WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW… Danielle Connor Morganne Taylor Ivy Tech.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development Standards William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany.
Advertisements

Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Designing and Using Rubrics Marilyn Greer David Kale.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Challenge Question: How would I like my performance on the job to be evaluated ? Self-Test Questions: 1.Why are some types of skills better assessed through.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
Contemporary Issues in Education Corporal Punishment in Schools.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Teacher Interview Project
What ACCESS, the New Virginia Test for LEP Students, Means for School Districts LEP Caucus Presentation July 2008.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
Autonomous Learning Proficiency: Getting students to think about their learning Lynn Grinnell College of Business.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN EDUCATION: HOMESCHOOLING MAYRA LOPEZ & ANDERSYN BENEDICT EDUCATION 101.
Lesson Planning and Writing Objectives Facilitators: Aaron Cooper, Peace Corps Volunteer, Dept. of Education Sonja Follett, English Language Fellow, Khovd.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
Information Literacy Standards: Boosting Student Achievement.
Grading and Reporting Chapter 15
Seaford School District Annual Parent Meeting 1. Title I Funding and Programs Parent Meeting Agenda Title I Program Presentation Document Review Parent.
SCHOOL EMERGENCY PLANNING EVACUATIONS By: Nicole M. and Cheyenne B.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Michigan Educational Assessment Program MEAP. Fall Purpose The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) is Michigan’s general assessment.
Health and Wellness Lesson Plans By: John Mitchell and Brandi King.
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
1 Handout #1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Language Arts)  Performance Indicator Progression  Scope and Sequence  Instructional Guide  Language.
Governor Thomas Johnson High School Analysis of 2008 AYP Scores.
Mental and Emotional Health By: David Cantwell and MacKenzie Sprout.
INNOVATIVE GRADING POLICY Leigh Ann Earnhart CAI 5322: Assessment and Evaluation February 15, 2012.
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6. Purpose of Understanding  If you don’t know where you are going, how will you know when you get there?  How.
Part I Educational Technology1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Educational Technology) Performance Indicator Progression Scope and Sequence Instructional.
Teacher Pay being Tied to Student Performance Ashley and Elizabeth Andrew Buckle November 20, 2014.
America´s Lab Report. Chapter 2: The Education Context Key Points: “High school students’ science achievement nationwide is not impressive and has not.
Georgia Milestone Assessments Bryant Elementary School 1"Where Scholars Are Prepared to Be LEADERS"
Dustin Featherstone. Standard #2: Learning Differences  The teacher understands how learners grow and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning.
Daretta L. Wilson EDU645: Learning & Assessment for the 21st Century Professor: Alan Belcher February 16, 2016.
Serendipity Early Learning Centre Policy Review. Agenda Welcome to our Annual General Meeting! Today we will be reviewing the outdoor environment policy.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
The No Child Left Behind Act By 2004, the President vowed African American, Hispanic, and poor children, all of whom were at the time scoring well below.
By: Emma and Brooke Physical Education Lesson Plan.
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Common Core State Standards: Myths vs. Facts
Pre-Referral to Special Education: Considerations
There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
American Institutes for Research
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6
What you need to know About Title I
PPMES-UPRM Methodology & Practice Working Retreat
Curriculum design Compliance with the new regulatory framework using the new ACU templates.
TESTING: How We Measure Academic Achievement
Cultural Autobiography PowerPoint Multicultural Education EDUC 255 October 4, 2015 Coleman Becca Deckard.
Muncy School District November 9, 2015
Tyler Nicole and Seth Hallett Ivy Tech Community College Dr. Coleman
NCLB “No Child Left Behind”.
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
Jeannette Smith Personal Statement
State Mandates Teachers Edition
Healthy Relationships
Tyler Nicole Ivy Tech Community College Dr. Coleman
Competency Based Instruction in CSI High Schools?
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT
LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES. The American Psychological Association put together the Leaner-Centered Psychological Principles. These psychological.
Presentation transcript:

WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW… Danielle Connor Morganne Taylor Ivy Tech

INTASC Standard/Rationale Standard #1: Learner Development The teacher understands how learners grow and develop, recognize that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical areas, designs and implements developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences. Brief Description: For this assignment, we gathered information regarding standardized testing in public schools to show the important areas these tests do not cover. We have included facts, statistics, real teachers testimonies, as well as our personal opinions along with others. Rationale: To document our understanding of Standard #1, Learner Development, we included this PowerPoint presentation to show that all of the areas included are important for the growth and development of students.

WHAT YOU DO KNOW… Majority of the standardized tests measure only a few subjects, which are normally, Math, Science, Language/Reading, and Writing. In Indiana, students are required to take the ISTEP test from 3 rd grade through 8 th grade and again as a high school sophomore. Additionally, 4 th and 6 th graders will also test in science, and 5 th and 7 th will test in social studies. Along with the ISTEP for sophomores, they must take the GQE (Graduation Qualifying Exam).

The No Child Left Behind Act states that all American states public schools must be tested in certain subjects to measure their level of understanding and achievement. Private and homeschooled students are not required to take these tests. They use the test to measure yearly progress in required subjects, and if one does not meet requirements they will be placed in remediation classes or receive tutoring until they are able to place properly.

WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW... “The standardized tests we all know so well don’t come close to assessing all the outcomes that students and teachers attain”. WHATS LEFT OUT: Creativity Reliabilty Courage Critical thinking Enthusiasm Compassion Resilience Empathy Resourcefulness Motivation Self-Awareness Sense of Beauty Persistence Self-Discipline Sense of Wonder Curiosity Leadership Honesty Endurance Civic-mindedness Integrity

Pressure All Around Teachers as well as students are measured ineffectively as a result of standardized testing. Schools & teachers around the country are being caught cheating on standardized tests due to the pressures being put on them. (The cheating in Atlanta is the biggest cheating scandal to be uncovered recently) The cheating in Atlanta is believed to have started as early as 2001.

Jobs On The Line “If new laws or policies specifically require that teachers be fired if their students' test scores do not rise by a certain amount, then more teachers could be terminated than is now the case". This leads to unfair firing of teachers, without a detailed reason other than low test scores. “There is simply no shortcut to the identification and removal of ineffective teachers. It must surely be done, but such actions will unlikely be successful if they are based on over-reliance on student test scores whose flaws can so easily provide the basis for successful challenges to any personnel action. Districts seeking to remove ineffective teachers must invest the time and resources in a comprehensive approach to evaluation that incorporates concrete steps for the improvement of teacher performance based on professional standards of instructional practice, and unambiguous evidence for dismissal, if improvements do not occur.”

Proficiency Differs With 50 states across our country, that means there is 50 different definitions of what “proficient” is for a student. A student could qualify as proficient in Indiana and then move to Missouri and not still be proficient in a certain subject area. This makes assessing and comparing students near impossible. No Child Left Behind law mandates that 100 percent of students must be "proficient" under state standards by a goal that has been “universally described as impossible”.

Questions? Are standardized tests a fair way to measure the students knowledge and success? Should teachers be evaluated by the results of their students standardized tests?

References Harris, Phillip, Joan Harris, and Bruce M. Smith. "Standardized Tests Do Not Effectively Measure Student Achievement." Standardized Testing. Ed. Dedria Bryfonski. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, At Issue. Rpt. from "Chapter 3: The Tests Don't Measure Achievement Adequately." The Myths of Standardized Tests: Why They Don't Tell You What You Think They Do Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 11 Apr Huff Post Education. (2011). Standardized Tests’ Measures Of Student Performance Vary Widely: Study. Retrieved from standards-vary-widely_n_ html The Reckoning: Atlanta’s Schools. (2013). In The Economist. Retrieved from tate.libproxy.ivytech.edu/docview/ ?accountid= tate.libproxy.ivytech.edu/docview/ ?accountid=41074