Paul “Butch” Harton, MD Harbin Clinic Eye Center Rome, GA USA ASCRS Boston Poster, 2010 The Author has no financial interest in the subject matter of this.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Sonomed, STAAR Surgical, Alcon

Advertisements

Presented by: Ray T. Oyakawa, M.D. Sharper Vision Centers A MEDICAL GROUP Comparison of PalmScan and IOL Master axial lengths measurements No financial.

The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this e-poster. Thomas John, MD 1 Alissa Pullos 1- Loyola University at Chicago.

Ultrasound is a high frequency sound that you cannot hear, but it can be emitted and detected by special machines. Ultrasound travels freely through fluid.

Biometry: Long & Short eyes Alireza Peyman, MD Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

Comparison of corneal astigmatism measured with 3 devices Mariko Shirayama, M.D, Li Wang, M.D, PhD, Mitchell P. Weikert, M.D, Douglas D. Koch, M.D. Cullen.

Astigmatism Following 2 IOL Injection Techniques: Wound Assisted Versus Wound Directed Jay J. Meyer, MD Hart B. Moss, MD Kenneth L. Cohen, MD University.

Financial Disclosure I have a financial interest with the following companies: Abbott Medical Optics Alcon Calhoun Vision NuLens Optimedica Optivue

IOL power calculation after refractive surgery A. Peyman, MD.

Clinical evaluation of foldable acrylic phakic IOL (fP) implantation ASCRS, San Diego, 2011 A.John Kanellopoulos, MD Professor NYU Medical School, NY Director,

Anterior Chamber Depth, Iridocorneal Angle Width, and Intraocular Pressure Changes After Phacoemulsification: Narrow vs Open Iridocorneal Angles Huang.

Phacoemulsification with Goniosynechialysis in the Management of Refractory Acute Angle-closure Glaucoma Ghasem Fakhraie*, MD, Mahmoud Jabbarvand, MD,

David Zadok MD, Isaac Avni MD

Repeatability of Anterior and Posterior Corneal Higher- Order Aberrations in 4 mm, 6 mm and 8 mm diameters measured by Pentacam System Jadwiga Wojtowicz.

Dept. of Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Outcome after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,

Reanalysis of Refractive Growth in Pediatric Aphakia and Pseudophakia Susan Whitmer, MD 1 Aurora Xu 2 Scott McClatchey, MD 1,3,4 1 Naval Medical Center.

Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

Seyed Javad Hashemian MD Eye Research Center Rasoul Akram Hospital Tehran University of Medical Sciences No financial interest

Elias F. Jarade, MD, FICS. Corneal and Refractive Surgery Service, The Dubai Mall Medical Center, Dubai- U.A.E. Tel: ; Mob

World Cornea Congress VI Michael K. Smolek & Panagiotis Kompotiatis Department of Ophthalmology LSU Eye Center of Excellence, New Orleans The authors.

Using the ASCRS Post-Refractive Surgery IOL Calculator: A Retrospective Review Amit Patel MRCOphth, Achyut Mukherjee MRCOphth, Vinod Kumar FRCSEd(Ophth)

Artemis tm II VHF Ultrasound for Sizing the Visian ICL ASCRS 2008 Philip C. Roholt, MD N. Canton, Ohio, USA The author has no proprietary interest in products.

INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION BY IMMERSION A-SCAN BIOMETRY VERSUS CONTACT A-SCAN BIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS BEFORE CATARACT SURGERY Burak Bilgin**, M.D.,

Phakic posterior chamber IOLs 1.Cells involved in crystalline lens and capsular bag opacification 2.Evolution of designs of PPCIOLs 3.Relevant aspects.

P91: Clinical Performance of Phakic Angle-Supported Investigational IOL in Prospective Global Trials, ASCRS 2010, Boston P91: Clinical performance of phakic.

A Prospective Study Examining Contact Lens Wear, Refractive Error, and Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements Marie Brenner.

Evaluation of refractive error measurements obtained by three different aberrometers Radha Ram, BA Li Wang, MD, PhD Mitchell P. Weikert, MD, MS Disclosure:

David Sung Yong Kang 1,2, Jin Young Choi 1, Hun Yang 1, Ik Hee Ryu 1, Hee Sun Kim 1, Seong Bae Park 1, Jin Kuk Kim 1 and Chan Yun Kim Clean Vision.

Endothelial Dystrophy Association with Hyperopia Glenn W. Thompson, M.D. Timothy P. Page, M.D. Authors have no financial interest.

Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD

Characterizing rooms …1 Characterizing rooms regarding reverberation time prediction and the sensitivity to absorption and scattering coefficient accuracy.

ELEVATION AND PACHYMETRY VALUES IN NORMAL CORNEAS OBTAINED BY GALILEI ASCRS Boston April Vision Sana Research Group Vision Sana Research Group.

Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With an Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens: A Montreal Experience Georges M. Durr, MD 1,2 Johanna Choremis, MD, FRCSC.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.

Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD

Evaluation of Corneal Tomography in Primary Pterygium Sahil Goel, MD (Presenting Author), Murugesan Vanathi MD *The authors have no financial interests.

IOL Calculations Based on Partial Biometry in Humanitarian Missions Joseph Schmitz, MD Kimberly Davis, MD, FACS Scott McClatchey, MD The authors have no.

Futoshi Taketani, MD,PhD,

Sherman W. Reeves, MD, MPH 1,3,4 ; Jacob A. Kozisek, OD 1,2 ; Noumia Cloutier-Gill, OD 1,2 ; David R. Hardten, MD 1,2,3,4 Accuracy of Scheimpflug Imaging.

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Donor Lenticule Dislocation Following DSEK Pravin K Vaddavalli MD, Suntia Chaurasia MD, Muralidhar Ramappa MD, Prashant Garg.

Study of Flap Thickness Precision with a Femtosecond Laser Shinagawa LASIK Center Tatsuya Yonekawa,MSc ; Minoru Tomita,MD.PhD ; Youhei Iida,CE ; Yuko Inada,CE.

Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Diagnosis of Benign Iris Cysts in Patient Presenting for Implantation of Copolymer Phakic IOL Muhammad Aman-Ullah MD Howard V.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.

Post-LASIK Intraocular Lens Power Adjustment Nomogram Joseph Diehl Kevin Miller, MD Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine.

Assessing the Need for Iris Registration System with Active Tracking Capability Julio Narvaez, MD; Peter Bekendam, MD; Kristin Schmid, BS; Gregory Bacon,

Optic Coherence Tomography Evaluation of Intrastromal Ring Segments Implanted Manually and with a Femtosecond Laser Author: Nicolas Cesário Pereira, M.D.

Minimizing Risk in Visian ICL Implantation.

9-Month Results after Implantation of a new accommodative IOL that works with one focus Mark Tomalla M.D.* Clinic for Refractive and Ophthalmic Surgery,

Simulated Experiments on IOL Power Calculation Using Anterior Segment OCT Dong Hyun Jo, M.D., 1,2 Mee Kum Kim, M.D., 1,2 Won Ryang Wee, M.D. 1,2 1 Department.

Poster# P36 Comparison of Techniques of Measuring Anterior Chamber Depth and Corneal Curvature in Indian Eyes Sujata Das, MS, FRCS Anjula Kumari, B.Optom.

Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Decentration With and Without Active Eye-Tracking System Mark Edmund Johnston MD FRCSC P 167: The author.

Vinohrady Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic Vinohrady Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD,

Intraocular Lens Outcomes: Comparison of Technologies and Formulas Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Research Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology Storm.

Characteristics of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Patients with Normal Intraocular Pressure at the First Visit Won Hyuk Oh1, Bum Gi Kim1, Joo Hwa Lee2.

Corneal Pachymetry in Prediction of Refraction After Cataract Surgery

Refractive outcomes of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry versus optical biometry alone for intraocular lens power calculation Zina Zhang MD1, Logan.

Comparison of Single-Scheimpflug and Dual-Scheimpflug Pachymetry Measurements and Effect of Decentration World Cornea Congress VI April 7-9, 2010.

and High-Order Aberrations After Intrastromal Presbyopia Correction

Hôpital Ophtalmique Universitaire

Nienke Visser, Tos T.J.M. Berendschot, Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts

MP Weikert, M Shirayama, L Wang, DD Koch

Comparison of corneal powers obtained from four different devices

Associate Professor of Ophthalmology

Vicente J. Correa-Gomez MD, Guillermo Tapia MD, Oscar Macias Manuel MD, Alejandro Navas Perez MD, Gilberto Islas MD, Tito Ramírez-Luquin MD, Enrique O.

Roxana Ursea, MD Matthew T. Feng, MD Ovette Villavicencio, PhD

Bernilla E; Izquierdo Jr. L; Miranda M.

Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD

International Vision Correction Research Centre

Michael Goodman, Alexandra Paul and Andrew Hsu

Presentation transcript:

Paul “Butch” Harton, MD Harbin Clinic Eye Center Rome, GA USA ASCRS Boston Poster, 2010 The Author has no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster

 Accurate Horizontal Anterior Chamber Angle- to-Angle (ATA) measurements are necessary for the implantation of both phakic and aphakic IOLs.  The general purpose of this pilot study was to determine the degree of correlation between the OCT and UBM methods of measuring ATA

 30 Eyes of 15 healthy volunteers  Each eye was scanned with the Sonomed VuMaxII High Resolution Ultrasound (UBM) by a single Technician  The Author, blind to the on-screen identity of each eye analyzed the UBM video  Using the on-screen calipers, the best visible ATA dimension was recorded

 Each eye was also scanned with the Visante OCT by a single Technician. The Author, again blind to the identity of each eye, used the on-screen calipers to measure OCT ATA  However the OCT ATA was measured 2 ways. The first was similar to UBM, the second used a rule developed for this study  This rule was suggested after personal communications indicated OCT might over- estimate ATA when measured with similar landmarks as UBM (This theory has been subsequently supported by Kim, Kim and Song in J Refract Surg. 2010;26: )

 The two values of OCT recorded are described below:  One caliper line simply measured the visible extent of ATA in a manner similar to the UBM  (OCT ATA – Visible Margins or VM)  The other method determined OCT ATA using a rule where the caliper line was always drawn tangential to the anterior lens surface. The ATA was determined where this line then intersected the inner aspect of the cornea.  (OCT ATA-Lens Plane or LP)

 Mean ATA in millimeters (N=30) UBM OCT VM OCT LP ( SD 0.47) (SD 0.48) (SD 0.58)

 Mean Difference (mm) UBM-OCT VM * UBM-OCT LP OCT VM – OCT LP+0.397*  Correlation Coefficient (r) UBM-OCT VM0.865 UBM-OCT LP0.873 OCT VM-OCT LP0.902 * Statistically Significant p<.0001

 OCT and UBM show close correlation with one another in their determination of the horizontal anterior chamber angle-to-angle measurement (ATA)  The absolute value of ATA is however significantly different between the two technologies when measuring from the visible margins of ATA. OCT VM consistently gives larger ATA values vs. UBM.

 These findings are similar to the recent article by Kim, Kim and Song in the Journal of Refractive Surgery.  This article found a high degree of correlation between UBM and OCT ATA measurements  The OCT measurements defined in their study were the same as theVisible Margin (VM) type in our study and similarly showed the OCT ATA to be consistently larger than the UBM ATA.  This may indicate the OCT overestimates ATA using this criteria

 Our adjustment in the OCT ATA measurement (OCT LP) has close correlation with UBM and produces similar absolute values as UBM  Further studies are needed to better define the degree of correlation and the accuracy of these technologies with respect to phakic and aphakic IOL sizing.  Further studies are needed to confirm which technology provides a better determination of the actual ATA value.