A Strawman for Discussion by Dottie Stockstill & Greg Ramon Special ERCOT Board Meeting June 24, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Advertisements

Program Management Office (PMO) Design
Ensure the Disaster Housing Strategy is institutionalized throughout the jurisdiction Identify a process to update and maintain the Disaster Housing Strategy.
ERCOT: A Work In Progress Board of Directors Austin, TX July 16, 2002.
Economic Criteria for Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Region Public Utility Law Seminar DeAnn Walker August 3, 2012.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
TAC July 2, 2003 Market Design Implementation Process Recommendation.
Involving the Whole Organization in Creating or Restructuring a Volunteer Program Louise DeIasi DeCava Consulting.
Texas Nodal Development Process Committee Structure.
Prepared by Opinion Dynamics Corporation May 2004.
Delaware Health Benefit Exchange (HBE) Project Update Delaware Health Care Commission Meeting: March 28, 2013.
Texas Regional Entity Update Sam Jones Interim CEO and President Board of Directors July 18, 2006.
August 7, Market Participant Survey Action Plan Dale Goodman Director, Market Services.
Prepared by Opinion Dynamics Corporation May 2006.
TEXAS NODAL Board Review and Approval August 19, 2003.
1 TSP Update NATF Review July 8, Today’s Objectives Goal: Successful Implementation of Go-Live Ensure there are no “Show Stoppers” Ensure there.
Item 5d Texas RE 2011 Budget Assumptions April 19, Texas RE Preliminary Budget Assumptions Board of Directors and Advisory Committee April 19,
PMO Update to PRS Troy Anderson Program Management Office April 20, 2007.
TEXAS NODAL Board of Directors Austin, Texas July 15, 2003.
March 26, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott April 7, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
RMS Update to TAC January 8, Voting Items From RMS meeting on 12/10/2008  RMGRR069: Texas SET Retail Market Guide Clean-up – Section 7: Historical.
Paragraph 81 Project. 2RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY Background FERC March 15, 2012 Order regarding the Find, Fix, Track and Report (FFT) process  Paragraph.
Nodal Education Initial Staff Concepts 11/30/05. Agenda Integrated Approach Roadmap and Processes Curriculum Development ERCOT Education Advisory Council.
Profiling Working Group March 14, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting March 14, 2006.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 TPTF Update for TAC March 8, 2007 Trip Doggett.
TEXAS NODAL Proposed Structure August 6,  TAC/ERCOT Staff converged approach is close to final  straw vote on six issues  selection of Independent.
TEXAS NODAL: THE BASICS Presentation to ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup June 25, 2003.
1 RMS TAC Update April 3, Test Plan Flight Dates It is the practice of RMS to approved the dates for future testing flights. This enables new.
1 Texas Nodal Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting September 20, 2005.
August 28, 2014 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott September 9, 2014 TAC Update to RMS 1.
Reconfiguring Nodal Stakeholder Participation Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee Texas Nodal Transition Planning Task Force February.
March 27, 2014 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott April 1, 2014 TAC Update to RMS 1.
1 TDTWG Scope and Goals 2015 Wednesday January 8, 2014.
Texas Nodal Market Implementation Metric Sub Group Readiness Advisor January 30, 2006.
Section 4.9 Review Report Request for MAC Approval December 1, 2015.
TDTWG Update to RMS Wednesday January 14. TDTWG Update to RMS Scope Texas Data Transport Working Group (TDTWG) is responsible for creating and maintaining.
Outage Scheduler Transition Plan Kenneth Ragsdale NATF.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 16, 2005.
October 3, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott October 16, 2013TAC Update to RMS 1.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Report to ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee December 5, 2002.
Commercial Operations Sub-Committee Update to TAC April 4, 2008.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors March 21, 2007.
Long Term Move-In Move-Out Development Strategy August 19, 2002 DRAFT.
1 TDTWG Accomplishments 2010 Friday January 28, 2011.
Review of PUC Discussion on Nodal Market Adoption Technical Advisory Committee September 7, 2005.
Handling Appeals of PRRs and other Contested Issues ERCOT Board Retreat February 21, 2007.
TEXAS NODAL Market Design Structure and Process August 19, 2003.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 1, 2009.
RMS Update to TAC November 1, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR057, Competitive Metering Working Group Name Change (VOTE) Update on RMS Working Group and.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2006 TAC Subcommittee Review ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
Market Operating Level Agreement (OLA) Discussion Betty Day 8 December 2009 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board November 14, 2006.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
TAC 2012 Meetings Update (March & April) to Commercial Operations Subcommittee Harika Basaran 5/8/2012.
Network Operations Model Go-Live Decision Kenneth Ragsdale TAC July 1, 2010.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
Transmission Advisory Group NCTPC Process Update Rich Wodyka September 7, 2006.
February 26, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott March 3, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
TEXAS NODAL (ERCOT REVISIONS)
Commercial Operations Sub-Committee Update to RMS
Protocol Revision Subcommittee
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Project Roles and Responsibilities
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Presentation transcript:

A Strawman for Discussion by Dottie Stockstill & Greg Ramon Special ERCOT Board Meeting June 24, 2003

PUCT July 24, 2003 Nodal Market Rule Making Board decision on stakeholder process design and selection of Project Oversight Team by July 15, 2003

Develop design options and alternatives by October 15, 2003 Board decision on stakeholder process design and selection of Project Oversight Team by July 15, 2003 PUCT July 24, 2003 Nodal Market Rule Making

Develop design options and alternatives by October 15, 2003 Board decision on stakeholder process design and selection of Project Oversight Team by July 15, 2003 Develop final design by December 2003 PUCT July 24, 2003 Nodal Market Rule Making

Develop design options and alternatives by October 15, 2003 Board decision on stakeholder process design and selection of Project Oversight Team by July 15, 2003 Develop final design by December 2003 Develop protocols, cost / benefit study by July 2004 PUCT July 24, 2003 Nodal Market Rule Making

March 1, 2006 Commercial Operations of Texas Nodal Market Develop design options and alternatives by October 15, 2003 Board decision on stakeholder process design and selection of Project Oversight Team by July 15, 2003 Develop final design by December 2003 Develop protocols, cost / benefit study by July 2004 Implement new market PUCT July 24, 2003 Nodal Market Rule Making

rd Q4th Q1st Q2nd Q3rd Q4th Q1st Q2nd Q3rd Q4th Q1st Q DETAILED DESIGN STAGE Assess Existing Systems Design DA Energy Market Define Operational Info Design Congestion Pricing Design Congestion Rights Define Zones Design Market Mitigation Design Optimization of AS Design Multi-Settlement Define Market Info to Post Develop Protocols IMPLEMENTATION STAGE Finalize Functional Spec Identify Requirements Develop Business Processes Develop & Test Software Internal & External Training System Integration Testing Internal & External Market Trials Production Cutover Texas Nodal In Service

1. Defining stakeholder process 2. Monitoring, adjusting and ensuring adherence to process 3. Approval of work and all associated PUCT filings Filings Decisions: final approval, disputes, clarifications, etc. Weekly / Monthly reporting Input / Feedback Weekly / Monthly reporting Input / Feedback ERCOT Board Design & Implementation Process PUCT TAC & Standing Committees Project Oversight Team  Leadership & facilitation of stakeholder process  Project management Stakeholders PUCT Recommendations }

Process Principles Independence of Leadership Clearly Defined Roles of Participants Decision Making Protocol Addressing Disagreements Building on Agreements Getting Started

Independence of Leadership Stakeholders with a vested interest in the existing market design or a change to a nodal design will not be perceived as independent Goal: the market design that delivers the most benefits to consumers while encouraging participation in the market by loads, transmission providers, suppliers, power marketers, scheduling entities and retailers

Defining Roles PUCT Commissioners and Staff ERCOT Board ERCOT Staff ERCOT Market Participants ERCOT TAC Process Oversight Team

Defining Roles - PUCT Commissioners –Primary Oversight –Decisions (final approval, disagreements, clarifications, give direction along the way) Staff – Participates in discussion, inputs ideas supporting objectives of the Rulemaking –Provide routine briefings to the Commissioners detailing progress and clearly defining disagreements needing Commission direction or decision –

Defining Roles - ERCOT Board Create (with advice from TAC), implement and monitor a clearly defined stakeholder process –Board Oversight Committee Filing of design developed through the stakeholder process, including documented alternate positions Recommendations on resolution of disagreements –PUCT final decision

Defining Roles - ERCOT Board Votes on recommended design(s) with options if not previously determined by PUCT action

Defining Roles - ERCOT Staff Recognized and needed expertise on reliability, operational & IT issues and impacts Will also contribute with other participants with development of market design concepts Candidate to coordinate the overall process Implementers of market design & protocols

Defining Roles - ERCOT TAC & Standing Committees Key advisory role with the Process Oversight Team & Board Important to maintain current design and PRR process - “keep the lights on” Coordinate interplay between existing and future market design

Defining Roles - ERCOT Market Participants Advisors on commercial aspects of various designs Key role in development of market principles and design concepts Participate in development of Protocol language Work collaboratively with ERCOT Staff, PUCT Staff and other Market Participants

Defining Roles - Project Oversight Team Leadership & facilitation of stakeholder process Document decisions reached in the stakeholder process (both agreements and disagreements, options, etc) Process managers must be independent and knowledgeable regarding the ERCOT market and market design principles Performs & coordinates the communications with ERCOT Board, TAC & Standing Committees and PUCT

Defining Roles - Project Oversight Team Uses Straw vote method to get sense of stakeholder views, build on agreements and pull together detailed proposals for review by everyone –Stakeholders –ERCOT Staff –PUCT MOD –TAC –Board

Defining Roles - Project Oversight Team Coordinate with PUCT Staff on reporting to Commissioners Task Forces/work groups will be chaired by ERCOT Staff or consultants

Disagreements Disagreements not resolved by the process are clearly documented and reported to TAC, the Board and the PUCT PUCT final decision on disagreements

Getting Started - Development of Principles & Concepts A key component of the stakeholder process The actual blueprint of the new “Texas Nodal” market will be based on this initial phase This phase will drill down on the PUCT Rule general concepts to set the stage for blueprints on the Texas nodal market design elements