Oct.10, 2007EAMA7 The next-generation Infrared astronomy mission SPICA Outline of SPICA Scientific Research Concept (SciReC) SPICA 研究コンセプト概要 17 th May.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oct.10, 2007EAMA7 Japanese Space Activity on Exoplanets (JAXAs prespective) & Pathways to Habitable Planets September 16, 2009 Takao Nakagawa (ISAS/JAXA)
Advertisements

SOFIA SOFIA Science Steering Committee Meeting Palmdale, Feb 18, 2010 Dietmar Lilienthal / Alois Himmes.
JWST Science Timeline: Current Status Janice C. Lee STScI Science Mission Office March 13, 2014.
VISTA as seen by the Prime Contractor Adrian Russell.
Preliminary management plan for PACE SDT What are the Goals of PACE? The goals of the PACE mission are: 1-Extend key climate data records on ocean color.
PHEOS PSRR Concept of Operations. 2 Scope The purpose of the PCW-UVI Concept of Operations (ConOps) is to communicate how mission systems will operate,
Stephan Ott (Herschel Science Centre, ESTEC) on behalf of the Herschel Science Ground Segment Consortium
14/06/20151 MORE Requirements seen from ESA Pedro Pablos 1 st MORE Team Meeting 27 Febrero 2007.
Mission Operations and Data Flow Overview Koji Mukai Astro-E2 Guest Observer Facility.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Review of the GLAST/LAT Project, Aug. 14, 2001 Scott Williams 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Operations Center Scott.
Section 15-1GLAST Ground System Design Review August 18&19, 2004 ISOC Organization ISOC Manager R Cameron Commanding, H&S Timeline Planning Command Generation.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 4.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
The Systems Engineer’s Role in Project Success J. H Rothenberg May 1, 2006.
1 Public Entities Risk Management Forum Office of the Accountant General National Treasury Project Risk Management Jeets Hargovan Government Technical.
TEMPO Mission Project July 23, 2013 Project Manager: Alan Little.
Andrea Santangelo, Kepler Center-Tü Toulouse, February 2, 2012 “The Organization of the EUSO- Balloon mission” Andrea Santangelo * Kepler Center for Astro.
ELISA Data Processing Centre Volker Beckmann APC, Francois Arago Centre A. Petiteau, E. Porter, G. Auger, E. Plagnol, P. Binétruy.
→ Potential ESA- Roscosmos Cooperation in Education Activities.
Hunt for Molecules, Paris, 2005-Sep-20 Software Development for ALMA Robert LUCAS IRAM Grenoble France.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Operations Concept Richard Saylor Jr. HTSI/Code 444 August 16-17, 2005.
Presentation EddiCam consortium, FF, Madrid 13/06/2002 Eddington programmatic status Fully approved by SPC as part of ESA’s science program as project.
SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies SOFIA SCIENCE UTILIZATION POLICIES Pamela M. Marcum SOFIA Project Scientist SSSC Feb 19, 2010.
“Joint planning” session Preliminary instrument operation & science plans of SOT/XRT/EIS for several months after the launch. Instrument checkout and Performance.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
Archiving 40+ years of Planetary Mission Data - Lessons Learned and Recommendations K. E. Simmons LASP, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
SGS: Activities and Requests Helen Middleton. Hermean Environment Working Group Meeting | SGS Team | Key Largo | 16/05/2013 | Slide 2 Contents 1.ESAC.
EPOS Preparatory phase Torild van Eck (ORFEUS) Call INFRA Deadline: December 3, 2009 Funding: between 3 and 6 MEuro Duration: max 4 year.
Harvey Tananbaum Director Chandra X-ray Center Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 13th HEAD Meeting April 8, 2013 Building International Space.
NIEM Domain Awareness June 2011 Establishing a Domain within NIEM.
CEOS Special Report on Data Applications Sep 16, 2014 JAXA.
Current Status of SPICA Focal Plane Instruments October 19, 2009 Hideo Matsuhara (ISAS/JAXA) & FPI team.
Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
Doug Tody E2E Perspective EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, 2004 EVLA Software E2E Perspective.
Planetary Science Archive PSA User Group Meeting #1 PSA UG #1  July 2 - 3, 2013  ESAC PSA Archiving Standards.
Report from Subaru Advisory Committee The main issues of the current SAC: ・ Extensive (strategic) program of Subaru telescope ・ International collaborations.
Consortium Meeting La Palma October PV-Phase & Calibration Plans Sarah Leeks 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – PV Phase and.
JWST Calibration mini-summit STScI June 13, 2008.
1 ASTRONET Coordinating strategic planning for European Astronomy.
Space Operations as a Guide for a Real-World Scheduling Competition Eduardo Romero Marcelo Oglietti
Swift HUG April Swift data archive Lorella Angelini HEASARC.
WBL - 1 Observation Planning Workshop, Pasadena, CA 3-4 June 2010 Herschel Observer Support Overview William B. Latter NHSC Deputy Director.
May 17, 2004SSWG - PFIS Shared Risk1 PFIS Commissioning, Shared Risk, and Transition to Operations.
SPICA / AIV&T issues Spacecraft test program & model philosophy
1 Space Telescope Science Institute JWST S&OC JWST S&OC Contract Peter Stockman TIPS March 20, 2003.
FPI related schedule & Model Philosophy Based on spica_AIVT_revC, FPI_review_by_SDR_E Mar. 15 th, 2010 by H. Matsuhara, N. Takahashi, T. Nakagawa.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
LISA News from ESA O. Jennrich LISA Project Scientist.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Mexican Space Agency Plenary Agenda Item # 3 29 th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto,
N. RadziwillEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, 2006 NRAO End to End (e2e) Operations Division Nicole M. Radziwill.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
Unit – I Presentation. Unit – 1 (Introduction to Software Project management) Definition:-  Software project management is the art and science of planning.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 10, 2004 Users’ Committee Meeting The Project Data Management Plan David Band – GSSC.
About the European Science Foundation 1. 2 ESF Member Organisations ESF is an independent association of 13 Member Organisations ● research funding organisations.
Mission Planning Concepts
Background D/HSO Announcement of Opportunity (July 2011) in coordination with D/EOP soliciting scientific experiments for the International Space Station.
I&T&C Organization Chart
Chapter 6: Database Project Management
Detlef Koschny Research and Scientific Support Department ESA/ESTEC
Marie Curie Research Training Networks Mid-Term Review Meeting
Systems Engineering Management
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Pier Giorgio Marchetti, Philippe Mougnaud European Space Agency
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
ASTRONET Coordinating strategic planning for European Astronomy
Nov. 19, 2009 prepared by H. Matsuhara, N. Takahashi, T. Nakagawa
ETS WG role and working methods
SPICA / FPI Mechanical /Optical Issues
Presentation transcript:

Oct.10, 2007EAMA7 The next-generation Infrared astronomy mission SPICA Outline of SPICA Scientific Research Concept (SciReC) SPICA 研究コンセプト概要 17 th May 2010 Hideo Matsuhara & Takao Nakagawa (ISAS/JAXA)

SciReC : Table of Contents Introduction Adopted/ref. documents Outline : scope of the SciRC Definition of “Research product” Assumptions / constraints Research Concept Management structure Structure of Tracking/control & science ground segment Observation & Operation Mode Observing/Operational Duration Data & Research products distribution Data archive Public Outreach Observation Programs Category of programs Selection strategy of programs Operation of observing programs Propriety Time of Data 2

Management Scheme (also described in SEMP) 3

4 International Collaboration Scheme ESA Subsystem Management SAFARI Consortium System Integration European Teams Japanese Teams FPI : SAFARI ESA Manufacturing ( 80K ) JAXA Integration ( ) Telescope JAXA Subsystem Integrator Japanese Group Korean Team (TBD) NAOJ (TBD) FPI:MIRs + SCI JAXA SPICA team: System Integration SPICA Steering Committee FPI:FPC FPI:BLISS NASA Team (TBD) ※ FPI : Focal Plane Instrument SAFARI : SPICA Far-Infrared Instrument MIRs : Mid Infrared Insturuments (MIRACLE,MIRMES,MIRHES) BLISS : Background-Limited Infrared-Submikimeter Spectrograph FPC : Focal Plane finding Camera Science Advisory Committee Joint System Engineering Team

Two-level management Agency-Level Management (Steering or Executive Committee) Manage the overall financial and programmatic issues Authority to make the top-level decisions when required (impacting the whole cost, schedule, major risks, and scientific performance) Project-Level Management Technical Issues, Schedule, Reviews SPICA JOINT PROJECT OFFICE Joint Systems Engineering Team Scientific Issues Science Advisory Committee

STEERING (or Executive) COMMITTEE (draft) Purpose Manage the overall financial and programmatic issues Authority to make the top-level decisions when required (impacting the whole cost, schedule, major risks, and scientific performance) Membership Chair JAXA representative JAXA JAXA/HQ representative, ISAS/HQ representative ESA ESA/HQ representative SRON SRON representative Other national institutes (e.g. US, Korea) Meetings WHEN REQUIRED

JOINT PROJECT OFFICE (draft) Purpose To manage the whole project efficiently Technical issues, Detailed Schedule, Detailed Financial Issues, performance check Membership Chair SPICA PI or PM JAXA SPICA PI, PM, SE, FPI chair, Each FPI PI ESA SPICA PM, PS, SAFARI Scientist, SAFARI PI, SAFARI PM Other institutes (TBD) Meetings Monthly Report to agency-level management structure

Joint Systems Engineering Team (draft) Purpose To check technical issues focusing on I/Fs between subgroups To avoid any “hidden gap” Membership Chair SPICA SE JAXA SPICA PM, SE, FPI chair, Technical experts (including members from industry partners) ESA TBD (SPICA PM, experts, …) Meetings Every three months (together with design meeting) Report to Steering committee

Science Advisory Committee (draft) Purpose To review the scientific objectives and to check if the specifications and performance of SPICA is compatible with scientific requirements Membership Japan: Project Scientist, (SPICA PI as an observer) ESA: Project Scientist International member: scientist representing all relevant fields of astronomy (including SPICA Task Force in Japan) Meetings Every two months Report to SPICA Steering Committee

Management Structure (NEED TO BE UPDATED!!) 10

Operation Plan 11

Operation Centers (1) Mission Operation Center (MOC) In charge of the direct operation of the whole SPICA satellite system Creating and sending commands Receiving telemetry data To check the health & basic functions of SPICA Science Operation Center (SOC) In charge of Observation Planning Generate the observation plan, and deliver to MOC Handling observation proposals, support the TAC (time allocation committee) decision for the observation plan User Support: support users to plan observations and to submit proposals Structure HQ at JAXA Instrument Control Centre (ICC) in Japan, Europe (& US, Korea) 12

Mission Operation Centre ( MOC) Science Operation Centre ( SOC) Tracking/control & science Ground Segment structure Japan ICC Europe ICC Korea ICC USA ICC Science/HK/tracking data Raw/processed Data & toolkit SPICA users ( Astronomers) Observation Plan TT&C data JAXA TT&C Ground Network ESA Space Operation Centre & Ground Station

Operation centers (2) Science Data Center (SDC) Management of science data, data analysis and archives develop data analysis pipe-line and other related tools under the collaboration with each instrument team Science data processing using pipe-line Pointing reconstruction Data distribution to observers support astronomers’ scientific activity Create data archives (both raw & and processed data) for public in collaboration with existing data centre (C-SODA at ISAS) Structure HQ at JAXA Japanese SDC branch support Japanese users of SPICA European SDC branch support European users of SPICA (US, Korean …) 14

Observation / Operation modes Routine Operation mode HK mode / Instrument C/O mode / STA focus adjustment / FoV Alignment verification / Orbit maneuver Observation Mode MIR imaging/spectroscopy Coronagraph mode FIR imaging/spectroscopy Data transmission mode (in case of failure of HGA) Contingency operation mode 15

Phases of Operation Launch & Early Operation (a few weeks) Cruising Phase A few weeks to a half year, to enter S-E L2 Check-out Phase (until 6 months at most after launch) Basic check-out phase(2 weeks) PV Phase (a few months) Test Observation Phase (a few months) Nominal Observation Phase Several proposal cycles 2.5 years to achieve “Full Success” (incl. 6 months margin) Observations to achieve “extra success” can also be executed so far as the “Full success” observations are not disturbed Extra Observation Phase 16

Observation Programs 17

Category of observation programs a. Performance Verification(PV) program b. Calibration program c. Guaranteed Time (GT) program d. Open Time (OT) program e. Director’s time (DT) program a. b. : individual program is planned for each FPI’s evaluation / calibration c. d. e. : program includes all FPI Definition of “director” is tbd 18

Time Allocation Issues (all numbers are tentative) TAC ( Time Allocation Committee) is unique for all SPICA member countries, will manage time allocation in GT and OT. Member countries should have their own allocated % of observation time. Engineering (calibration) Time: TBD (5) % Director ’ s time: TBD (5) % Including TOO observations Guaranteed time for SPICA team: 20% To be allocated as a function of “ contribution ” SWG time ? Mission scientists ’ time ? Open Time for Member Countries: 50 % Including Legacy Programs each member country should have its own allocated time. Open Time for General Community: 20% 19

Proprietary Time One year Proprietary time applies only to Guaranteed time & Open time (no proprietary time for Engineering, director time) Start point: after Observers receive processed data All the data after the proprietary time will be open for general community Not only for member countries Legacy Programs(not yet defined) To be released when data processing is over ? 20