P13371
Customer Dr. Schrlau Team Jacob Bertani Bridget Lally Avash Joshi Nick Matson Keith Slusser Guide Bill Nowak
Jacob Bertani – Lead Hydraulic Subsystem Engineer Avash Joshi – Lead Driver / Hydraulic Interface Subsystem Engineer Keith Slusser – Lead Manipulator Subsystem Engineer Bridget Lally – Lead Controls Engineer Nick Matson – Project Manager & Controls Engineer
Ultra-high precision positioning instrument Maneuver objects under high magnification, at the micro and nano scales Primary customer uses: Cell behavior for medical diagnostics
Improve prototype and redesign where applicable Improve overall nanomanipulator function to meet competitive operational specifications Reduce price of nanomanipulator with respect to commercial devices Broaden participation in nanoscience
Spec: 8x8x8 (cm) Theory: 10x10x10 (cm) Actual: 13x13x13 (cm) Fail ◦ 1% of relative customer needs CAD model smaller than actual cylinder Did not account for fittings
Spec: 550 (grams) Theory: 570 (grams) Actual: 689 (grams) Fail ◦ 1% of relative customer needs Inaccurate CAD model Weight of water 8% improvement from phase 1 (750 grams)
Spec: <$2,500 Theory: $900 Actual: $2,128 Pass ◦ 8% of relative customer needs
Spec: $1,500 Theory: $1,400 Actual: $1,471 Pass ◦ 11% of relative customer needs $179 cost reduction from phase 1 Assuming $270 for labor costs
Spec: 1 (cm) Theoretical: 1.1 (cm) Actual:1.1 (cm) Pass ◦ 5% of relative customer needs X: 1.2 cm Y: 1.1 cm Z: 1.1 cm
Spec: 0.5 mm/sec Theory: mm/sec Actual: 0.04 mm/sec Fail ◦ 6% of relative customer needs Stepper motor gear ratio Stepper motor max rpm
Spec: 100 nm/step Theory: 66 nm/step Actual: X: 56 nm/step Y: 51 nm/step Z: 56 nm/step Pass ◦ 12% of relative customer needs
Spec: <1 rev Theory: 0 rev Actual: X: 1.1 Y: 2.9 Z: 2.8 Fail ◦ 9% of relative customer needs 80% improvement phase 1 (14 rev)
Spec: <0.02 um Theory: 0 um Actual: 0 um Pass ◦ Part of position repeatability ◦ 4% of relative customer needs Manipulator does not change position when left for hours in lab
Spec: undefined Theory: undefined Actual: X: 2.0um Y: 3.8um Z: 6.2um Pass/ Fail ? ◦ Part of position repeatability ◦ 8% of relative customer needs
System is easily assembled / disassembled ◦ Yes ◦ Pass 3% of relative customer needs ◦ See operators manual for instructions System is easy to use ◦ Yes ◦ Pass 7% of relative customer needs ◦ See users experience survey
System is controlled by GUI ◦ Yes ◦ Pass 7% of relative customer needs System is controlled by Joystick ◦ Yes ◦ Pass 11% of relative customer needs System mounts standard pipette holder ◦ Yes ◦ Pass 3% of relative customer needs
System can be operated safely through range of motion ◦ Yes ◦ Pass 3% of relative customer needs System can be controlled remotely ◦ Remote desktop only ◦ Fail 0% of relative customer needs
83% of customer needs passed Major Failures: ◦ Backlash (9%) ◦ Speed of travel (6%) Significant improvements on backlash, position repeatability and cost for manufacturing Maximum travel speed is still functional and practical when working in field of vision under microscope
Controls ◦ Stepper motor control board ◦ Implementation of limit switches ◦ Limited computer engineering experience ◦ Outdated serial communication
Pump Assembly ◦ Reevaluate stepper motor gear ratio to get best resolution vs. speed ◦ Improper manufacturing on reused parts Manipulator Assembly ◦ Implement bearing sliders ◦ Cylinders ◦ Implement hard mount for correct orientation
Hydraulics Assembly ◦ Cylinders ◦ Protection of hydraulic lines ◦ Hose length Manufacturing ◦ Uniform parts for all axes ◦ Multiple bolted fasteners can cause alignment issues
Purchasing ◦ Use reliable suppliers ◦ Ample amount of spares when testing Refer to subject mater experts Scheduling Communication and organization
Dr. Schrlau – Customer Bill Nowak - Guide Mr. Wellin -RIT ME Department Dr. Patru - RIT EE Department Sabine Loebner & Brad Olan - P12371 Ken Snyder – RIT EE Department Rick Tolleson– RIT CE Department Rob Kranynik & Jan Maneti - ME Machine Shop