Source Control Project, Phases I-III 2000-2008 1. Risk Assessment Methodology at radiation and chemical hazardous industrial facilities was developed 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISO EMS OVERVIEW FOR CONTRACTORS
Advertisements

1 LEGISLATIVE AND NORM BASIS FOR DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS IN RUSSIA Main authors: Prof. B.K. BYLKIN, Dr. Yu.A. ZVERKOV Russian Research.
International Energy Agency Hydrogen Implementing Agreement Proposed Task on Hydrogen Safety.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 561 Emergency Response Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
Nuclear power plant siting International Nuclear Power Conference October 23, 2009, Tallinn.
Risk Management Program Quality Assurance Program Plan David R. Taylor US EPA Region 9 Quality Assurance Office.
Kiggavik Project Final Hearing Presentation
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
Course Outline MAIL.PPT/1 © All Rights Reserved by TQMI TQMI, India's leading training and consultancy organisation, with its network of offices across.
E nvironmental P erformance R eview - A udit. 2 DELPHI CONFIDENCIAL/CONFIDENTIAL Agenda u Introductions and Plant Safety Orientation u Organization Chart.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Commission, regulation, advisory, standards. Description This presentation provides general information about each of the.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
1 NEED IN INTEGRAL APPROACH  Strategy and Politics in Decommissioning  Institutional and Legal aspects  Regulatory aspects  Economic aspects  Socio-Economic.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Republic of Moldova.
ISO training courses Developed by DOE and IBRAE RAN and conducted at the Training Center “Emergency Response” of the Institute for Advanced Training.
Source Control Project, Phase I Chemical hazards Objectives  Development of the of risk assessment methodology based on the use of approaches of ISO
Source Control Phases I-II: Source Control Phases I-II: Main findings  Facility: drinking water and sewage treatment utility in Apatity, Murmansk region,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Maria J Moracho Ramirez Regulatory Activities Section
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
Update on EPPR Radiation Projects October 2012 Ann Heinrich, U.S. Department of Energy.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “ Development of regulatory framework for oversight of decommissioning Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo.
1 PORTABLE ANALYSIS CAPABILITY (Laptop based). 2 Deployment of the Portable System on the basis of Protected Laptop The software and hardware complex.
May 22, 2000Wright-Hamilton Associates1 How Environmental Management System Development Can Enhance Your Company’s Environmental Health and Safety Michele.
US-Russia cooperation in emergency response enhancement Emergency Exercise Series US-Russia cooperation in emergency response enhancement Emergency Exercise.
Technical Meeting on Milestones for nuclear power infrastructure development Radiation Protection Khammar Mrabit Head, Regulatory Infrastructure and Transport.
Nikolay Kutin Chairman CEOC Conference May 30, 2011 Warsaw Federal Environmental, Industrial and Nuclear Supervision Service State Supervision and Control.
C O N T R A C T O R I N F O R M A T I O N E X C H A N G E Reister CE Presentation 1/98 1 Program Elements and Related Activities Rich Reister U.S. Department.
LEGAL and REGULATORY FRAMEWORK for NUCLEAR and RADIATION SAFETY in BULGARIA General overview Dr. M. Mateeva – Chief Inspector R. Markova-Mihaylova – Chief.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
International Atomic Energy Agency Irina Sanda Education and Training in the Area of Safety Assessment Irina Sanda Safety Assessment Section Division of.
International Atomic Energy Agency M. El-Shanawany IAEA Technical Support & Capacity Building Programme M. El-Shanawany Department of Nuclear Safety &
STRENGTHENING NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURES FOR THE CONTROL OF RADIATION SOURCES RER/9/096 REGIONAL PLANNING MEETING ARMENIA ASHOT MNATSAKANYAN Head of Radiation.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection and the Regulatory Framework Module IV 1.3. The role.
4rd Meeting of the Steering Committee on Competence of Human Resources for Regulatory Bodies Vienna, 4-7 December 2012 Current Status of the Human Resources.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
Current Status of the National Nuclear Infrastructure and Human Resources Development in the Republic of Belarus TM/WS on Topical Issues on Infrastructure.
Visit us at E mail: Tele:
Practice of HOF regulatory oversight E.G. Kudryavtsev Department of Safety Regulation of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities, Marine Nuclear Power Installations.
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections Gerald A. Schlapper, PhD, PE, CHP Health Physicist Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Region I.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
Leading State Inspector Ivan Rovkach Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus(GOSATOMNADZOR)
Ecological insurance and risk assessment Authors: Prof. A.N.Kosarikov, Dr.Sc (Econ) Assoc.Prof. A.V.Ivanov Assoc.Prof. Zh.A.Shevchenko, Cand.Sc. (Econ)
Exercise «ARCTIC-2005» The exercise to perfect MTB “Atomflot” personnel actions under the accident caused by nuclear ice-breaker refueling was conducted.
2-6 November 2015 Lisbon, Portugal Regional Meeting on Applications of the Code of Conduct on Safety of RR's 1 Some aspects of the Code of Conduct on the.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, Associate Professor.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE CENTER OF THE ROSATOM:
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module V Safety classification of structures, systems and components Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015.
Office of Legal Affairs
Lecture 15 Environmental auditing
Ensuring Nuclear Safety Culture in Ghana: Regulatory Perspective
ILC PROJECT ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT CFS Europe – KICK OFF MEETING
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
HSE Case: Risk Based Approach.
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
The Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point
RCF Plenary Session 21 September 2018
The Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN
Education and Training in the Area of Safety Assessment Irina Sanda
IAEA Technical Support & Capacity Building Programme M. El-Shanawany
SAFEGUARDS CAPACITY BUILDING ARGENTINE EXPERIENCE
Unit 14 Emergency Planning IS 235
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
IAEA - Department of Nuclear Safety & Security
Presentation transcript:

Source Control Project, Phases I-III Risk Assessment Methodology at radiation and chemical hazardous industrial facilities was developed 2. Risk assessment was performed for the following hazardous facilities :  Drinking water and sewage treatment utility in Apatity, Murmansk region, RF  Fuel Research Department of State Scientific Centre of Russian Federation “Scientific and Research Institute of Atomic Reactors” (SSC RF NIIAR)  Onshore Complex for unloading SNF of FSUE “ME Zvezdochka“, Severodvinsk, Archangelsk region, RF  Onshore Complex for unloading SNF of FSUE “Atomflot“, Murmansk, RF 3. Based on comparative risks, recommendations on enhancing the safety of facility operation were developed 4. Recommendations on introduction of environmental management systems based on ISO were developed for the facilities 1. Risk Assessment Methodology at radiation and chemical hazardous industrial facilities was developed 2. Risk assessment was performed for the following hazardous facilities :  Drinking water and sewage treatment utility in Apatity, Murmansk region, RF  Fuel Research Department of State Scientific Centre of Russian Federation “Scientific and Research Institute of Atomic Reactors” (SSC RF NIIAR)  Onshore Complex for unloading SNF of FSUE “ME Zvezdochka“, Severodvinsk, Archangelsk region, RF  Onshore Complex for unloading SNF of FSUE “Atomflot“, Murmansk, RF 3. Based on comparative risks, recommendations on enhancing the safety of facility operation were developed 4. Recommendations on introduction of environmental management systems based on ISO were developed for the facilities

Source Control Project, Phases I-III Workshops for specialists of the facilities were conducted on ISO standards, risk assessment and management 6. All projects were implemented by IBRAE RAN specialists, DOE experts and personnel of the facilities 5. Workshops for specialists of the facilities were conducted on ISO standards, risk assessment and management 6. All projects were implemented by IBRAE RAN specialists, DOE experts and personnel of the facilities

Risk Assessment Methodology at Hazardous Industrial Facilities (HIF) Risk Assessment Methodology at Hazardous Industrial Facilities (HIF) Risk assessment was done in accordance with the methodology developed at phases I-III of the Source Control project.Risk assessment was done in accordance with the methodology developed at phases I-III of the Source Control project. The methodology includes a detailed description of main elements of risk assessment, identifications of hazards and methods of risk assessment.The methodology includes a detailed description of main elements of risk assessment, identifications of hazards and methods of risk assessment. Ranking the corrective measures on priorities and development of risk management programs are performed using the risk matrices given in the methodology.Ranking the corrective measures on priorities and development of risk management programs are performed using the risk matrices given in the methodology. Regulatory documentation and references are included and are updated as needed.Regulatory documentation and references are included and are updated as needed. Risk assessment was done in accordance with the methodology developed at phases I-III of the Source Control project.Risk assessment was done in accordance with the methodology developed at phases I-III of the Source Control project. The methodology includes a detailed description of main elements of risk assessment, identifications of hazards and methods of risk assessment.The methodology includes a detailed description of main elements of risk assessment, identifications of hazards and methods of risk assessment. Ranking the corrective measures on priorities and development of risk management programs are performed using the risk matrices given in the methodology.Ranking the corrective measures on priorities and development of risk management programs are performed using the risk matrices given in the methodology. Regulatory documentation and references are included and are updated as needed.Regulatory documentation and references are included and are updated as needed.

Source Control Projects: Application of Risk Assessment Methodology at the facilities Source Control Projects: Application of Risk Assessment Methodology at the facilities Facilities in the projects received: - Risk Assessment Methodology, - recommendations on application of the methodology, - working materials and Risk Assessment Report including recommendations on risk reduction. Facility experts gained experience during project implementation. Facilities in the projects received: - Risk Assessment Methodology, - recommendations on application of the methodology, - working materials and Risk Assessment Report including recommendations on risk reduction. Facility experts gained experience during project implementation. Risk Assessment Methodology can be applied to hazardous sources of all types independently of ISO process. Risk Assessment Methodology is useful in the process of ISO Standard implementation at a facility by facilitating: - identification and ranking of significant environmental aspects and identification of environmental objectives. - determination of corrective action priorities, allowing for a more effective program of risk management and accomplishing continual improvement – a basic principle of ISO Risk Assessment Methodology is useful in the process of ISO Standard implementation at a facility by facilitating: - identification and ranking of significant environmental aspects and identification of environmental objectives. - determination of corrective action priorities, allowing for a more effective program of risk management and accomplishing continual improvement – a basic principle of ISO

Source Control Projects: Risk Assessment Methodology and ISO Process Source Control Projects: Risk Assessment Methodology and ISO Process Risk Assessment Methodology

Source Control Project: connection with other radiation-related EPPR projects Exercise "Arctic-2008" (Severodvinsk, Jul 30 – Aug ) Technological scenario ISO Training Courses: 1-day course “Understanding ISO “ for senior managers at Rosatom and Rosatom facilities (Dec, 2003)1-day course “Understanding ISO “ for senior managers at Rosatom and Rosatom facilities (Dec, 2003) 3-day course “Implementing ISO standard at facilities of the Federal agency for atomic energy” (Nov, 2004)3-day course “Implementing ISO standard at facilities of the Federal agency for atomic energy” (Nov, 2004) 3-day course “Implementing ISO standard at facilities of Concern “Rosenergoatom” (Oct, 2005)3-day course “Implementing ISO standard at facilities of Concern “Rosenergoatom” (Oct, 2005) 3-day course “Internal audit of EMS at Rosatom facilities” (Mar, 2006) ISO Training Courses: 1-day course “Understanding ISO “ for senior managers at Rosatom and Rosatom facilities (Dec, 2003)1-day course “Understanding ISO “ for senior managers at Rosatom and Rosatom facilities (Dec, 2003) 3-day course “Implementing ISO standard at facilities of the Federal agency for atomic energy” (Nov, 2004)3-day course “Implementing ISO standard at facilities of the Federal agency for atomic energy” (Nov, 2004) 3-day course “Implementing ISO standard at facilities of Concern “Rosenergoatom” (Oct, 2005)3-day course “Implementing ISO standard at facilities of Concern “Rosenergoatom” (Oct, 2005) 3-day course “Internal audit of EMS at Rosatom facilities” (Mar, 2006) Risk Assessment Methodology was used in preparation of training course section relating to environmental aspects and impacts. Risk Assessment Methodology was used in preparation of training course section relating to environmental aspects and impacts. Technological scenario for accident of the highest risk level, which was examined earlier in Source Control Project, Phase III, was used in the exercise. Technological scenario for accident of the highest risk level, which was examined earlier in Source Control Project, Phase III, was used in the exercise.

Source Control Project, Phase IV Objectives:  Application and further verification of the developed methodology at a large Russian enterprise involved in transportation of radioactive substances by motor transport Site to be studied:  State Scientific Centre of Russian Federation “Scientific and Research Institute of Atomic Reactors” (SSC RF NIIAR) The project is implementing by:  IBRAE RAN, SSC RF NIIAR US Department of Energy  IBRAE RAN, SSC RF NIIAR, US Department of EnergyDuration:  2008 – 2010

Source Control Project, Phase IV: Selected facility Amsterdam Ottawa Los Angeles London Copenhagen Buenos Aires Pretoria Helsinki Warszawa Budapest Prague Beijing Sydney Berlin Teheran Dimitrovgrad SSC RF NIIAR conducts research in nuclear power development manufactures sources and radiopharmaceuticals for medical purposes; industrial sources; specialized sources for scientific research Supplies sources to many organizations and hospitals in Russia and more than 20 other countries.

Source Control Project, Phase IV: Project Management Plan and Where We Are 1.Forming a working team, 1.Forming a working team, distribute the functions and responsibilities 2.Studying of requirements of regulatory and legal documents 3.Planning and organization of works 4.Identification of hazards and preliminary risk assessmen 4.Identification of hazards and preliminary risk assessment, selection of the most hazardous scenarios to carry out a detailed quantitative risk assessment 5.Preparing more detailed data on selected 5.Preparing more detailed data on selected scenarios and quantitative risk assessment 6.Making conclusions and development of the recommendations on risk management and reduction of risks in the future 1.Forming a working team, 1.Forming a working team, distribute the functions and responsibilities 2.Studying of requirements of regulatory and legal documents 3.Planning and organization of works 4.Identification of hazards and preliminary risk assessmen 4.Identification of hazards and preliminary risk assessment, selection of the most hazardous scenarios to carry out a detailed quantitative risk assessment 5.Preparing more detailed data on selected 5.Preparing more detailed data on selected scenarios and quantitative risk assessment 6.Making conclusions and development of the recommendations on risk management and reduction of risks in the future By now, the following has been done: A working group on implementation of the project is formed;A working group on implementation of the project is formed; Analysis of requirements of documentation regulating transportation of radioactive substances has been conducted;Analysis of requirements of documentation regulating transportation of radioactive substances has been conducted; Working materials on the facility and technological processes were collected.Working materials on the facility and technological processes were collected. By now, the following has been done: A working group on implementation of the project is formed;A working group on implementation of the project is formed; Analysis of requirements of documentation regulating transportation of radioactive substances has been conducted;Analysis of requirements of documentation regulating transportation of radioactive substances has been conducted; Working materials on the facility and technological processes were collected.Working materials on the facility and technological processes were collected.

Source Control Project, Phase IV: Next Steps 1.Accumulation of initial data for identification of hazards and preliminary risk assessment (the report is under development at present). 2.Identification of accident hazards (list of hazards and risk factors). 3.Development of accident scenarios. 4.Preliminary (qualitative and quantitative) assessment of probabilities and consequences of accidents. 5.Ranking of scenarios according to relative risks 5.Ranking of scenarios according to relative risks to make a decision to end examination of the least hazardous scenarios and to conduct detailed quantitative risk assessment for the most hazardous scenarios. 1.Accumulation of initial data for identification of hazards and preliminary risk assessment (the report is under development at present). 2.Identification of accident hazards (list of hazards and risk factors). 3.Development of accident scenarios. 4.Preliminary (qualitative and quantitative) assessment of probabilities and consequences of accidents. 5.Ranking of scenarios according to relative risks 5.Ranking of scenarios according to relative risks to make a decision to end examination of the least hazardous scenarios and to conduct detailed quantitative risk assessment for the most hazardous scenarios. Identification of hazards and preliminary risk assessment: