Light-induced instabilities in large magneto-optical traps G. Labeyrie, F. Michaud, G.L. Gattobigio, R. Kaiser Institut Non Linéaire de Nice, Sophia Antipolis, France T. Pohl ITAMP, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, USA
Outline 1. Magneto-Optical Traps (MOTs) in the multiple scattering regime 2. New instability in large MOTs 3. Driven behavior 4. Conclusion
Introduction many body systems with long range interactions interactions in MOTs : Dalibard, Opt. Commun. 68, 203 (1988) compression force in optically-thick vapors Walker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 408 (1990) long-range repulsive force MOT size... Vorozcovs et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 22, 943 (2005) temperature in the multiple scattering regime plasmas & ultracold plasmas stars... neutral cold atoms (light) Wilkowski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1839 (2000) instabilities in retroreflected MOTs (shadow effect) instabilities in MOTs :
MOT basics few atoms (N < 10 4 ) effective detuning : I, x B 0 at `` e kv Bx kv , Bx v x force : F F F FF temperature k B T D size k B T x 2 independent of N 2. New instability in large MOTs
Long-range interactions in MOTs multiple scattering regime many atoms (N >> 10 4 ) restoring force - x photon re-absorption multiple scattering force F R repulsion L R d L R d I, Coulomb-like interaction q / e ~ tunableeffective charge I, x laser attenuation absorption force F A compression L x non local 2. New instability in large MOTs
MOTs in the multiple scattering regime F R F A if r L MOT size : R Walker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 408 (1990). net repulsion density limit inelastic scattering x (mm) N 2. New instability in large MOTs uniform density without spatial dependence of with spatial dependence of
MOT Production and Characterization vapor cell (Rb 85 ) 6 independent trapping beams N R 6 mm T 40 K photodiode time (ms) dynamics of MOT photodiode optical thickness 2. New instability in large MOTs CCD N, size, density t ILIL BB trapping imaging
New instability in MOTs spontaneous periodic oscillations for N > N th ( , B, I L,...) unstable Labeyrie et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, (2006). stable 2. New instability in large MOTs
Simple 1-zone model threshold ± ± kv ± Bx F s { } hk 2 e -b 1+4( ) 1 1+4( ) R L x R e -b 1+4( ) x 0 R 12 3 attenuated trapping beam 1 non-attenuated trapping beam 2 total repulsive force 3 x R : negative friction R th R > R th N G/cm R th mm 2. New instability in large MOTs
unstable stable Investigation of threshold 2. New instability in large MOTs N and R vary at threshold, but b 1 analytical model OK
t < 0t > 0 2. New instability in large MOTs Investigation of threshold N e -t sin( t ) below threshold (ms) N overdamped under damped damping when N
below threshold above threshold 2. New instability in large MOTs t < 0t > 0 Investigation of threshold B (G/cm) critical parameter osc (Hz) 0 (Hz) 0.6 MOT subcritical at threshold frequency continuous no hysteresis supercritical Hopf bifurcation
Numerical model N-zone model dynamics ! Pohl et al., Phys. Rev. A 74, (2006). Doppler N < 10 6 test particles double scattering position-dependent cross-sections ingredients : confirms analytical model for threshold supercritical Hopf bifurcation complex dynamics with external active motion zone 2. New instability in large MOTs
Driven oscillations below threshold above threshold 3. Driven behavior sin t
exc (Hz) Driven oscillations sin t Hz exc osc spontaneous oscillation suppressed harmonics of excitation 3. Driven behavior
Driven oscillations 3. Driven behavior exc osc resonance at exc parametric resonance ? exc (Hz) sin t
Driven oscillations 3. Driven behavior other resonances...
Conclusion observation of a new instability in large MOTs competition between compression and repulsive longe-range interaction (light) mechanism predicted by simple analytical model and numerical simulations perspectives : better control of experiment new measurements (critical exponent, larger parameter space,...) numerical model quantitative comparison with experiment : dynamics, forced regime,...