Isospin and mixed symmetry structure in 26 Mg DONG Hong-Fei, BAI Hong-Bo LÜ Li-Jun, Department of Physics, Chifeng university.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Valence shell excitations in even-even spherical nuclei within microscopic model Ch. Stoyanov Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Sofia,
Advertisements

Testing isospin-symmetry breaking and mapping the proton drip-line with Lanzhou facilities Yang Sun Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China SIAP, Jan.10,
Generalized pairing models, Saclay, June 2005 Generalized models of pairing in non-degenerate orbits J. Dukelsky, IEM, Madrid, Spain D.D. Warner, Daresbury,
Nuclear Collective Dynamics II, Istanbul, July 2004 Symmetry Approach to Nuclear Collective Motion II P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Symmetry and dynamical.
IBA – An Introduction and Overview Basic Ideas, underpinnings, Group Theory, basic predictions.
Emission of Scission Neutrons: Testing the Sudden Approximation N. Carjan Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Bordeaux-Gradignan,CNRS/IN2P3 – Université Bordeaux.
Microscopic time-dependent analysis of neutrons transfers at low-energy nuclear reactions with spherical and deformed nuclei V.V. Samarin.
The Collective Model Aard Keimpema.
Structure of odd-odd nuclei in the interacting boson fermion-fermion model 3.
Projected-shell-model study for the structure of transfermium nuclei Yang Sun Shanghai Jiao Tong University Beijing, June 9, 2009.
NPSC-2003Gabriela Popa Microscopic interpretation of the excited K  = 0 +, 2 + bands of deformed nuclei Gabriela Popa Rochester Institute of Technology.
Terminating states as a unique laboratory for testing nuclear energy density functional Maciej Zalewski, UW under supervision of W. Satuła Kazimierz Dolny,
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS
Masses (Binding energies) and the IBA Extra structure-dependent binding: energy depression of the lowest collective state.
The IBA The Interacting Boson Approximation Model Preliminary review of collective behavior in nuclei Collective models, and why the IBA Basic ideas about.
NSDD Workshop, Trieste, February 2006 Nuclear Structure (II) Collective models P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France.
Even-even nuclei odd-even nuclei odd-odd nuclei 3.1 The interacting boson-fermion model.
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Symmetries in Nuclei Symmetry and its mathematical description The role of symmetry in physics Symmetries of the nuclear.
Odd nuclei and Shape Phase Transitions: the role of the unpaired fermion PRC 72, (2005); PRC 76, (2007); PRC 78, (2008); PRC 79,
fermions c j N bosons A nucleons valence nucleonsN nucleon pairs L = 0 and 2 pairs s,d  even-even nuclei 2.2 The Interacting Boson Approximation A.
Rotation and alignment of high-j orbitls in transfermium nuclei Dr. Xiao-tao He College of Material Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics.
4. The rotating mean field. The mean field concept A nucleon moves in the mean field generated by all nucleons. The mean field is a functional of the.
1 New formulation of the Interacting Boson Model and the structure of exotic nuclei 10 th International Spring Seminar on Nuclear Physics Vietri sul Mare,
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Symmetries in Nuclei Symmetry and its mathematical description The role of symmetry in physics Symmetries of the nuclear.
Collective Model. Nuclei Z N Character j Q obs. Q sp. Qobs/Qsp 17 O 8 9 doubly magic+1n 5/ K doubly magic -1p 3/
Structure of neutron-rich A~60 nuclei: A theoretical perspective Yang Sun Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China KAVLI-Beijing, June 26, 2012.
Shape phase transition in neutron-rich even-even light nuclei with Z=20-28 H.B.Bai X.W.Li H.F.Dong W.C.Cao Department of Physics, Chifeng University, Chifeng.
原子核配对壳模型的相关研究 Yanan Luo( 罗延安 ), Lei Li( 李磊 ) School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin Yu Zhang( 张宇 ), Feng Pan( 潘峰 ) Department of Physics, Liaoning.
The calculation of Fermi transitions allows a microscopic estimation (Fig. 3) of the isospin mixing amount in the parent ground state, defined as the probability.
The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry.
Coupling of (deformed) core and weakly bound neutron M. Kimura (Hokkaido Univ.)
Regular structure of atomic nuclei in the presence of random interactions.
ESNT Saclay February 2, Structure properties of even-even actinides at normal- and super-deformed shapes J.P. Delaroche, M. Girod, H. Goutte, J.
IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The interacting boson model P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Dynamical symmetries of the IBM Neutrons, protons.
Nuclear Collective Excitation in a Femi-Liquid Model Bao-Xi SUN Beijing University of Technology KITPC, Beijing.
Partial dynamical symmetries in Bose-Fermi systems* Jan Jolie, Institute for Nuclear Physics, University of Cologne What are dynamical symmetries? Illustration.
Quark Nuclear Physics and Exotic Pentaquark as a Gamov-Teller Resonance Dmitri Diakonov Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute QNP-09, Beijing Sep 24, 2009.
Anomalous two-neutron transfer in neutron-rich Ni and Sn isotopes studied with continuum QRPA H.Shimoyama, M.Matsuo Niigata University 1 Dynamics and Correlations.
ShuangQuan Zhang School of Physics, Peking University Static chirality and chiral vibration of atomic nucleus in particle rotor model.
Lecture 23: Applications of the Shell Model 27/11/ Generic pattern of single particle states solved in a Woods-Saxon (rounded square well)
N. Itagaki Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Shell model Notes: 1. The shell model is most useful when applied to closed-shell.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Extreme independent particle model!!! Does the core really remain inert?
July 29-30, 2010, Dresden 1 Forbidden Beta Transitions in Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Kazuo Muto Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Shell model space and the collectivity of low-lying states in SD- pair shell model Yanan Luo 1, Feng Pan 2, Yu Zhang 2 and Jerry P Draayer 3 1. School.
DIRECT AND SEMIDIRECT NEUTRON RADIATIVE CAPTURE BY MEDIUM-HEAVY MASS NUCLEI: A NEW VERSION OF THE SEMIMICROSCOPIC DESCRIPTION B.A. Tulupov 1, M.H. Urin.
Some (more) High(ish)-Spin Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics Univesity of Surrey Guildford, UK Lecture 2 Low-energy.
Shape evolution of highly deformed 75 Kr and projected shell model description Yang Yingchun Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai, August 24, 2009.
The i 13/2 Proton and j 15/2 Neutron Orbital and the SD Band in A~190 Region Xiao-tao He En-guang Zhao En-guang Zhao Institute of Theoretical Physics,
Quantum Phase Transitions in Nuclei
Algebraic collective model and its applications Gabriela Thiamová Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie Institut National Polytechnique.
Emergent Euclidean Dynamical Symmetry in Nuclear Shape Phase Transition Yu Zhang Department of Physics, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China
Quantum Phase Transition from Spherical to γ-unstable for Bose-Fermi System Mahmut Böyükata Kırıkkale University Turkey collabration with Padova–Sevilla.
Time dependent GCM+GOA method applied to the fission process ESNT janvier / 316 H. Goutte, J.-F. Berger, D. Gogny CEA/DAM Ile de France.
How do nuclei rotate? 3. The rotating mean field.
Nordita Workshop on chiral bands /04/2015 Multiple chiral bands associated with the same strongly asymmetric many- particle nucleon configuration.
Nuclear Low-lying Spectrum and Quantum Phase Transition 李志攀 西南大学物理科学与技术学院.
Few-Body Models of Light Nuclei The 8th APCTP-BLTP JINR Joint Workshop June 29 – July 4, 2014, Jeju, Korea S. N. Ershov.
Rotational energy term in the empirical formula for the yrast energies in even-even nuclei Eunja Ha and S. W. Hong Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan.
超重原子核的结构 孙 扬 上海交通大学 合作者:清华大学 龙桂鲁, F. Al-Khudair 中国原子能研究院 陈永寿,高早春 济南,山东大学, 2008 年 9 月 20 日.
Determining Reduced Transition Probabilities for 152 ≤ A ≤ 248 Nuclei using Interacting Boson Approximation (IBA-1) Model By Dr. Sardool Singh Ghumman.
The role of isospin symmetry in medium-mass N ~ Z nuclei
Yu Zhang(张宇), Feng Pan(潘峰)
Euclidean Dynamical Symmetry in Nuclear Shape Phase Transition
Ch. Stoyanov Two-Phonon Mixed-Symmetry States in the Domain N=52
Isovector and isoscalar pairing in low-lying states of N = Z nuclei
Isospin Symmetry test on the semimagic 44Cr
a non-adiabatic microscopic description
Rotation and alignment of high-j orbitls in transfermium nuclei
The Mass and Isotope Distribution of Limiting Temperatures
Presentation transcript:

Isospin and mixed symmetry structure in 26 Mg DONG Hong-Fei, BAI Hong-Bo LÜ Li-Jun, Department of Physics, Chifeng university

Introduction The IBM-3 Hamiltonian Energy levels Electromagnetic transition Conclusion

Introduction Nuclei with Z≈N have been a subject of intense interest during the last few years [1-5].The main reason is that the structure of these nuclei provides a sensitive test for the isospin symmetry of nuclear force. The interacting boson model (IBM) is an algebraic model used to study the nuclear collective motions.

IBM In the original version (IBM-1), only one kind of boson is considered, and it has been successful in describing various properties of medium and heavy even-even nuclei [6-10]. In its second version(IBM-2), the bosons are further classified into proton-boson and neutron-boson, and mixed symmetry in the proton and neutron degrees of freedom has been predicted [11]. For lighter nuclei, the valence protons and neutrons are filling the same major shell and the isospin should be taken into account, so the IBM has been extended to the interacting boson model with isospin(IBM-3)

IBM-3 whose microscopic foundation is shell model [12,13]. The isospin T=1 triplet including three types of bosons :proton-proton(π) neutron-neutron(υ) proton-neutron(δ) The IBM-3 can describe the low-energy levels of some nuclei well and explain their isospin and F-spin symmetry structure [3-5,14-16].

The dynamical symmetry group for IBM-3 is U(18), which starts with Usd(6)×Uc(3) and must contain SU T ( 2 ) and O ( 3 ) as subgroups because the isospin and the angular momentum are good quantum numbers. The natural chains of IBM-3 group U(18) are the following[17] U(18) (Uc(3) SU T (2))×(U sd (6) U d (5) O d (5) O d (3)), U(18) (Uc(3) SU T (2))×(U sd (6) O sd (6) O d (5) O d (3)), U(18) (Uc(3) SU T (2))×(U sd (6) SU sd (3) O d (3)), The subgroups U d (5), O sd (6) and SU sd (3) describe vibrational,γ- unstable and rotational nuclei respectively. The dynamical symmetry group for IBM-3

26 Mg lies in the lighter nuclei region and is one even-even nucleus. By making use of the interacting boson model (IBM-3), we study the isospin excitation states, electromagnetic transitions and mixed symmetry states at low spin for 26 Mg nucleus. The main components of the wave function for some states are also analyzed respectively.

The IBM-3 Hamiltonian The IBM-3 Hamiltonian can be written as [13]

, with =0 , 1 , 2 ; with =0 , 2 , =0 , 2 , 4 ; with =1 , 3 。

Casimir operator IBM-3 Hamiltonian can be expressed in Casimir operator form, i.e., Hamiltonians for the low-lying levels of 26 Mg : From the IBM-3 Hamiltonian expressed in Casimir operator form, we know that the 26Mg is in transition from U(5) to SU(3) because the interaction strength of is and that of is 。

Energy levels ε dρ (ρ=π,υ,δ)4.763 ε sρ (ρ=π,υ,δ)1.171 Ai(i=0,1,2) Ci0(i=0,2,4) Ci2(i=0,2,4) Ci1(i=1,3) Bi (i=0,2) Di(i=0,2)1.310 Gi(i=0,2) Table 1. The parameters of the IBM-3 Hamiltonian of the 26Mg nucleus

The calculated and experimental energy levels are exhibited in figure 1.When the spin value is below 8+, the theoretical calculations are in agreement with experimental data.

Fig.1 Comparison between lowest excitation energy bands ( T=1 , T=2 ) of the IBM-3 calculation and experimental excitation energies of 26Mg

The wave function of the,,,, and states

We found that the main components of the wave function for the states above are s N, s N−1 d, s N−2 d 2, s N−3 d 3 and so on configurations. The wave function of these states contain a significant amount of δ boson component, which shows that it is necessary to consider the isospin effect for the light nuclei. From the analysis of the component of wave function of and states, it is known that they are two-phonon states. The parameters C 11 and C 31 are Majorana parameter, which have a very large effect on the energy levels of mixed symmetry state. From Fig. 2, we see that the and states have a large change with the parameters C 11 and C 31 respectively, which shows that the and states are mixed symmetry states.

Fig.2 Variation in level energy of 26 Mg as a function of C 11 and C 31 respectively

Electromagnetic transition In the IBM-3 model, the quadrupole operator was expressed as : where The M1 transition is also a one-boson operator with an isoscalar part and an isovector part where M =

For the 26 Mg, the parameters in the electromagnetic transitions are determined by fitting the experimental data, they are Table 2 gives the electromagnetic transition rate calculated by IBM-3 [20]

Experimental and calculated B(E2)( e 2 fm 4 ) and B(M1)( ) for 26 Mg B(E2)/B(M1)/ Exp.Cal. Exp.Cal

Table 2 shows that the calculated B(E2) values are quite close to the experimental ones [21]. The calculated quadrupole moments of the state is Q( ) = eb. state is Q( ) = eb. state is Q( ) = eb.

Conclusion The calculated results are in agreement with available experimental data and state is the mixed symmetry states. the calculated quadrupole moments of the state is eb state is eb state is eb. 26 Mg is in transition from U(5) to SU(3).

The authors are greatly indebted to Prof. G. L Long for his continuing interest in this work and his many suggestions. Thanks

[1] R. Sahu and VKB Kota, Phys.Rev.C67(2003) [2] M. Bender, H. Flocard and P-H Heenen, Phys. Rev. C68 (2003) [3]H.Al-Khudair Falih, Li Yan-Song and Long Gui-Lu,J. Phys.G: Nucl.Part.Phys.30 (2004) [4] E.Caurier , F.Nowacki and A.Poves , Phys.Rev.Lett.95(2005) [5] Long G L and Sun Yang , Phys.Rev.C65(2001) R0712 (Rapid Communication) [6] A.Arima and F. Iachello, Ann.Phys.(N.Y.)99(1976) 253. [7] A.Arima and F. Iachello, Ann.Phys.(N.Y.)111(1978) 201. [8] A.Arima and F. Iachello, Ann.Phys.(N.Y.)123 (1979)468. [9] Liu Yu-xin, Song Jian-gang, Sun Hong-zhou and Zhao En-guang,Phys. Rev. C 56(1997) [10] Pan Feng, Dai Lian-Rong, Luo Yan-An, and J. P. Draayer,Phys. Rev. C 68 (2003) [11] F.Iachello and A. Arima, The Interacting Boson Model (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press) (1987). [12] J. P. Elliott, A. P. White, Phys.Lett. B97(1980) 169. [13] J. A. Evans, Long G L and J. P. Elliott, Nucl. Phys. A561(1993) [14] H Al-Khudair Falih, Li Y S and Long G L, High Energ Nucl Phys 28 (2004) [15] HAK. Falih, Long G L, Chin. Phys. 13 (8)( 2004) [16] Zhang Jin Fu, Bai Hong Bo, Chin. Phys. 13(11) (2004) [17] Long G L, Chinese J. Nucl. Phys. 16(1994 )331. [18] Li Y S,Long G L , Commun.Theor.Phys.41(2004) 579 [19] P.Van Isacker,et al., Ann. Phys.(N.Y.)171(1986) 253. [20] R. B. Firestone, Table of Isotopes 8th edn ed V S Shirley (1998). References