Grading Policy Review, Recommendation and Rationale March 13, 2012 Mr. Ray Gravuer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STANDARDS-BASED PROMOTION Grades Elementary Schools Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G.
Advertisements

Standards-based Promotion Policy Presented by Donna R. Simien, Coordinator Intervention Programs, Local District G.
Square Peg and Round Hole… As parents and educators, the change in grading systems requires a fundamental switch in our thinking… 4=A 1=F 2=D 3=B.
Credit for Demonstrated Mastery (CDM): Policy Overview & Conversation WS/FCS Board of Education Meeting Paula B. Wilkins & Kenneth Simington January 28,
An Update on Novi’s Journey Presentation for MAASE April 13, 2011.
The teacher of each classroom is responsible for evaluating the individual student's progress toward the AKS as described in the guidelines below. Kindergarten.
Growing Success Overview
Creating Freshmen Success Task Force Report High School Study Session Board Presentation January 30, 2007.
8 th Grade Parent Meeting. Getting Ready for HS Begin Your Journey With the End in Mind! Every step beyond high school requires a high school diploma.
IREAD-3 Indiana Reading Evaluation And Determination.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
Parents Need To Know About… HB 656 Georgia Academic Placement and Promotion Law Revised 7/08, Department for Elementary Instruction, DeKalb County School.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Parental Waivers for English Learners Carlos Rivera, Administrator.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Report Cards 101. ELD Progress Report Cards Complete ELD portfolios. Only score the standards you have taught. Score individual standards on assessments/work.
Parent Informational Presentation on the Third Grade Reading Guarantee November 7, 2012 Campus Elementary School Cafeteria 6:00 – 7:00 PM.
Implemented: November Credit by Demonstrated Mastery (CDM) is the process where Buncombe County Schools shall, based on a body-of-evidence, award.
1 School Year 2006–07 Accounting and Budgeting Committee Video Teleconference Kim Thompson OSPI - School Apportionment and Financial Services
DVUSD Elementary Report Card Revisions
1 Magnet Program A “school within a school” Magnet Program to include commitment to the planning and implementation that would enhance the learning of.
Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 1 April 16, 2009 Credit Recovery Best Practices in Dropout Prevention Jackson Convention Center.
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
Parent Community Student Services
1 FTE SELF-REVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Attendance Services Ms. Mary Lee Snipes Administrative Director Ms. Yvette Senior-Stewart Coordinator.
V: Maryland’s High School Assessments (HSAs) & the Bridge Plan for Academic Validation Overview.
SPED Referral and IEP Process Guide Ginger Alonzo & Emily Disbennett.
Planning Time & Florida’s K-12 Comprehensive Reading Program Contractual Provisions.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
(High/Middle School) HSTW/MMGW Site Presentation ( Month Date, 2006) Promising Practices Next Steps Major Challenges Technical Review Visit (TRV)
Strong Schools, Strong Communities Strategic Plan Implementation Process and Roles Saint Paul Public Schools has designed the following process and roles.
ESOL Program (English for Speakers of Other Languages) in Greenwood District Questions and Answers Updated July 2015.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. District Assessment Coordinators Annual Meeting September 8, 2015.
Documenting Ongoing ELD Progress Using the Secondary ELD Assessment REF Amaris Rivas Coordinator’s Meeting April 10, 2008.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
March 28, 2013 GradingPracticesCommittee Report and Recommendations.
EXTENDED LEARNING PROGRAM (ELP) for High Schools EXTENDED LEARNING PROGRAM (ELP) for High Schools.
1 Ed 306 ~ Standards for School Approval ~ Competency and Extended Learning Opportunities Paul K. Leather NH School Administrators Association September.
Eighth Grade Standards-Based Promotion (SBP) Policy Local District G Presented by Donna R. Simien, Intervention Coordinator.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Grading Special Education Students Elementary, Middle School, and High School Ages “Research suggests that grading practices vary considerably among.
+ Programs for students with exceptional needs VCSD Strategic Plan.
Chapter 16 Highlights A presentation for Octorara School District March 30, 2010.
High School 101 Promotion and Retention Policy, GPA, and Diploma of Distinction Monday, August 18 th, 4 th period.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
Special Education Module #1 : Legislative Overview.
Standards-based Promotion Policy Presented by Donna R. Simien, Coordinator Intervention Programs, Local District G.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Program Evaluations A summary of recommendations from the completed program evaluations March 6, 2009.
 This presentation does NOT replace reading the Updated for Student Success Initiative Manual.
Our Iceberg is Melting 4/5/16 Mission Statement - Pequea Valley School District will create an environment that inspires each individual to excel.
CREDIT RECOVERY AND ACCRUAL David Patteson, Credit Recovery/Accrual Teacher Julia Cunningham, Credit Recovery/Accrual Administrator.
V: Maryland’s High School Assessments (HSAs) & the Bridge Plan for Academic Validation Overview.
» Students who meet the passing standard on STAAR must still meet all promotion requirements outlined in the district policy. We will review.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Parent Information Meeting Gifted & Talented Education Pam Cernocky, Gifted Education Coordinator Eau Claire Area School District ,
Mr. Chavel September 2015 Teacher Talk.  For allowing me to partner with you to help your young person be all that he is intended to be!  For completing.
Navigating the ARD/IEP Process
Volusia County Schools
AN OVERVIEW OF THE ABSS ACADEMICALLY INTELLECTUALLY GIFTED PROGRAM
Grading/Progress Reports to Parents
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant
Fowler Middle School 7th Grade Course Information
Welcome to the 7th to 8th Grade Fowler Parent Informational Meeting!
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
EXTENDED LEARNING PROGRAM (ELP)
Grading Students with Disabilities
Annual Report Public Hearing
Presentation transcript:

Grading Policy Review, Recommendation and Rationale March 13, 2012 Mr. Ray Gravuer

Policy 4111: Evaluation and Grading Last Officially Revised September 2007 Scheduled for review in 2011

Inconsistencies and Confusion Exist Supporting practices and procedures are found in multiple locations and may contradict one another. Policy is mixed with practices and procedures.

Examples of Disparity Page 2: Elementary and Middle School Grade Determinations Grading Scale A+ = (97-100%)A = (93-96%)A- = (90-92%) B+ = (87-89%)B = (83-86%)B- = (80-82%) C+ = (77-79%)C = (73-76%)C- = (70-72%) D+ = (67-69%)D = (63-66%)D- = (60-62%) F = 59% and below

Examples of Disparity Page 2: Elementary and Middle School Interim Progress Reports/Report Cards C. Interim progress reports and report cards will be issued three (3) times annually in accordance with the established calendar dates for marking periods.

Examples of Disparity Page 3: Promotion, Academic Intervention & Retention Retention a.ii. This notification may occur as early as the end of the second marking period, but no later than April 15 th of the academic year. Delaware Department of Education notification may occur as late as the first week of August, following summer school.

Examples of Disparity Page 5: High School Class Rank/GPA e. In grades10 through 12, students must earn a grade of “B-“ or higher in accelerated, honors courses in order to earn the weighted designation of.5 additional quality point per credit. Students must earn a grade of “B-“ or higher in an advanced placement or tech prep course in order to earn the weighted designation of 1.0 additional quality point per credit. f. Non-weighted GPA is computed electronically at the end of each marking period. The official class rank is determined electronically by end of marking period 2 of the senior year..

Solution Maintain two separate and distinct documents in reference to district grading. – One is the Board Policy that establishes the beliefs of the district and sets forth an expectation for annual review and reporting to the school board. –Another, the operational document, maintains supporting practices and procedures that determine the consistent implementation of grading throughout our district schools.

Board Policy 4111 Recommendation Teachers shall be provided with a standardized record-keeping system for student achievement which includes minimum instructional objectives and a place to certify whether each objective has or has not been mastered. Each school shall follow the Board approved District Grading Policy and the procedures developed by the Superintendent, or designee, to support this policy. Report cards to parents shall reflect the achievement of instructional objectives, teacher judgment of student effort, and class attendance. All parents shall be guaranteed a regular conference to discuss their child’s progress as well as special conferences as may be required. A grade is a measure of student achievement relative to district curricular goals and objectives. Grades serve to inform students, parents, teachers and administrators of the degree in which mastery has been attained and to help teachers adjust instruction to meet the individual needs of all students. It shall be the responsibility of the superintendent to establish a process to develop, monitor and revise as needed, a fair, comprehensive procedure for teachers to follow when grading students. This procedure will be reviewed and reported to the board annually, and will include processes to address the following areas:

Board Policy 4111 Recommendation Grade Level Distinctions for Grading Determinations –Grading Scale(s) –Product vs. Product weighting within grades Special Population Considerations in Grading –Students with an IEP –English Language Learners –Students with 504 Accommodations Grade Reporting –Interim Progress Reports/Report Cards Promotion, Academic Intervention and Retention Course Transfers Incomplete Codes Withdrawals Credits Earned/GPA/Class Rank This policy shall be consistently applied and clearly communicated to all teachers, students, and parent(s) annually.