Use of Multifocal IOLs in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Helga P. Sandoval, MD, MSCR 1 Reid B. Murphy, MD, 1 Luis E. Fernández de Castro,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery Eriko Fukuyama, MD Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan.
Advertisements

Diffractive Multifocal IOL Prof. Dr. Daniel H. Scorsetti
Earth in Yellow Flower Presenter Name By PresenterMedia.comPresenterMedia.com By Sumitra Marda Optometrist, Ocularist, Low vision specialist, Sportvision.
Keiichiro Minami, Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima, Mami Yoshino, Kunihiko Nakamura Department of Ophthalmology Tokyo Dental College Suidobashi Hospital, Tokyo,
V. S. Liarakos, K. van Dijk, L. Ham, L. Baydoun and G.R.J. Melles Anterior Chamber vs Posterior Chamber IOL in DMEK for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy.
Visual outcome & subjective visual symptoms of the Tecnis ZM900 multifocal intraocular lens in Asian eyes Dr Colin S.H. Tan MBBS, MMed (Ophth), FRCSEd.
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses & Contrast Sensitivity
Anupama Kotha 1, Simar J. Singh 1, William B. Trattler 1,2, Carlos Buznego 1,2 The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.
A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Evaluation of Patients with Contralateral Implantation of Two Aspheric Acrylic Intraocular Lenses R. Cionni, MD.
Myoung Joon Kim, MD Len Zheleznyak, MS2
CLINICAL OUTCOMES WITH A NEW DIFFRACTIVE MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) Pilar Casas de Llera Ana Belen Plaza Alfredo Vega-Estrada Jorge L Alio Vissum.
Eltutar, Kadir; Akcetin, Tulay A.; Ozcelik, N. Demet Istanbul Education and Research Hospital Department of Ophthalmology The authors state that they have.
Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD PhD 1,2, Jan Willem van der Linden BOpt 2, and Ivanka J. van der Meulen MD 1,2 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center,
Disclosure of finanacial interest * Author has no financial interest in this paper. ** Author's research is partially funded by Imperial Medical Technologies.
1 Clinical Performance of the Crystalens® AO Guy M. Kezirian, MD, FACS.
Retrospective Comparison of 3177 Eyes Implanted with Presbyopic IOLs Carlos Buznego MD Elizabeth A. Davis MD, FACS Guy M. Kezirian MD, FACS William B.
M. Allison Roensch, MD, Preston H. Blomquist, MD, Nalini K Aggarwal, MD, James P. McCulley, MD Department of Ophthalmology University of Texas Southwestern.
The Effect of the Restor Multifocal IOL on Frequency Doubling Perimetry Elizabeth Yeu, MD1, Elizabeth Woznak, BS2, Nicole Kesten, BS2, Steven VL Brown,
Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy for Irregular Astigmatism following Penetrating Keratoplasty Johnson Tan, MBBS MRCSEd (Ophth) FRCSEd (Ophth)
Functional Vision With Apodized Diffractive Aspheric Multifocal IOL With +3.0 D Add Jonathan M. Davidorf, MD Los Angeles, CA ASCRS Annual Symposium March,
Elvin H. Yildiz, Elisabeth J. Cohen, Ajoy S. Virdi, Kristin M. Hammersmith, Peter R Laibson, and Christopher J. Rapuano Cornea Service, Wills Eye Institute,
Panel Questions 1.Please discuss the following regarding endothelial cell density: a.The primary safety endpoint for this study was mean ECD ≤ 17%. The.
Transparency of Transition from 2.75 mm to 1.8 mm Microincision Surgery Jay McDonald II, MD Adjunct Clinical Professor University of Arkansas School of.
Bret Fisher, MD The Eye Center of North Florida Panama City, FL
Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,
USAMA MOURIS BEBAWY, MB MBCh CLINICAL FELLOW, MCMASTER UNIV No Financial Disclosure GEORGE H.H. BEIKO, B.M.,B.Ch.,FRCSC ST. CATHARINES, CANADA ASSIST PROF,
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon.
Unilateral multifocal lens implantation in patients with a contralateral monofocal or phakic eye is a viable presbyopic correction option Robert J. Cionni,
Neeti Parikh, MD Fuxiang Zhang, MD Department of Ophthalmology Henry Ford Hospital A Comparison Of Patient Satisfaction With Modified Monovision Versus.
Vision related quality of life in persons with Dry eye syndrome using the 25 item National eye Institute visual function questionnaire S.P. Mahesh MD Janine.
Correction of presbyopia by central biaspheric multifocal LASIK (PRESBYMAX ® ) in myopic patients. Jorge L. Alió MD, PhD, Dolores Ortiz PhD, Esperanza.
SK Kwok, MD Hong Kong Laser Eye Centre, Hong Kong The author has no financial interest in the subject matter of this e-poster ASCRS 2011 San Diego, US.
Clinical and simulation outcomes of a multifocal intraocular lens with rotational asymmetry and two different levels of near addition Jorge Alió, MD,PhD.
Astigmatism management with toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients Adriano Guarnieri 1-2, Luis W. Lu 3-4, Alfonso Arias- Puente INCIVI, Madrid,
March 2011 Bascom Palmer Eye Institute University of Miami Elaine Wu, M.D. Ana Paula Canto, M.D. William Culbertson, M.D. Sonia Yoo, M.D. Financial disclosure:
P91: Clinical Performance of Phakic Angle-Supported Investigational IOL in Prospective Global Trials, ASCRS 2010, Boston P91: Clinical performance of phakic.
Mohamed A Guenena, MD Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR, Kerry D Solomon, MD Magill research center for vision correction Storm Eye Institute Medical University.
Refractec ViewPoint™ CK System for the Treatment of Spherical Hyperopia Sheryl Berman, MD Medical Officer FDA/CDRH/ODE/DOED.
Factors which Influence Accommodative Amplitude in Crystalens HD Patients Uday Devgan, MD, FACS Devgan Eye Surgery, Los Angeles, CA FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES:
LONG TERM OUTCOMES OF RESTOR IOL IMPLANTATION Lori Dao, Orkun Muftuoglu, V. Vinod Mootha, Steven M. Verity, R. Wayne Bowman, H. Dwight Cavanagh, James.
Department of Ophthalmology Rudolf Foundation Clinic Vienna Head: Prof. Dr. Susanne Binder YEWHI-Study - A Comparison Between Blue Light Filtering and.
Binocular Defocus Curve of Apodized Diffractive Multifocal IOL in Asian-Indian Eyes Dr.A. Shetty; Dr. M. K. Kummelil; Dr. S.Nagappa Cataract and Refractive.
DGII 2008 Comparison of Aspheric ReSTOR and Tecnis multifocal IOL Dongho Lee MD, PhD Yonsei eye center, Seoul, South Korea No Financial Interest.
AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL. Aspheric IOL AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® 2 AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL SN6AD3 Add Power: +4 D Spectacle Plane: 3.2 D Range:
Wound Architecture and Wound Healing after Torsional and Longitudinal Phaco in a Rabbit Model Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Research Assistant Professor.
LogMAR-Analysis of multifocal intraocular lenses: Clinical performance A. Mannsfeld, I.-J. Limberger, A. Ehmer, M.P. Holzer, G. U.Auffarth International.
AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Apodized Diffractive IOL. What is the AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® IOL? The AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® IOL incorporates an apodized diffractive optic.
Corneal Wound: Architecture and Integrity Luis E. Fernández de Castro, M.D. 1 Helga P. Sandoval, M.D., M.S.C.R. 1 Kerry D. Solomon, M.D. 1 1 Magill Research.
Jay Fiore MD, Eric Donnenfeld MD, Hank Perry MD, Dana Morschauser OD
Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.
Refractive Outcomes with Advanced Wavefront-Guided LASIK William Trattler, MD Charles Reilly, MD Consultant to the USAF SG for Refractive Surgery Lackland.
O.I.I. EC-3 Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens: The European Experience Thierry Amzallag, M.D. Institut Ophtalmique Somain, France.
Clinical Outcomes Post AcrySof Toric IOL Implantation In 231 Consecutive Eyes Johnny L. Gayton, MD, FSEE Eyesight Associates 216 Corder Road 216 Corder.
Investigation of Multifocal Toric IOLs to Compensate for Corneal Astigmatism and to Provide Near, Intermediate, and Distance Vision José L. Rincón, MD.
Preliminary Results after Cataract Surgery with the Aspheric Acrysof ReSTOR IOL to Correct Presbyopia Meeting of the ASCRS Chicago 8-10 February 2007 R.M.M.A.
Toric IOLs: wavefront aberrometry and quality of life Mencucci Rita Giordano Cristina, Stiko Ermelinda, Miranda Paolo, Eleonora Favuzza, Ugo Menchini Authors.
9-Month Results after Implantation of a new accommodative IOL that works with one focus Mark Tomalla M.D.* Clinic for Refractive and Ophthalmic Surgery,
Intraocular Lens Outcomes: Comparison of Technologies and Formulas Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Research Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology Storm.
J. E. “Jay” McDonald, II M.D. McDonald Eye Associates Fayetteville, Arkansas Financial disclosure: Bausch and Lomb – Consultant; Addition.
FreeVis LASIK Zentrum Universitätsklinikum Mannheim
Postoperative Refraction and Patient Satisfaction after Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Robert Cionni, MD Financial.
Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
Thomas Kohnen, MD Department of Ophthalmology
Mohamed A Guenena, MD Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR Kerry D Solomon, MD
The authors have no financial interest to disclosure
Factors Potentially Affecting the Accuracy of Methods to Calculate Effective Refractive Power After Keratorefractive Surgery Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR,
David T. Vroman, MD Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology
Visual Outcomes and Satisfaction with Toric IOL Versus Monofocal IOL
BOGOTA LASER REFRACTIVE INSTITUTE
Consultant Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth
Presentation transcript:

Use of Multifocal IOLs in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Helga P. Sandoval, MD, MSCR 1 Reid B. Murphy, MD, 1 Luis E. Fernández de Castro, MD, 1 Kerry D Solomon, MD 1 1 Magill Research Center for Vision Correction, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

Financial Disclosure Helga P. Sandoval & Luis E. Fernández de Castro: –Alcon Laboratories, Inc. - D –Allergan, Inc. - D –Advanced Medical Optics - D Reid B. Murphy: None Kerry D. Solomon: –Alcon Laboratories, Inc. - A,C,D –Allergan, Inc. - A,C,D –Advanced Medical Optics - A,C,D –Advanced Medical Research - A,C,D –Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated - A,C,D –InSite Vision, Inc. - A,C,D –Eyemaginations - A,C,D

Background Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is the most common cause of visual loss in adults 50 years or older in the U.S.Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is the most common cause of visual loss in adults 50 years or older in the U.S. The most common complaint of these patients is their inability to read.The most common complaint of these patients is their inability to read. Current visual aids available for advanced ARMD include external devices –Often cosmetically & functionally unacceptable

Background AcrySof ReSTOR ® IOL –Uses apodized, diffractive technology to provide near, intermediate, and distance vision –Provides approximately 4.00 D of near add in the plane of the IOL –Improves uncorrected near vision in normal eyes

Background Using ReSTOR ® & creating myopic shift could improve near vision:Using ReSTOR ® & creating myopic shift could improve near vision: –Georgaras - Greece –Gayton & Mackool – 2 sites in U.S. Inducing Myopia in AMD –Image minification, may allow patients to have a better near visual field –Smaller, brighter image is easier to see than larger, dimmer one (e.g., stand magnifier)

Purpose To evaluate a potential method for improving near visual function and quality of life in patients with advanced AMD.To evaluate a potential method for improving near visual function and quality of life in patients with advanced AMD.

Methods A prospective series of patients with cataract and AMD (dry form or stable scarring)A prospective series of patients with cataract and AMD (dry form or stable scarring) –BCVA between 20/50 and 20/400 Phacoemulsification followed by off-label implantation of the ReSTOR ® SN60D3 IOLPhacoemulsification followed by off-label implantation of the ReSTOR ® SN60D3 IOL IOL power selected for target postoperative refraction of -3.00IOL power selected for target postoperative refraction of National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25)National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25)

Demographics to date 7 subjects7 subjects Mean age 80.4 ±4.1 (Range 74 – 85)Mean age 80.4 ±4.1 (Range 74 – 85) GenderGender –4 ♀ –3 ♂ Mean Visual Acuity 20/ ± 1 letter (Range 20/80 – 20/250)Mean Visual Acuity 20/ ± 1 letter (Range 20/80 – 20/250) Refraction SphCylSE Preop ±2.52 (-4.25 – +3.25) 0.71 ±0.47 (0.25 – 1.50) ±2.56 (-4.13 – +3.00) Postop ±0.63 (-4.50 – -2.50) 0.07 ±0.19 (0.00 – 0.50) ±0.55 (-4.25 – -2.50)

ReSTOR ® in AMD Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity at Best Distance Net Change in Lines of Visual Acuity Mean = 3.2 Lines Gained

ReSTOR ® in AMD Best-corrected Near Visual Acuity at Best Distance Net Change in Lines of Visual Acuity Mean = 2.9 Lines Gained

VFQ-25 Average Change From Preop to Postop General Vision-Increased ± Near Vision Activities-Increased ± Distance Vision Activities-Increased 2.86 ± Social Functioning Limitations-Decreased* 8.33 ± Mental Health-Increased* ± Role Limitations due to Vision-Decreased* 4.17 ± Dependency on others due to Vision- Decreased* 8.33 ± Color Vision – Increased* ± Peripheral Vision Limitations-Decreased* ± Scale * Data available for only 3 subjects preoperatively

Conclusions Largest gains in uncorrected and best corrected Near visual acuity.Largest gains in uncorrected and best corrected Near visual acuity. The ReSTOR ® IOL is a promising option to enhance quality of life in patients with AMD.The ReSTOR ® IOL is a promising option to enhance quality of life in patients with AMD. Enrollment of additional patients is continuing.Enrollment of additional patients is continuing.