THE FLOW STRESSOR-RESPONSE METHOD Jay O’Keeffe, WWF Professor of Freshwater Ecosystems, Department of Environmental Resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benthic Assessments One benthic ecologists concerns and suggestions Fred Nichols USGS, retired.
Advertisements

Ecosystem Flows Hydrology and Connectivity Joe Trungale October 2, 2006.
Healthy Ecosystem A healthy ecosystem is composed of:
1 Floodplain Management Session 13 Biology Management and restoration of floodplain ecology Prepared by Susan Bolton, PhD, PE.
Primary Headwater Habitats (PHWH). The Basics - What is a Primary Headwater Stream? Characteristics: A Watercourse 1 with: A Watercourse 1 with: A defined.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Our Water, Our Resource, Our Responsibility DRAFT Module 4: Water and Biodiversity Unit 2: Assessing Biodiversity.
15 The Nature of Communities. 15 The Nature of Communities Case Study: “Killer Algae!” What Are Communities? Community Structure Interactions of Multiple.
Instream flow assessment in New Zealand. Flow assessment framework Morphology Evaluate for changes in flow Water quality Methods and parameters DO Temperature.
Habitat and biota FISH Dr. e.r. irwin. Goals Review relations between biota and fluvial habitats Understand the what and why of HSC (and other tools.
“Habitat Assessment Using the QHEI “ Edward T. Rankin June 6 City of Columbus, Level 3 Training Course Columbus, Ohio Senior ResearchScientist
The Water Withdrawal Assessment Process Context within regional water policy discussions Context within regional water policy discussions –Aquatic ecosystems.
Range Practices 1 Objectives and Range Practices under FRPA & Objectives & Objectives The Focus is on Results.
WHAT ARE ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS? Background and rationale Jay O’Keeffe WWF Professor of Freshwater Ecosystems UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands.
Environmental flows in Europe Mike Acreman. Green and pleasant land? Thames basin 10,000 km mm rainfall 15 million people significant water stress.
Bellringer “When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the universe.” -John Muir (naturalist, writer and founder.
Section 1: What Is an Ecosystem?
SFCC Walkover Habitat Survey Training Course July 2015.
Ecoregion typing Ecological classification or typing will allow the grouping of rivers according to similarities based on a top-down nested hierarchical.
King County Normative Flow Project Parametrix, King County, Herrera, & Foster Wheeler Normative Flow Studies King County Department of Natural Resources.
Non-pollutant ecosystem stress impacts on defining a critical load Or why long-term critical loads estimates are likely too high Steven McNulty USDA Forest.
HYDROLOGY AND ECOLOGY. HYDROLOGY WATER QUALITY HYDRAULICS GEOMORPHOLOGY ECOLOGY SOCIO/ECONOMICS RESEARCHTEACHINGPOLICYCONSULTANCY VERTICAL INTEGRATION.
Conceptual Ecological Model of San Acacia Reach of Middle Rio Grande River – 2/13/07 1 st Draft Ibis Ecosystem Associates, Inc. Diversion & Regulation.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Lesson 9 Channel characteristics
Biology Unit - Ecology 4.1 Notes.
Stream Processes and Habitat Ryan Johnson. Overview Watershed Processes – Factors and their effects on the watershed as a whole Stream Processes – Factors.
Recommendations for Determining Regional Instream Flow Criteria for Priority Tributaries to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta A Report to the California.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invertebrate Communities as Tools for Establishing Minimum Flows and Levels in Florida Streams.
Potomac Flow-by Stated Management Objectives (1) estimate the amount and quality of biotic habitat available at different flow levels, particularly as.
Elevation (m) Figure 1: The left panel shows the entire modeled reach which extends from RM 63.4 to RM 65.9, with arrows indicate locations of the rapids.
- Aquatics - Presented by: Rick Pattenden Mainstream Aquatics Ltd.
Fish Assemblages of the Wabash River Mark Pyron. Wabash River Fishes 1.Large river 2.High diversity 3.History of human impact 4.Fish assemblages respond.
Impact Analysis 2. Impact Prediction. Environmental Impacts The change in an environmental parameter, which results from a particular activity or intervention.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Biodiversity Biology ATAR Year 11 Biology 1AB Biology 3AB.
“The minimum flow for a given watercourse shall be the limit at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology.
January 27, 2011 Summary Background on Delta Flow and Habitat Relationships Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
1 Individual and Population Level Analysis and Validation of an Individual-based Trout Model Roland H. Lamberson Humboldt State University.
Prescribing Flows for the Potomac River Ecosystem: Six Recommendations Brian Richter The Nature Conservancy.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
Hydropeaking and minimum flow : the French approach. P. Baran CIS ECOSTAT - HYDROMORPHOLGY WORKSHOP 12th and 13th June Brussels Pôle Ecohydraulique.
Biodiversity Health Index Main Streams for Life John MacKinnon UNDP consultant June 2012.
Run of the River Introducing a healthy rivers board game Proudly presented by: Swap with Regional WW logo.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW REQUIREMENTS OF INDIAN RIVER BASINS VLADIMIR SMAKHTIN International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka CP-NRLP Progress.
Environmental water requirements Surface water. From Guide to Plan Guide proposed reduction in diversions from 3000 to 4000 GL Reductions based on simplified.
13. Sediment and aquatic habitat in rivers (a)Benthic organisms and bed sediments (b)Fish and bed sediments (c)Reach classification based on bed material.
Do not reproduce any photos that are in this presentation.
Environmental Flow Instream Flow “Environmental flow” is the term for the amount of water needed in a watercourse to maintain healthy, natural ecosystems.
Botkin and Keller Environmental Science 5e Chapter 20 Water Supply, Use and Management.
Guide to Choosing Time-Series Analyses for Environmental Flow Studies Michael Stewardson SAGES, The University of Melbourne.
ENERGY SECURITY BIODIVERSITY TECHNOLOGICAL FIX. Can you….. a)Convert this text to a simple flow diagram?
C.4: Conservation of biodiversity
OUR Ecological Footprint …. Fall 2008 IB Workshop Series sponsored by IB academic advisors Study Abroad for IB Majors Thursday, October 30 4:00-5:00PM.
How do we work… Samuli Korpinen, Finnish Environment Institute, Marine Research Centre HELCOM BalticBOOST WS on Physical loss and damage to the seafloor.
“Low Flow” “Water is taken out of the stream for a variety of uses, such as irrigated agriculture, municipal and industrial. Low flow means that amount.
International Water Quality Guidelines for Ecosystems
Section 1: What Is an Ecosystem?
TU EBT Portfolio, Range-wide, & Focal Area Assessments
Watersheds and Hydrology
Section 1: What Is an Ecosystem?
C.4 Conservation of biodiversity
Lotic Communities What is a community? A) The Dictionary B) The Ideal
Watersheds as Integrators of Climate: The Hydrogeomorphic Template as
ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS II PP
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
IBI’s: An Introduction
Advanced Ecology Option C.
1.1 Introduction to Ecology & Structure of Ecosystems
Presentation transcript:

THE FLOW STRESSOR-RESPONSE METHOD Jay O’Keeffe, WWF Professor of Freshwater Ecosystems, Department of Environmental Resources

South African rivers Semi-arid Flashy Unpredictable Highly variable Incised channels Few with floodplains No/few commercial fish

DEFINITIONS OF STRESS

There are lots of different types of stress Stresses due to: Flow,Water quality, Temperature,Predation, Competition, etc. etc. In this method, we are dealing initially with stresses caused by low flows. We will also investigate the quite different stresses caused by high flows to see if the method can usefully be extended to deal with these.

OUR DEFINITION

THE CONCEPT OF LOW-FLOW STRESS River processes, functions and components are best adapted to their natural flow regime The flow regime is a main driver of the ecological disturbance regime, which drives much of the biodiversity of a system Natural biodiversity = Ecosystem goods and services, and stability and resilience of ecosystems

BUT People need the water resources By reducing the flow, they increase the low- flow disturbances in the system Natural biodiversity, goods and services, stability and resilience are reduced (its ecological health is reduced) The ecological risk to the system is increased, it becomes an increasingly stressed system We use fish/inverts/veg/sediment processes as indicators of the overall stress in the system

SOMETIMES The low flows are increased (IBT’s, return flows) Natural low-flow disturbances in such systems are decreased, and stress is removed Habitat diversity in time and space is decreased Some species are advantaged to the detriment of others Biodiversity etc is decreased.

Stressors (decreased flow, reduced habitat), cause stress responses (reduced abundance, increased risk, death) Both biotic and abiotic components can be stressed, as can the whole system Natural stress levels will vary from system to system (temporary streams will have much higher natural stress levels than permanent streams) The desirability (or otherwise) of stresses in a system can only be judged in relation to the natural (or reference) stress regime USE FOR THIS METHOD

StressStress  % Duration  Natural (A)  Inc. Flow (C)  Decreased  Flow (C)  Assessing increased and decreased stress

HYDRAULIC ASSUMPTION  The structure and resultant hydraulic complexity of most natural river channels ensures that, when there are areas of fast deep flow, there will also be areas of other hydraulic habitats (eg fast shallow, slow shallow, slow deep and no flow) – and therefore conditions suitable for a variety of species

A Generic Stress Index An index of 0 to 10 where 0 indicates no stress, and 10 the highest level of stress Stressors: Flow-related hydraulics and habitat Biological responses: Reduced abundance (1 to 3), increasing risk to critical life stages (4 to 6), and disappearance of populations (7 to 10) Flow-related hydraulics: Velocity, depth and wetted perimeter Habitat: Quantity and quality (the diversity and connectivity of habitat types)

Site specific discharge (m 3 s -1 ) 1 Stressors 2,3 Flow-related hydraulics 4 Physical habitat Very fast Very deep Very wide WP In excess Very high quality Fast Deep Wide WP Plentiful High quality Fast Deep Wide WP, slightly reduced Critical habitat sufficient Quality slightly reduced Moderate velocity Fairly deep WP slightly/ moderately reduced Reduced critical habitat Reduced critical quality Moderate velocity Some deep areas WP moderately reduced Critical habitat limited Moderate quality Moderate/slow velocity Few deep areas WP moderately/very reduced Critical habitat very reduced Moderate/low quality Moderate/slow velocity No deep areas Narrow WP Critical habitat residual Low quality Slow Shallow Narrow WP No critical habitat Other habitats moderate quality Slow Trickle Very narrow WP Flowing water habitats residual Low quality No flowStanding water habitats only Very low quality No surface waterOnly hyporheic refugia 5 Biological responses of target organism(s) Stress Index AbundanceAquatic Life Stages 8 Persistence 0Very abundantAll 7 healthyYes 1AbundantAll healthyYes 2Slight reduction for 6 sensitive rheophilic spp All healthy in some areas Yes 3Reduction for all 6 rheophilic species All healthy in limited areas Yes 4Further reduction for all rheophilic species All 7 viable in limited areas, critical life- stages of some sensitive rheophilic species at risk Yes 5Limited populations of all rheophilic species Critical life-stages of sensitive rheophilic species at risk or non-viable Yes 6Sensitive rheophilic species rare Critical life-stages of sensitive rheophilic species non-viable, and at risk for some less sensitive species In the short-term 7Most rheophilic species rare All life-stages of sensitive rheophilic species at risk or non- viable Most sensitive rheophilic species disappear 8Remnant populations of some rheophilic species All life-stages of most rheophilic species at risk or non-viable Many rheophilic species disappear 9Mostly pool dwellersAll life-stages of most rheophilic species non- viable Most or all rheophilic species disappear 10Only specialists persist Virtually no development Only specialists persist

The process for applying the FS/R method Select a site, survey and model hydraulic characteristics Specialists apply the stress index to the site, in relation to selected species/groups, to develop stress curves The hydrologist converts the resulting critical stress curve to stress time series for flow scenarios Analyse the stress profile of each scenario in terms of the magnitude, frequency and duration of different stresses Assess the severity of each stress profile in relation to the natural stress profile

AN EXAMPLE OF A SITE SPECIFIC STRESS INDEX FOR INVERTEBRATES

Black = Natural, Red = Recommended, Blue = Present day

Blyde River spell analysis (Stress = 1.5) White = natural, Red = recommended, Blue = Present day

Fish Fish and inverts Fish Rip Veg

OBJECTIVES HIERARCHY Overall objective (Ecological category A to D) General flow objectives Component objectives Target species objectives +Descriptions of conditions for classes below and above the objective category

EXAMPLE OBJECTIVES (e.g. to maintain Category B) Maintain perennial flow Summer flows > winter flows Av. velocity > 0.1 m/s at all times for target fish(stress never > 6) Sufficient depth (30 cm) to allow target fish to feed and breed 85% of time in summer (stress < 1 for 42.5% of time) Av. velocity > 0.3 m/sec for 80% of time, to ensure Trichoptera habitat (stress < 3 for 80% of time) Wetted perimeter in reeds for 60% of summer to provide marginal habitats (stress < 0.8 for 30% of time)

Application of objectives to define ecological category B

Thukela IFR4 Based on dry season flows BB/C

ADVANTAGES OF THE FS-R METHOD Biological responses treated as a continuum rather than as thresholds Analysis includes frequency and duration as well as magnitude Links between flow and biological responses are explicit Analysis of any number of flow regimes is possible and repeatable The natural stress profile provides a reference condition

FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS Apply method to high flows Parallel development of FS-R method for water quality Refinement of stress index Analysis and comparison of stress profiles Regionalised stress/response relationships

REFERENCE: O ’ KEEFFE J H, HUGHES D A AND THARME R E (2002) Linking ecological responses to altered flows, for use in environmental flow assessments: The Flow Stressor-Response method. Proceedings of the International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology, 28:84-92.