1 Linac4 Overview M. Vretenar, SLHC Meeting, 26.2.2009 1.Motivations 2.Layout 3.Main parameters 4.Schedule 5.Status.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LINAC4 and 3 MeV test stand at CERN
Advertisements

ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
C. Rossi – L4 Project Meeting 3 March 2011 Status and Plans of 3 MeV Test Stand.
H. Haseroth July 26 – August 1, 2004 NuFact04, Osaka 1 The 3 MeV H - Test Stand at CERN - The first part of the SPL - H. Haseroth on behalf of the SPL.
CSC, Status of HIPPI – September 2006 Maurizio Vretenar Alessandra Lombardi.
CSC, , A. Lombardi. 1 Status of HIPPI – April 2007 Maurizio Vretenar Alessandra Lombardi.
Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac M. Pasini, CERN AB-RF LINAC4 Machine Advisory Committee 1 st meeting CERN January 29-30, 2008.
SLHC-PP – WP7 Critical Components for Injector Upgrade Plasma Generator – CERN, DESY, STFC-RAL Linac4 2MHz RF source Thermal Modeling Gas Measurement and.
Linac4 Status C. Carli presenting (a slightly adopted selection of) slides prepared by and on behalf of M. Vretenar Looking from this point and with a.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
R.G. – 17/03/2003 MORIOND Workshop The SPL* at CERN OUTLINE  Why ?  How ?  Roadmap  Summary * SPL = Superconducting Proton Linac A concept for.
Field and Phase Error Studies in Normal Conducting Structures LLRF and Beam Dynamics in Hadron Linacs – EuCARD2 Workshop Ciprian Plostinar
Proton Linac, Workshop, December 3 rd - 4 th, 2007 The FAIR Proton Linac Outline Requirements to Proton Linac Source, RFQ, DTL, RF Beam Dynamics.
LINAC4 STATUS Alessandra M. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 1.Motivation and goals 2.Status of Linac4 2 years after official start of the project ( )
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Parameters of 2 nd SPL feasibility study A.M.Lombardi (reporting for the working group)
LAGUNA meeting September , 2010 CAES – CNRS – Aussois - FRANCE Prospective Proton Drivers for neutrino facilities at CERN 8/09/2010 R. Garoby.
June 23, 2005R. Garoby Introduction SPL+PDAC example Elements of comparison Linacs / Synchrotrons LINAC-BASED PROTON DRIVER.
Linac4 and SPL Linac4 and SPL R. Garoby for the linac team.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Revised SPL-study work-plan W. Weingarten 3 May 20101SPL Cavity WG Meeting.
MEF - Machines & Experimental Facilities Linac4 project EN/MEF roles & responsibilities EN/MEF group meeting October J.Coupard1.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE) Sergei Nagaitsev Dec 19, 2011.
Update on LHC Upgrade Plans Frank Zimmermann ATLAS Upgrade Week Tuesday 10 November 2009.
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
Overview and Status of the Fermilab High Intensity Neutrino Source R&D Program Giorgio Apollinari for Bob Webber.
1 PS Days - Evian / MV The SPL : a High-Power Superconducting H – Linac at CERN  Motivations  Applications  Design features  Improvements.
0 Plenty Energy Clean Environment Healthy Life Commissioning and Initial Operation of the KOMAC 100-MeV Proton Linac KOMAC / KAERI Kyung-Tae Seol
Linac4 Status 1 M. Vretenar sLHC public event
Module 5 A quick overview of beam dynamics in linear accelerators
WP2 status Gijs de Rijk This project has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/ )
Accelerator Physics and synchrotron Design R. Garoby 5/10/ SPL session summary Talks & speakers Plans for proton linacs at CERN Lessons on superconducting.
LIU Day – 11 th april 2014 ALESSANDRA LOMBARDI LINAC4 COMMISSIONING OVERVIEW.
LINAC4 and the Upgrade of the LHC Injector Complex R. Garoby 26 February, 2013.
1 1.Summary of H- source review 2.Options for connection to the PS Booster 1.Summary of H- source review 2.Options for connection to the PS Booster.
High power RF tests places at CERN O. Brunner, CERN 4th SPL Collaboration Meeting jointly with ESS.
SLHC-PP WP7 8 April 2008 Structure SLHC- PP WP7 SLHC-PP Steering Group SPL Study Group DESY Peters INFN ? CERN Scrivens / Hofle STFC- RAL Faircloth CEA.
THE LINAC4 RFQ – Experience with Design, Fabrication and Tuning C. Rossi and the RFQ Project Team GSI Review – 20 November 2013.
Linac4 status and long-term schedule M. Vretenar, Project Meeting  status  timeline  open issues  status  timeline  open issues.
Wolfgang Vinzenz FAIR Proton Linac 10 th FAIR MAC November 25 th and 26 th 2013 Proton Linac 1 Status Buncher Design  Rectangular design, longitudinal.
R. Garoby for S. Atieh, I. Aviles Santillana, G. Arnau Izquierdo, R. Bonomi, O. Brunner, S. Calatroni, O. Capatina, J. Chambrillon, F. Gerigk, M. Guinchard,
Research progress and plan CERN-KEK Committee, 2nd meeting 07/Dec/07 Masamitsu AIBA CERN-Japan fellow, AB/BI.
1. Baseline – from LMC  Presentation by F. Bordry at LHC Machine Committee 5.10 on LS1 Organisation: 1. Linac4 is not going to be connected.
SLHC The SPL at CERN 1.Introduction 2.Description -Stage 1: Linac4 -Stage 2: LP-SPL 3.Possible future stages 4.Goal and status of the SPL study R oa Garoby.
UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design
Linac4 & SPL Status of preparation and Opportunities M. Vretenar (R
Linac4 status and perspectives
The CERN Linac4 history, performance, perspectives
Present and possible future schemes for hadron therapy linacs Alberto Degiovanni for the ADAM team HG2017 Workshop , Valencia.
Plans for a Superconducting Proton Linac at CERN
Linac4 M. Vretenar for the Linac4 design team
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
Complementary ISTC Projects #3888, 3889p
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
WP11: electron and proton beam testing
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
LINAC4 commissioning plans etc.
Report from the 1st meeting of Linac4 Machine Review Committee
Plans for new LHC injectors R. Garoby
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collective Effects and Beam Measurements in Particle Accelerators
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
Joint session – Beta-beams
The SPL-based Proton Driver at CERN
LHC Machine Advisory Committee, CERN 12th June 2008
Presentation transcript:

1 Linac4 Overview M. Vretenar, SLHC Meeting, Motivations 2.Layout 3.Main parameters 4.Schedule 5.Status

2 The upgrade of the LHC Injectors Motivations: progressively increase the LHC luminosity, increase reliability, simplify operation, reduce radiation, open to new physics applications. (LP)SPL: (Low Power) Superconducting Proton Linac (4-5 GeV) PS2: High Energy PS (~ 5 to 50 GeV – 0.3 Hz) SPS+: Superconducting SPS (50 to1000 GeV) SLHC: “Superluminosity” LHC (up to cm -2 s -1 ) DLHC: “Double energy” LHC (1 to ~14 TeV) Phase 1: Approved 06/2007, started 2008 Phase 2: Design approved 06/2007

3 PS2 - SPS PS PSB Future SPL Transfer line Linac4 Linac4 on the CERN site Linac4 will be built in an area between the PS complex and the IT building where used to be the “Mount Citron”. Position and orientation allow future extension to the SPL. A transfer line from the Linac4 tunnel connects to the present Linac2- PSB line. Present 50 MeV Linac2

4 Linac4 civil engineering Linac4 tunnel Linac4-Linac2 transfer line Equipment building Access building Low-energy injector ground level Pre-integration May – October 2007 Tendering drawings November 2007 – April 2008 Tendering May 2008, Contract to FC September Civil Engineering Works October November 2010.

5 Linac4 Groundbreaking –

6 Civil engineering is progressing

7 Linac4 - motivations Linac4 is a normal-conducting H − linac at 160 MeV energy that will replace Linac2 as injector to the PSB and can be lately extended to the SPL. Linac4 because the 4 th linac to be built at CERN (Linac3 is the heavy-ion linac). 160 MeV energy gives a factor 2 in  2 with respect to the present 50 MeV Linac2  factor 2 increase in bunch density in the PSB  easier production of LHC beam, margin to reach ultimate luminosity.

8 Linac4 Parameters  Structures and klystrons dimensioned for 50 Hz  Power supplies and electronics dimensioned for 2 Hz, 1.2 ms pulse. Re-use 352 MHz LEP RF components: klystrons, waveguides, circulators. Ion speciesH − Output Energy160MeV Bunch Frequency352.2MHz Max. Rep. Rate2 Hz Max. Beam Pulse Length1.2ms Max. Beam Duty Cycle0.24 % Chopper Beam-on Factor65 % Chopping scheme: 222 transmitted /133 empty buckets Source current80 mA RFQ output current70mA Linac pulse current40mA N. particles per pulse1.0× Transverse emittance0.4  mm mrad Max. rep. rate for accelerating structures 50 Hz H − particles + higher injection energy (160/50 MeV, factor 2 in  2 )  same tune shift in PSB with twice the intensity. Chopping at low energy to reduce beam loss at PSB.

9 Linac4: 3 modes of operation Linac4 is designed to operate in 3 different modes: 1. Injector to PS Booster ( ?): 1.1 Hz, 40 mA, 400  s. 2. Injector to Low Power-SPL (2018- ?): 2 Hz, 20 mA, 1.2 ms only minor upgrades 3. Injector to High Power-SPL (>2020 ?): 50 Hz, 40 mA, 1.2 ms max. important upgrade (RF modulators, power supplies, cooling, etc.) Main consequences on the design: 1.Shielding dimensioned for the SPL high beam power operation (1 W/m beam loss). 2.Accelerating structures and klystrons dimensioned for high duty operation. 3.Power supplies, electronics and infrastructure (water, electricity) dimensioned only for low beam power operation (PSB, LP-SPL). 4.Space provided at the end of the linac for the connection to the SPL

10 Linac4 challenges 1.First challenge of Linac4 is RELIABILITY: must operate ~6000 hours/year with a fault rate comparable to Linac2, ~1.5% of scheduled beam time. 2.Control of transverse and longitudinal EMITTANCE GROWTH is of paramount importance for clean PSB and SPL injection. 3.Careful LOSS CONTROL to prepare for the SPL mode of operation  uncontrolled beam loss <1 W/m in SPL mode  <0.1 W/m in PSB injection mode (at 160 MeV, 1.5*10 -5 /m loss rate). 4.Keep the COST of the machine within what is acceptable in the critical post-LHC period.

11 Linac4 Layout CCDTLPIMS 3MeV50MeV102MeV160MeV Drift Tube Linac 352 MHz 18.7 m 3 tanks 3 klystrons 4 MW 111 PMQs Pi-Mode Structure 352 MHz 22 m 12 tanks 8 klystrons ~12 MW 12 EMQuads Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac 352 MHz 25 m 21 tanks 7 klystrons 6.5 MW 21 EMQuads RF Duty cycle: 0.1% phase 1 (Linac4) 3-4% phase 3 (HP-SPL) 4 different structures, (RFQ, DTL, CCDTL, PIMS) Total Linac4: 80 m, 18 klystrons Ion current: 40 mA (avg. in pulse), 65 mA (bunch) CHOPPERRFQ Chopper Line 352 MHz 3.6 m 11 EMquad 3 cavities Radio Frequency Quadrupole 352 MHz 3 m 1 Klystron 540 kW H- 3MeV45keV RF volume source (DESY type) DTL

12 Linac4 accelerating structures DTL, 3 – 50 MeVCCDTL, 50 – 100 MeVPIMS, 100 – 160 MeV 7-cell cavities in p-mode (12 cavities) Prototype in construction Drift Tube Linac (3 tanks) Prototype built, under testing. Costruction starts in 2009 Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac (7 modules) Modules of 3 DTL-type cavities (2 drift tubes), connected by coupling cells. Prototypes built and tested, construction starts in 2009

13 The 3 MeV Test Stand In construction in the South Hall extension. - H- source (2008) - LEBT ( ) - RFQ (February 2010) - Chopper line (2008) - Diagnostics line (2010) - Infrastructure (1 LEP Klystron, pulsed modulator, etc.) - ready In the front end are concentrated some of the most challenging technologies in linacs, and this is where the beam quality is generated. Early understanding and optimisation of front-end is fundamental for a linac project. klystron modulator sourceRFQ chopper line diagnostics line

14 3 MeV Test Stand – 02/2009 Chopper line assembledLEP-type klystron and prototype modulator under test

15 Linac4 Master Plan End CE works: December 2010 Installation: 2011 Linac commissioning: 2012 Modifications PSB: shut-down 2012/13 (7.5 months), to be confirmed. Beam from PSB: June 2013

16 Linac4 R&D collaborations ( ) INDIA: klystron power supplies, waveguides SAUDI ARABIA: RF prototypes PAKISTAN vacuum chambers, supports Network of collaborations for the R&D phase, via EU-FP6, CERN-CEA/IN2P3, ISTC (CERN- Russia), CERN-India and CERN-Pakistan agreements. International participations to the construction of Linac4 under definition: Signed or being signed: Russia (CCDTL), France (modulators, etc.), Pakistan (transfer line) In preparation: Saudi Arabia (DTL tanks), Poland (PIMS), India (supports, waveguides, couplers, etc.), USA (diagnostics). H - source RFQ DTL 45 keV 3 MeV 50 MeV 90 MeV 160 MeV chopper line CCDTL PIMS transfer line to PSB LEBT 352 MHz 704 MHz 80 m

17 FP6 (CARE-HIPPI) for Linac4 1.Development and prototyping of the Linac4 accelerating structures. 2.Design and construction of the chopper structure and of the chopper line. 3.Development of the beam optics, benchmarking of codes. 4.Development of specific diagnostics. In contact (exchange of information and expertise) with the other EU labs and with the support of an External Advisory Committee. HIPPI = “High Intensity Pulsed Proton Injectors” Joint Research Activity in CARE, active from 2004 to 2008, has given an essential contribution to the Linac4 R&D:

18 Linac4 Status (02/2009) oCivil Engineering works started , delivery of building end oPreliminary Safety File submitted to CERN Safety Commission in June Building approved. oIon source almost completed, first beam tests expected soon. o3 MeV Test Stand infrastructure completed. oRFQ in construction, ready by end of oPrototype modulator tested with LEP klystron in pulsed mode. oChopper line built and assembled. oPrototypes of accelerating structures tested (CCDTL), being tested (DTL), starting construction (PIMS). Material being ordered, construction of DTL and CCDTL will start in oStarted preparation for large contracts (klystrons, modulators, magnets,…). oWorkpackages finalises, complete project in EVM, project baseline being frozen.