Joe Klemp National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado Convection Resolving NWP using WRF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Weather Research & Forecasting: A General Overview
Advertisements

5 th International Conference of Mesoscale Meteor. And Typhoons, Boulder, CO 31 October 2006 National Scale Probabilistic Storm Forecasting for Aviation.
A NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF LOCAL ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES A.V.Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Report of the Q2 Short Range QPF Discussion Group Jon Ahlquist Curtis Marshall John McGinley - lead Dan Petersen D. J. Seo Jean Vieux.
WRF Modeling System V2.0 Overview
WMO International Cloud Modeling Workshop, July 2004 A two-moment microphysical scheme for mesoscale and microscale cloud resolving models Axel Seifert.
Advanced Research WRF High Resolution Simulations of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma (2005) Kristen L. Corbosiero, Wei Wang, Yongsheng Chen, Jimy Dudhia.
5/18/2015 Prediction of the 10 July 2004 Beijing Flood with a High- Resolution NWP model Ying-Hwa Kuo 1 and Yingchun Wang 2 1. National Center for Atmospheric.
Rapid Refresh and RTMA. RUC: AKA-Rapid Refresh A major issue is how to assimilate and use the rapidly increasing array of off-time or continuous observations.
NOAA/NWS Change to WRF 13 June What’s Happening? WRF replaces the eta as the NAM –NAM is the North American Mesoscale “timeslot” or “Model Run”
WRF Verification: New Methods of Evaluating Rainfall Prediction Chris Davis NCAR (MMM/RAP) Collaborators: Dave Ahijevych, Mike Baldwin, Barb Brown, Randy.
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
452 Precipitation. Northwest Weather = Terrain + Ocean Influence.
Eta Model. Hybrid and Eta Coordinates ground MSL ground Pressure domain Sigma domain  = 0  = 1  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
Nesting. Eta Model Hybrid and Eta Coordinates ground MSL ground Pressure domain Sigma domain  = 0  = 1  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
Roll or Arcus Cloud Supercell Thunderstorms.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
Weather Research & Forecasting Model (WRF) Stacey Pensgen ESC 452 – Spring ’06.
1 NGGPS Dynamic Core Requirements Workshop NCEP Future Global Model Requirements and Discussion Mark Iredell, Global Modeling and EMC August 4, 2014.
1 st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April 2007 Science Question 3: Science Question 3: Numerical Weather Prediction Aspects of Forecasting Alberta Thunderstorms.
Roll or Arcus Cloud Squall Lines.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Mesoscale & Microscale Meteorological Division / ESSL / NCAR WRF (near) Real-Time High-Resolution Forecast Using Bluesky Wei Wang May 19, 2005 CISL User.
Roll or Arcus Cloud Supercell Thunderstorms.
Henry Fuelberg Nick Heath Sean Freeman FSU WRF-Chem During SEAC 4 RS.
Jordan G. Powers Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Space Weather Workshop.
The Hurricane Weather Research & Forecasting (HWRF) Prediction System Next generation non-hydrostatic weather research and hurricane prediction system.
Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction With the WRF Model Ying-Hwa Kuo, Joseph Klemp, and John Michalakes Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division.
Incorporation of TAMDAR into Real-time Local Modeling Tom Hultquist Science & Operations Officer NOAA/National Weather Service Marquette, MI.
Nesting. Eta Model Eta Coordinate And Step Mountains MSL ground  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
Warn on Forecast Briefing September 2014 Warn on Forecast Brief for NCEP planning NSSL and GSD September 2014.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
Atmospheric Modeling in an Arctic System Model John J. Cassano Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Atmospheric.
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
Birmingham Urban Heat Islands during 2003 Heatwave Period  Preliminary WRF/BEP Simulation Xiaoming Cai, Richard Bassett and John E. Thornes School of.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Model Resolution Prof. David Schultz University of Helsinki, Finnish Meteorological Institute, and University of Manchester.
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Operational Mesoscale Model History Early: LFM, NGM (history) Eta (mainly history) MM5: Still used by some, but.
The Challenge of Convective Forecasting “Predictability does not necessarily imply ability to predict” ASP/MMM Colloquium July 10-21, 2006 Morris Weisman.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Outline Background Highlights of NCAR’s R&D efforts A proposed 5-year plan for CWB Final remarks.
Experiences with 0-36 h Explicit Convective Forecasting with the WRF-ARW Model Morris Weisman (Wei Wang, Chris Davis) NCAR/MMM WSN05 September 8, 2005.
PARTNERING WITH THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Michael C. Morgan Director, Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences National Science Foundation.
Experiments in 1-6 h Forecasting of Convective Storms Using Radar Extrapolation and Numerical Weather Prediction Acknowledgements Mei Xu - MM5 Morris Weisman.
The Case for Using High-Order Numerical Methods in Mesoscale and Cloudscale NWP Bill Skamarock NCAR/MMM.
WSN05 6 Sep 2005 Toulouse, France Efficient Assimilation of Radar Data at High Resolution for Short-Range Numerical Weather Prediction Keith Brewster,
Performance of the Experimental 4.5 km WRF-NMM Model During Recent Severe Weather Outbreaks Steven Weiss, John Kain, David Bright, Matthew Pyle, Zavisa.
3 rd Annual WRF Users Workshop Promote closer ties between research and operations Develop an advanced mesoscale forecast and assimilation system   Design.
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Major U.S. High-Resolution Mesoscale Models (all non-hydrostatic ) WRF-ARW (developed at NCAR) NMM-B (developed.
1 5. Overview of DTC Status and Annual Operating Plan WRF Executive Oversight Board Meeting 2 30 July 2004.
1 11/25/2015 Developmental Testbed Center (DTC) Bob Gall June 2004.
NOAA Hazardous Weather Test Bed (SPC, OUN, NSSL) Objectives – Advance the science of weather forecasting and prediction of severe convective weather –
Are Numerical Weather Prediction Models Getting Better? Cliff Mass, David Ovens, and Jeff Baars University of Washington.
Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) and the WRF Model Jason Knievel Material contributed.
Real-Time High-Resolution MM5 and WRF Forecasts during RAINEX John P. Cangialosi 1*, S. S. Chen 1, W. Zhao 1, D. Ortt 1 W. Wang 2 and J. Michalakas 2 1.
Do the NAM and GFS have displacement biases in their MCS forecasts? Charles Yost Russ Schumacher Department of Atmospheric Sciences Texas A&M University.
Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction and Data Assimilation Research At CAPS Ming Xue Director Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms and.
Shu-Hua Chen University of California, Davis eatheresearch & orecasting
August 6, 2001Presented to MIT/LL The LAPS “hot start” Initializing mesoscale forecast models with active cloud and precipitation processes Paul Schultz.
Predicting Hurricanes with Explicit Convection: The Advanced Hurricane-research WRF (AHW) Chris Davis NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale and Microscale.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
Comparison of Convection-permitting and Convection-parameterizing Ensembles Adam J. Clark – NOAA/NSSL 18 August 2010 DTC Ensemble Testbed (DET) Workshop.
Hurricane Model Transitions to Operations at NCEP/EMC 2006 IHC Conference, Mobile, AL Robert Tuleya, S. Gopalkrishnan, Weixing Shen, N. Surgi, and H.Pan.
Higher Resolution Operational Models
RUC Convective Probability Forecasts using Ensembles and Hourly Assimilation Steve Weygandt Stan Benjamin Forecast Systems Laboratory NOAA.
Evaluation of Precipitation from Weather Prediction Models, Satellites and Radars Charles Lin Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences McGill University,
Numerical Weather Forecast Model (governing equations)
A few examples of heavy precipitation forecast Ming Xue Director
452 Precipitation.
Presentation transcript:

Joe Klemp National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado Convection Resolving NWP using WRF

36h WRF Precip Forecast Analyzed Precip 27 Sept Goals: Develop an advanced mesoscale forecast and assimilation system, and accelerate research advances into operations Collaborative partnership, principally among NCAR, NOAA, DoD, OU/CAPS, FAA, and university community Multi-agency WRF governance; development conducted by 15 WRF Working Groups Software framework provides portable, scalable code with plug-compatible modules Ongoing active testing and rapidly growing community use – Over 1,400 registered community users, annual workshops and tutorials for research community – Daily experimental real-time forecasting at NCAR, NCEP, NSSL, FSL, AFWA, U. of Illinois Operational implementation at NCEP and AFWA in FY04 Weather Research and Forecasting Model

km Cumulus Parameterization Resolved Convection LES PBL Parameterization Two Stream Radiation 3-D Radiation Model Physics in High Resolution NWP Physics “No Man’s Land”

Convection Resolving NWP using WRF Questions to address: Is there any increased skill in convection-resolving forecasts, measured objectively or subjectively? Is there increased value in these forecasts? What can we expect given that the detailed aspects of convection may be inherently unpredictable at forecast times of O(day)? If the forecasts are more valuable, are they worth the cost?

Terrain-following hydrostatic pressure vertical coordinate Arakawa C-grid, two-way interacting nested grids (soon) 3 rd order Runge-Kutta split-explicit time differencing Conserves mass, momentum, dry entropy, and scalars using flux form prognostic equations 5 th order upwind or 6 th order centered differencing for advection Physics for CR applications: Lin microphysics, YSU PBL, OSU/MM5 LSM, Dudhia shortwave/RRTM longwave radiation, no cumulus parameterization WRF Mass Coordinate Core

Model Configuration for 4 km Grid Domain – 2000 x 2000 km, 501 x 501 grid – 50 mb top, 35 levels – 24 s time step Initialization – Interpolated from gridded analyses – BAMEX: 40 km Eta CONUS analysis – Isabel: 1 o GFS global analysis (~110 km) Computing requirements – 128 Processors on IBM SP Power 4 Regatta – Run time: 106 min/24h of forecast

Bow Echo and Mesoscale Convective Vortex Experiment (BAMEX) Goal: Study the lifecycles of mesoscale convective vortices and bow echoes in and around the St. Louis MO area 10 km WRF forecast domain 4 km WRF forecast domain Field program conducted 20 May – 6 July 2003

Real-time WRF 4 km BAMEX Forecast Composite NEXRAD Radar 4 km BAMEX forecast 36 h Reflectivity 4 km BAMEX forecast 12 h Reflectivity Valid 6/10/03 12Z

Real-time WRF 4 km BAMEX Forecast Composite NEXRAD RadarReflectivity forecast Initialized 00 UTC 9 June 03

Real-time WRF 4 km BAMEX Forecast Initialized 00 UTC 10 June 03 Reflectivity forecastComposite NEXRAD Radar

Real-time 12 h WRF Reflectivity Forecast Composite NEXRAD Radar 4 km BAMEX forecast Valid 6/10/03 12Z 10 km BAMEX forecast 22 km CONUS forecast

Real-time WRF 4 km BAMEX Forecast Composite NEXRAD Radar23 h Reflectivity Forecast Line of Supercells Valid 5/30/03 23Z

Realtime WRF 4 km BAMEX Forecast Composite NEXRAD Radar30 h Reflectivity Forecast Squall line 6” hail 00Z Valid 6/23/03 06Z

Realtime WRF 4 km BAMEX Forecast Composite NEXRAD Radar30 h Reflectivity Forecast Missed Valid 6/12/03 06Z

Realtime WRF 4 km BAMEX Forecast Composite NEXRAD RadarReflectivity Forecast 12 h 24 h Squall line PersistsDissipates Initialized 5/24/03 00Z

Preliminary BAMEX Forecast Verification (Done, Davis, and Weisman) Number of MCSs for each 36 h forecast initialized at 00 UTC. ObservedForecast

Observed Model Hovmoller Depiction of Hourly Precip Data have been averaged in the latitudinal direction

Preliminary BAMEX Forecast Verification (Done, Davis, and Weisman) Subjective analysis of organized convection Criteria for successful forecast: forecast system within 400 km and 3 h of those observed. Probability of detection (POD) = 58% False alarm rate (FAR) = 28% Cases Observed YesNo Cases Predicted Yes No

Preliminary Findings for BAMEX Forecasts Rapid spinup of storm-scale structure from large-scale IC Forecasts were helpful to field operations planning, particularly on the number of systems, their mode and location 4 km WRF replicates overall MCS structure and character better than 10 km WRF with cumulus parameterization – More detailed representation of convective mode – No improvement in precipitation threat scores Skill in forecasting systems as high after 21 h as during the first 6-12 h, suggesting mesoscale control of initiation Convective trigger function wasn’t needed Convection resolving forecasts should be a useful tool for predicting significant convective outbreaks and severe weather

Hurricane Isabel NOAA –17 AVHRR 13 Sep 03 14:48 GMT

Hurricane Isabel Track 18/1700Z 10 km WRF Initialized 15/1200Z 4 km WRF Initialized 17/0000Z

Hurricane Isabel 3 h Precip Forecast Initialized: 12 UTC 15 Sep 03 WRF Model 10 km grid 5 day forecast

48 h Hurricane Isabel Reflectivity Forecast 4 km WRF forecastRadar Composite Initialized 00 UTC 17 Sep 03

Hurricane Isabel Reflectivity at Landfall Radar Composite 18 Sep Z 41 h forecast from 4 km WRF

Hurricane Isabel Surface-Wind Forecast Initialized: 00 UTC 17 Sep 03 WRF Model 4 km grid 2 day forecast

Problems with Traditional Verification Schemes truth forecast 1forecast 2 Issue: the obviously poorer forecast has better skill scores From Mike Baldwin NOAA/NSSL

Scientific Questions for Storm-Scale NWP What is the predictability of storm-scale events, and will resolution of fine-scale details enhance or reduce their prediction? What observations are most critical, and can high-resolution data from national networks be used to initialize NWP models in real time? What physics is required, and do we understand it well enough for practical application? How can ensembles be utilized for storm-scale prediction? What are the most useful verification techniques for storm and mesoscale forecasts? What networking and computational infrastructures are needed to support high-resolution NWP? How can useful decision making information be generated from forecast model output?