Tight correlations in ‘canonical’ lightcurves of Gamma Ray Bursts M.G. Dainotti 1, R. Willingale 2, V.F. Cardone 3, S. Capozziello 4, M. Ostrowski 1 Dainotti.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vanessa Mangano - Venice 2006 Rest frame light curves of Swift GRBs Vanessa Mangano, Giancarlo Cusumano, Valentina La Parola, Eleonora Troja, Teresa Mineo.
Advertisements

High Energy Gamma Ray Group
GRB : a canonical fake short burst L. Caito, M.G. Bernardini, C.L. Bianco, M.G. Dainotti, R. Guida, R. Ruffini. 3 rd Stueckelberg Workshop July 8–18,
1 Explaining extended emission Gamma-Ray Bursts using accretion onto a magnetar Paul O’Brien & Ben Gompertz University of Leicester (with thanks to Graham.
Understanding the prompt emission of GRBs after Fermi Tsvi Piran Hebrew University, Jerusalem (E. Nakar, P. Kumar, R. Sari, Y. Fan, Y. Zou, F. Genet, D.
Bruce Gendre Osservatorio di Roma / ASI Science Data Center Recent activities from the TAROT/Zadko network.
Optical Emission Components of Gamma-Ray Burst Phenomenon Enwei Liang GXU-NAOC Center for Astrophys. & Space Sci. Co-authors: Liang Li (GXU), Shuangxi.
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Tsvi Piran Re’em Sari 2nd EUL Workshop on Gamma-Ray Bursts.
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Re’em Sari Tsvi Piran GRBs in the Era of Rapid Follow-up.
GRB afterglows in the Non-relativistic phase Y. F. Huang Dept Astronomy, Nanjing University Tan Lu Purple Mountain Observatory.
Unifying afterglow diversity Gabriele Ghisellini INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera - Italy with the help of G.Ghirlanda and M. Nardini.
GRB Spectral-Energy correlations: perspectives and issues
Gamma-Ray Burst Optical Observations with AST3 Xue-Feng Wu Xue-Feng Wu Chinese Center for Antarctic Astronomy, Chinese Center for Antarctic Astronomy,
Reverse Shocks and Prompt Emission Mark Bandstra Astro
Gamma-ray Bursts in Starburst Galaxies Introduction: At least some long duration GRBs are caused by exploding stars, which could be reflected by colours.
Spectral Energy Correlations in BATSE long GRB Guido Barbiellini and Francesco Longo University and INFN, Trieste In collaboration with A.Celotti and Z.Bosnjak.
Gamma-ray bursts Discovered in 1968 by Vela spy satellites
1 Nanjing June 2008 A universal GRB photon energy – luminosity relationship * Dick Willingale, Paul O’Brien, Mike Goad, Julian Osborne, Kim Page, Nial.
Temporal evolution of thermal emission in GRBs Based on works by Asaf Pe’er (STScI) in collaboration with Felix Ryde (Stockholm) & Ralph Wijers (Amsterdam),
The Canonical Swift/UVOT Lightcurve Sam Oates (UCL-MSSL) On behalf of the Swift/UVOT team UCL DEPARTMENT OF SPACE AND CLIMATE PHYSICS MULLARD SPACE SCIENCE.
 The GRB literature has been convolved with my brain 
“ Testing the predictive power of semi-analytic models using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey” Juan Esteban González Birmingham, 24/06/08 Collaborators: Cedric.
Gamma Ray Bursts and LIGO Emelie Harstad University of Oregon HEP Group Meeting Aug 6, 2007.
Swift Nanjing GRB Conference Prompt Emission Properties of X-ray Flashes and Gamma-ray Bursts T. Sakamoto (CRESST/UMBC/GSFC)
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: High Energy I: Gamma-Ray Bursts Geoff Bower.
X-Ray Flashes D. Q. Lamb (U. Chicago) “Astrophysical Sources of High-Energy Particles and Radiation” Torun, Poland, 21 June 2005 HETE-2Swift.
Jet Models of X-Ray Flashes D. Q. Lamb (U. Chicago) Triggering Relativistic Jets Cozumel, Mexico 27 March –1 April 2005.
Gamma Ray Bursts A High Energy Mystery By Tessa Vernstrom Ast 4001, Fall 2007 A High Energy Mystery By Tessa Vernstrom Ast 4001, Fall 2007.
GRB CORRELATIONS AND THEIR COSMOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS Maria Giovanna Dainotti JSPS Fellow at Riken, Tokyo, Japan 1 RIKEN(ITHES/RNC)-IPMU-RESCEU, 7TH OF.
Luminosity-time correlations for GRBs afterglows Maria Giovanna Dainotti Department of Astronomy, Stanford University, Stanford, California In collaboration.
Conclusions We established the characteristics of the Fe K line emission in these sources. In 7 observations, we did not detect the source significantly.
Konus-Wind 10 years of operating in space 10 years of GRBs observations from the joint Russian-American KONUS-WIND experiment: results and perspectives.
Rise and Fall of the X-ray flash : an off-axis jet? C.Guidorzi 1,2,3 on behalf of a large collaboration of the Swift, Liverpool and Faulkes Telescopes,
Properties of X- Ray Rich Gamma- Ray Bursts and X -Ray Flashes Valeria D’Alessio & Luigi Piro INAF: section of Rome, Italy XXXXth Moriond conference, Very.
Is the Amati relation due to selection effects? Lara Nava In collaboration with G. Ghirlanda, G.Ghisellini, C. Firmani Egypt, March 30-April 4, 2009 NeutronStars.
Extended emission in short gamma-ray bursts registered by SPI-ACS of INTEGRAL observatory Pavel Minaev 1, 2, Alexei Pozanenko 1, Vladimir Loznikov 1 1-
The Early Time Properties of GRBs : Canonical Afterglow and the Importance of Prolonged Central Engine Activity Andrea Melandri Collaborators : C.G.Mundell,
Studies on the emission from the receding jet of GRB Xin Wang, Y. F. Huang, and S. W. Kong Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University, China A&A submitted.
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed by XMM-Newton Paul O’Brien X-ray and Observational Astronomy Group, University of Leicester Collaborators:- James Reeves, Darach.
Dark Gamma-Ray Bursts and their Host Galaxies Volnova Alina (IKI RAS), Pozanenko Alexei (IKI RAS)
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Open Questions and Looking Forward Ehud Nakar Tel-Aviv University 2009 Fermi Symposium Nov. 3, 2009.
Is GRB050509b a genuine short? Gustavo de Barros, Maria Grazia Bernardini, Carlo Luciano bianco, Roberto Guida, Remo Ruffini.
Radio faint GRB afterglows Sydney Institute for Astronomy (SIfA)/ CAASTRO – The University of Sydney Dr. Paul Hancock with Bryan Gaensler, Tara Murphy,
Composition and spectral properties of the 1 AU quiet- time suprathermal ion population during solar cycle23 M Al-Dayeh, M I Desai, J R Dwyer, H K Rassoul,
Chandra Searches for Late-Time Jet Breaks in GRB Afterglows David Burrows, Judith Racusin, Gordon Garmire, George Ricker, Mark Bautz, John Nousek, & Dirk.
MNRAS, submitted. Galaxy evolution Evolution in global properties reasonably well established What drives this evolution? How does it depend on environment?
Host Galaxy of Dark Gamma-Ray Burst GRB Host Galaxy of Dark Gamma-Ray Burst GRB A. Volnova (SAI MSU), A. Pozanenko (ISR RAS), V. Rumyantsev.
Origin of the Seemingly Broad Iron- Line Spectral Feature in Seyfert Galaxies Ken EBISAWA (JAXA/ISAS) with H. INOUE, T. MIYAKAWA, N. ISO, H. SAMESHIMA,
BeppoSAX Observations of GRBs: 10 yrs after Filippo Frontera Physics Department, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy and INAF/IASF, Bologna, Italy Aspen.
The Lag-Luminosity Relation in the GRB Source Frame T. N. Ukwatta 1,2, K. S. Dhuga 1, M. Stamatikos 3, W. C. Parke 1, T. Sakamoto 2, S. D. Barthelmy 2,
Gamma-Ray Burst Ring-shaped Jets And Their Afterglows Ming Xu Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University Gamma-ray Sky from Fermi: Neutron.
Galactic Astronomy - Paper Luminosity Functions of GRB Afterglows Dong-hyun Lee 2007/09/18.
Luminosity -time correlation Determination of The intrinsic nature of the Luminosity -time correlation in the X-ray afterglows of GRBs Maria Giovanna.
Gamma-Ray Burst Working Group Co-conveners: Abe Falcone, Penn State, David A. Williams, UCSC,
Elisabetta Maiorano IASF/INAF, Sezione di Bologna & Dip. Astronomia, Università di Bologna GRB : the burst before the Burst.
A relation to estimate the redshift from the X-ray afterglow light curve Bruce Gendre (IASF-Roma/INAF) & Michel Boër (OHP/CNRS)
R. M. Kippen (LANL) – 1 – 23 April, 2002  Short transients detected in WFC (2–25 keV) with little/no signal in GRBM (40–700 keV) and no BATSE (>20 keV)
Stochastic wake field particle acceleration in Gamma-Ray Bursts Barbiellini G., Longo F. (1), Omodei N. (2), Giulietti D., Tommassini P. (3), Celotti A.
Radio afterglows of Gamma Ray Bursts Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics - Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Collaborator: Dale.
A complete sample of long bright Swift GRBs: correlation studies Paolo D’Avanzo INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera S. Campana (OAB) S. Covino (OAB)
Gamma-ray bursts Tomasz Bulik CAM K, Warsaw. Outline ● Observations: prompt gamma emission, afterglows ● Theoretical modeling ● Current challenges in.
Sorting out GRB correlations with spectral peak David Eichler (presented by Jonathan Granot)
The Mysterious Burst After the Short Burst Jay Norris Brief History, Overview, Central Questions Spectral lag distributions (long & short GRBs) Pulse width.
From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups
Afterglow Plateau and Energy Injection from Magnetar:
Adam M. Corrigan, Jonathan R. Chubb  Current Biology 
Speaker: Longbiao Li Collaborators: Yongfeng Huang, Zhibin Zhang,
Swift observations of X-Ray naked GRBs
Tight Liso-Ep-Γ0 Relation of Long Gamma-Ray Bursts
Top: probability distribution of the mass-to-light ratios observed when nebular emission is included in the fitting, stacked across all of the MC samples.
Presentation transcript:

Tight correlations in ‘canonical’ lightcurves of Gamma Ray Bursts M.G. Dainotti 1, R. Willingale 2, V.F. Cardone 3, S. Capozziello 4, M. Ostrowski 1 Dainotti et al. ApJL, 722, L MNRAS, submitted 1)Jagellonian University, Krakow, Poland, 2) University of Leicester, United Kingdom 3) Observatory of Roma, Frascati, Italy 4) University of Naples, Italy Gamma ray bursts (GRBs) observed up to redshifts z > 8 are fascinating Willingale et al (2007) model objects to study due to their still unexplained relativistic outburst mechanisms. Analysis of 77 GRB afterglows with known redshifts revealed a physical subsample of long GRBs with canonical plateau breaking to power-law light curves with a significant luminosity L*X(T*a) ≡ L*a - break time T* a correlation, in the GRB rest frame. Recently we extended the study to correlations between the afterglow characteristic luminosity L*a and the prompt emission quantities: 1.) the mean luminosity derived as 45 =E iso /T* 45 2.) 90 =E iso /T* 90 vs L* a 3.) Tp =E iso /T* p vs L* a 4.) the isotropic energy E iso L* a Conclusion: The afterglows with regular (“canonical”) light curves obey a tight LT physical scaling. The presence of (L* a, 45, ) tight correlation, (also for 90, E iso ) proves that afterglow plateau phase is related to the prompt emission. The highest LT correlated afterglow subsample for the GRBs with canonical X-ray light curves, leads also to highest prompt-plateau (L*a, 45 ) correlations, with ρ=0.98. L*x(Ta) vs T*a distribution for the sample of 62 long afterglows with u < 4, with the fitted correlation line in black. The upper red line is fitted to the 8 lowest error (red) points (presented separately in an inset panel). To analyze how accuracy of fitting the Willingale et al (2007) model - influence the studied correlations we define a fit error parameter to distinguish the canonical shaped light curves from the more irregular ones Result : GRBs with regular afterglow light curves show higher correlations between their both afterglow and prompt emission physical properties regular afterglows obey a tight physical LT scaling: very irregular afterglow light curves are dimmer (L* a, 45, ) (also 90, E iso ) correlation proves the existence of atight physical scaling between the prompt emission energetics and the afterglow plateau phase, Correlations between the physical properties of the prompt emission and the luminosity of the afterglow plateau reveals that only mean (averaged in time) energetic properties of the prompt emission clearly influence the afterglow plateau phase to study GRB correlation look for regular light curve cases log Lx(Ta)=log a +b log Ta ρ=-0.76 b=-1.06±0.27 For u<4 (L* a vs. 45 for the u ≤ 4 sample, with the fitted correlation dashed line in black. The red line is fitted to the 8 lowest error (red) points. Correlation coefficients ρ for the distributions (L* a, 45 - red squares (L* a, 90 ) - black circles (L* a, Tp ) - green asterixes (L* a, E iso ) - blue square for the long GRB subsamples with the varying error parameter u. Bologna, Italy Comparison of the characteristic time scales for the GRB prompt emission for all GRBs analyzed in this paper. The green points are the IC GRBs, the red ones are the long GRBs with u < and the black ones are the other long GRBs with u < 4. Upper panel: log T* p vs log T* 45 distribution. Lower panel: log T* T90 vs T* 45 distribution. The reference lines are T* 90 *2T* 45 and T* 45 = T* p for the left and right panel respectively