C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda – Day 1 8:00 am – 8:15 am Introductions and House Keeping
Advertisements

Load Rating Seminar1 Agenda – Day 1 8:00 am – 8:15 amIntroductions and House Keeping 8:15 am – 8:45 amSession 1: Load Rating Basics 8:45 am – 9:30 amSession.
Overview of New Practices & Policy Deck Issues. Topics Stakeholder Responsibilities Stakeholder Responsibilities Deflection Control Measures Deflection.
Understanding Skewed Bridge Behavior
ODOT Structure Project Manager Seminar Concrete Decks
CIEG 301: Structural Analysis
T1. DESIGN OF STEEL BEAMS Steel framed building
New Graphic Engine New Graphic User Interface Tabbed Toolbar
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures
3D Analysis with AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating
GEOPAK Road For Bridge Chapter 5.7 COGO Bridge Deck Elevation Commands.
Chp12- Footings.
Foundation Engineering CE 483
Reinforced Concrete Design-8
Advanced Flexure Design COMPOSITE BEAM THEORY SLIDES
Bridge Engineering (6) Superstructure – Concrete Bridges
By : Prof.Dr.\Nabil Mahmoud
SHRP2 Project R04 Bridge Designs for ABC
SHEAR IN BEAMS. SHEAR IN BEAMS Example (4.1): A rectangular beam has the dimensions shown in Figure 4.12.a and is loaded with a 40 ton concentrated.
Section 5 Analysis of Continuous Spans Developed by the pTI EDC-130 Education Committee lead author: Bryan Allred.
Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation
Section 3 design of post-tensioned components for flexure Developed by the pTI EDC-130 Education Committee lead author: trey Hamilton, University of.
Two-Span LRFD Design Example
Bridge Engineering (7) Superstructure – Reinforced Concrete Bridges
Reconstruction of the Eads Bridge Highway Deck
Design and Rating for Curved Steel I- and box-girder Bridge Structures
Steel and Reinforced Concrete
Slab Design.
Reinforced Concrete Design II
EXAMPLE 9.2 – Part IV PCI Bridge Design Manual
Schematic Design of an Accelerated Bridge Construction Project Michael P. Culmo, P.E. Vice President of Transportation and Structures CME Associates, Inc.,
Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation RADBUG - August 2014 Water Management and Structures.
EXAMPLE 9.2 – Part I PCI Bridge Design Manual
ODOT Policy for Deck/Slab Closure Pours Sean Meddles, P.E. Assistant Administrator ODOT Office of Structural Engineering.
EXAMPLE 9.3 – Part III PCI Bridge Design Manual
RM Product Update October 2009 Alexander Mabrich, PE, Msc Senior Engineering Consultant.
EXAMPLE 9.2– Part VI PCI Bridge Design Manual
EXAMPLE 9.2 – Part VII PCI Bridge Design Manual
EXAMPLE 9.2 – Part II PCI Bridge Design Manual
DESIGN OF HORIZONTALLY CURVED GIRDERS
Bentley Leap Bridge Components Overview
Introduction of Open Web Steel Joist, Deck and Composite Steel Joist
1 Differences Between BRASS and AASHTO Standard Spec Engines Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2011 Helena, Montana.
BEAMS AND COLUMNS PRESENTED BY K.ROSHIN RUKSHANA.
1 AASHTOWare Bridge Technical Update AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/Design User Group Training Meeting Traverse City – August 2014.
Bridge Design to AS 5100 Sydney May 25th 2005 Using High Strength Concrete with AS 5100 opportunities and restrictions.
N.W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar 1 By: Prof Dr. Akhtar Naeem Khan Lecture 12: Composite Beams.
EXAMPLE 9.3 – Part V PCI Bridge Design Manual BULB “T” (BT-72) THREE SPANS, COMPOSITE DECK LRFD SPECIFICATIONS Materials copyrighted by Precast/Prestressed.
Design and Rating for Curved Steel I- and box-girder Bridge Structures
Generating Construction Drawings from RM Bridge
1 Virtis/Opis Technical Update Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2010 Nashville, Tennessee.
Dr Ana M. Ruiz-Teran Transverse schemes for bridge decks. Part 3: Box girders.
Structural Curriculum for Construction Management and Architecture Students 1 Prepared by: Ajay Shanker, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor Rinker School.
1 Differences Between BRASS and AASHTO LRFD/LRFR Engines Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2011 Helena, Montana.
RATIONAL K VALUES FOR BRIDGE PIER DESIGN David Liu, Ph.D., P.E., S.E. Robert Magliola, P.E., S.E. PARSONS.
ENCE 710 Design of Steel Structures IV. COMPOSITE STEEL-CONCRET CONSTRUCTION C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University.
Biobehavioral Health Building The Pennsylvania State University Daniel Bodde Structural Option Advisor – Heather Sustersic.
1 PennDOT Truss Gusset Plate Analysis and Ratings Spreadsheet Overview Karim Naji Assistant Structural Engineer FHWA PA Division
A Paper from the Transportation Research Record
Inspection Form Types Each form has a unique
Offsite manufactured Bridges
High Bridge Re-Deck Project
Advisor: Dr. Bilal El Ariss
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridges.
Lecture 39 - Design of Two-Way Floor Slab System
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures
Civil Engineering and Architecture
AASHTOWare Bridge Design & Rating (BrDR) 3D FEM Analysis Capabilities
Presentation transcript:

ENCE466 Design and Analysis of Straight Highway Bridges Tutorial (for Steel Bridges) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center Department of Civil & Environ. Engineering University of Maryland 2010

Figure 1: Typical Bridge Cross Section DASH Input for Example 2 Figure 1: Typical Bridge Cross Section http://www.cee.umd.edu/best/ExSteeld1.dat

Bridge and Roadway Alignment

Bridge Superstructure Design

Bridge Substructure Design

Design Guidelines (1)

Design Guidelines (2)

DASH Input for Example 2 Span interval can be any numbers from 4-20 4 modes: Steel Composite & Noncomposite, RC & PC 8 modes for steel

DASH Input for Example 2 Position will affect the Effective Width and Distribution Factor Haunch will affect the section properties and weight % of composite will affect the moment distribution Detailed factor applied to steel section only

DASH Input for Example 2 Figure 2: Framing Plan

Distance between centerlines of bearings DASH Input for Example 2 Distance between centerlines of bearings

Spacing is required for Distribution Factor and DL calculation DASH Input for Example 2 Spacing is required for Distribution Factor and DL calculation

DASH Input for Example 2 Figure 3: Elevation of Interior Girder

2 unique PG sections are defined DASH Input for Example 2 2 unique PG sections are defined

DASH Input for Example 2 Members are defined from left to right in an ascending order These 3 entries are for non-prismatic members These 3 entries are for hybrid members

DASH Input for Example 2 HL-93 or HS loading from 1 to 99 If =2 proportional to the HS loading For fatigue use

DASH Input for Example 2 If not a staging case, slab loads have to be defined span by span or total span length. For a staging case, slab distances can be arbitrary. Pouring no. & Day are used for staging

Not for hybrid sections DASH Input for Example 2 For the proper calculation of moment capacity, distance has to be equally divided by the lateral bracing spacing Not for hybrid sections

MERLIN-DASH Execution Utility

Case Study: Bulb-Tee (BT-72), Single Span, Composite Deck, based on Standard Specifications Bridge Cross Section (Ref. PCI Bridge Design Manual Example 9-3)

Structural Details (03012) Position will affect the Effective Width and Distribution Factor Haunch will affect the section properties and weight These two entries are used for steel girder only

Span Lengths (03062) For single span, only input for Span Length (2) and Overhangs (1&3)

Beam Spacing (03042) Spacing is required for Distribution Factor and DL calculation

AASHTO-PCI-BT-72 Bulb-Tee Internally Stored Girder Sections in Win-DASH/P: AASHTO I – VI Bulb Tee BT-54, 63, & 72

PC Section (04012) ID 0 is for internally stored AASHTO Girder. 72 is for BT-72

Composite Section (calculated by Win-DASH/P)

Strand Pattern (Ref. PCI Bridge Design Manual)

Longitudinal Strand Profile (Ref. PCI Bridge Design Manual)

Member and Tendon Geometry (05032) Lines 1-4 are for straight tendons input by rows. Line 5 is for draped tendons input by groups where distance refers to the C.G. of the group

Arbitrary Uniform and Concentrated Loads (11012) SDL for wearing surface

Auto Generation of Dead and Superimposed Dead Loads (02012) Slab thickness for section property calculation and slab + integral wearing surface for DL calculation

Alternate Input of Slab Loads (10012) Slab thickness for section property calculation and intensity based on slab + integral wearing surface for DL

Slab Information (12034)

Precast Beam Information (12036) fc’ at 28 days is for service condition. fc’ at release is for initial condition

Prestressing Steel Properties (04032) fsi=0.75fs’ is used in this example If leaving blanks, losses will be calculated by the program based on the AASHTO