“Society is fundamentally dead,” says Derrida. Thus, subconstructive dialectic theory holds that the establishment is capable of social comment, given.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to Run a Kritik Affirmative
Advertisements

(Counter) Plans Because they didn’t limit the topic.
By Mark Veeder-SCFI How to properly construct an AC and NC -Getting the most out of cross-ex -How to structure a rebuttal.
Advanced cp competition exercises
Welcome to the Dark Side of the Force Introduction to Policy Debate.
Team Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
TOPICALITY Where debate begins.
Introduction to Kritiks Ryan Galloway Samford University.
Theory CODI 2014 Lecture. Rules of Debate Debate has surprisingly few rules Time limits and speaking order There must be a winner and loser No outside.
UNDERSTANDING THE KRITIK by Lurp Lank and Alex Kosmachavelli.
Matt Gomez Ph.D in Theoretical Objections to Negative and Affirmative argumentation (Bingham Campus) SCFI 2011 THEORY.
By Beth Mendenhall. Introduction Why you should listen Please ask questions.
Introduction to Debate -Negative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L. Husick,
Counterplans CODI 2014 Lecture 2. What is a counterplan? A plan offered by the negative to solve some or all of the affirmative’s advantages The negative.
SCIE Birmingham 14/06/ The participation of adult service users in developing social care Jennifer Taylor Vic Forrest Jo Moriarty.
Examples we talked about in class Ferguson, Missouri You tube commercials Movie trailers / Parodies Unnecessary censorship
Intro to Critiques. Fiat The assumption in the debate game that we pretend the plan gets passed by the USFG. Then, we can debate out the Costs (DA’s)
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Value Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing.
Most important things Keep your personal views outside the room Debaters must adapt to you Be honest about your judging experience.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Counterplans The Negative’s Best Friend The Negative’s Best Friend.
The Stock Issues of Debate 5 Things Every Debater Needs, and Needs to Know!
MDAW All debate is performing Form and content are inseparable. The norms of debate performance are conditioned by systems (and histories) of oppression.
Week 1. Q. From where did LD debate come? Q. Where policy debate involves federal policy, what does LD involve? Q. LD involves which civilization?
Opposition Strategy NCFA Rookie Debate Camp. Agenda ❖ A Brief Word on Trichotomy ❖ Basic Path to Winning ❖ Opposition Strategies by Position* ❖ Quick.
LINCOLN DOUGLAS DEBATE. Table of Contents  What is it  LD Debate Structure  Terms to Know  Constructive Arguments  Affirmative  Negative  Cross.
Theory Debating Baxter MDAW  It Really is  There are 4 Components of a Theory Argument  Interp  Violation  Standards  Voting Issue  You.
Baxter MDAW Overviews: What they are For Meta-level debate Stuff with no place on the flow Increase judge comprehension Overviews: What they aren’t.
The Disadvantage Provides an added measure to vote against the affirmative plan and vote for the present system.
Debating the Case GDI Glossary Aff case Advantage Offense Defense Card Analytic.
Going Negative The Surveillance Topic. Outline for the topic I. Categories of neg ground -Go over the specific arguments we have II. Dealing.
Affirmative Strategy Austin Layton. Overview At least, take two things from this lecture Main Advantage of Being Aff: Familiarity – Preparation Matters.
Critiques Brian Rubaie, Debate Central. What is a critique?  Disadvantages question desirability of action  Counterplans question methods of action.
Team Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
Debate The Essentials Ariail, Robert. “Let the Debates Begin.” 18 Aug orig. published in The State, South Carolina. 26 Sept
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards Baylor University July 2013.
Intro to Counterplans Casey Parsons. Introduction to Counterplans Thus far in debate, we have assumed that the neg defends the status quo In the vast.
Overview of the workout TimeContentMethod / Person 10 minutesWelcome & objectives  Trainer led 10 minutes What is closing  Trainer led 5 minutes Dealing.
Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
GDI 2015 THE NEGATIVE.  The counter to the Affirmative  Negates the course of action proposed  So much variety! Many ways to negate  What makes someone.
 If you can convince the judge that passing your affirmative plan is a good idea, you will win the debate. Essentially, you need to prove that the affirmative.
The official view of the newspaper. The editorial or opinion page is dominated by comment and analysis rather than objective unbiased reporting. Purpose.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Prepared by Jason Hong, David Miko and the University of Calgary Debate Society.
 Philosophical or performative advocacy  Rejects Traditional policy focus  Micro vs Macro resistance to oppression.
Welcome to Debating  Introduction  2008 changes  Speaker roles  Types of debates  Coaching tips  Draw announcement for the Senior Competition.
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards & Russell Kirkscey June 2015.
Beginning Policy Debate: I ain’t scared ! NSDA Nationals 2014 Jane Boyd Grapevine HS, TEXAS.
Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),
INTRO TO SPEECH & DEBATE EVENTS. TOURNAMENT SEASON o Individuals can participate in up to 10 tournaments a season o 3 debate only o 5 speech/debate combined.
Topicality “That sounds good. That’s a good skill to have.” –Julia Marshall “Naw. Advantages don’t matter when it comes to Topicality.” –Humza Tahir.
Basic Strategies Dallas Urban Debate League December, 2007.
REFUTATION. CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE IS JUSTIFIED BECAUSE OF THE GOOD IT CAN DO FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. DURING THE 1960’S, THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT DID.
Affirmative vs. negative
WHAT IS A CRITIQUE? For the purposes of this presentation, we will focus on critiques run by the negative. It is a philosophical argument against the.
KRITIKS Melissa Witt.
Policy Debate Speaker Duties
8th Annual Great Corporate Debate
BASICS OF CRITIQUES.
How to be negative Gabi Yamout.
UNDERSTANDING THE KRITIK
Answering the CP Casey Parsons.
Debate What is Debate?.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Topicality Casey Parsons.
Getting To Know Debate:
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Presentation transcript:

“Society is fundamentally dead,” says Derrida. Thus, subconstructive dialectic theory holds that the establishment is capable of social comment, given that culture is distinct from art. The subject is interpolated into a posttextual paradigm of expression that includes consciousness as a paradox. Postmodern Generator

Kritik Definition from the Rostrum: Since the Affirmative plan never happens… …we should focus on REAL VALUES REAL IDEAS REAL CRITICISMS of REAL PROBLEMS

“A critic is a man who knows the way, but can’t drive the car.” (Kenneth Tynan)

Slavery Women’s Vote Civil Rights Hitler

Also can use … as a Net Benefit for a Counter Plan as a solvency take-out as a link impact with a DA

I.Basic Structure II.Do’s and Don’ts III.Specific K’s to this Topic IV. How to Answer

3 parts of a Kritik: I.Link II.Impact III.Alternative

Link 1.Omission 2.Plan action 3.Representation 4.Language 5.Assumptions 6.Process

Impact 1.No value to life 2. Utilitarianism

Alternative 1.Utopian “the judge voting for us is the 1 st step of stopping capitalism” Sorry Ella, I’ve de-developed & you must now potty train into a 5 gallon bucket. That’s okay, Mommy. I’ve joined the revolution too!

Right, so I’ve basically given all my money to be redistributed to the poor. Now I’m planning my predetermined community Dude, McDonalds is still going to be open 24 hours a day… you can’t stop capitalism. Meanwhile… planning the anarchy over diet coke and chips.

Another good alternative is the Floating PIC, in which you TRANSFORM the plan, excluding the bad parts. We could have done all of your plan minus the - link - sexist language - violence - speed delivery

3 rd type of alternative: Rethink and Re-evaluate -Take time to consider before doing the plan -Do nothing and reject the plan -Only way people will be jolted into rethinking is with a ballot loss

DO’s 1.Be passionate 2.KISS

3. Have SPECIFIC Links DO’s 1.Be passionate, sincere 2.Keep It Simple, Stupid 4. Have a short prepared overview that explains the Alternative and how it interprets or solves the AFF

2. Don’t use post-modern language DONT’s 1. Don’t have a 5 minute overview

Wah wan wah wah wan wa wa.

2. Don’t use post-modern language DONT’s 1. Don’t have a 5 minute overview 3. Don’t underestimate the value of theory against your Kritik

Kritiks on this Topic 1. Environmental Security

Kritiks on this Topic 2. Eco-Management & Heidegger Destruction

Kritiks on this Topic 3. Capitalism or Economy

Kritiks on this Topic 4. Eco-Feminism 5. Eco-Phenomonology

Kritiks on this Topic 6. Consumption / De- Development

How to Answer a K: go P.O.S.T.A.L. P. – Permutation O. - Offense Theory is wrong K the K DA on the K K’s are bad

P.O.S.T.A.L. S. – Solvency T. - Theory 1.Framework 2.Interpretation 3.Reasons to prefer your interpretation 4.Reasons the other team should lose

P.O.S.T.A.L. 1.Framework - Environmental Pragmatism (Farber)(Farber) 2. Interp - action, experimentation, and a concern with what “works” 3.Reasons to prefer – offers a middle ground in which we are educated as concerns are considered and solutions are attempted, rather than leaving problems to continue hurting. 4. Voting Issue – vote for the team that offers a real solution and valuable education

P.O.S.T.A.L. 1.Framework – Policy Making Paradigm 2. Interp – using fiat or “what if”, consider the pros and cons of government passing a policy and choose the best policy option 3.Reasons to prefer – the existence of real world governments shouldn’t be denied. We model their processes to learn so we can impact our real world & know how to participate in it; also this venue of CX debate with certain time limits and resolutions is designed to test policy options, not read and debate values and philosophies. 4.Voting Issue – vote for the team that offers the best policy option and follows the rules of cx debate.

P.O.S.T.A.L. #4 Voting Issues Cont. a. K’s are bad, illegit in CX venue b. K’s are infinitely regressive c. K’s make the resolution pointless d. Decrease education of alternative energy policies e. Utopian Ideals are bad

P.O.S.T.A.L. P. – Permutation O. - Offense S. - Solvency T. - Theory A. – Alternative bad L. – Link – always say “no link”…1st

Now what? NEG – read and choose AFF - Write block in Library tomorrow. Choose a K to work against. Choose a framework to support Read about both frameworks Practice paraphrasing and summarizing. Practice reading your blocks.