Arm Length Stabilisation for Advanced Gravitational Wave Detectors Adam Mullavey, Bram Slagmolen, Daniel Shaddock, David McClelland Peter Fritschel, Matt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

Dual Recycling for GEO 600 Andreas Freise, Hartmut Grote Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Universität Hannover Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik.
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
One Arm Cavity M0 L1 L2 TM M0 L1 L2 TRIPLE QUAD 16m R = 20m, T=1% R = ∞, T=1%  Optimally coupled cavity (no mode matched light reflected back)  Finesse.
Transportation of Ultra-Stable Light via Optical Fiber Emily Conant Bard College, California Institute of Technology Mentors: Evan Hall, Rana Adhikari,
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
1 LIGO-G v3 Transmission Monitoring Telescope and Suspension – TMS Eric Gustafson aLIGO NSF Review LIGO Livingston Observatory April 25-27, 2011.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory1 Characterization of LIGO Input Optics University of Florida Thomas Delker Guido Mueller Malik Rakhmanov.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Towards dual recycling with the aid of time and frequency domain simulations M. Malec for the GEO 600 team Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik Albert-Einstein-Institut.
Current progress of developing Inter-satellite laser interferometry for Space Advanced Gravity Measurements Hsien-Chi Yeh School of Physics Huazhong University.
Katrin Dahl for the AEI 10 m Prototype team March 2010 – DPG Hannover Q29.1 Stabilising the distance of 10 m separated.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
1 1.ISC scope and activities 2.Initial Virgo status 3.Design requirements 4.Reference solution and design status 5.Plans toward completion 6.Technical.
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
GEO600 Detector Status Harald Lück Max-Planck Institut für Gravitationsphysik Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik, Uni Hannover.
Displacement calibration techniques for the LIGO detectors Evan Goetz (University of Michigan)‏ for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April 2008 APS meeting.
LIGO-G D “First Lock” for the LIGO Detectors 20 October 2000 LIGO Hanford Observatory Stan Whitcomb.
Enhanced LIGO with squeezing: Lessons Learned for Advanced LIGO and beyond.
1 Wan Wu, Volker Quetschke, Ira Thorpe, Rodrigo Delgadillo, Guido Mueller, David Reitze, and David Tanner Noise associated with the EOM in Advanced LIGO.
Variable reflectivity signal-recycling mirror and control Stefan Goßler for the experimental team of The ANU Centre of Gravitational Physics.
Frequency Dependent Squeezing Roadmap toward 10dB
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
LIGO-G09xxxxx-v1 Form F v1 LIGO Laboratory1 Designing a frequency offset locking loop for the 40m prototype Arm Length Stabilization System Sai.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.
Aligning Advanced Detectors L. Barsotti, M. Evans, P. Fritschel LIGO/MIT Understanding Detector Performance and Ground-Based Detector Designs LIGO-G
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Optical Spring Experiments With The Glasgow 10m Prototype Interferometer Matt Edgar.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
Torsion Pendulum Dual Oscillator (TorPeDO) David McManus, Min Jet Yap, Robert Ward, Bram Slagmolen, Daniel Shaddock, David McClelland.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
LOGO Gravitational Waves I.S.Jang Introduction Contents ii. Waves in general relativity iii. Gravitational wave detectors.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
Thoughts on an SPI for AdLIGO SPI: Suspension Point Interferometer, or Seismic Platform Interferometer with Rana Adhikari and Matt Evans.
Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.
Testing Advanced LIGO length sensing and control scheme at the Caltech 40m interferometer. at the Caltech 40m interferometer. Yoichi Aso*, Rana Adhikari,
Time domain simulation for a FP cavity with AdLIGO parameters on E2E
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Technologies of Gravitational Wave Detection
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
Time domain simulation for a FP cavity with AdLIGO parameters on E2E
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
ALS Noise Budget and Model Status Report
ALS HIFO-X Noise Budget and Model Status Report
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
A study of Arm Length Stabilization in KAGRA
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Yoichi Aso on behalf of the LCGT ISC Group
A RTP crystal electro-optic modulator for next generation gravitational wave detector Wan Wu, Volker Quetschke, Ira Thorpe, Guido Mueller, David Reitze,
Variable reflectivity signal-recycling mirror and control
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Lessons Learned from Commissioning of Advanced Detectors
Arm Length Stabilization at LHO
Advanced Optical Sensing
Radiation pressure induced dynamics in a suspended Fabry-Perot cavity
Measurement of radiation pressure induced dynamics
Advanced Virgo ISC subsystem
Presentation transcript:

Arm Length Stabilisation for Advanced Gravitational Wave Detectors Adam Mullavey, Bram Slagmolen, Daniel Shaddock, David McClelland Peter Fritschel, Matt Evans, Sam Waldman, Lisa Barsotti and the ISC team

Advanced LIGO Higher Optical Power Signal Recycling Mirror New Seismic Isolation systems –Quadruple Suspensions for the test masses [1]

The Lock Acquisition Challenge Initial LIGO lock acquisition was probabilistic Advanced LIGO lock acquisition more complicated than for initial LIGO –Extra cavity (signal recycling cavity) –Weaker actuation of test masses –Residual displacement noise of test masses, at low frequencies –Finesse of arm cavity ~ 400, linewidth ~ 94Hz, range of linear error signal very small ~ 1.3nm

The Lock Acquisition Challenge Advanced LIGO will acquire lock using a deterministic approach Arm cavities locked independent of the rest of the interferometer, i.e. Arm Length Stabilisation –Seismic Platform Interferometer [2], Digitally Enhanced Interferometry [3], Pound Drever Hall [4] –Advanced LIGO going ahead with a PDH based scheme [2] Y. Aso, et al; Physics Letters A Volume 327, Issue 1 [3] D. Shaddock; Optics Letters, Vol. 32, No. 22 [4] R. W. P. Drever et al; Appl. Phys. B 31, 97

Arm Length Stabilisation [5] B. Slagmolen et.al. ; LIGO-T v1-D

Arm Length Stabilisation Step 1: Inject 532nm beam from “Acquisition Laser” into each arm cavity –Different wavelength doesn’t interfere with other interferometer beams –Uses light with double the frequency of the main laser

Arm Length Stabilisation Step 2: Phase lock the Acquisition Laser to the Main Laser –Optical fiber used to transfer main laser tap-off to end station for phase reference –Acquisition laser - dual frequency laser, 1064nm beam exactly half the frequency of the 532nm beam –Beating of the two 1064nm beams gives heterodyne signal that is fed back to the acquisition laser to phase lock the two lasers

Arm Length Stabilisation Step 3: Inject offset into Phase Locked Loop –Will eventually allows us to tune the length of the arm cavity

Arm Length Stabilisation Step 4: Lock the frequency of the acquisition laser to the arm cavity length –Use PDH technique –The frequency actuator has a much larger dynamic range than the quad test mass actuators –Acquiring lock not a problem

Arm Length Stabilisation Step 5: Hand-off the feedback to the quad actuators, to lock the cavity length to the frequency of the laser.

Arm Length Stabilisation Step 6: Acquire lock of the rest of the interferometer –Recycling cavities –PLL offset tuned so that cavity is non-resonant with the main laser

Arm Length Stabilisation Step 7: Tune PLL offset to bring cavity onto resonance with the main laser

Arm Length Stabilisation Step 8: Finally, switch feedback from the Acquisition Laser to the Main Laser.

Possible ALS issues Modifying the HR coating of the test masses ITM reflectivity ~ 99%, ETM reflectivity ~95%, Finesse ~ 100, overcoupled cavity –The modification has minimal effect on the coating thermal noise for the 1064nm beam Noise induced by the fiber –Polarisation drift –Scattering effects –Optical path length fluctuations

 pm =  main +  fiber -  acq Fiber Induced Phase Noise Mechanical and temperature fluctuations in the fiber induce phase noise onto the beam passing through Limits how well the lasers are phase-locked Is ultimately imposed onto the cavity length fluctuations seen by main laser Maximum sensor noise equivalent to 1pm/√Hz [6] or 75mHz/√Hz in differential frequency noise BAD!!! [6] B.J Slagmolen et.al. ; LIGO-T v1-D

Drive  local +  remote to zero Fiber Noise Experiment  local = (  main +  fiber ) -  acq  remote =  main - (  acq +  fiber )  local +  remote = 2(  main -  acq )  acq =  main +  fiber  acq =  main Drive  local to zero Local Feedback OnlyDual Feedback Not Cool! Very Cool!

Fiber Noise Experiment 4.6km single mode optical fiber used. Power into fiber ~ 100uW (Minimise scattering effects). Signal power onto detector ~5uW. LO power onto detector ~50uW. Phase-meters immune to the small amount of polarisation drift present. Results measured using out- of-loop detector and phase- meter.

Fiber Noise Results

Future Work Test ALS scheme in a table top experiment –to test the various feedback hand-offs and offsetting away from the main laser Fiber noise cancellation scheme used Suspended cavity Testing fiber noise cancellation at caltech 40m Eventual testing of ALS at LIGO Hanford observatory (Nov 2010?)

Conclusion Advanced LIGO going ahead with PDH based “Arm Length Stabilisation” scheme to achieve deterministic Lock Acquisition of the interferometer. Technical issues being mitigated –Fiber phase noise issue solved Need to integrate system into Advanced LIGO hardware

References [1] [2] Y. Aso, M. Ando, K. Kawabe, S. Otsuka and K. Tsubono; Physics Letters A Volume 327, Issue 1; “Stabilization of a Fabry–Perot interferometer using a suspension-point interferometer”; June 21, 2004 [3] D. Shaddock; Optics Letters, Vol. 32, No. 22; “Digitally Enhanced Heterodyne Interferometry”; November 15, 2007 [4] R. W. P. Drever, J. L. Hall, F. V. Kowalski, J. Hough, G. M. Ford, A. J. Munley and H. Ward; Appl. Phys. B 31, 97; “Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator”; June 1983 [5] B.J Slagmolen et.al. ; LIGO-T v2-D; “Adv. LIGO Arm Length Stabilisation Requirements”; [6] B.J Slagmolen et.al. ; LIGO-T v1-D; “Adv. LIGO Arm Length Stabilisation Design”; [7] J. Ye et.al. ; J. Opt. Soc. Am. B/Vol. 20, No.7; “Delivery of high-stability optical and microwave frequency standards over an optical fiber network”; July 2003 [8] P. A. Williams, W. C. Swann and N.R. Newbury; J. Opt. Soc. Am. B/Vol. 25, No.8; “High Stability Transfer of an optical frequency over long fiber-optic links”; August 2008