Scientifically-Based Research What is scientifically-based research? How do evaluate it?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 2 The Process of Experimentation
Advertisements

MSP and Scoring Rubric T ITLE II, P ART B M ATHEMATICS AND S CIENCE P ARTNERSHIPS (MSP) P ROGRAM M ATHEMATICS S CIENCE T ITLE II, P ART B MSP P ARTNERSHIPS.
Animal, Plant & Soil Science
WEBINAR 2 Defining Scientific Research Based Intervention.
Chapter 3 Flashcards. obligation of an individual to other individuals based on a social or legal contract to justify his or her actions; the processes.
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL REFORM PROGRAM (Obey-Porter) CSR Program Overview January 2002.
8. Evidence-based management Step 3: Critical appraisal of studies
+ Evidence Based Practice University of Utah Presented by Will Backner December 2009 Training School Psychologists to be Experts in Evidence Based Practices.
Critiquing Research Articles For important and highly relevant articles: 1. Introduce the study, say how it exemplifies the point you are discussing 2.
Introduction to Research
Scientific method - 1 Scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena and acquiring new knowledge, as well as for correcting and.
1 Writing the Research Proposal Researchers communicate: Plans, Methods, Thoughts, and Objectives for others to read discuss, and act upon.
TEXAS REGIONAL COLLABORATIVES FOR EXCELLENCE IN SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS TEACHING MATHEMATICS PROJECT DIRECTORS MEETING February 12, 2008 Debbie Junk-TRC.
Chapter 4 Principles of Quantitative Research. Answering Questions  Quantitative Research attempts to answer questions by ascribing importance (significance)
Conducting Randomized Evaluations in Schools Lisa Markman Associate Director Education Research Section Princeton University.
McGraw-Hill © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Nature of Research Chapter One.
Reporting & Ethical Standards EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez.
CSD 5100 Introduction to Research Methods in CSD First Day Opening Stretch Course Requirements/Syllabus What is Science? What is Research? The Scientific.
Moving from Development to Efficacy & Intervention Fidelity Topics National Center for Special Education Research Grantee Meeting: June 28, 2010.
Research Methodology For IB Psychology Students. Empirical Investigation The collecting of objective information firsthand, by making careful measurements.
Big Idea 1: The Practice of Science Description A: Scientific inquiry is a multifaceted activity; the processes of science include the formulation of scientifically.
MODULE 3 INVESTIGATING HUMAN AND SOCIL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CARIBBEAN.
Techniques of research control: -Extraneous variables (confounding) are: The variables which could have an unwanted effect on the dependent variable under.
Is research in education important?. What is the difference between Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods?
Assumes that events are governed by some lawful order
1 f02kitchenham5 Preliminary Guidelines for Empirical Research in Software Engineering Barbara A. Kitchenham etal IEEE TSE Aug 02.
URBDP 591 I Lecture 3: Research Process Objectives What are the major steps in the research process? What is an operational definition of variables? What.
Interventions: Research and Review Johanna Cena Dean Richards.
For ABA Importance of Individual Subjects Enables applied behavior analysts to discover and refine effective interventions for socially significant behaviors.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Hilary Rhodes, PhD Ellen Bobronnikov February 22, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
Unit 1 Lesson 3 Scientific Investigations Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
Introduction to SoTL Patrick Ashton Yvonne Zubovic September 23, 2005.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Intelligent Consumer Chapter 14 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov Hilary Rhodes January 11, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
Selecting Evidence Based Practices Oregon’s initial attempts to derive a process Implementation Conversations 11/10.
Anatomy of a Research Article Five (or six) major sections Abstract Introduction (without a heading!) Method (and procedures) Results Discussion and conclusions.
1 f02laitenberger7 An Internally Replicated Quasi- Experimental Comparison of Checklist and Perspective-Based Reading of Code Documents Laitenberger, etal.
Utilizing Federal IDEA Special Education Funds Permissively to Serve At-Risk Students in General Education The Fiscal Mechanics of RTI and PBS.
Research Methods Chapter 2.
Criteria for selection of a data collection instrument. 1.Practicality of the instrument: -Concerns its cost and appropriateness for the study population.
Introduction to Research. Purpose of Research Evidence-based practice Validate clinical practice through scientific inquiry Scientific rational must exist.
AF5.3 L1-2 Processing and analysing data to support the evaluation process and draw conclusions Say what happened in an investigation.
Aim: How can we use scientific inquiry to explain how the world works? DO NOW: In your notebook, describe what scientific inquiry means to you.
Single Plan for Student Achievement Cycle Traci Albee, Administrator of State and Federal Programs December 2013.
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
Scientific Methodology Vodcast 1.1 Unit 1: Introduction to Biology.
Designing an Experiment &The Characteristics of Scientific Knowledge.
SCIENTIFIC METHOD What is the Scientific Method? This is a process by which scientists go about answering questions and solving problems. The process includes.
Research Methods Research Fundamentals Business Research Methods.
1 Prepared by: Laila al-Hasan. 1. Definition of research 2. Characteristics of research 3. Types of research 4. Objectives 5. Inquiry mode 2 Prepared.
Outcomes for the ESA 6 Regional In-Service “What Works in Schools” Gain an understanding of … Dr. Marzano’s, “What Works in Schools.” the eleven factors.
Research methods revision The next couple of lessons will be focused on recapping and practicing exam questions on the following parts of the specification:
SCIENTIFIC METHOD NATURE OF SCIENCE AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN VANCE
Dr. Aidah Abu Elsoud Alkaissi An-Najah National University Employ evidence-based practice: key elements.
Scientific Literature and Communication Unit 3- Investigative Biology b) Scientific literature and communication.
Features of science revision
Writing a sound proposal
Methods of Science Chapter 1 Section 3.
Principles of Quantitative Research
Hallmarks of scientific research
Six Steps to Building Academic Vocabulary
AXIS critical Appraisal of cross sectional Studies
© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Philip G. Zimbardo Robert L. Johnson Ann L. Weber
Methods of Science Chapter 1 Section 3.
REFERENCES AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Scientific Method Learning Outcome A2.
Biological Science Applications in Agriculture
The Research Process & Surveys, Samples, and Populations
Presentation transcript:

Scientifically-Based Research What is scientifically-based research? How do evaluate it?

The Law  Section 91(37) of NCLB

What is scientifically-based research?  Research that involves the application of rigorous, systematic, and objective procedures  to obtain reliable and valid knowledge relevant to educational activities and programs.

To meet the standard, the research must:  Employ systematic, empirical methods that draw on observation or experiment;  Involve rigorous data analyses that are adequate to test the stated hypotheses and justify the general conclusions drawn;

To meet the standard, the research must:  Rely on measurements or observational methods that provide reliable and valid data across evaluators and observers, across multiple measurements and observations, and across studies by the same or different investigators;

To meet the standard, the research must:  Be evaluated using experimental or quasi- experimental designs in which individuals, entities, programs, or activities are assigned to different conditions and with appropriate controls to evaluate the effects of the condition of interest, with a preference for random assignment experiments;

To meet the standard, the research must:  Ensure that experimental studies are presented in sufficient detail and clarity to allow for replication or, at a minimum, offer the opportunity to build systematically on their findings;

To meet the standard, the research must:  Have been accepted by a peer-reviewed journal or approved by a panel of independent experts through a comparably rigorous, objective, and scientific review.

What evidence is critical in evaluating whether a body of research is scientifically based? SSystematic and empirical methods RRigorous data analyses RReliable and valid data collection SStrong research design DDetailed results that allow for replication RResults subjected to scrutiny

SSystematic and empirical methods Does the research have a solid theoretical foundation? Were methodology, subject, and researcher clearly identified? Was the study conducted in a consistent, disciplined, and methodical manner? Were the data obtained using observation or experiment? Was the research grounded in data that are factual rather than opinion-based? Are the research findings supported by tangible, measurable evidence?

SSystematic and empirical methods RRigorous data analyses RReliable and valid data collection SStrong research design DDetailed results that allow for replication RResults subjected to scrutiny

RRigorous data analyses Did the research test the stated hypotheses and justify the general conclusions drawn? Does the research report the sample size and the statistical procedures used? Were the data analyzed using methods that were appropriate for the task? Did the methods correspond to the nature and structure of the data? Did the research minimize alternative explanations for observed effects? Did the research findings present convincing documentation that the observed results were caused by the intervention?

SSystematic and empirical methods RRigorous data analyses RReliable and valid data collection SStrong research design DDetailed results that allow for replication RResults subjected to scrutiny

RReliable and valid data collection Did the data result from a study involving multiple investigators in a number of locations? Were research biases minimized? Were the data measured consistently? Did repeated measurements on subjects taken under similar circumstances produce similar results?

SSystematic and empirical methods RRigorous data analyses RReliable and valid data collection SStrong research design DDetailed results that allow for replication RResults subjected to scrutiny

SStrong research design Does the design describe a random assignment experiment in which subjects are assigned to different conditions with appropriate controls? Do the controls allow for the evaluation of the condition(s) of interest? Was the study designed to optimize the investigator’s ability to answer the research question?

SSystematic and empirical methods RRigorous data analyses RReliable and valid data collection SStrong research design DDetailed results that allow for replication RResults subjected to scrutiny

DDetailed results that allow for replication Are the findings clearly described and reported? Are the results of the research sufficiently detailed so that replication of the design is possible? Can the findings be enhanced with additional research?

SSystematic and empirical methods RRigorous data analyses RReliable and valid data collection SStrong research design DDetailed results that allow for replication RResults subjected to scrutiny

RResults subjected to scrutiny Has the research been accepted by a peer-reviewed journal or approved by a panel of independent experts? Has the research been reviewed by unbiased experts who were not a part of the research study? Have reviewers applied strict standards of scholarship and provided quality controls for the research they reviewed? Has the research been subjected to external verification?