1 Breaking Up: It’s Not So hard To Do Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities for Establishing a North American Emissions Trading System Chicago November.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional.
Advertisements

Work and Activities of the Executive Committee Relating to the Establishment of a Special Funding Facility to Support ODS Destruction and the Achievement.
1 Toshiaki Nagata UNFCCC secretariat Progress on CDM registry development Inter-sessional consultations on registry systems.
Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. CHAPTER 18 H ost-Country Regulation: Corporate Law,
Canada’s Offset System for Greenhouse Gases Dean Stinson O’Gorman New Brunswick Climate Change Hub meeting October 7, 2009.
Price Undertakings Under U.S. Antidumping Duty Law Prepared by Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce for the June 2 nd Korea Trade Commission’s.
The conditions required to establish natural gas infrastructures Presentation by Mr. Robert Tessier, President and Chief Executive Officer CAMPUT 2005.
Introduction to Derivatives and Risk Management Corporate Finance Dr. A. DeMaskey.
EFET comments on obstacles to trading November 2007 Obstacles to Electricity Trading in Central & Eastern Europe – latest development.
Emission trading: will it work for PRC ’ s SO2 emission and acid rain control? ZHANG, Shiqiu College of Environmental Sciences Peking University Beijing.
Carbonless Promise, a CP Holdings, LLC Company presents…
ECON1661/API135 section: Climate change overview 4/17/2009.
1 Andrew Howard UNFCCC secretariat Registry systems and the data exchange standards Intersessional consultations on registry.
Commodity Marketing Activity Chapter One Marketing History Chicago 1840’s - merchants buy corn from farmers 1850’s - merchants buy corn on time contracts.
Accounting of Emissions and Assigned Amount under the Kyoto Protocol Clare Breidenich UNFCCC Consultant.
Climate Action EU ETS Outreach and Linking The Future of the International Carbon Market.
Carbon Trading: The Challenges and Risks John Drexhage Director, Climate Change and Energy International Institute for Sustainable Development Agriculture.
Chapter 7 The Foreign Exchange Market. Outlines… Introduction, The Structure Of Foreign Exchange Market, Functions of foreign exchange markets Spot Market.
13th Annual Meeting of the INTOSAI Working Group on the Audit of Privatisation, London, 26 – 28 September SUPREME AUDIT OFFICE CZECH REPUBLIC Audit.
Introduction of technical paper Funding adaptation in developing countries: extending the share of proceeds used to assist in meeting the costs of adaptation;
Implications of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MIFID”) Richard Thompson.
OPTIONS FOR STATES IMPLEMENTING CARBON STANDARDS FOR POWER PLANTS ARKANSAS STAKEHOLDER MEETING MAY 28, 2014 FRANZ LITZ PROGRAM CONSULTANT.
1 Registry Issues for Domestic Emissions Trading and the Kyoto Mechanisms Consultations on Registries Bonn June 2, 2002 Erik Haites Margaree Consultants.
Manitoba Hydro’s Emission Management Perspectives Bill Hamlin.
The implementation status of specific mechanisms under Kyoto Protocol EU-ETS 13 May 2013 Geta Diaconu.
FEDERAL CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Overview of Key Provisions of House and Senate Bills for Industrial Energy Users John Clancy Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. 780.
© 2006 UNDP. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Proprietary and Confidential. Not For Distribution Without Prior Written Permission. State and Trends of the.
Climate Change: Opportunities in the Carbon Market Peter Koster Chairman, European Climate Exchange Athens, CEO & CSR 2007, 31st October 2007 Eurocharity.
September 23, 2015 Sacramento, CA Frédéric DINGUIRARD PMR Expert Overview Presentation on Registry Procurement and Specifications Workshop “Building Registries.
OPTIONS TO USE EXISTING INTERNATIONAL OFFSET PROGRAMS IN A DOMESTIC CONTEXT Case Study: The use of CDM in support of domestic offset schemes Sacramento,
The Doha Declaration and the Protocol amending the TRIPS Agreement Islamabad, 28 November 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
1 “Using Carbon Markets to Encourage the Uptake of Low Carbon Vehicles” Meeting the Low Carbon Challenge The Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership Third Annual.
Chuck Seidler California Air Resources Board September 2015.
Developing a Framework for Offset Use in RGGI Opportunities and Risks Dale Bryk, NRDC and Brian Jones, MJB&A – Northeast Regional GHG Coalition RGGI Stakeholder.
Economic Instruments for Climate Change Mitigation Tradable Renewable Energy Certificates Workshop at the 2009 Climate Change Summit.
Presentation “Green Investment Schemes – greenhouse gas emissions quotas trading mechanisms in Ukraine according to the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention.
Assignment of NTS Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 06 November 2008.
European Commission: Environment Directorate General Slide: 1 Registry systems for the EU emissions trading scheme SBSTA pre-sessionals Bonn, Germany,
Large Industrial Emitters Emissions Trading Natural Resources Canada March 14, 2003.
Offsets as Common Currency: U.S. and Canadian Offset Programs World Resources Institute Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities for Establishing a North.
Convention of Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol of 1997 Shaina Conners Period 6 4/30/2009.
Manitoba Perspectives on Emissions Trading Bryan Gray Manitoba Energy Science and Technology March 14, 2003.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Update On Long-Term Postclosure Maintenance And Corrective Action Financial Assurances Activities Permitting.
Flexibility Mechanisms A Consideration of Flexibility Mechanisms for Inclusion in the Gothenburg Protocol Chris Dore.
Linking regional emissions trading schemes with the EU ETS Peter Zaman UK Emissions Trading Group DTI Conference Centre 20 February 2007.
The Emission Units Allowances Market: organization and rules CO2 Expo Fiera di Roma 29 september 2005.
CDM: Enhancing demand and improving supply Fatima-Zahra Taibi, UNFCCC secretariat Regional Workshop on CDM and NAMAs for Latin America and the Caribbean.
Air Quality Management Comparison of Cap-and-Trade, Command-and Control and Rate-Based Programs Dr. Ruben Deza Senior Environmental Engineer Clean Air.
Overview of Western Climate Initiative WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2008.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Workshop July 9, 2009 AB 2296 Consulting Group Financial Assurances Phase II Rulemaking AB 2296 Consulting.
Resolving Different Levels of Stringency  As framed: –There are benefits to linking separate “cap-and- trade systems.” –There may be “weak” and “stringent”
European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Institutional Lessons for China Ping CHEN, PhD Researcher Department of Public International Law Gent University.
Fair Value Definition Price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
EUETS Registry EUETS Registry; the UK Experience and Changes for Phase III Lee Oliver Workshop on EU Emission Trading Scheme – Monitoring, Reporting and.
PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Protocol Amending the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation.
Preparing Readiness for Market Instruments
MINISTRY OF AGRARIAN POLICY
The Economics of Climate Change
Eligibility issues and joint implementation
Manitoba Hydro’s Emission Management Perspectives
Issues in linking registries and the transaction log
Key issues in Article 6 negotiations
Climate markets. RBCF and other climate finance
WEEE Program Wind Up Steward EHF Update.
Session 1 Guidelines for projects under Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol First UNFCCC workshop on implementation of Article 6 projects under the Kyoto Protocol.
Commodity Marketing Activity
Carbon Offset Markets and Utah’s Opportunity
Incentive Based Strategies: Transferable Discharge Permits
Canada’s Regulatory Framework for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Joint implementation and eligibility requirements
Presentation transcript:

1 Breaking Up: It’s Not So hard To Do Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities for Establishing a North American Emissions Trading System Chicago November 15, 2007 Erik Haites

MARGAREE2 Why Break Up? The basic reason why the administrator of an emissions trading system linked to another trading system would sever the link is a difference of opinion over the perceived environmental integrity of the two systems, such as: Differences in adjustments to the respective caps The types of offset projects accepted The stringency of the protocols for offset projects Differences in enforcement standards Links by the second system to a third system Severing the link is likely to cause prices in the two systems to diverge

MARGAREE3 Issues Raised by Severance Severance requires: Rules relating to use/transfer of units of linked system that will no longer be accepted Mechanisms for implementing those rules Procedures for implementing those rules to minimize market uncertainty Discussed first for unilateral link, then a bilateral link

MARGAREE4 Unilateral Link A unilateral link means system B accepts units issued by system C for compliance, but system C does not accept system B units System B entities and administrator have accounts in system C registry To use system C units, a system B entity transfers them from its account in the system C registry to the system B administrator’s account in the same registry

MARGAREE5 Unilateral Link - Rule The C unit holdings of each B entity in the C registry at the time the system B administrator announces the end of the link can be determined System B administrator can allow use of those units for system B compliance for a specified time, e.g., the end of the next compliance period System B entities could use system C units for compliance or sell them to system C entities Sale might be the only option for some C units; C units for future compliance periods or C units owned by B entities with no compliance obligations (a B entity of C trader?)

MARGAREE6 Unilateral Link - Administration System B administrator requires system B entities transferring C units into its account for system B compliance to demonstrate the quantity owned on the announcement date from C registry statements At end of the transition, system B administrator closes its account in the C registry

MARGAREE7 Unilateral Link – Market Impact Can not prevent speculation of a break-up, but announcement should be handled like currency devaluation; no comment until the moment (after markets are closed) of the announcement with great care to prevent leaks CCX termination of acceptance of Phase 1 EUAs did not disrupt the CCX market

MARGAREE8 Bilateral Link A bilateral link means system D accepts (some) units issued by system E for compliance and system E accepts system D units for compliance Registries are linked by a transaction log; system D(E) entities can hold both D and E units in their system D(E) registry account To use E units, a system D entity transfers them from its account in the system D registry to the compliance account in the system D registry

MARGAREE9 Severing A Bilateral Link A bilateral link might be only partially severed: System D might terminate acceptance of some system E units – Phase 1 but not Phase 2 EU allowances, sink enhancement but not emission reduction offset credits, etc. System D might terminate acceptance of all system E units, but system E might continue to accept system D units – the bilateral link becomes a unilateral link

MARGAREE10 Bilateral Link - Rule The E(D) unit holdings of each D(E) entity in the D(E) registry at the time the system D(E) administrator announces the end of the link can be determined System D(E) administrator can allow use of those units for system D(E) compliance for a specified time, e.g., the end of the next compliance period System D(E) entities could use system E(D) units for compliance or sell them to system E(D) entities Sale might be the only option for some E(D) units; E(D) units for future compliance periods

MARGAREE11 Bilateral Link - Administration System D(E) administrator prohibits system D(E) entities from transferring E(D) units into the system D(E) registry after the announcement date The transaction log is used to prevent further transfers of E(D) units into the D(E) registry

MARGAREE12 Bilateral Link – Market Impact Can not prevent speculation of a break-up, but announcement should be handled like currency devaluation; no comment until the moment (after markets are closed) of the announcement with great care to prevent leaks

MARGAREE13 Conclusions Link could be severed if environmental risks become too large Entities that own units of the delinked system could be allowed to use holdings on date of announcement for compliance by a specified date They could also sell the units to entities in the delinked system; sale might be the only option for some units (e.g., units for future periods)

MARGAREE14 Conclusions Severing a link is easy administratively Announcement should be handled like a currency devaluation Erik Haites Margaree Consultants