark Scott Sharon Chisholm Hector Trevino
Building Information Exchange with First Responders (BIEFR) David Holmberg, NIST June 11, 2009 Slides credit to Alan Vinh.
POSITION DESCRIPTION OHIO DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PERSONNEL DIVISION DIVISION Sheriff’s Office AGENCY Ottawa County _____State Agency X County.
IEEE “Green Book” This set of slides is a collection of presentations, motions and other material that has come before the Working Group.
Draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency- framework-00 Brian Rosen NeuStar CPa
Section 1-5 Resolving Consumer Problems. Registering a Complaint Need to: – State the problem clearly – Decide the outcome you desire – Gather all relevant.
GIS and Next Generation Public Safety
IETF70, Vancouver, December 2007draft-wing-sipping-srtp-key-021 Disclosing Secure RTP (SRTP) Session Keys draft-wing-sipping-srtp-key-02 Dan Wing,
Technical and Policy Considerations for Unified European Emergency Services Presented at EENA Brussels, 6.7 June, 2007.
Critical Decisions, Myths & Lessons Learned in Networking What is important at the time may be only apparent with hindsight What seems important at the.
Draft-ietf-ecrit-framework-06 Brian Rosen NeuStar.
The mandate of this working group is to facilitate effective service interoperability utilizing SIP in heterogeneous network environments as noted below.
BRIAN ROSEN HANNES TSCHOFENIG HENNING SCHULZRINNE draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea.
Individuals/Organizations to Government + Obtaining and Providing Information + Communications During Emergencies.
Network Reliability and Interoperability Council VII NRIC Council Meeting Focus Group 1B Network Architectures for Emergency Communications in 2010 September.
Doc.: IEEE /0xxxr0 Submission March, 2007 Gabor/SriniSlide 1 Joint TGu : Location Configuration for Emergency Services Notice: This document.
Security Threats and Requirements for Emergency Calling draft-tschofenig-ecrit-security-threats-01.txt Hannes Tschofenig, Henning Schulzrinne, Murugaraj.
Emergency Text Messaging using SIP MESSAGE draft-kim-ecrit-text-00
9-1-1 Text Messaging Black Hawk County Consolidated Communications Center.
ECRIT requirements update draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-requirements-01 IETF 63 Aug 02, 2005 Roger Marshall
1 Procurement Operations Division (POD) Guidance for Telework and Work Schedules February 2016.
Appending appending is a pre-requisite for developing marketing success; it creates multi-channel touch indicate connect to customers.
© NENA is the Voice of © NENA was founded in 1981 on the principle of “One Nation, One Number,” in order to help assure ubiquitous.
Presentation Material ● PAR ● 5 Criteria ● ✔ Problem tutorial ● ✔ Why VoIP doesn't work today ● ✔ What is needed to fix it ● ✔ Working with ECRIT should.
Joint TGu : Location Configuration for Emergency Services
Location Configuration at Layer 7
Preparing for the Future
Hannes Tschofenig, Henning Schulzrinne, Bernard Aboba
Henning Schulzrinne Stephen McCann Gabor Bajko Hannes Tschofenig
Thoughts on VoIP and Emergency Calling
Hannes Tschofenig Henning Schulzrinne M. Shanmugam
This presentation outlines general information related to the NL911 province-wide emergency 911 telephone service.
Education Abroad Program Director Training
IEEE Emergency Services
Summary of PAD SG use cases
Presentation transcript:

Response to Call Back questions IETF 77 – Anaheim Stephen McCann, RIM

Overview Document contains some RIM responses to the 5 questions from Hannes Tschofenig, regarding Call Back behavior.

Call Back Q1 What functionality is available in today's CS networks? Disabling ‘a’ party clear is likely to be implemented in some countries but we are unsure of which countries.

Call Back Q2 Is this useful functionality to have for IP-based emergency services? The procedures in place for CS based emergency services should be at least the same as for IP based emergency services.

Call Back Q3 Do you envision a time-restriction on this capability? Example: only within one hour callbacks from the PSAP are treated differently to normal calls.? The call back time needs to be configurable as it is likely to be a national matter. In some countries it may be zero.

Call Back Q4 Would you expect the call to reach primarily the device that initiated the emergency call? The call back should reach the device that made the emergency call.

Call Back Q5 In some cases the device that was used to originally initiate the call does not respond anymore to a callback (e.g. imagine a fixed line phone that was used to report a fire in a house and is out of order soon afterwards). Since the initial emergency call provided a second contact mechanism (namely the address of record) it could be used by the call taker as well. Should this communication also experience the same type of override privilege as the initially transmitted callback to the emergency caller's device ? PSAP’s and emergency response services should be free to use whatever means is appropriate and at their disposal to contact the caller. It is beneficial for the caller’s device to provide more information than the minimum required to the PSAP about location, identify and alternative call back options.

Additional use case An emergency situation may change and the caller awaiting a PSAP call back may desire that the call back is made requiring the intervention of the called user or without first alerting. Such a capability could be available for a limited time. Imagine someone such as a kidnapped person reporting that their life is in danger.