1 ADDRESSING THE OVERREPRESENTATION OF STUDENTS OF COLOR AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN SPECIAL EDUCATION DPI Summer Institute on Disproportionality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Instruction ________________________________ Response To Intervention New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Advertisements


Disproportionality in Special Education
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
Including Other Professionals In the SAT Process: Factors for Consideration by Donald J. Frazier, Ph.D.
Daniel J. Losen Independent Consultant Breaking Down the Data: Developing a Deeper Understanding at the District Level.
Understanding Special Education services SPECIAL EDUCATION REFERRAL PROCESS.
ADSUP 721: School Law & Finance Nick DiSanto Prof. Becker Hunter College Spring 2012.
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
Assistance Team Procedures East Iredell Middle School Sept 15, 2010.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
JoEtta Gonzales, Director The Equity Alliance at ASU February 15, 2011.
NYCDOE TAC-D OVERVIEW Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools Technical Assistance Center on Disproportionality
IDEA Reauthorization and Disproportionality Sammie Lambert, DECS KYCASE Summer Institute Lexington, Kentucky July 16, 2007.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
July 2007 IDEA Partnership 1 RTI Process What is it?
January 2010IDEA Partnership1 Response to Intervention: Basics for families and community members.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
“Sorting Out Response to Intervention” Nassau Association of District Curriculum Officials February 26, 2009 Presented by Arlene B. Crandall ABCD Consulting,
1 Cultural Competencies, Part IV: Race & Ethnicity Maggie Rivas April 11, 2007.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. 1 CHAPTER 5 Sociocultural Diversity.
FOR: MIRANDA MURPHY LINDSAY FIRN AGAINST: KAREN STEWART BRANDI WAINSCOTT Is Eliminating Minority Overrepresentation Beyond the Scope of Public Schools?
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Closing the Achievement Gap A 3-hour training for experienced SBDM Council members.
Addressing Disproportionality through Technical Assistance: A Case Study of New York Project 405 Team Metropolitan Center for Urban Education New York.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
DISPROPORTIONALITY What is it? And Why Do We Care? Carolyn Jefferson-Jenkins, Ph. D. University of Colorado- Denver.
The Madison Story Vision into Reality – Inclusive, Collaborative and Culturally Responsive Schools.
SPED Referral and IEP Process Guide Ginger Alonzo & Emily Disbennett.
Laura Matson, Ph.D. Director, Special Services Puget Sound Educational Service District Navigating the School Culture September 25, 2014.
State Laws, Recommendations, & NCLB How research becomes policies Janice Kroeger, Ph.D. Associate Professor, TLC, ECED.
STEPHEN BYRD SCHOOL OF EDUCATION ELON UNIVERSITY Disability and Equity In Special Education: Where Do We Go From Here?
1 Joyce James, LMSW-AP Associate Deputy Executive Commissioner Overview of the Texas Model for Eliminating Disproportionality and Disparities Center for.
District 97 Special Education Status and Plan Michael J. Padavic, LCSW Director.
Student Support Team (SST) Training A Humanware Strategic Plan Activity Cleveland Metropolitan School District 1.
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
Culture, Practice, and Leadership: Where Do I Stand? Tiffany Young, M. Ed. Equity & Diversity Coordinator Josh Deason, M.A. Equity & Diversity Specialist.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
1 Disproportionality Project Overview HESC Task Force on Quality Inclusive Schooling September 28, 2007 Yolanda Sealey-Ruiz, Ph.D.-
Northwest Regional ESD Inservice Aug. 24, 2006 English Language Learners with Special Needs: A Framework to Distinguish Language from Disability By R.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Whittney Smith Adelphi University IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and Special Education.
Challenges for Education Changing demographics –“Minority” groups are expected to comprise more than 40% of the population by 2020, and 50% by 2040 Poverty.
Diversity in Special Education. What is Diversity Diversity is about difference – students in special education vary in many ways, and those in regular.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comprehensive Evaluations. Overview OBJECTIVES: Review Comprehensive Evaluation Process Provide Information On Selected Topics  Specific Learning Disability.
1 DISPROPORTIONALITY A review of files of American Indian and Black Students Identified with a Disability in EBD in Green Bay Area Public Schools (GBAPS)
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Addressing Disproportionality Through PBIS and Restorative Justice: Oakland’s Story Nov 9 th, 2015 Barbara McClung & Lori Lynass supportsk12.com.
RTI stands for Response to Intervention. It is a four tiered process designed to meet the needs of struggling students. W HAT IS RTI??
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1: An Introduction To Assessing.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
1. Chapter Three Cultural and Linguistic Diversity and Exceptionality 2.
Special Education Plan Feedback Sessions. Agenda Welcome and Introductions Department of Student Services Purpose Why are we updating the Special Education.
Using Data to Develop Your School’s Single Plan Parent Institute December 7, 2005 Presenter: Reyna Corral, Categorical Coordinator.
Sources of Disproportionality in Special Education: Tracking Minority Representation through the Referral-to-Eligibility Process Ashley Gibb M. Karega.
Whittney Smith Assistant Principal / SCSE Chairperson Mineola Middle School IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
UPDATE ON DISPROPORTIONATE DISCIPLINE DATA August 25, 2015.
OVER-IDENTIFICATION OF STUDENTS FOR SERVICES: Special education
CHAPTER 6: WORKING WITH FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILIES
Cultural and Linguistic Diversity and Exceptionality
Working with Families of Children with Disabilities
Russ Brock Coordinator of Programs
Presentation transcript:

1 ADDRESSING THE OVERREPRESENTATION OF STUDENTS OF COLOR AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN SPECIAL EDUCATION DPI Summer Institute on Disproportionality in Special Education August 16, 2005 Presenter – Jack Jorgensen Executive Director, Department of Educational Services Madison Metropolitan School District

2 The Problem School Year A disproportionate number of students of color, especially black males, were being referred to special education (6% vs. 2% for white males). Subsequently a disproportionate number of students of color, especially black males were being placed into special education (80% placement rate). The overall special education prevalence rate in MMSD was steadily climbing, from 12.68% in to in

3 The Response Aug Moved the responsibility for conducting initial evaluations from school- based staff to a centrally coordinated IEP system (CCIS) Oct – Superintendent initiated the development of a pre-referral intervention system later referred to as the MMSD Educational Framework Sept Initiated a study group on disproportionality of minority students in special education Sept Courageous conversations on race and equity began to occur district-wide

4 Centrally Coordinated IEP System (CCIS)

5 A centrally coordinated IEP system (CCIS) for processing and completing initial special education referrals of students ages 5-21 Began in 1999 in response to growing special education prevalence rate and over representation of black students being placed in special education Special Education program support teacher is assigned to the IEP Team as: a) special ed. teacher, b) IEP chairperson and c) LEA representative Included the optional appointment of a CCIS bilingual bicultural school psychologist, speech & language program support teacher and/or O.T., P.T. program support person when appropriate General education teacher and other staff (e.g., social worker, nurse, etc.) were appointed as appropriate from the student’s school of attendance

6 Six Years of Data - Have we improved? Rate of referrals Rate of placements Looking at the data by ethnicity, socio-economic status and gender How CCIS is impacting our district’s overall prevalence rate

Poverty, Race and K-12 CCIS Referrals for

Student Subgroup Placement Rate Change Between and White, Female, Low Income-22% White, Female, Not Low Income-13% White, Male, Low Income-2% White, Male, Not Low Income-28% African American, Female, Low Income-22% African American, Female, Not Low Income-30% African American, Male, Low Income-15% African American, Male, Not Low Income-26%

17 CCIS Data - What does it suggest? There has been a steady decrease in initial referrals since the year. The percentage of referrals resulting in placement has leveled off over the past 5 years suggesting more appropriate referrals and more accurate conclusions on the questions of impairment and need for special education. There is still a disproportionate number of students of color and low income students being referred and placed.

18 Study Group

19 Study Group - Gaining a Better Understanding of the Underlying Issues Related to Overrepresentation In 2002, a study group was convened that looked at current research and best practice related to the topic of disproportionality. The group read and discussed over 15 articles and research studies. They then developed a multi-year Action Plan to address areas of concern needing improvement. This served as a catalyst for more focused efforts to conduct non-bias, multicultural assessments.

20 Study Group - Resulting Action Plan The multi-year Action Plan addressed the following: Development of non-bias, multi-cultural assessment guidelines and practices Improved training in evaluations procedures that began to address the exclusionary factors as part of eligibility Creation of a non-bias, multi-cultural assessment cadre and use of Tuning Protocol to review cases resulting in decrease in percentage of ELL students placed (90% placed in 98-99; 34% placed in 04-05).

21 MMSD Educational Framework

22 The MMSD Educational Framework Introduced by the Superintendent to help organize the way we think about and deliver services and supports to students, especially at the pre-referral level. Provides a common vocabulary and structure for conversations and planning on how to assist struggling learners prior to a special education referral.

Engagement Classroom School Community Learning Content Instruction Relationships Student Staff Student Staff Families Core Practices, Services & Programs IF A STUDENT ISN’T SUCCESSFUL? SOME Students Classroom Specific Supports School/District Wide Supports FEW Students Time Limited Specialized Support FEWER Students Long Term Intensive Specialized Support FEWEST Students ASSESSMENT ALL Students COMMUNITY COLLABORATIONS © MMSD

24 MMSD Educational Framework – So what has changed? Development of collaborative team structure at each school Focus on building capacity to support struggling learners in regular classrooms Scaffolding of interventions that address engagement, relationships and learning Systematic student data collection and tracking system that informs decisions Decrease in referrals from to

25 Race and Equity Discussions

26 Race and Equity Discussions – What affect has this had on disproportionality? People are engaging in open and candid conversations about race, racism and how our biases and stereotypes influence the way in which we relate to children and families of color Examining how differences in culture and ethnicity influence our perceptions of children’s learning and potential There is a greater awareness of the influence of race and culture and its impact on staff’s decisions to refer students of color for special education

27 Putting It All Together … A combined approach: A centralized system for initial evaluations Non-bias, multicultural assessment MMSD Educational Framework Courageous conversations on race and equity

28 Putting It All Together … Results in: Fewer students being misidentified as disabled and needing special education Improved identification of students who truly have a disability needing special education, especially English language learners