J. Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK UZH – Foundations of Human Social Behaviour, Zurich, Switzerland Dynamic Causal Modelling:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) for fMRI
Advertisements

J. Daunizeau Institute of Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich, Switzerland Brain and Spine Institute, Paris, France Bayesian inference.
Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 01 / 05 / 2009.
EEG-MEG source reconstruction
Bayesian inference Jean Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging 16 / 05 / 2008.
Dynamic causal Modelling for evoked responses Stefan Kiebel Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging UCL.
Dynamic Causal Modelling for ERP/ERFs
DCM for ERP/ERF A presentation for Methods for Dummies By Ashwini Oswal and Elizabeth Mallia.
Bayesian models for fMRI data
Dynamic Causal Modelling for ERP/ERFs Valentina Doria Georg Kaegi Methods for Dummies 19/03/2008.
What do you need to know about DCM for ERPs/ERFs to be able to use it?
DCM demo André Bastos and Martin Dietz Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging.
MEG/EEG Inverse problem and solutions In a Bayesian Framework EEG/MEG SPM course, Bruxelles, 2011 Jérémie Mattout Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre ? ?
Computational and physiological models Part 2 Daniel Renz Computational Psychiatry Seminar: Computational Neuropharmacology 14 March, 2014.
J. Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK Institute of Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich, Switzerland Bayesian inference.
How much about our interactions with – and experience of – our world can be deduced from basic principles? This talk reviews recent attempts to understand.
J. Daunizeau Motivation, Brain and Behaviour group, ICM, Paris, France Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK Dynamic Causal Modelling for.
Dynamic Causal Modelling THEORY SPM Course FIL, London October 2009 Hanneke den Ouden Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging Radboud University.
Rosalyn Moran Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute Dynamic Causal Modelling for Cross Spectral Densities.
Rosalyn Moran Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute Bradley Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral.
Abstract We start with a statistical formulation of Helmholtz’s ideas about neural energy to furnish a model of perceptual inference and learning that.
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany A hierarchy of time-scales and the brain Stefan Kiebel.
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) for fMRI
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM): Theory Demis Hassabis & Hanneke den Ouden Thanks to Klaas Enno Stephan Functional Imaging Lab Wellcome Dept. of Imaging.
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) for fMRI
The other stuff Vladimir Litvak Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
DCM for ERPs/EFPs Clare Palmer & Elina Jacobs Expert: Dimitris Pinotsis.
EEG/MEG Source Localisation SPM Course – Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging – Oct ? ? Jérémie Mattout, Christophe Phillips Jean Daunizeau Guillaume.
Dynamic Causal Modelling of Evoked Responses in EEG/MEG Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London Stefan Kiebel.
Dynamic causal modelling of electromagnetic responses Karl Friston - Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, UCL In recent years,
J. Daunizeau ICM, Paris, France ETH, Zurich, Switzerland Dynamic Causal Modelling of fMRI timeseries.
Input Single-state DCM Intrinsic (within- region) coupling Extrinsic (between- region) coupling Multi-state DCM with excitatory and inhibitory connections.
Abstract This talk will present a general approach (DCM) to the identification of dynamic input-state-output systems such as the network of equivalent.
Dynamic Causal Modelling for EEG and MEG
Abstract This tutorial is about the inversion of dynamic input-state-output systems. Identification of the systems parameters proceeds in a Bayesian framework.
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) Marta I. Garrido Thanks to: Karl J. Friston, Klaas E. Stephan, Andre C. Marreiros, Stefan J. Kiebel,
Dynamic Causal Modelling Introduction SPM Course (fMRI), October 2015 Peter Zeidman Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London.
Bayesian Model Comparison Will Penny London-Marseille Joint Meeting, Institut de Neurosciences Cognitive de la Mediterranee, Marseille, September 28-29,
Bernadette van Wijk DCM for Time-Frequency 1. DCM for Induced Responses 2. DCM for Phase Coupling.
Dynamic Causal Model for evoked responses in MEG/EEG Rosalyn Moran.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 10 – Neuronal Populations Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 10.1 Cortical Populations - columns.
DCM: Advanced issues Klaas Enno Stephan Centre for the Study of Social & Neural Systems Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich.
Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 23 / 10 / 2009.
Dynamic Causal Models Will Penny Olivier David, Karl Friston, Lee Harrison, Stefan Kiebel, Andrea Mechelli, Klaas Stephan MultiModal Brain Imaging, Copenhagen,
DCM for evoked responses Ryszard Auksztulewicz SPM for M/EEG course, 2015.
Principles of Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) Bernadette van Wijk Charité-University Medicine Berlin SPM course for MEG & EEG 2016.
1 Jean Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging 23 / 10 / 2009 EEG-MEG source reconstruction.
DCM for ERP/ERF: theory and practice Melanie Boly Based on slides from Chris Phillips, Klaas Stephan and Stefan Kiebel.
J. Daunizeau ICM, Paris, France TNU, Zurich, Switzerland
Dynamic Causal Modelling for event-related responses
Principles of Dynamic Causal Modelling
Dynamic Causal Model for Steady State Responses
Dynamic Causal Modeling of Endogenous Fluctuations
DCM for ERP/ERF: theory and practice
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM): Theory
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
Dynamic Causal Model for evoked responses in M/EEG Rosalyn Moran.
? Dynamical properties of simulated MEG/EEG using a neural mass model
Dynamic Causal Model for Steady State Responses
Dynamic Causal Modelling for ERP/ERFs
Dynamic Causal Modelling
DCM for evoked responses
Dynamic Causal Modelling
Dynamic Causal Modelling for M/EEG
Dynamic Causal Modelling
CRIS Workshop: Computational Neuroscience and Bayesian Modelling
Bayesian inference J. Daunizeau
Dynamic Causal Modelling for evoked responses
Presentation transcript:

J. Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK UZH – Foundations of Human Social Behaviour, Zurich, Switzerland Dynamic Causal Modelling: basics

Overview 1 DCM: introduction 2 Neural ensembles dynamics 3 Bayesian inference 4 Conclusion

Overview 1 DCM: introduction 2 Neural ensembles dynamics 3 Bayesian inference 4 Conclusion

Introduction structural, functional and effective connectivity structural connectivity = presence of axonal connections functional connectivity = statistical dependencies between regional time series effective connectivity = causal (directed) influences between neuronal populations ! connections are recruited in a context-dependent fashion O. Sporns 2007, Scholarpedia structural connectivityfunctional connectivityeffective connectivity

Introduction DCM: a parametric statistical approach DCM: model structure  24 u likelihood DCM: Bayesian inference model evidence: parameter estimate: priors on parameters

Introduction DCM for EEG-MEG: auditory mismatch negativity S-D: reorganisation of the connectivity structure rIFG rSTG rA1 lSTG lA1 rIFG rSTG rA1 lSTG lA1 standard condition (S) deviant condition (D) t ~ 200 ms … … S SS D S S S S D S sequence of auditory stimuli

Overview 1 DCM: introduction 2 Neural ensembles dynamics 3 Bayesian inference 4 Conclusion

Neural ensembles dynamics systems of neural populations GolgiNissl internal granular layer internal pyramidal layer external pyramidal layer external granular layer mean-field firing ratesynaptic dynamics macro-scalemeso-scalemicro-scale EP EI II

Neural ensembles dynamics from micro- to meso-scale: mean-field treatment S(x)H(x) : post-synaptic potential of j th neuron within its ensemble mean-field firing rate mean membrane depolarization (mV) mean firing rate (Hz) membrane depolarization (mV) ensemble density p(x)

Neural ensembles dynamics synaptic dynamics time (ms) membrane depolarization (mV) post-synaptic potential IPSP EPSP

Neural ensembles dynamics intrinsic connections within the cortical column GolgiNissl internal granular layer internal pyramidal layer external pyramidal layer external granular layer spiny stellate cells inhibitory interneurons pyramidal cells intrinsic connections

Neural ensembles dynamics from meso- to macro-scale: neural fields local (homogeneous) density of connexions local wave propagation equation:

Neural ensembles dynamics extrinsic connections between brain regions extrinsic forward connections spiny stellate cells inhibitory interneurons pyramidal cells extrinsic backward connections extrinsic lateral connections

Neural ensembles dynamics systems of neural populations GolgiNissl internal granular layer internal pyramidal layer external pyramidal layer external granular layer macro-scalemeso-scalemicro-scale EP EI II mean-field firing ratesynaptic dynamics

likelihood function? Neural ensembles dynamics the observation function

Overview 1 DCM: introduction 2 Neural ensembles dynamics 3 Bayesian inference 4 Conclusion

Bayesian inference forward and inverse problems forward problem likelihood inverse problem posterior distribution

generative model m likelihood prior posterior Bayesian inference likelihood and priors

Principle of parsimony : « plurality should not be assumed without necessity » “Occam’s razor” : model evidence p(y|m) space of all data sets y=f(x) x Bayesian inference model comparison Model evidence:

free energy : functional of q approximate (marginal) posterior distributions: Bayesian inference the variational Bayesian approach

time Bayesian inference a note on causality 12 3 u

12 3 u Bayesian inference key model parameters state-state coupling input-state coupling input-dependent modulatory effect

Bayesian inference model comparison for group studies m1m1 m2m2 differences in log- model evidences subjects fixed effect random effect assume all subjects correspond to the same model assume different subjects might correspond to different models

1 DCM: introduction 2 Neural ensembles dynamics 3 Bayesian inference 4 Conclusion Overview

Conclusion back to the auditory mismatch negativity S-D: reorganisation of the connectivity structure rIFG rSTG rA1 lSTG lA1 rIFG rSTG rA1 lSTG lA1 standard condition (S) deviant condition (D) t ~ 200 ms … … S SS D S S S S D S sequence of auditory stimuli

Conclusion DCM for EEG/MEG: variants  DCM for steady-state responses  second-order mean-field DCM  DCM for induced responses  DCM for phase coupling time (ms) inputdepolarization time (ms) auto-spectral density LA auto-spectral density CA1 cross-spectral density CA1-LA frequency (Hz) 1 st and 2d order moments

Many thanks to: Karl J. Friston (London, UK) Rosalyn Moran (London, UK) Stefan J. Kiebel (Leipzig, Germany)