Biogenic Contributions to Methane Trends from 1990 to 2004 Arlene M. Fiore 1 Larry W. Horowitz 1, Ed Dlugokencky 2, J. Jason West.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Advertisements

CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
Increasing Wetland Emissions of Methane From A Warmer Artic: Do we See it Yet? Lori Bruhwiler and Ed Dlugokencky Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder,
Simulations and Inverse Modeling of Global Methyl Chloride 1 School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology 2 Division of Engineering.
Interpreting MLS Observations of the Variabilities of Tropical Upper Tropospheric O 3 and CO Chenxia Cai, Qinbin Li, Nathaniel Livesey and Jonathan Jiang.
CO 2 in the middle troposphere Chang-Yu Ting 1, Mao-Chang Liang 1, Xun Jiang 2, and Yuk L. Yung 3 ¤ Abstract Measurements of CO 2 in the middle troposphere.
Interannual variations in global OH radicals over the period in GEOS-Chem, and preliminary comparisons to other models I. Bey 1, S. Koumoutsaris.
The Atmosphere: Oxidizing Medium In Global Biogeochemical Cycles EARTH SURFACE Emission Reduced gas Oxidized gas/ aerosol Oxidation Uptake Reduction.
REFERENCES Maria Val Martin 1 C. L. Heald 1, J.-F. Lamarque 2, S. Tilmes 2 and L. Emmons 2 1 Colorado State University 2 NCAR.
Global simulation of H 2 and HD with GEOS-CHEM Heather Price 1, Lyatt Jaeglé 1, Paul Quay 2, Andrew Rice 2, and Richard Gammon 2 University of Washington,
Evolution of methane concentrations for the period : Interannual variability in sinks and sources J. Drevet, I. Bey, J.O. Kaplan, S. Koumoutsaris,
Interactions Among Air Quality and Climate Policies: Lectures 7 and 8 (abridged versions)
THE ATMOSPHERE: OXIDIZING MEDIUM IN GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
Evaluating the Impact of the Atmospheric “ Chemical Pump ” on CO 2 Inverse Analyses P. Suntharalingam GEOS-CHEM Meeting, April 4-6, 2005 Acknowledgements.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Workshop USEPA/OAQPS.
This Week—Tropospheric Chemistry READING: Chapter 11 of text Tropospheric Chemistry Data Set Analysis.
Evaluating the Role of the CO 2 Source from CO Oxidation P. Suntharalingam Harvard University TRANSCOM Meeting, Tsukuba June 14-18, 2004 Collaborators.
Influence of the Brewer-Dobson Circulation on the Middle/Upper Tropospheric O 3 Abstract Lower Stratosphere Observations Models
Sensitivity of U.S. Surface Ozone to Isoprene Emissions & Chemistry: An Application of the 1°x1 ° North American Nested GEOS-CHEM Model GEOS-CHEM Model.
Impact of Reduced Carbon Oxidation on Atmospheric CO 2 : Implications for Inversions P. Suntharalingam TransCom Meeting, June 13-16, 2005 N. Krakauer,
METHANE. TOPICS FOR TODAY 1.Why do we care about methane? 2.What are the sources and concentrations of methane in the atmosphere? 3.Uncertainties in the.
Connecting Climate and Air Quality: The Contribution of Methane to Hemispheric Ozone Pollution Center for Atmosphere Ocean Science, New York University.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Simple Chemical modeling of ozone sensitivity
A51B-0036 Uncertain Isoprene Emissions and Chemistry: Implications for Ozone in the Eastern United States Arlene M. Fiore 1 Larry.
 Among all CO source/sink terms, the loss due to CO reaction with OH and the emission from biomass burning appear to be main causes for seasonal fluctuation.
ICDC7, Boulder, September 2005 CH 4 TOTAL COLUMNS FROM SCIAMACHY – COMPARISON WITH ATMOSPHERIC MODELS P. Bergamaschi 1, C. Frankenberg 2, J.F. Meirink.
Global budget of ethane and constraints on North American sources from INTEX-A aircraft data Yaping Xiao 1, Jennifer A. Logan 1, Daniel.
Air Quality and Climate Connections Green and Environmental Systems Regional and Urban Air Quality: Now and in the Future New York Academy of Sciences,
Kaitlyn Steele Bryan Duncan, NASA-GSFC Juying Warner, UMBC-JCET Eric Nielsen, NASA-GSFC Research and Discover 2010 Surface [CH 4 ] in NASA GEOS-5 CCM.
TROPOSPHERIC OZONE AND OXIDANT CHEMISTRY Troposphere Stratosphere: 90% of total The many faces of atmospheric ozone: In stratosphere: UV shield In middle/upper.
Effect of NO x emission controls on the long-range transport of ozone air pollution and human mortality J. Jason West, Vaishali Naik, Larry W. Horowitz,
. s Yuqiang Zhang 1, J. Jason West 1, Meridith M. Fry 1, Raquel A. Silva 1, Steven J. Smith 2, Vaishali Naik 4, Zachariah Adelman 1, Susan C. Anenberg.
The effect of pyro-convective fires on the global troposphere: comparison of TOMCAT modelled fields with observations from ICARTT Sarah Monks Outline:
Source vs. Sink Contributions to Atmospheric Methane Trends:
Itsushi UNO*, Youjiang HE, Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Kasuga, Fukuoka, JAPAN Toshimasa OHARA, Jun-ichi KUROKAWA, Hiroshi.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
TEMIS User Workshop, Frascati, Italy October 8-9, 2007 Formaldehyde application Derivation of updated pyrogenic and biogenic hydrocarbon emissions over.
Trends in Tropical Water Vapor ( ): Satellite and GCM Comparison Satellite Observed ---- Model Simulated __ Held and Soden 2006: Robust Responses.
MOZART Development, Evaluation, and Applications at GFDL MOZART Users’ Meeting August 17, 2005 Boulder, CO Arlene M. Fiore Larry W. Horowitz
A modelling study on trends and variability of the tropospheric chemical composition over the last 40 years S.Rast(1), M.G.Schultz(2) (1) Max Planck Institute.
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 14: Methane and CO Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Illinois,
Climatic implications of changes in O 3 Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies How well.
Observational Constraints on the Global Methane Budget Ed Dlugokencky NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Global Monitoring Division Boulder, Colorado.
TF HTAP Multi-model Estimates of Intercontinental Source-Receptor Relationships for Ozone Pollution TF HTAP Workshop, Washington, DC, June 10, 2008 Arlene.
Recent and future trends in atmospheric methane: Connecting global chemistry, climate and ozone pollution Berkeley Atmospheric Sciences Symposium, September.
The Double Dividend of Methane Control Arlene M. Fiore IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria January 28, 2003 ANIMALS 90 LANDFILLS 50 GAS 60 COAL 40 RICE 85 TERMITES.
F.J. Dentener, C. Cuvelier, M.G. Schultz, O. Wild, T.J. Keating, A. Zuber, S. Wu, C. Textor, M. Schulz, C. Atherton, D.Bergmann, I. Bey, G. Carmichael,
A21E-0863 Connecting Climate and Air Quality: Tropospheric Ozone Response to Methane Emission Controls Arlene M. Fiore 1 Larry.
Atmospheric Methane Distribution, Trend, and Linkage with Surface Ozone Arlene M. Fiore 1 Larry W. Horowitz 1, Ed Dlugokencky.
Background ozone in surface air over the United States Arlene M. Fiore Daniel J. Jacob US EPA Workshop on Developing Criteria for the Chemistry and Physics.
OsloCTM2  3D global chemical transport model  Standard tropospheric chemistry/stratospheric chemistry or both. Gas phase chemistry + essential heteorogenous.
HYMN: Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the biosphere GOCE-CT TM4 model evaluations
27-28/10/2005IGBP-QUEST Fire Fast Track Initiative Workshop Inverse Modeling of CO Emissions Results for Biomass Burning Gabrielle Pétron National Center.
TROPOSPHERIC OZONE AS A CLIMATE GAS AND AIR POLLUTANT: THE CASE FOR CONTROLLING METHANE Daniel J. Jacob with Loretta J. Mickley, Arlene M. Fiore, Yaping.
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
A proposal for multi-model decadal hindcast simulations
Yuqiang Zhang1,2, Owen R, Cooper3,4, Audrey Gaudel3,4, Anne M
Reducing tropospheric ozone with methane controls:
Distribution and Trends: Impacts on Climate and Ozone Air Quality
Preliminary Ozone Results from the TF HTAP Model Intercomparison
The Double Dividend of Methane Control
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Global atmospheric changes and future impacts on regional air quality
Intercontinental Transport, Hemispheric Pollution,
Linking Ozone Pollution and Climate Change:
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review
Climatic implications of changes in O3
The global cycle of methane CMI methane project
Presentation transcript:

Biogenic Contributions to Methane Trends from 1990 to 2004 Arlene M. Fiore 1 Larry W. Horowitz 1, Ed Dlugokencky 2, J. Jason West 3 1 NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ 2 NOAA Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO 3 Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Program and Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 1. Introduction REFERENCES Dentener, F., et al. (2003), J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4442, doi: /2002JD Dlugokencky, E.J., et al. (2003), Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1992, doi: /2003GL Dlugokencky, E.J., et al. (2005), J. Geophys. Res., 110, D18306, doi: /2005JD Horowitz, L.W., et al. (2003), J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4784, doi: /2002JD What is the contribution from each process? Are existing bottom-up CH 4 emission inventories for the 1990s consistent with observations? 2. Methane in the MOZART-2 CTM 3. Influence of Sources on Surface CH 4 Distribution and Trend 4. Meteorologically-driven Changes in the CH 4 Lifetime Methane (CH 4 ) emission controls are a cost-effective strategy for abating global surface ozone, while simultaneously slowing greenhouse warming [West and Fiore, 2005]. Sources of CH 4 are shown to the right; the major CH 4 sink is reaction with the hydroxyl radical (OH) in the troposphere. Surface CH 4 concentrations rose by 5-6 ppb yr -1 on average until 1999 when they leveled off (see Figure below). There is no clear consensus on the driving mechanism. Possible explanations suggested by previous studies: (1) Source changes of CH 4 [e.g. Langenfelds et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2004] or other species [e.g. Karlsdóttir and Isaksen, 2000] (2) Meteorologically-driven changes in the CH 4 sink [e.g. Warwick et al., 2002; Dentener et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2004] (3) Approach to steady-state with constant lifetime [Dlugokencky et al., 2003] BASE Constant emissions (1990) Sensitivity simulations applying different CH 4 emission inventories: Latitudinal distribution of 1990 CH 4 emissions for each case ANTH Time-varying anthrop. emissions ANTH + BIO Time-varying anthrop. and wetland emissions Tg CH 4 yr -1 EDGAR v and 1995 anth. emissions [Olivier, 2002] EDGAR “FAST-TRACK” for 2000 [van Aardenne et al., 2005] Linear interpolation applied for intermediate years Biogenic source adjusted to maintain same global total emissions in 1990 as in BASE BASE ANTH ANTH+BIO Latitude Tg CH 4 yr -1 Combine wetland emissions from Wang et al. [2004] (above) and anthropogenic emissions from ANTH, constraining global mean wetland emissions to equal those in ANTH Apply climatological mean (224 Tg yr -1 ) post-1998  Recycled NCEP  Meteorological drivers for observed trend  Not just simple approach to steady-state Area-weighted global mean surface CH 4 in BASE simulation (constant emissions) BASE captures observed rate of increase and leveling off after 1998 OBSERVED BASE too low post-1998 ANTH improves CH 4 vs. OBS post-1998 Global mean surface CH 4 concentrations as measured (or sampled in the model) at 42 Global Monitoring Division (GMD) stations [e.g. Dlugokencky et al., 2005] with an 8-year minimum record. Values are area-weighted after averaging in latitudinal bands (60-90N, N, 0-30N, 0-30S, 30-90S).  = Temperature Humidity Lightning NO x Photolysis (changes in stratospheric O 3 columns neglected) Changes in emissions of other species (neglected) Transport to sink regions How might meteorology affect  ? Mean model bias and correlation with monthly mean surface GMD observations BASE ANTH ANTH+BIO Latitude Bias (ppb) r2r ANTH+BIO best captures the CH 4 interhemispheric gradient ANTH+BIO improves the correlation with with observations, especially at high northern latitudes BASE wetland emissions yield a closer match with observed CH 4 in tropics OBS (GMD) BASE ANTH ANTH+BIO  Model captures the observed seasonal cycles CH 4 Lifetime Against Tropospheric OH (  )  Mean annual CH 4 lifetime shortens Alert (82.4N,62.5W) South Pole (89.9S,24.8W) Mahe Island (4.7S,55.2E) Midway (28.2N,177.4W) Surface CH 4 concentrations at selected GMD stations ANTH+BIO improves: 1)high N latitude seasonal cycle 2) Trend 3) Low bias at S Pole, especially post-1998 BASE simulation (constant emissions) captures observed rate of CH 4 increase from , and leveling off post-1998 ANTH emissions (EDGAR FT-2000 inventories) improve modeled CH 4 post-1998 ANTH+BIO spatial and temporal distribution of wetland CH 4 emissions is critical for reproducing the observed seasonality, interhemispheric gradient, and global mean trend  CH4 decreases by ~2% from to due to warmer temperatures (35%) and higher OH (65%, resulting from a ~10% increase in lightning NO x emissions) Future research should: consider climate-driven feedbacks from biogenic emissions and fires (CH 4, CO, NO x, NMVOC) on  CH4 develop more physically-based parameterizations of lightning NO x emissions to determine whether higher emissions are a robust feature of a warmer climate van Aardenne, J.A., F. Dentener, J.G.J. Olivier and J.A.H.W. Peters (2005), The EDGAR 3.2 Fast Track 2000 dataset (32FT2000). Wang, J.S., et al. (2004), Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 18, GB3011, doi: /2003GB Warwick, N.J., et al. (2002), Geophys. Res. Lett., 29 (20), 1947, doi: /2002GL West, J.J. and A.M. Fiore (2005), Environ. Sci. & Technol., 39,  OH increases in the model by +1.4% from to due to a 0.3 Tg N yr -1 (~10%) increase in lightning NO x  Large uncertainties in magnitude (and trend) of lightning NO x emissions in the real atmosphere Karlsdóttir, S., and I.S.A. Isaksen (2000), Geophys. Res. Lett., 27 (1), Langenfelds, R.L., et al. (2002), Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 16, 1048, doi: /2001GB Olivier, J.G.J., et al. (1999), Environmental Science & Policy, 2, Olivier, J.G.J. (2002) In: "CO2 emissions from fuel combustion ", 2002 Edition, pp. III.1-III.31. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris. ISBN nmol/mol = ppb in dry air 5. Conclusions ~100 gas and aerosol species, ~200 reactions NCEP meteorology o latitude x 1.9 o longitude x 64 vertical levels detailed description in Horowitz et al. [2003] 547 Tg CH 4 yr -1 Biogenic and biomass burning from Horowitz et al. [2003] Anthropogenic (energy, rice, ruminants) from EDGAR 2.0 [Olivier et al., 1999] Deconstruct   (-0.17 years) from to into individual contributions by varying temperature and OH separately Change in mean (  ) from to (years) BASE  T(+0.3K)  OH(+1.4%) + = Tg CH 4 yr ANTH+BIO best captures measured abundances