Air pollution. Command and control 27,000 major sources of pollutants in US are subject to control Clean Air Act 1970; EPA created to oversee Describe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting More for Four Principles for Comprehensive Emissions Trading Jan Mazurek, Director Center for Innovation and the Environment 2002 Environmental.
Advertisements

Clean Air Act By: Sophie Netter. Clean Air Act Drafted in 1970 Amended in 1977 and 1990 in order to set new dates for the goals because many areas had.
Water Markets & Tradable Permits Sopheak & Huy. Our Focus Water Markets & Transferable Permits Water Auctions Tradable Pollution Permits Lessons Learnt.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Stationary-Source Local Air Pollution.
Ch. 16 Stationary Source Local Air Pollution Introduction n in U.S.: 27,000 major stationary pollution sources; 100,000s of more minor sources n many.
Trading and Efficiency © 1998, 2006 Peter Berck. Topics Marginal Cost of abatement and Bid for Permits Efficient Allocation of Emissions among firms Cap.
Environmental economics Chapter issues what is appropriate level of waste? how to achieve that level (who has to reduce how much?)
EXTERNALITIES Chapter 5.
Figure 6.4 Total and marginal damage and benefit functions, and the efficient level of flow pollution emissions. D(M) B(M) D(M) B(M) Maximised net benefits.
Pollution Control: Instruments
Options for Setting Environmental Interim Targets for Health for CAFE Summary of presentations to the CAFE Working Group on Target Setting and Policy Advice.
 Homework #3 Due Thursday  Quiz #2 Next Thursday Sept. 29th  Homework #4 Due Tuesday Oct. 11  Exam #2 Tuesday Oct. 11  Writing Assignment Due Oct.
EXTERNALITIES Chapter 5.
Economics of Pollution Control: An Overview
Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.
The Economics of Environmental Regulation Public Regulation or the Market.
How the U.S. judges air quality Clean Air Act of 1970 – First Federal Act to set air quality standards National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS):
Commanding Clean Air The Clean Air Act of 1970 as a Model for U.S. Environmental Policy Clean Air Act.
REGULATIONS. LIMITATIONS Availability of funds Lack of scientific data Property rights of individuals.
Regulation Natural Monopolies Breaking up a monopoly that isn’t natural is a good idea Breaking up a monopoly that isn’t natural is a good idea – Ex.
Exam 3 review. optimal pollution what is appropriate level of waste? how to achieve that level (who has to reduce how much?) identify efficient levels.
Pollution control: instruments
Cap and Trade 101 Marlon G. Boarnet Professor of Public Policy Director of Graduate Programs in Urban Planning and Development University of Southern California.
Air Pollution Solutions Ch. 18. How should we deal with air pollution? Legal, economic, and technical tools can help us to clean up air pollution, but.
Chapter 11 Slide 1 Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc.
Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process
Section 6 API-135 / Econ 1661 April 5, 2013 Rich Sweeney 0.
Class 7 Environmental Policy Tools
Research on ‘Emissions Trade’ By Sarah Jang Research on ‘Emissions Trade’ By Sarah Jang.
Air Quality Programs.
International Environmental Policy: Controlling Ozone Depletion.
Dr. Laura Dawson Ullrich March 25, Q per year $ MB MD MPC MSC = MPC + MD Q1Q1 Q* Actual output Socially efficient output b a c.
Protecting Drinking Water: The U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act Chapter 16 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Protecting Drinking Water The Safe Drinking Water Act Chapter 17 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternThomas and Callan, Environmental Economics.
Protecting Drinking Water: The Safe Drinking Water Act Chapter 16.
Air Resources Board Research Division Economic Valuation of Air Quality Benefits Bart Croes, Chief Research Division.
Command-and-Control Strategies: The Case of Standards Chapter 11.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 14 Stationary-Source Local Air Pollution.
Sometimes externality problems can’t be solved by private bargaining (transaction costs are too big). Public policy toward externalities. “Command-and-control”
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 13 Economics of Pollution Control: An Overview.
Air Quality Management Comparison of Cap-and-Trade, Command-and Control and Rate-Based Programs Dr. Ruben Deza Senior Environmental Engineer Clean Air.
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
CH 23: ECONOMICS, ENVIRONMENT, AND SUSTAINABILITY Andrew, Summer, Nisha.
Trading and Efficiency © 1998, 2006 Peter Berck. Topics Marginal Cost of abatement and Bid for Permits Efficient Allocation of Emissions among firms Cap.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 13 Economics of Pollution Control: An Overview.
EPA Proposed Ground-level Ozone (O 3 ) NAAQS Rich McAllister National Tribal Air Association Policy Advisory Committee Hobbs Straus Dean & Walker.
An Intro to the Economics of Climate Policy
A General Model of Pollution Control
Topic 5: Public Policy Instruments
EU’s CO2 Emissions Trading Scheme – Benchmarks for Free Allocation from 2013 Onwards 9 September 2010 Hans Bergman DG Climate Action European Commission.
Economics of Pollution Control: An Overview
Clean Air Act Glossary.
C h a p t e r 3 EXTERNALITIES AND GOVERNMENT POLICY
A General Model of Pollution Control
Trading and Efficiency
©2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved.
Trading and Efficiency
Representative Measurements – AQ-Workshop Bucharest, July 2008
Economics of Pollution Control: An Overview
Taxes, Standards and Tradable Permits
Externalities.
J. Burke1, K. Wesson2, W. Appel1, A. Vette1, R. Williams1
Ground-level Ozone (O3)
Incentive Based Strategies: Transferable Discharge Permits
Policy Mix or Evolution?
Trading and Efficiency
Taxes, Standards and Tradable Permits
Session 7: Public Policy Instruments
Presentation transcript:

Air pollution

Command and control 27,000 major sources of pollutants in US are subject to control Clean Air Act 1970; EPA created to oversee Describe C & C framework Is C & C framework efficient? Cost-effective?

C & C framework Establish ambient air quality standards  Legal ceiling on outdoor air concentration  Set according to health “threshold”  Protect the most sensitive members of popn States develop procedure / timetables for meeting standards EPA can halt federal funds to states if goals not met

Efficiency of C & C policy? Threshold concept  “margin of safety sufficiency high that no adverse effects would be suffered by any member of the population as long as the air quality is at least as good as that specified by the standards.” But adverse health effects are occurring at pollution levels lower than the ambient standard

Efficient level of standard Efficiency: set standard to max net benefit Problem is measuring benefits (damages avoided from higher standards) Efficient level hard to estimate with much confidence EPA study of Clean Air Act estimated benefits btw. $5 and $50 trillion

Uniformity (space) No account for number of people exposed Sensitivity of local ecology Costs of compliance in various areas Efficiency would dictate different standards in different areas Lots of inefficiencies in rural areas (low popn)

Timing of emission flows (time) Concentrations are important Standards based on averages Constant levels of control Efficiency would dictate:  Stringent control when meteorological conditions stagnant  Less so under normal conditions

Concentration vs. exposure Present standards defined in terms of concentration Health effects are related to human exposure to pollution  Determined by both concentration, space, and how much time spent in place On average, only 10% time spent outdoors Very little attention to indoor pollutants

Cost-effectiveness?

Innovative approaches Emissions trading  Initial allocation matters  Free vs. auction  EU experience Windfall profits to big polluters  RGGE in NW NE states; emissions capped starting 2009 Emission charges  Tax damage costs per unit  Double dividend