Interpreting the Bill of Rights.  Judges - interpret meaning of citizens’ rights 1. local judges 2. states judges 3. Supreme Court *Decisions of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freedom of Speech.
Advertisements

Al A The tinker case was a very neat case because b the ob the ob the of the of D d Al A The tinker case was a very neat case because b the ob the ob the.
Student Speech Symbolic Speech 1969 Turbulent Times Country was embroiled in conflict regarding the Vietnam War. This conflict was not approved by Congress.
Tinker v. DeMoines ". . . In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom.
Amendment #1 The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion,
Formulating a Legal Question The Case of Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Students John Tinker(age 15), Mary Beth Tinker(age 13), and Christopher Eckhardt(age 16) decided to publicize their opposition to the Vietnam War by.
Landmark Cases.
Famous court cases #4 Emmitt and Jordan.
Supreme Court Cases. What you need to know to present your case: The background of the case – What happened? – What were both sides of the argument? Constitutional.
The Bill of Rights: The First Amendment Chapter 4 Section 1.
Social Science.  The addition of the Bill of Rights, or a list of citizen’s rights, to the Constitution was the first test of the amendment process,
Constitution Day The Bill of Rights: Freedom of Speech.
Tinker Sample Law and Ethics.
Student Rights: What rights do students have once inside the schoolhouse door? Tinker v. Des Moines and New Jersey v. T.L.O.
The Rights of Individuals Analyze court cases that demonstrate how the U.S. constitution and the bill of rights protect the rights of individuals.
Amendment 1 The Bill of Rights.
SUPREME COURT CASES. Marbury v. Madison (1803)  William Marbury was commissioned Justice of the Peace of the District of Columbia at the end of President.
The Courts and the Constitution The Silent Protest Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District Copyright 2010 The Florida Law Related Education.
INTERPRETING THE BILL OF RIGHTS BY SEAN KIGIN INTERPRETING THE BILL OF RIGHTS BY SEAN KIGIN.
C HAPTER S EVEN Our Enduring Constitution. F IRST, L ETS GO BACK TO THE B ILL OF R IGHTS … Interpreting the Bill of Rights People often disagree about.
The Bill of Rights Ch. 6 Pp The Amendment Process Anti-Federalists wanted a bill of rights added Madison wanted it passed quickly to gain support.
Rachel Pleasants  In December 1965, a group of students met to discuss plans of wearing armbands to school throughout the holiday season and fasting.
How the Constitution applies to you. Constitution When someone feels that their constitutional rights have been violated, they will usually go to court.
Legal Latin  Certiorari: SIR-shee-uh-RARE-ee  Stare decisis: STAIR-ee dee-SIGH-sis  Amicus curiae: uh-MEE-kuss CURE-ee-EYE  Ratio decidendi: RAY-shee-oh.
Tinker v. Des Moines Overview
Freedom of Speech Tinker v. Des Moines 1969 Information obtained from:
Chapter 4 – The Amendments to the US Constitution ess.org/the-bill-rights.
Formulating a Legal Question The Case of Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Tinker v. Des Moines Unit 4 Lesson 9.
The Bill of Rights Integrated Social Studies Madison Southern High School.
Chapter 4 – The Amendments to the US Constitution.
What Amendment protects the actions shown below? What type of speech would this be? Why? Airport workers strike for higher wages (increased hourly pay)
Texas vs. Johnson and Tinker vs. Des Moines By Emily Franklin.
In 1969, in Des Moines, Iowa, students (John F. Tinker, Christopher Eckhardt and Mary- Beth Tinker) wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam.
QUESTION: “Does a prohibition against the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of symbolic protest, violate the free speech clause of the First.
Drill # Because Mary Beth Tinker and Chris Eckhardt wore armbands in school to protest the __________ which they were suspended. 2. The U. S. Supreme.
Freedom of Speech: First Amendment “The test of democracy is freedom of criticism.” ~David Ben-Gurion.
Civil Rights Court Cases Go to Create a chart of the court cases – summarizing the facts & conclusion Court CaseDate Decided FactsQuestionConclusion.
Aim: What are the landmark First Amendment cases of the 20 th Century? Do Now: What does the First Amendment protect?
Journalism Law and Ethics Notes. Freedom of speech and press are guaranteed by the First Amendment. This freedom is not absolute.
Haley Jurbala Derek Hegna Ashley Hitchcock Andrew Howard COURT CASES- GROUP 2.
The Warren Court (1950s-1960s) How did the Supreme Court (under the leadership of Earl Warren) expand the rights of individuals?
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) 393 U.S. 503
Interpreting the Bill of Rights
Freedom of the Press and Student Journalists
1st Amendment.
Civil Liberties Americans have held liberty in high regard since lost their liberties spurred a break from Great Britain. Americans valued the idea of.
T-Shirts & Free Speech Drake University EDL 276.
The Constitution and Bill of Rights
1st Amendment & School (8 cases = 7 revolving around school and 1 NOT)
Freedom of Speech.
Freedom of Speech.
Tinker Sample Law and Ethics.
And how they relate the Judicial Branch
1st Amendment By Haley & Briana.
Tinker vs. Des Moines Independant School District
By Ben Reimer and Connor Mundy
Tinker Sample Law and Ethics.
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
Tinker v. Des Moines Public Schools, 1969
Our Enduring Constitution
Our Enduring Constitution
Tinker v. Des Moines Student Speech At School
Freedom of Speech.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District
Happy Monday! Have your notes out
Students and the Law Chapter 3 Sarah Bell.
Law and Education Jeopardy
Presentation transcript:

Interpreting the Bill of Rights

 Judges - interpret meaning of citizens’ rights 1. local judges 2. states judges 3. Supreme Court *Decisions of the ‘Court’ are presented as case studies- descriptions of situations or conflicts, the issues involved, and the decisions made.

 Des, Moines Iowa (1965) - Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt - protesting the Vietnam War - wore black arm- bands to school

 The Case *Once school officials learned about the protest... - school officials forbade the armbands - students wore the armbands anyway and were suspended

 Argument - parents: - students were being denied their rights - did not disrupt classes - did not interfere with other students’ rights - school: - ‘armband rule’ preserved discipline - schools not places for political demonstrations

 Court’s Decision -What was the court’s decision on the case?

 Court’s Decision - local and state court - armband rule was necessary - avoided disruption of classes - Supreme Court - form of ‘speech’- symbols representing ideas - did not interfere with students’ right to education

 Background ( ) ’s Adolf Hitler Nazi Party - attacked Jews throughout Germany

 Skokie, Illinois (1977) - town included 40,000 Jews - many survived Nazi camps (and many relatives did not) -American Nazi Party wanted to march through Skokie with large black swastika (symbol of Nazi Party)  To prevent march… - group would have to obtain $350,000 of insurance

 Argument: - people against ‘march’: - “freedom of expression has no meaning when it defends those who would end this right for others” - American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU): - “the First Amendment has to be for everyone- or it will be for no one”

 Appealing the Case - What was the court’s decision on the case?

 June 14, Supreme Court - Protecting 1 st Amendment Rights - Skokie law requiring insurance violated First Amendment (limited freedoms of speech/assembly) - right to distribute materials expressing hatred (First Amendment protects expression of all ideas)

- Symbols as Speech - swastika was not banned - Market of Ideas - amendment protects popular and unpopular ideas

 Judge Learned Hand - defender of free speech - “by respecting one another’s rights, we help guarantee that the Bill of Rights survives”