Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

RtI Response to Intervention
PLP Circle of Support: A prevention/intervention model December 12, 2003 Rhode Island Department of Education.
3-Tier Reading Model West Virginia Department of Education Division of Student and Instructional Services Office of Instructional Services Catherine A.
Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Language, Learning And Literacy (L3)
RtI: The Key to “All” is Every RtI Basics in BASD.
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
Eugene, OR Brown Bag Presentation: November 19, 2007
May Dr. Schultz, Dr. Owen, Dr. Ryan, Dr. Stephens.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Malissa Patrick and Kim Thorndycraft February 25, 2010.
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
1 Differentiated Instruction Massachusetts Reading First Plan and John Silber Early Literacy Initiative Advanced Seminar Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph. D.
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Pennsylvania Reading First Leadership Meeting A Pathway For Success Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center Florida Center for Reading.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
RTI for Literacy: Strand A Leigh Rohde, M.Ed. Eileen Leavitt, M.Ed. February 6, 2009.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
CENTENNIAL PUBLIC SCHOOL RtI 101 Slides adapted from the NE RtI Consortium.
Data Summit July 27, 2012 Stephanie Smyka RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION.
RtI/DI Intervention Model for The Public Schools of Petoskey Building Strong, Life-long Learners.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Harry Wong Says Procedures are the Way to Go… Response to Intervention is a procedure-based system. It is also a problem solving system. Something isn’t.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
RtII & Title 1 Dr. Diane Barrie Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment October 4, 2012.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
RTI: Response to Intervention An Invitation to Begin… Rutgers Conference January 2015 Janet Higgins Reading Specialist East Amwell Township School Rutgers.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
RTI & THE CONNECTION TO PLC’S Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
 Response to Intervention ◦ Most often associated with a new and effective special education model for identifying and servicing students ◦ In PA, and.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
ELP Smart Goal Intervention Instruction ELP Inservice Feb 25/26 09.
Response to Intervention (RtI) The Third Year Richboro Elementary School.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-Based Reading Instruction K-5 Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform H325A
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… … a process for providing high quality instruction, assessment, and intervention that allows schools to.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
RTI: Big Ideas (Secondary Level) RESOURCES. Data-based instructional decision making model for MTSS Is this an individual student problem or a larger.
Plan for Response to Intervention (RTI). What is Response to Intervention? Response to Intervention (RTI) is a practice of providing high-quality instruction.
Response to Instruction and Intervention and how it could apply to High Achievers/Gifted Education Tanya Morret, Dr. Christine.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Multi-Tiered System Of Supports (MTSS)
3 Tier Leadership Team Implementation Training: Day 5 The Intervention Continuum Oakland Schools Early Childhood Special Education
WVDE Title I Fall Conference Whole Group Session
An Overview April 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central Kansas

 Create the literacy framework for the Shawnee Heights School District.  Tier One: Core Curriculum  Tier Two: Strategic Interventions  Tier Three: Intensive Interventions  Outline what staff development might be needed to implement the literacy framework. Goals

Need for Early Intervention  According to the National Institute of Health and Human Development  It takes 4 times as long to intervene in 4th grade as it does to intervene in late Kindergarten. 30 mins./day 2 hours per day Late K4th Grade

Grade level corresponding to age Reading grade level At Risk on Early Screening Early Screening Identifies Children At Risk of Reading Difficulty Low Risk on Early Screening

Additional Instructional Intervention Changes Reading Outcomes  Four years later, the researchers went back to the same school. Two major changes were implemented:  research-based comprehensive reading program  Intervention program for at risk students

Grade level corresponding to age Reading grade level Early Intervention Changes Reading Outcomes At Risk on Early Screening Low Risk on Early Screening 3.2 Control With research- based core but without extra instructional intervention 4.9 Intervention With substantial instructional intervention

Struggling Readers Do Not Catch Up! The probability that a child would remain a poor reader at the end of fourth grade, if the child was a poor reader at the end of first grade was.88. Connie Juel, % of children who are poor readers in third grade remain poor readers in ninth grade. Francis, et al., 1996

New Model for Intervention  Old Model - Wait to Fail  Too often intervention instruction was tied to special education qualification practices.  New Model - Preventive  Early intervention

Core classroom instruction All students Intervention Approximately 20–30% of students Intensive intervention Approximately 5–10% of students I II III (may include special education students) 3-Tier Reading Model

Tier I: Core classroom reading instruction that all students receive, assessment of student progress three times per year, and ongoing professional development Tier II: Intervention (additional reading instruction) and frequent progress monitoring that struggling readers receive Tier III: More intensive intervention and frequent progress monitoring that students with extreme reading difficulties receive after not making adequate progress in Tiers I and II Overview of the Three Tiers

Core Instruction in Reading and Writing Targets all students Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum 90 minutes Benchmark assessments 3 x year Strategic Intervention Target specific groups of students with specific needs minutes in addition to core Progress monitoring assessments Intensive Intervention Targets individual needs min. in addition to core Progress monitoring assessments 3-Tier Reading Model

Core Instruction in Reading and Writing Targets all students Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum 90 minutes Benchmark assessments 3 x year Strategic Intervention Target specific groups of students with specific needs minutes in addition to core Progress monitoring assessments Intensive Intervention Targets individual needs min. in addition to core Progress monitoring assessments 3-Tier Reading Model

Tier 1: Core Class Instruction Focus All students Program Scientific-based reading instruction and curriculum emphasizing the five critical elements of beginning reading Time 90 minutes per day or more Interventionist General education teacher Setting General education classroom Grouping Multiple grouping formats to meet student needs Assessment Benchmark assessment at the beginning, middle, and end of year

Tier 1: Core Class Instruction Focus All students Program Scientific-based reading instruction and curriculum emphasizing the five critical elements of beginning reading Time 90 minutes per day or more Interventionist General education teacher Setting General education classroom Grouping Multiple grouping formats to meet student needs Assessment Benchmark assessment at the beginning, middle, and end of year

Optimal Learning Model DEMONSTRATION (Teacher Directed) SHARED DEMONSTRATION (Joint Practice) GUIDED PRACTICE (Student Practices Under Teacher Guidance) INDEPENDENT PRACTICE (Independent Use) Model thinking Model fluency Explicit strategy instruction Collaboration Share Thinking Scaffolding Strategy Use Differentiation Small Group Assessment Application Transferable I DO YOU WATCH I DO YOU HELP YOU DO I HELP YOU DO I WATCH

What does the Research Say?

Tier 1: Core Class Instruction Focus All students Program Scientific-based reading instruction and curriculum emphasizing the five critical elements of beginning reading Time 90 minutes per day or more Interventionist General education teacher Setting General education classroom Grouping Multiple grouping formats to meet student needs Assessment Benchmark assessment at the beginning, middle, and end of year

Tier I Initial Lesson Tier I Adapted Initial Lesson Tier I New Lesson Meeting Diverse Needs in Tier I 100% Addresses the Same Instructional Objective Adapted from the University of Texas Center for Reading and Language Arts, 2003

Optimal Learning Model DEMONSTRATION (Teacher Directed) SHARED DEMONSTRATION (Joint Practice) GUIDED PRACTICE (Student Practices Under Teacher Guidance) INDEPENDENT PRACTICE (Independent Use) Model thinking Model fluency Explicit strategy instruction Collaboration Share Thinking Scaffolding Strategy Use Differentiation Small Group Assessment Application Transferable I DO YOU WATCH I DO YOU HELP YOU DO I HELP YOU DO I WATCH

What it is…What it isn’t… Time Commitment/ Structure Resources Component One: Shared Reading7-8

C.A.R.E. Time J C ollaborate J A sk questions J R ecord ideas J E valuate

Team Planning Guide: Tier I Framework  What should the literacy framework look like for SHAWNEE HEIGHTS?  K-2  3-6  7-8  9-12  What “components” of a comprehensive reading/writing program should be in place in all classrooms at SHAWNEE HEIGHTS?  How much time should be devoted to each component?

Tier 1: Core Class Instruction Focus All students Program Scientific-based reading instruction and curriculum emphasizing the five critical elements of beginning reading Time 90 minutes per day or more Interventionist General education teacher Setting General education classroom Grouping Multiple grouping formats to meet student needs Assessment Benchmark assessment at the beginning, middle, and end of year

“If we make an assessment and don’t use it to move teaching and learning forward, the assessment is largely a waste of time.” ~Reading Essentials by Regie Routman

Types of Assessments Screening Given to all students to determine which students may be at risk for reading failure. Diagnostic Administered to individual students who were identified through the screening process as being potentially at risk. Provides more in depth information. Progress Monitoring Assessments that determine if students are making adequate progress or need more intervention to achieve grade level reading outcomes.

Instructional Assessment and Planning Cycle

Types of Assessments 1. Screening 2. Diagnostic 3. Progress Monitoring Are all five areas included in your assessment program?

Team Planning Guide: Tier I Assessments 1. What assessments are currently being used? 2. Which areas of reading are they assessing? 3. What type of assessments are they? (screening, diagnostic, progress monitoring)

Teachers need ongoing professional development that is: Timely Effective Responsive to their needs Supportive Assessment driven Professional Development

C.A.R.E. Time J C ollaborate J A sk questions J R ecord ideas J E valuate

Reflect on Tier One: Core Instruction What information, resources, and/or training might you need to successfully implement Tier One (Core Classroom Instruction)?

Core Instruction in Reading and Writing Targets all students Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum 90 minutes Benchmark assessments 3 x year Strategic Intervention Target specific groups of students with specific needs minutes in addition to core Progress monitoring assessments Intensive Intervention Targets individual needs min. in addition to core Progress monitoring assessments 3-Tier Reading Model

Tier II: Strategic Intervention Focus For students identified with marked reading difficulties, and who have not responded to Tier 1 efforts Program Scientifically-based strategies emphasizing the five critical elements of reading Time minutes per day in addition to core Interventionist Classroom teacher, specialized reading teacher, special education teacher Setting General education classroom or outside of the classroom Grouping Homogeneous small group instruction (1:5) Assessment Progress monitoring

Interventionists…How are they used? How do you currently utilize your:  Title One Staff?  Paraprofessionals?  Instructional Aides?  Trained Parents or Volunteers?

How does Tier II reading instruction differ from Tier I reading instruction?  Tier II:  MORE explicit, systematic, and intensive  MORE instructional time (e.g., an additional 30 minutes) than regular Tier I classroom reading instruction  SAME-ABILITY GROUPS of 3 to 5 students within or outside the classroom setting  FREQUENT PROGRESS MONITORING to track student progress and inform instruction

100% Students Achieve Mastery Adapted from the University of Texas Center for Reading and Language Arts, 2003 Tier II Initial Lesson Tier II Adapted Initial Lesson Tier II New/ Different Lesson Addresses the Same Instructional Objective Meeting Diverse Needs in Tier II

What happens if most of the students in a class are identified for Tier II? a. Change the criteria so it seems like your students don’t need Tier II b. Provide additional 30 minutes of Tier II intervention for those students. c. Focus on improving Tier I core classroom reading instruction that ALL students receive

The Structure of Intervention Sessions J 1-Individual Structures (pp ) J 2-Group Structures (pp ) J 3-Group Structures (pp.27-28) J 4-Classroom Structures (pp ) Read and discuss the intervention models. Share with your home table (overview pp ).

Designing Your Own Structures  Intervention  Format (grouping, interventionist, setting)  Grade  Time  Lesson Structure

C.A.R.E. Time J C ollaborate J A sk questions J R ecord ideas J E valuate

Team Planning Guide: Tier II What systems are currently in place to provide additional support? 1. What programs are used? 2. How much additional time is devoted for struggling readers and writers? 3. Who is the interventionist? 4. Where does the additional instruction take place? 5. What grouping formats are used? 6. Does your current assessments show:  When interventions are needed?  If interventions are working?

Reflect on Tier Two: Strategic Intervention What are the strengths of your current Tier II framework? What areas might need improvement? What information, resources, and/or training might you need to strengthen Tier II?

Core Instruction in Reading and Writing Targets all students Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum 90 minutes Benchmark assessments 3 x year Strategic Intervention Target specific groups of students with specific needs minutes in addition to core Progress monitoring assessments Intensive Intervention Targets individual needs min. in addition to core Progress monitoring assessments 3-Tier Reading Model

Tier III: Intensive Intervention Focus For students identified with marked reading difficulties, and who have not responded to Tier 1 or 2 efforts Program Sustained, intensive, scientifically-based reading program emphasizing the critical elements of reading for students with reading difficulties/disabilities Time minutes per day in addition to core Interventionist Specialized reading teacher, special education teacher Setting Outside of the classroom Grouping Homogeneous small group instruction (1:3) Assessment Progress monitoring

Movement Through the Tiers +30

 The answer to this question varies from school to school  Some students, but probably not all, who qualify for Tier III may be receiving 504, or special education services  Each school determines the relationship of instruction in Tier III and instruction delivered through 504 and special education services Are most students who qualify for Tier III usually receiving 504 or special education services?

C.A.R.E. Time J C ollaborate J A sk questions J R ecord ideas J E valuate

Team Planning Guide: Tier III What systems are currently in place to provide intensive intervention? 1. What programs are used? 2. How much additional time is devoted to intensive intervention? 3. Who provides the intensive intervention? 4. Where does the intensive intervention take place? 5. What grouping formats are used? 6. Does your current assessment system show if intensive interventions are working?

Reflect on Tier Three: Intensive Intervention What are the strengths of your current Tier III? What areas might need improvement? What information, resources, and/or training might you need to strengthen Tier III?

Buhler USD 313

Action Planning: 3-Tier Model  Create your own 3-Tier Reading Model  Show current practices  Highlight components that need to be added in red

1. Focus on improving the core classroom reading instruction (Tier I) that all students receive 2. Provide high-quality intervention (Tier II) for struggling readers 3. Participate in ongoing professional development to enhance classroom implementation of SBRR practices 4. Make sure the Student Improvement Team and Staff Members understand the 3-Tier Model First Steps for Implementing the 3-Tier Reading Model