MATN Conference, 20041 Consideration: Introduction to a Guide for Maryland Schools John Castellani, Ph.D. Penny Reed, Ph.D. and Joy Zabala.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

Assistive Technology & the IEP Sue Loeffler, M.A., CCC-SLP Assistive Technology Specialist Denver Public Schools.
Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 2 of 8 Background and Legal Context.
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY An overview of AT services to support the teachers and students in Cobb County.
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICES AND SERVICES
Assistive Technology Definitions and the Law. Assistive Technology Devices Services Consideration.
SCHOOLS K - 12 Dr. Susan W. Floyd Education Associate Speech-Language Disabilities, Assistive Technology Office of Exceptional Children South Carolina.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Working with Parents of a Child with Disabilities Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.
Considering Assistive Technology and the AT Plan Sara Menzel, ATP UCP Michigan Assistive Technology Center
Assistive Technology AT services provided through Oklahoma ABLE Tech, a contractor for the Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Understanding the IEP Process
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Joan Breslin Larson Follow up webinar post Feb for AT Conference for AT Teams Hosted by Oklahoma.
Implementing Assistive Technology in School and Beyond 1.
AT services provided through Oklahoma ABLE Tech, a contractor for the Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Assistive Technology Works: Legislation, Definitions and Benefits
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Special Education Adrienne Lacey-Bushell, Ed.D. Director Special Education.
Hosted by Rogelio Campa Assistive Technology AT Fixes IEP Types of ATAT Categories
Assistive Technology Getting There Another Way. “The Power of A.T. to improve and enhance the lives of individuals with disabilities is virtually.
Instruction with Technology for Secondary Students with Exceptionalities
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
True or False A student’s need for AT must be considered at every ARD.
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICES AND SERVICES Special Education Department Presenters Assistive Technology Team.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
THE PERSONNEL AND PROCEDURES OF SPECIAL EDUCATION Chapter 2.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Assistive Technology Tools That Benefit ALL Learners By Lourdes Day, FDLRS Technology Specialist Local Assistive Technology Team (LAT)
1 Considering Assistive Technology in the IEP Process.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
In the State-Required Assessment and Accountability Programs 703 KAR 5:070 1.
Michigan Protection & Advocacy Services, Inc. Assistive Technology (AT) in Special Education Mark McWilliams, Education Team Michigan Protection & Advocacy.
AssistiveTechnology101 SPECIAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Cc Developed through a partnership of the Maryland State Department of Education Division of Special Education and Early Intervention Services and the.
Assistive Technology Tools That Benefit ALL Learners By Lourdes Day, FDLRS Technology Specialist and Local Assistive Technology Team (LAT) Florida Diagnostic.
Joy Zabala, AT & LEADERSHIP Joy Smiley Zabala, Ed.D, ATP SETTing the Stage for Technology-Supported Achievement.
Historical and Legal Perspectives of Assistive Technology BJ Gallagher, Ph.D., CCC-SLP.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
Accessible Educational Materials and the IEP. Introduction to the National Center for Accessible Educational Materials for Learning October 2014 to October.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY LEGAL ISSUES that influence decision making.
Technology for Learning Rob Culp Lewis University.
+ ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY (AT) ROUND ROBIN PART 2: AT ASSESSMENT Presented by Oklahoma ABLE Tech.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Sept. 16, Session #2 PED3106 : Agenda - Housekeeping: Hardcopy course outlines, Assignment 1 (8:30AM-8:45AM) - Complimen-tree, Inclusion in I/S Schools.
AT Consideration Overview of Issues & Solutions. P ROCEDURAL ISSUES … Consideration / Assessment / Evaluation Integration into IEP Implementation & Progress.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
Have You Considered AT Lately? Answers to your questions about Assistive Technology as members of the IEP team Michigan's Integrated Technology Supports.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Supporting Student Success USE OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN DERRY TOWNSHIP January 2016.
Slide 1 Assistive Technology Guidelines for Kentucky Schools AT Training Team.
Assistive Technology Assessment Process Bonnie Young Wendy Homlish AT Consultants Carbon Lehigh Intermediate Unit 21.
Understanding Your Child’s IEP
Assistive Technology.
Federal Regulations for Students with Disabilities
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Developing the Individual Education Program (IEP)
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Assistive Technology Implementation
Writing Assistive Technology (AT) in the IEP: A brief guide
Assistive Technology Legal Requirements and Implications
Presentation transcript:

MATN Conference, Consideration: Introduction to a Guide for Maryland Schools John Castellani, Ph.D. Penny Reed, Ph.D. and Joy Zabala

MATN Conference, Framing the Session Legal Review and Update – IDEA Reauthorization Issues in AT Consideration Introducing… Considering the Need for Assistive Technology within the Individualized Education Program Process

MATN Conference, Ground Rules Contribute actively Ask questions Honor contributions of others Speak one at a time Be prompt Take care of yourself Enjoy yourself

MATN Conference, Legal Update What is.. What is to come…

MATN Conference, LANGUAGE

MATN Conference, Academic Achievement Functional Performance Senate IDEA Reauthorization Bill S. 1248

MATN Conference, NEW POLICY

MATN Conference, …call for an instructional materials accessibility standard and the development of a National Instructional Materials Access Center Addition in Senate IDEA Reauthorization Bill S. 1248

MATN Conference, DEFINITIONS

MATN Conference, IDEA ’97 Definition of AT Devices (Sec ) … Assistive technology device means any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the functional capabilities of a child with a disability.

MATN Conference, Addition in Senate IDEA Reauthorization Bill S …The term does not include a medical device that is surgically implanted, or the post-surgical maintenance, programming, or replacement of such device, or an external device connected with the use of a surgically implanted medical device (other than the costs of performing routine maintenance and monitoring of such external device at the same time the child is receiving other services under this Act).

MATN Conference, CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL FACTORS

MATN Conference, IDEA ’97 (i)In the case of a child whose behavior impedes his or her learning or that of others consider, when appropriate, strategies, including positive behavior interventions strategies and supports to address that behavior. S (i) In the case of a child whose behavior impedes his or her learning or that of others consider, provide for positive behavior interventions and supports to address that behavior. CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL FACTORS Behavior: Change from ‘97

MATN Conference, CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL FACTORS Braille: Addition in S (I)provide for instruction in Braille and the use of Braille unless the IEP Team determines, after an evaluation of the child's reading and writing skills, needs, and appropriate reading and writing media (including an evaluation of the child's future needs for instruction in Braille or the use of Braille), that instruction in Braille or the use of Braille is not appropriate for the child; and (II) consider, when appropriate, instructional services related to functional performance skills, orientation and mobility, and skills in the use of assistive technology devices, including low vision devices;

MATN Conference, CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL FACTORS Communication: Change from ‘97 IDEA ’97 (iv) consider the communication needs of the child, and in the case of a child who is deaf or hard of hearing, consider the child's language and communication needs, opportunities for direct communications with peers and professional personnel in the child's language and communication mode, academic level, and full range of needs, including opportunities for direct instruction in the child's language and communication mode; S (iv)in the case of a child who is deaf or hard of hearing, consider the child's language and communication needs, opportunities for direct communications with peers and professional personnel, and access to the general curriculum and instruction at the child’s academic level in the child’s language and communication mode;

MATN Conference, CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL FACTORS Assistive Technology IDEA ’97 and S (v)Consider whether the child requires assistive technology devices and services HR 1350 (II) Consider whether the child needs assistive technology devices and services

MATN Conference, Consideration? What DOES it mean?

MATN Conference, “What If ?”

MATN Conference, “What If ?” What would your IEP team do if, during consideration, they found that Jane, who has very poor handwriting, had been using a portable word processor to write and, using that tool, the quality and quantity of her written work had increased to a level that is commensurate with the written work of her peers?

MATN Conference, “What If ?” What if Brenda, a fully included 10th grader, was unable to access the computers the high school writing lab that her class attended twice a week ? What would your IEP team do?

MATN Conference, A Snapshot of What’s Happening in Your District

MATN Conference, Action Item Consideration? What’s working well with AT consideration? What’s your greatest concern about AT consideration?

MATN Conference, What We Have Observed…

MATN Conference, What Others Have Said... “We assessed or we didn’t do anything…” “We prioritize.. most visible needs first” “Johnny?... he’s too low” “We just checked yes or no on the form” “Sally?…she just needs to try harder” “Not before the fifth grade” “We don’t have enough money for that” “Jeff?.. He’s bright. Get the kid a laptop!”

MATN Conference, Assistive Technology in IDEA ‘97

MATN Conference, Final Regulations of IDEA ’97 Sec (a) Each public agency shall ensure that assistive technology devices and assistive technology services, or both, as those terms are defined in Secs , are made available to a child with a disability if required as a part of the child's - (1) Special education under Sec ; (2) Related services under Sec ; or (3) Supplementary aids and services under Secs and (b)(2).

MATN Conference, Final Regulations of IDEA ’97 Sec (b) On a case-by-case basis, the use of school- purchased assistive technology devices in a child's home or in other settings is required if the child's IEP team determines that the child needs access to those devices in order to receive FAPE.

MATN Conference, IDEA ’97 Comment in Regulations (page 12540) “ Section is sufficient to explain how a determination about a child's need for an assistive technology device or service is made.” The Federal Register March 12, 1999

MATN Conference, Consideration Integral Part of the Special Educational Process –Prereferral –Referral –Evaluation –IEP Development –Implementation –Annual Review

MATN Conference, What are the three most important issues in the consideration of AT in the IEP?

MATN Conference, Process, Process, Process Problem solving Promising Practices Resources Educational Process Considering the Need for Assistive Technology within the IEP Process

MATN Conference, Defining a process for Maryland schools…

MATN Conference, Considering the Need for Assistive Technology within the Individualized Education Program Process The Center for Technology in Education with a grant from the Maryland State Department of Education and the Technology and Media Division of the Council for Exceptional Children

MATN Conference, THREE SPECIFIC GOALS 1.To increase awareness of a) the range of AT devices currently available, b) the importance of AT services, and c) effective applications and practices related to AT use in educational settings. 2.To demystify the AT consideration process by providing a clear, systematic approach for IEP teams to follow when developing plans for students with disabilities, in any grade or setting regardless of disability type or severity.

MATN Conference, THREE SPECIFIC GOALS 3.To increase access to AT through the consideration process so that students with disabilities are able to successfully participate in the educational activities and achieve curricular goals.

MATN Conference, FIVE MEANS TO ACCOMPLISH GOALS 1.Exploring the legal requirements related to assistive technology that are mandated by IDEA ’97, including provision of AT devices and services, definitions of AT devices and services, and consideration of a student's possible need for AT during the development of the IEP; 2.Describing a student-centered, systematic process for considering AT during the IEP development process;

MATN Conference, FIVE MEANS TO ACCOMPLISH GOALS 3.Discussing the importance of documentation and describe effective methods for documenting AT; consideration; 4.Discussing frequently asked questions about assistive technology devices, services and consideration; and, 5.Providing a selection of resources that have been helpful to others.

MATN Conference, Contents IDEA 1997: THE LEGAL MANDATE FOR ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY IDEA Sec Definition of Assistive Technology: Improving Functional Capability IDEA Sec Definition of AT Services: Supporting Implementation of AT Devices Thinking about AT Services: What’s Needed to Support Proper and Effective Use of AT? Consideration of Special Factors: Attending to Very Specific Needs

MATN Conference, Contents CONSIDERING THE NEED FOR AT DEVICES AND SERVICES: MAKING INFORMED DECISIONS ▪ The AT Consideration Process: A Five Step Approach ▪ Making a Decision About AT: Four Options for the IEP Team ▪ Weighing AT Options: Balancing Short-Term Need and Long-Term Benefit

MATN Conference, Contents DOCUMENTING AT CONSIDERATION: What to Include on the IEP IMPROVING THE AT CONSIDERATION PROCESS: Working with Teams and Stakeholders Common Problems and How to Avoid Them: Stay Focused on Student Needs Improving the AT Consideration Process District-Wide: Useful Tools

MATN Conference, Contents RESOURCES TO HELP WITH AT CONSIDERATION Web-based Print Other APPENDICES

MATN Conference, The Five Step Approach The AT consideration process outlined in IDEA ’97 mirrors the IEP development process, follows the same steps, and takes place at the same time. When facilitated by a knowledgeable IEP team member, AT consideration is likely to be a relatively brief and reasonably easy process completed in 5 logical steps.

MATN Conference, The Five Step Approach 1.Review present level of performance and other pertinent information 2.Develop annual goals, including benchmarks 3.Identify tasks necessary to accomplish goals 4.Determine the difficulty of the student’s tasks 5.Identify appropriate supports and services, including AT

MATN Conference, Outcomes of Assistive Technology Consideration

MATN Conference, Results of AT Consideration: Options for the IEP Team There are four major outcomes that result from the consideration process 1.AT is not required, 2.AT is required and specific tools are known 3.AT is required, but trials are required to determine exactly which tool 4.more information is needed

MATN Conference, Results of AT Consideration: AT is not required AT is not required or is no longer needed because it is anticipated that the student will be able to access the curriculum and make reasonable progress in his/her educational program without AT devices and services. This is a reasonable decision if the IEP team has completed the five-step process and can provide supporting evidence or data 1

MATN Conference, Results of AT Consideration: AT is required and specific tools are known AT is required for the student to access the curriculum and make reasonable progress in his/her educational program. In this case, the team should also make recommendations for specific devices and/or services. 2

MATN Conference, Results of AT Consideration: AT is required, but trials are required to determine exactly which tool(s) If the IEP team determines that AT is required but they are not able to identify the specific tool(s) that would most effectively enable the student to access the curriculum and make reasonable progress in his educational program, the IEP would document the need for AT… 3

MATN Conference, More about trials… During implementation, comparative trials would be conducted to determine the device and services that will be most effective. For example, the team may decide that a child needs an alternative keyboard for computer access but they are not clear on which alternative keyboard would best meet the student’s needs. 3 (Continued)

MATN Conference, Results of AT Consideration: More information is needed More information is needed before the team can make a decision about AT and the team needs additional help. The team documents the nature of the assistance that is needed and a timeline for getting it. If an AT assessment is needed a referral is made and it is documented in the IEP as an AT service to be provided. 4

MATN Conference, Where is it written? It depends… In the objective As a method or material In related services objectives In accommodations or modifications In the minutes As support for staff

MATN Conference, Improving Consideration in Your District Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology Services

MATN Conference, Assistive technology devices and services are considered for all students with disabilities regardless of type or severity of disability. 2.The IEP team has the knowledge and skills to make informed assistive technology decisions. Quality Indicators for Consideration of Assistive Technology Needs

MATN Conference, The IEP team uses a collaborative decision making process based on data about the student environment and tasks to determine assistive technology needs. 4.A continuum of assistive technology devices and services is explored. Quality Indicators for Consideration of Assistive Technology Needs

MATN Conference, Decisions regarding the need for assistive technology devices and services are made based on access to the curriculum and the student's IEP goals and objectives. 6.Decisions regarding the need for assistive technology devices and services and supporting data are documented. Quality Indicators for Consideration of Assistive Technology Needs

MATN Conference, A Quick Review …

MATN Conference, A Quick Review… Why must IEP teams consider assistive technology? IEP teams consider assistive technology because they are required by state and federal statutes to do so during the development of the IEP

MATN Conference, What decisions do IEP teams make as a result of AT consideration? 1.AT is not required, 2.AT is required and specific tools are known 3.AT is required, but trials are required to determine exactly which tool 4.more information is needed

MATN Conference, Next Steps - Action Items What is one thing you will do back in your district based on our conversation today?

MATN Conference, Contact Information