CC10-1 ZOMETA ® in Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma: Pamidronate-Controlled Trial (010) James Berenson, MD Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, California.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
516 (32723) Phase III trial comparing AC (x4)taxane (x4) with taxane (x8) as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: Results of N-SAS-BC02.
Advertisements

Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Facon T et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 2.
Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD Co-Director, Comprehensive Breast Cancer Center Magee-Women’s Hospital University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Prof. Robert Coleman, MD, FRCP Cancer Research Centre
Advances in the Management of Skeletal Related Events/Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer Robert Dreicer, M.D., M.S., FACP, FASCO Chair Dept of Solid Tumor.
Presented by Martin H. Cohen, M.D. at the 27 July 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
Results of a Randomized Study of the JAK Inhibitor Ruxolitinib (INC424) versus Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post- Polycythemia.
1Stopeck A et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Renal Safety of Zoledronic Acid in Patients With Breast Cancer.
The Effect of Zoledronic Acid (ZOL) on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Letrozole:
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer A Regulatory Perspective of End Points to Measure Safety and Efficacy of Drugs Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer Bhupinder.
Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) upregulation Dose- and time-dependent upregulation of TP in human colon cancer xenografts PaclitaxelDocetaxel.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
CC39/11-1 ZOMETA ® in Prostate Cancer and Solid Tumors Other Than Prostate Cancer and Breast Cancer: Placebo-Controlled Trials Matthew Smith, MD, PhD Massachusetts.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Efficacy and Safety of Continued Zoledronic Acid every 4 Weeks versus every 12 Weeks in Women with Bone Metastases from Breast Cancer: Results of the OPTIMIZE-2.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al.
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
Bondronat achieves better outcomes in metastatic bone disease Ingo Diel CGG-Klinik GmbH Mannheim, Germany.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
Core Benefit/Risk (CR)
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
Zometa for Patients with Bone Metastases Overview and Review of Study 010 Grant Williams, M.D. Medical Team Leader Division of Oncology Drug Products.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined with Melphalan and Prednisone Followed by Continuous Lenalidomide Maintenance.
D-1 Bisphosphonate Bone Metastases Trials Proportion of Patients With Any SRE § (12, 010) Patients, % TreatmentN 3 mo6 mo9 mo12 mo Pamidronate Study 12.
IN-1 Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Bethesda, Maryland January 31, 2002 C.
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
SNDA Letrozole (Femara®) Indication: First-line therapy in post- menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Prior approval: Second-line therapy.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
Continued Overall Survival Benefit After 5 Years’ Follow-Up with Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) versus Melphalan-Prednisone (MP) in Patients with.
until tumour progression until tumour progression
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
SNDA # GLIADEL® WAFER (Polifeprosan 20 with Carmustine Implant) APPLICANT: GUILFORD PHARMACEUTICALS ODAC: December 6, 2001 Medical Reviewer: Alla.
REGULATORY HISTORY of ZOMETA and AREDIA JAW OSTEONECROSIS (ONJ) Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee March 4, 2005 Nancy S. Scher, M.D.
CON - 1 Conclusions C David R. Parkinson Vice President, Global Head, Clinical Research and Development Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
C-1 Safety Results S. aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis Study Gloria Vigliani, M.D. Vice President, Medical Strategy Cubist Pharmaceuticals.
Zometa for Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases Protocol 039 Amna Ibrahim, M.D. Oncology Drug Products FDA.
1 NDA Clofarabine Cl-F-Ara-A Presented by Martin Cohen, M.D. at the December 01, 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting.
R2 민준기 / 정재헌 교수님. Introduction Patients with resected high-risk locally advanced head and neck cancer –Expect favorable outcomes after concomitant radiochemotherapy(CCRT)
2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial Aron Goldhirsch, Richard.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
MONARCH 2: Phase III Study of Abemaciclib + Fulvestrant in HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer After Progression on Endocrine Therapy CCO Independent Conference.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
LUX-Lung 6 clinical trial
ELOQUENT-2: Elotuzumab + Len/Dex in R/R MM
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 25:
Mostafa AL Turk Tatiana Hawat
Slide set on: McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC, et al
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
Phase III PROUD-PV: Ropeginterferon α-2b Noninferior to Hydroxyurea in Polycythemia Vera New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage of.
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
Alena Kreychman Xofigo.
Switch ABC/3TC to TAF/FTC
until tumour progression until tumour progression
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Tips on using ruxolitinib
ARV-trial.com Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC STRIIVING NEAT
Presentation transcript:

CC10-1 ZOMETA ® in Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma: Pamidronate-Controlled Trial (010) James Berenson, MD Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, California C

CC10-2 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Trial Design (1)  Double-blind, double-dummy  Stratification – Durie-Salmon Stage III multiple myeloma with  1 osteolytic lesion – Chemotherapy – Hormonal therapy  Appropriate antineoplastic therapy at baseline and during the course of the trial  ECOG performance status 0, 1, 2  Serum creatinine  3.0 mg/dL (265 µmol/L) C Stage IV breast cancer with  1 osteolytic, osteoblastic, or mixed lesion

CC10-3 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Trial Design (2)  12-mo dosing regimen – Pamidronate 90 mg every 3 to 4 wk/ 120-min infusion – ZOMETA ® 4 mg and 8/4 mg every 3 to 4 wk/ 5-min amended to 15-min infusion  Study duration of 13 mo  Patients received oral vitamin D 400 IU and calcium 500 mg C

CC10-4 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Study Objectives  Primary objective – Demonstrate the effectiveness of ZOMETA ® through the noninferiority § comparison to pamidronate for the treatment of bone metastases – Demonstrate safety profile of ZOMETA comparable to pamidronate 3 §Margin of 8% with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals based on the results of pamidronate bone metastases registration trials.

CC10-5 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Study Endpoints (1)  Primary endpoint – Proportion (%) of patients experiencing any skeletal-related event (SRE) not including hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) C

CC10-6 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Study Endpoints (2)  Secondary endpoints – Time to first SRE – Skeletal morbidity rate (SMR) – Andersen-Gill multiple event analysis – Time to first SRE, SMR, and proportion (%) of patients with any SRE (+HCM) – Pain/analgesic scores – Bone lesion response – Time to progression of disease – Safety (including survival) Additional 6 mo of survival and serum creatinine data C

CC10-7 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Skeletal-Related Events (SREs)  Pathologic fractures  Spinal cord compression  Radiation for bone pain or to treat or prevent pathologic fractures or spinal cord compression  Surgery to bone  Hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) C

CC10-8 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Preplanned SRE Analysis  Proportion (%) of patients with an SRE – Number of patients with SRE divided by number of patients in each treatment group  Time to first SRE – Time from randomization to first SRE (days)  Skeletal morbidity rate (SMR) § – Number of SREs divided by time at risk on trial (yr)  Andersen-Gill multiple event analysis § – Time from randomization to each occurrence of the events §Skeletal events occurring within 21 days counted as a single occurrence. C

CC10-9 Clinical Trial History  Original study design – ZOMETA ® (4 mg or 8 mg) via 5-min infusion versus pamidronate 90 mg infused over 120 min every 3 to 4 wk for 12 mo  Renal amendment 1 (June 1999) – Infusion time for ZOMETA increased from 5 min to 15 min – Infusion volume increased from 50 mL to 100 mL  Renal amendment 2 (June 2000) – 8 mg switched to 4 mg (8/4-mg group) – Renal function monitoring within 2 wk prior to each dose  Statistical amendment – Primary efficacy analysis based on ZOMETA 4 mg versus pamidronate 90 mg C

CC N = 1,648 Clinical Trial History Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma (010) 29 6/9812/986/996/0012/0012/99 Accrual 1/01 Treatment and follow-up833 Renal amendment 2 (8 mg  4 mg dose) Renal amendment 1 (5  15 min infusion)

CC10-11 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Demographics and Prognostic Factors ZOMETA ® ZOMETAPam 4 mg8/4 mg 90 mg Demographic factorN = 561N = 524N = 555 Mean age, yr Gender, % female Race, % Caucasian Performance status ECOG 0 - 1, % Breast cancer Chemotherapy, n Hormonal therapy, n Multiple myeloma, n  Treatment groups were generally well balanced for prior skeletal complications, prognostic factors, and prior therapy

CC10-12 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Patient Disposition ZOMETA ® ZOMETAPam Disposition4 mg8/4 mg90 mg Intent-to-treat, N Completed study therapy (13 mo) n % ISE T2-27, 28

CC10-13 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Reasons for Early Discontinuation Patients, % ZOMETA ® ZOMETA Pam 4 mg 8/4 mg 90 mg Reason for discontinuation N = 561 N = 524 N = 555 Total discontinued prematurely Death Adverse events Withdrew consent Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect Condition no longer required study drug Protocol violation Others ISE T2-27, 28

CC10-14 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Proportion (%) of Patients With an SRE N =  ZOMETA 4 mg versus pamidronate 90 mg: 95% CI (–7.9%, 3.7%). The noninferiority criterion, the upper boundary of the 95% CI, is below 8%

CC10-15 Noninferiority Margin for Study 010 (Using Pamidronate 12, 18, and 19) % with SRE Placebo vs Pam 90 mg PatientsPlaceboPamDiff95% CImargin All (7.3, 18.9) Pt 91-2AR1 Conservative 12, 18, 19: (Placebo – Pam) 010: (ZOMETA – Pam) 0 0 ( ( ) ) * * ( ( ) ) –7.93.7–2.0 PAM Placebo ZOM

CC10-16 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Components of SRE by Month 13 8 ISE T 2-40; CSR 010 T9-7 N

CC10-17 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Time to First SRE ZOMETA 4 mg ZOMETA 8/4 mg Pam 90 mg ZOMETA ® 4 mg (0.786, 1.090) ZOMETA 8/4 mg (0.834, 1.185) Pam 90 mg PTF 9.2-1p4; CSR 010 T Median time, days Hazard ratio § (95% CI) §ZOMETA 4 mg, ZOMETA 8/4 mg versus pamidronate 90 mg.

CC10-18 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Mean SMR N =

CC10-19 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Andersen-Gill Multiple Event Analysis Time to SRE up to Month 13 ZOMETA ® 4 mg ZOMETA 8/4 mg Hazard95% CI forHazard95% CI for ratiohazard ratioratiohazard ratio Pam 90 mg0.885(0.748, 1.047)0.910(0.768, 1.079) ZOMETA 4 mg1.025(0.863, 1.218) C

CC10-20 Breast Cancer (010) Proportion of Patients With an SRE Patients With Different Types of Bone Lesions 57 N =

CC10-21 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Disease- and QOL-Related Endpoints  Comparable disease and QOL-related measures were demonstrated for the ZOMETA ® and pamidronate arms – Time to progression of bone metastases – Time to overall progression of disease – Pain and analgesic scores – ECOG performance status – Global quality of life C

CC10-22 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Disease-Related Endpoints Median time, days ZOMETA ® ZOMETA Pam 4 mg 8/4 mg 90 mg EndpointN = 561 N = 524 N = 555 Time to progression of bone lesion, days Time to progression of disease, days CSR 010 T9-14 C

CC10-23 §Increased score = decline. ||Increased score = improvement. Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Quality-of-Life Endpoints Change from baseline, mean  SD ZOMETA ® ZOMETA Pam 4 mg 8/4 mg90 mg Endpoint (13 mo) N = 561N = 524N = 555 Brief pain inventory score § –0.5  2.06–0.6  2.20–0.4  2.13 Analgesic score § –0.1  1.41–0.1  1.44–0.1  1.41 Performance status (ECOG) § 0.3    1.09 FACT-G total score || 0.5    15.6 CSR 010 T9-10, 9-11, 9-12, 9-13 C

CC10-24 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Efficacy Summary  ZOMETA demonstrated comparable efficacy to pamidronate (noninferiority) in preventing skeletal-related events C Time to Multiple Proportionfirst SREMean skeletalevent analysis with SRE, %(hazard ratio)morbidity ratehazard ratio ZOMETA ® 4 mg ZOMETA 8/4 mg Pam 90 mg46—1.40—

CC10-25 ZOMETA ® in Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma: Pamidronate-Controlled Trial (010) Safety

CC10-26 Primary Cause of Death During the Trial or Within 28 Days After Study Drug Termination § Patients, n (%) ZOMETA ® ZOMETAPam 4 mg8/4 mg90 mg Cause of deathN = 563N = 524N = Neoplasms benign/ malignant 54(9.6)40(7.6)47(8.5) Respiratory/thoracic/ mediastinal4(0.7)6(1.1)9(1.6) Cardiac7(1.2)6(1.1)9(1.6) General disorders/ administration site 3(0.5)1(0.2)5(0.9) Infections/infestations11(2.0)8(1.5)10(1.8) Renal/urinary0(0.0)4(0.8)0(0.0) Hepato-biliary disorders3(0.5)1(0.2)0(0.0) ISS T5-12 §6 mo additional data.

CC10-27 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Survival – All Patients § ZOMETA 4 mg ZOMETA 8/4 mg Pam 90 mg Median time, days ZOMETA ® 4 mg838P =.843 ZOMETA 8/4 mg830P =.516 Pam 90 mg E1 PTF p4 35 §6 mo additional data.

CC10-28 Safety-evaluable patients, n (%) ZOMETA ® 4 mg ZOMETA 8/4 mgPam 90 mg Preferred termN = 563N = 524N = 556 Bone pain312 (55.4)276 (52.7)302 (54.5) Nausea250 (44.4)240 (45.8)245 (44.1) Fatigue217 (38.5)192 (36.6)212 (38.1) Pyrexia200 (35.5)180 (34.4)160 (28.8) Vomiting NOS166 (29.5)158 (30.2)164 (29.5) Anemia NOS153 (27.2)155 (29.6)155 (27.9) Myalgia144 (25.6)119 (22.7)130 (23.4) Diarrhea NOS141 (25.0)138 (26.3)139 (25.0) Dyspnea NOS138 (24.5)110 (21.0)134 (24.1) Cough135 (24.0)101 (19.3)114 (20.5) Constipation134 (23.8)130 (24.8)132 (23.7) Arthralgia125 (22.2) 98 (18.7) 95 (17.1) Weakness113 (20.1) 93 (17.7) 91 (16.4) Headache NOS106 (18.8)113 (21.6)131 (23.6) Anorexia105 (18.7) 83 (15.8) 70 (12.6) Edema lower limb 92 (16.3) 83 (15.8)108 (19.4) Alopecia 89 (15.8) 73 (13.9) 72 (12.9) Neutropenia 84 (14.9) 80 (15.3) 77 (13.8) Insomnia NEC 80 (14.2) 78 (14.9) 94 (16.9) Back pain 60 (10.7) 82 (15.6) 72 (12.9) Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Incidence of Adverse Events (  15%) Regardless of Study Drug Relationship NOS = Not otherwise specified. NEC = Not elsewhere classified. C

CC10-29 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma NCI Grade 3/4 Hematology Electrolyte and Mineral Changes  Anemia – Incidence < 6% for all treatment groups No differences between treatment groups – Use of red blood cells and erythropoietin was similar for all treatment groups  Electrolyte and mineral adverse events – Incidence < 10% in all treatment groups Most common events in the ZOMETA ® 4 mg treatment group were hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia, and hyperkalemia 8 Vol 166 ISS PTT 5.1-5

CC10-30 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Definition of Serum Creatinine Increase  Serum creatinine normal (< 1.4 mg/dL) and an increase of 0.5 mg/dL  Serum creatinine abnormal (  1.4 mg/dL) and an increase of 1.0 mg/dL  Doubling of serum creatinine baseline value If serum creatinine was increased, dose was held until within 10% of the baseline serum level 48

CC10-31 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Kaplan-Meier Estimates of First Serum Creatinine Increase § n Hazard ratioP-value ZOMETA ® 4 mg ZOMETA 8/4 mg || Pam 90 mg E1 PTF p1 35 nHazard ratioP-value ZOMETA 4 mg ZOMETA 8/4 mg ¶ Pam 90 mg268 Percent of patients without increase (randomized prior to 15-min infusion amendment) Percent of patients without increase (randomized after 15-min infusion amendment) §6 mo additional data. ||46% of patients received only 8-mg. ¶21% of patients received only 8 mg.

CC10-32 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Patients Enrolling After the 15-min Amendment NCI Grade 3/4 Serum Creatinine Changes § Patients, n (%) N = 803 ZOMETA ® ZOMETA Pam 4 mg 8/4 mg90 mg N = 272N = 263N = 268 Grade 3 1 (0.4)6 (2.3)4 (1.5) Grade 4 0 (0.0)1 (0.4)1 (0.4) C §6 mo additional data.

CC10-33 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Safety Summary  ZOMETA ® (4 mg via 15-min infusion) has a safety profile, including renal effects, comparable to i.v. pamidronate (90 mg over 120 min) dosed every 3 to 4 weeks C

CC10-34 Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Overall Summary  ZOMETA ® 4 mg via 15-min infusion every 3 to 4 weeks demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy (noninferiority) to pamidronate 90 mg over 120 min in treating bone metastases in breast cancer and osteolytic lesions in multiple myeloma C