US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, 20041 The CMS Physics Analysis Center - PAC Dan Green US CMS Program Manager Jan. 28, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US CMS LPC, JTerm-IV, Aug Intro to the LPC Ian Shipsey (Purdue) and Dan Green (Fermilab) LPC Coordinators.
Advertisements

ROSCOE Status IT-GS Group Meeting Focus on POW November 2009.
DOE/NSF U.S. CMS Operations Program Review Closeout Report Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory March 10, 2015 Anadi Canepa, TRIUMF Anna Goussiou, University.
DOE Neutrino Program Plans
Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
Physics Department Meeting June 19, 2008  Safety items: Mike Zarcone  DOE Emergency Management Audit next week  Department news  Budget update  Looking.
1 US CMS ASCB (Advisory Software & Computing Board) u Function u Membership u Activities u Future Plans.
Open Meeting on LHC Ideas for a Physics Analysis Center Open Meeting on LHC Ideas for a Physics Analysis Center Fermilab, September 4, 2003 Regina Demina.
U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Budget and Schedule Review John Huth Harvard University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven.
Assessment of Core Services provided to USLHC by OSG.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
LHC Accelerator Coordination Meeting: March 28, Remote Operations for CMS Erik Gottschalk.
US FSU, May 10-11,20021 Physics in US CMS Dan Green May 10, 2002.
Requirements Review – July 21, Requirements for CMS Patricia McBride July 21, 2005.
23rd June, 2004Outcomes of NZA Instrumentation Workshop 1 Outcomes of the NZA Instrumentation Workshop Very successful meeting. Many thanks to Royal Society.
Fermilab User Facility US-CMS User Facility and Regional Center at Fermilab Matthias Kasemann FNAL.
Management subcommittee closeout Jay Marx (chair, LBNL), Joel Butler (Fermilab), Stan Wojcicki (Stanford) Thanks to all for cooperation and openness!!
SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 1 SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing Remarks David MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Directory for PPA.
US CMS Education and Outreach Dan Karmgard University of Notre Dame.
E.Elsen European LC Workshop, Cockcroft, UK, Jan 2007 Perspectives for European LC R&D.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Peter Bond Deputy Director for Science and Technology October 29, 2005 New Frontiers at RHIC Workshop.
BESAC Dec Outline of the Report I. A Confluence of Scientific Opportunities: Why Invest Now in Theory and Computation in the Basic Energy Sciences?
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.3 Infrastructure and Installation Sims, Edwards 1.Does the conceptual design and planned implementation satisfy the performance specifications.
Contractor Assurance System Peer Review April Page 1 NSTAR 2011 May 16, 2011 Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery.
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, US CMS US CMS M&O Planning Dan Green US CMS Project Manager DOE/NSF Lehman Review, May 8-10, 2001.
1 HiGrade Kick-off Welcome to DESY Hamburg Zeuthen.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
1 Direction scientifique Networks of Excellence objectives  Reinforce or strengthen scientific and technological excellence on a given research topic.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
Fermilab Annual DOE Program Review May 16-18, 2005 JF1 CMS M&O at FNAL Jim Freeman US CMS M&O Manager May 17, 2006.
BNL Tier 1 Service Planning & Monitoring Bruce G. Gibbard GDB 5-6 August 2006.
…building the next IT revolution From Web to Grid…
11 DOE Office of Science High Energy Physics Program AAAC Meeting October 15, 2009 National Science Foundation Dennis Kovar Associate Director of the Office.
US LHC Accelerator Research Program Jim Strait For the BNL-FNAL-LBNL LHC Accelerator Collaboration DOE Meeting 18 April 2003 brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley.
P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC The Role of the LHC in US HEP Dan Green US CMS Program Manager January 28, 2003.
Report from Fermilab Presentation to ICFA Symposium Daegu, Korea September 2005 Pier Oddone.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
BESAC Workshop on Opportunities for Catalysis/Nanoscience May 14-16, 2002 William S. Millman Basic Energy Sciences May 14, 2002 Catalysis and Nanoscience.
11 November 2010 Natascha Hörmann Computing at HEPHY Evaluation 2010.
WWSWWS Report of the World Wide Study J. Brau June 4, 2008 Dubna ILCSC Meeting.
9/2/2004 TB Strategy J. Yu 1 LC Test Beam Funding and Strategy Large number of detector R&D groups made great progress Technology decision provides great.
1 Report of PAC for Particle Physics T. Hallman Presented by P. Spillantini JINR Scientific Council Meeting June 3-4, 2004 Dubna, Russia.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
John Womersley LHC Joel Butler, Marcela Carena, Jim Strait, John Womersley No formal meeting of the group yet, but we took the opportunity to sit with.
LARP Collaboration Meeting April BNL -FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Status Report E. Harms 28 March 2006.
Management February 20, Annual Review of the Muon Accelerator Program (MAP) Subcommittee members: Ron Prwivo, Ron Lutha, and Jim Kerby.
Computing Division FY03 Budget and budget outlook for FY04 + CDF International Finance Committee April 4, 2003 Vicky White Head, Computing Division.
John Womersley 1/13 Fermilab’s Future John Womersley Fermilab May 2004.
E.Elsen GDE Meeting, Beijing, Feb 2007 Perspectives and Planning for European LC R&D.
Remote Monitoring for Hardware & Beam Commissioning E. Harms/FNAL 7 April 2005 Port Jefferson, New York bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research.
UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, US CMS Status Dan Green US CMS PM June 11, 2002.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
University Research Model Committee - Key points/issues - Other points/issues - New ideas - “University Model” issues in the report - Findings and Recommendations.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
CD Strategy Session/Briefing on Collaboration Tools: Sept. 12, Collaboration Tools Erik Gottschalk.
CMS Crosscut Operations and Research, Theory, Computing, University Involvement C. Young and B. Zhou.
Visit to CERN/CMS Jan 2006 Patricia McBride Fermilab Slides taken from presentations by Hans Hoffmann and Werner Jank.
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
1 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts Budget and Activity Summary Slides with budget numbers and FTE summaries/activity for FY14 through FY16.
Particle Physics Sector Young-Kee Kim / Greg Bock Leadership Team Strategic Planning Winter Workshop January 29, 2013.
Gene Oleynik, Head of Data Storage and Caching,
Presentation to The US CMS Collaboration
DOE/NSF Lehman Review, May 8-10, 2001
LHC Science Goals & Objectives
Dagmar Adamova, NPI AS CR Prague/Rez
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Presentation transcript:

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, The CMS Physics Analysis Center - PAC Dan Green US CMS Program Manager Jan. 28, 2004

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, OutlineOutline The Physics Plan for US CMS Part of the RP financial planning Took 3 years to baseline Dialogue with US CMS Funding Agencies buyin Support by “host lab”, Fermilab Why Now? FNAL long range plan is developing DC04 – boat is leaving, LHC data in 2007 Run II b and CDF/D0 evolution Infrastructure – WH11

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, LHC Significance LHC will be the first jump in C.M. energy and luminosity in 20 years. Based on the last 40 years of HEP, new phenomena are expected.

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, LHC Impact on US HEP The LHC is the first accelerator in > 20 years to advance the energy frontier. The LHC also advances the luminosity frontier significantly. These advances mean that discoveries can come almost immediately, so that we must be ready on “day one”. The US detector efforts will be ~ complete by We are thus able to prepare well for the physics with a solid base of detector expertise.

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, US CMS Support DOE and NSF - funding 167 M$ + the operations phase at ~ 35 M$/year. HEPAP and Sub - panels. P5. The Facilities subcommittee. With the SLHC this program has decades of vitality. Fermilab base support and the Fermilab Long Range Planning Committee (J. Womersley).

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, Fermilab Letter on M&O FNAL is using GPP funds to site US CMS on WH11 – VCR, PAC. Support for US CMS at FNAL is strong. Occupancy in FY04 is planned.

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, US CMS Physics Goal US CMS aims to continue to be a major intellectual force within CMS in the operations and exploitation phase. To that end a community sized above a “critical mass” must be formed to address the Physics. The natural source for the growth of this community is CDF and D0 - overlap with US CMS at Fermilab in the PAC with the current expertise in the “state of the art”. (now through 2008)

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, How to do US CMS Physics? The funding agencies are already involved in “virtual” collaborations and laboratories. Astronomers propose a National Virtual Observatory (NVO). NSF has supported the NVO. Our model is the “collaboratory”. Need state of the art teleconferencing – but also face to face interactions  “critical mass”.

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, US CMS Advantages PAC is designed as an integral part of US CMS with financial support and the support of the host lab. US CMS will complete detector construction ~ in 2005, leaving ~ 2-3 years to commission the detector and prepare for the physics. Assuming physics goes from bottoms up, US CMS is well positioned by virtue of possessing detector expertise - HCAL (Jet/Met), ME, TOB, FPIX. Planning for the 10 fold luminosity upgrade (the SLHC) can begin now – using strong FNAL in house facilities to design the detectors for the next decade.

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, Evolution of the Plan For > 3 years the Research Program has been being developed. In regards to the VCR and PAC there has been a long dialogue within the collaboration. In addition, inclusion of a PAC in the RP was accepted by DOE/NSF after considerable discussion.

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, PAC – CMS and US CMS Context, Schedule In US CMS, planning is in place for a “collaboratory” or virtual laboratory. Elements are Virtual Control Room (commissioning, shifts and US accelerator community) and Physics Analysis Centers ( teleconf, analysis groups). VCR/PAC will save on travel funds and provide a nucleation point for a critical mass of physicists. This support will go directly and solely to US HEP physicists.

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, “Build it and they will come” Collaboratory supported by US CMS. We need only to start. However, the PAC must be a better place to do Physics than CERN or we should not create it (and US HEP will become a European appendage). PAC avoids excessive travel and allows greater participation - e.g. CDF/D0 can multiplex while running at FNAL. There is motion on the part of CDF and D0 - because we are only 3 years away from first beam. Now is the right time to start a core effort.

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, Crucial Needs Visitors program - support senior physicists for research to nucleate around. “Mixing” with CDF and D0 experts in p- p physics. Access to Fermilab (WH11), other theorists and phenomenological physicists.

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, Technical Support High speed Fermilab network and CERN connection. CP at CERN are in the baseline plan to facilitate data transfer. Good connectivity within US to tie US CMS together (e.g. Tier 2) State of the art videoconferencing Shared data and databases e logbook remote ops and controls (PVSSII) remote shift taking and debugging workspaces, tasks

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, The VCR and PAC on WH11 We need liaison between the infrastructure on WH11 and the users. There should be a “bottoms up” design for the PAC.

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, Mundane Needs and Support Office space (WH11) – no more trailer trash. AA/Sec support Desktops and support Materials and Supplies Tier1 environment Help desk and CMS computing environment - CP. VCR infrastructure - CP

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, Points of Contact Heidi Schellman - LHC Users Org., Workshops on 1/4 basis? K. Maeshima - WH11 layout and funding, US CMS management L. Bauerdick, I. Fisk - Tier 1 and SWC interfaces S. Eno + A. Yagil - Think through initial tasks and assemble the core group.

US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, SummarySummary Planning for US CMS Physics has been a long process, because the situation is unprecedented for US HEP. At all points a dialogue within the US CMS collaboration has been maintained. The VCR and PAC are part of the baseline planning for RP and are financially secure. Physics research in US CMS has the Tier 1 and Tier 2 centers as points of nucleation. The aim is to have a “critical mass” of US physicists doing LHC physics and being in leadership positions within CMS for future decades – to help secure a future for US HEP. Three years is a short time to be ready for spectacular new Physics – start now!