P13371.  Customer Dr. Schrlau  Team Jacob Bertani Bridget Lally Avash Joshi Nick Matson Keith Slusser  Guide Bill Nowak.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team Churro: Sharon Grimshaw, Maggie Su, Louis Yi, and Morgan Zheng.
Advertisements

Problem Statement: Broaden participation and collaboration in nanoscale science by creating low cost, remotely accessible instrumentation. Phase II: Nanomanipulator.
© Chinese University, CSE Dept. Software Engineering / Software Engineering Topic 1: Software Engineering: A Preview Your Name: ____________________.
Automated Golf Ball Teeing System Mr. Tee - The Automated Golf Buddy Jeremy Woods Mike Seyboth Tim Walker Tomas Krones.
Granular Science Lab Mechanical Engineering Department New Jersey Institute of Technology Aleksandr Spiridonov December 2, 2011.
COMPACT MOBILE LIFTING DEVICE Team Michael Shaffer, Ken Kammerer, Dave Geesaman, Jin Ko Sponsor: Jim Adkins, Fraunhofer Advisor: Dr. Michael Keefe.
P10511: Miniaturization of Xerography Derek Meinke (ME, PM) Matthew Liff (ME) Tony Zhang (EE) Zaw Htoo (ISE)
P11213: Modular Student Attachment to the Land Vehicle for Education Jared Wolff, Andrew Komendat, Oyetunde Jolaoye, Dylan Rider.
P11310: Parabolic Dish Autopoint Solution Project Family Team Leader: Trae Rogers (ME) Project Engineer: Pat Ryan (EE) Kyle Norlin (ME) Chris Reed (CE)
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P08110 – UAV Based Digital Imaging System David Eells (Mechanical Engineering)
Catheter Guidewire Control System Derek Carlson & Caleb Anderson Advisors: Dr. Dempsey & Dr. Stewart.
Nandini Vemuri (EE) Jason Jack (CE) Ryan Schmitt (CE) Jeff Howe (EE) John Corleto (CE) Emily Phillips (EE) Power Distribution Subsystem Wireless Communication.
P11212Land Vehicle for Education: Controls Team Control Board Design The MSA Control Board boasts a Arduino Nano which contains most importantly an ATMega328.
04013 Micro Turbine Senior Design Micro Turbine Senior Design CDR – May 14 th, 2004 Project
Senior Design: Validation of Design December 15, 2008.
Team CNH Design a less expensive propulsion control system with equivalent or better performance than existing hardware for Hydrostatic Windrower Machine.
Nandini Vemuri (EE) Jason Jack (CE) Ryan Schmitt (CE) Jeff Howe (EE) John Corleto (CE) Emily Phillips (EE) Power Distribution Subsystem Wireless Communication.
Airbag Automaton John Bailey Hattie Hiatt Chun Hau Low Jason Harwood Wayne Gallup Jason Canaday.
R I T Team Members: Dan Lester → Team Lead Chris Feuerstein → Lead Engineer/Electrical Lead Mike Schwec → Electrical Support Jacob Hillmon → Electrical.
The objective of this project was to design a dynamic similarity test rig to replicate the operating conditions of the main crank bearing in the Dresser-Rand.
P13625 – Indoor AIR Quality Monitor
Background Cooper Crouse-Hinds Industries is a leader in the manufacturing of luminaires, an encased lighting system, for hazardous locations. These luminaires.
Automated Feeding Solutions for Dog Owners Preliminary Design Review October 19, 2007 Project Automated Dog Feeder Project Advisor Dr. Hongwei Wu The Canine.
Electrosurgical Life-test Fixture Team E.L.F. Design Review Mechanical Engineers Mary Hamann Brad Watson Naomi Sanders Electrical Engineers Tony Giedl.
Sponsor/Customer: Dr. Ferat Sahin Multi Agent Bio-Robotics Lab Faculty Guide: Prof. George Slack Team Members: Matthew LeStrange – Electrical Engineering.
Bicycle Harvesting Waste Energy: Bicycle Power Generation MSD-I RIT-Systems Design Review Winter/Spring P12414 January 13, 2012 Group # P12414.
P14311: PCB Isolation Routing System Final Presentation Team Members: Matthew Clark, Marley Collier Sears, Sarah Duman, Richard Kalb, Joseph Post, Zoe.
Athletic Field Marking Device Anthony Cortese, Ryan Crump, Matthew Lawler, Patrick Shaughnessy (Team Leader), John Sudia.
Servo Motor Control. EML 2023 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Design Project You are to design a mechanical device that can tilt a.
HYDRAULIC NANOMANIPULATOR P Table of Contents & Agenda TaskTime Project Introduction10 min Mechanical System40 min Software40 min Project Plan and.
Golf Swing Robot EE 486 Project Presentation College of Engineering and Technology Presented by Nasser Almarri.
P09204: Second Generation Design Team Members: Jason Jack Nandini Vemuri Jeff Howe John Corleto Emily Phillips Ryan Schmitt.
Problem Statement: Broaden participation and collaboration in nanoscale science by creating low cost, remotely accessible instrumentation. Phase II: Nanomanipulator.
Project Active Vibration Cancellation. The Team NameDisciplineRole Kaitlin PeranskiIndustrial and SystemsProject Leader/ Edge Updating Jeremy BerkeElectricalScribe.
SQUIGGLE Nanomanipulator P13372 To develop a low-cost, high resolution, three-axis Cartesian nanomanipulator using SQUIGGLE piezoelectric linear actuators.
ECE 480 Design Team 1 Autonomous Docking of NASA Robotic Arm.
DAVID ANDERSON RYAN DUNN BRYON ELSTON ELIZABETH FISCHER ROBERT MENNA GUIDE : BILL NOWAK CUSTOMER: DR. MICHAEL SCHRLAU (ME DEPARTMENT) P13375 : Computer.
Daniel Bressan David Tran Robbie Banks Amit Kapoor MACH 1/7.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Preliminary Detailed Design Review November 13, 2015.
Path The purpose of this project is to design a universal data recording device to monitor the health of a Dresser-Rand compressor during operation. In.
P13061 Periodontal Measurement Test System Tooth Phantom Requirements Tooth phantom must be made of non-biological materials that mimic human tissue with.
Digital Doorbell Team 2 Tyler Blaker, Mike Woessner, Jose Pina, Bill Kessler, Jesse Yanik, Justin Bayham, Brandon Roberts, Mike Goggins, Ralph Voltz.
May 10, 2013P Xerox Bearing Tester Final Project Review.
Device Interface Board for Wireless LAN Testing
P – , TOW TANK FOR TETHERED HYDROFOIL TEAM MEMBERS: Hope Alm (ME)Tim Buckner (ME) William Lentlie (ME) Andres Santizo Matheu (ISE) Shauna.
Break Findings. Piston Cylinder Actuators Creates 1-directional motion, returning force is generated with a spring. To meet both resolution and max travel.
ALIS Engineering A product of Advanced Lawn Irrigation Systems (ALIS) Joe Beach Tom Benich Luke Biggs Casey Valkenburg.
P14471 Vibration Testing Application. Team Introductions NameRoleMajor Brett BillingsTeam LeaderIndustrial Engineer Nick GrecoLead EngineerMechanical.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P09103 Rocket Self-Destruction Device Chris Natoli (ME)
P15007: Anti-Rollback Wheelchair Jessica Jeffrey (ISE) Jacob McCarthy (ME) Warren Roser (ME) John Sweet (ME) Faculty Guide: Edward Hanzlik Customers: Dr.
Joseph Ferrara Team Lead (ME) Joseph ChurchDesign Engineer (ME) Joshua Van Hook LabView Engineer (EE) Jamie Jackson Electronics (EE) Joelle Kirsch Project.
CNC FEED DRIVES Akhil Krishnan G M.Tech 1. CONTENTS 1.Introduction 2.Requirements of CNC feed drives 3.Servo motor 3.1 Servo drive control 3.2 Components.
CNC FEED DRIVES.
FINAL PRESENTATION Western Michigan University Advisors:
Dr. Marcos Esterman Faculty Guide W. Casolara Project Leader
SQUIGGLE Nano-Manipulator System
P07203 Dynamometry Laboratory Infrastructure
Xerox Bearing Tester Final Project Review
Senior Design Project with RLE Technologies: Automated PCB
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Detailed Design
P14551: Multi-Process 3-D Printer
Multidisciplinary Capstone Design:
P08002-Automated Parallel Bars
SQUIGGLE NANOMANIPULATOR
Project Status Update P09023 – Air Muscle Artificial Limb Next Generation Jim Breunig (ME)
Surface Mount Technology Laboratory
Anti-Rollback & Brake Assist
Preliminary Detailed Design Review
Connecticut Corsair Senior Design
Presentation transcript:

P13371

 Customer Dr. Schrlau  Team Jacob Bertani Bridget Lally Avash Joshi Nick Matson Keith Slusser  Guide Bill Nowak

 Jacob Bertani – Lead Hydraulic Subsystem Engineer  Avash Joshi – Lead Driver / Hydraulic Interface Subsystem Engineer  Keith Slusser – Lead Manipulator Subsystem Engineer  Bridget Lally – Lead Controls Engineer  Nick Matson – Project Manager & Controls Engineer

Ultra-high precision positioning instrument Maneuver objects under high magnification, at the micro and nano scales Primary customer uses: Cell behavior for medical diagnostics

 Improve prototype and redesign where applicable  Improve overall nanomanipulator function to meet competitive operational specifications  Reduce price of nanomanipulator with respect to commercial devices  Broaden participation in nanoscience

 Spec: 8x8x8 (cm)  Theory: 10x10x10 (cm)  Actual: 13x13x13 (cm)  Fail ◦ 1% of relative customer needs  CAD model smaller than actual cylinder  Did not account for fittings

 Spec: 550 (grams)  Theory: 570 (grams)  Actual: 689 (grams)  Fail ◦ 1% of relative customer needs  Inaccurate CAD model  Weight of water  8% improvement from phase 1 (750 grams)

 Spec: <$2,500  Theory: $900  Actual: $2,128  Pass ◦ 8% of relative customer needs

 Spec: $1,500  Theory: $1,400  Actual: $1,471  Pass ◦ 11% of relative customer needs  $179 cost reduction from phase 1  Assuming $270 for labor costs

 Spec: 1 (cm)  Theoretical: 1.1 (cm)  Actual:1.1 (cm)  Pass ◦ 5% of relative customer needs  X: 1.2 cm  Y: 1.1 cm  Z: 1.1 cm

 Spec: 0.5 mm/sec  Theory: mm/sec  Actual: 0.04 mm/sec  Fail ◦ 6% of relative customer needs  Stepper motor gear ratio  Stepper motor max rpm

 Spec: 100 nm/step  Theory: 66 nm/step  Actual: X: 56 nm/step Y: 51 nm/step Z: 56 nm/step  Pass ◦ 12% of relative customer needs

 Spec: <1 rev  Theory: 0 rev  Actual: X: 1.1 Y: 2.9 Z: 2.8  Fail ◦ 9% of relative customer needs  80% improvement phase 1 (14 rev)

 Spec: <0.02 um  Theory: 0 um  Actual: 0 um  Pass ◦ Part of position repeatability ◦ 4% of relative customer needs  Manipulator does not change position when left for hours in lab

 Spec: undefined  Theory: undefined  Actual: X: 2.0um Y: 3.8um Z: 6.2um  Pass/ Fail ? ◦ Part of position repeatability ◦ 8% of relative customer needs

 System is easily assembled / disassembled ◦ Yes ◦ Pass  3% of relative customer needs ◦ See operators manual for instructions  System is easy to use ◦ Yes ◦ Pass  7% of relative customer needs ◦ See users experience survey

 System is controlled by GUI ◦ Yes ◦ Pass  7% of relative customer needs  System is controlled by Joystick ◦ Yes ◦ Pass  11% of relative customer needs  System mounts standard pipette holder ◦ Yes ◦ Pass  3% of relative customer needs

 System can be operated safely through range of motion ◦ Yes ◦ Pass  3% of relative customer needs  System can be controlled remotely ◦ Remote desktop only ◦ Fail  0% of relative customer needs

 83% of customer needs passed  Major Failures: ◦ Backlash (9%) ◦ Speed of travel (6%)  Significant improvements on backlash, position repeatability and cost for manufacturing  Maximum travel speed is still functional and practical when working in field of vision under microscope

 Controls ◦ Stepper motor control board ◦ Implementation of limit switches ◦ Limited computer engineering experience ◦ Outdated serial communication

 Pump Assembly ◦ Reevaluate stepper motor gear ratio to get best resolution vs. speed ◦ Improper manufacturing on reused parts  Manipulator Assembly ◦ Implement bearing sliders ◦ Cylinders ◦ Implement hard mount for correct orientation

 Hydraulics Assembly ◦ Cylinders ◦ Protection of hydraulic lines ◦ Hose length  Manufacturing ◦ Uniform parts for all axes ◦ Multiple bolted fasteners can cause alignment issues

 Purchasing ◦ Use reliable suppliers ◦ Ample amount of spares when testing  Refer to subject mater experts  Scheduling  Communication and organization

 Dr. Schrlau – Customer  Bill Nowak - Guide  Mr. Wellin -RIT ME Department  Dr. Patru - RIT EE Department  Sabine Loebner & Brad Olan - P12371  Ken Snyder – RIT EE Department  Rick Tolleson– RIT CE Department  Rob Kranynik & Jan Maneti - ME Machine Shop