ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö ASAS Thematic Network First Workshop Outcome Eric Hoffman 6-8th October Malmö

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö WS 1 Overview ASAS Operational improvements: Dream or Reality? Roma, 28th to 30th Attendees Report published June 28th 2003

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö WS 1 Structure Day 1 –Welcome –ASAS TN Overview –Workshop Objectives –Operational applications enabled by ADS-B –Key Players expectations

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö WS1 Structure Day 2 –Benefits –Cost/implications –Impact –Inter-operation and Safety Day 3 –Wrap up

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö Plenary Session What are the expectations from the main players? Chris North (EC DGTREN) Pieter van der Kraan (EUROCONTROL) Nicolas Zveguintzoff (IATA) Bo Redeborn (LFV)

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö Plenary Session Need to get airports and airlines more involved. Get full commitment Implementation time lines are too long. Too many things are going on separately. USA/European cooperation – R&D sufficient?

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö Benefits Operational needs, lessons learned, expected benefits, overall maturity and potential implementation timeframe. Juergen Lauterbach (Lufthansa) Graeme Clark (Easyjet) Pedro Rastrilla (AENA) Alain Printemps (CENA)

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö Benefits A large number of potential benefits were identified: –ASAS Spacing most promising application for the short term; –Airport enhanced surveillance could improve the safety and efficiency. A number of concerns were highlighted: –Sharing of responsibilities, Controller acceptability, Safety Case –Need for reference operational concepts –Competing enabling technologies (1090 vs. VDL Mode 4) –Business case paramount

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö Costs/Implications Implications of ASAS applications on ground/ airborne systems, training communication, infrastructure, and the ‘associated costs’. Pieter van der Kraan (EUROCONTROL) Peter Howlett (THALES ATM) Thomas Fixy (Airbus) Patrick Souchu (DGAC)

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö Costs/Implications Early implementation is essential Further work is needed for Standards and CBA We should mandate Package 1 and focus on subset Application to reduce timetable 1090ES is not the answer but is going to happen, a study for the up-link is needed

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö Impact Expected impact of ASAS on workload, safety, and responsibility for the human operators Uwe Kroger (IFALPA and VC) Anthony Smoker (IFATCA) Bengt Moberg (SAS) Roberto Barchitta (Alitalia)

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö Impact Lack of knowledge concerning what ASAS Willingness to be involved by IFALPA, IFATCA and ATCEU Trust - both technical and managerial issues Package 1 may not be ambitious enough/ paradigm shift Learn from experience in “parallel worlds” and use the safety case

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö Inter-operation / Safety Change the environment, delays, standards, military, ATC sectors, single sky. Transition aspects. Mix equipage environment. Time scales. Interoperability Alberto Pasquini (Deep Blue) Jose Roca (EUROCONTROL) Ronald van Gent (NLR) Martin Robinson- (IAOPA)

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö Inter-operation / Safety General –Need to disseminate/coordinate better –Still a need to avoid the capacity gridlock Maturity –Validation required –Integration with existing systems Mixed equipage –Equipage rate –Transition Mandate –Safety benefits –Mode S elementary surveillance –Incentive

ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö Conclusions Need for agreement and commitment from the various stakeholders Package 1 definition exists but fragile Need for pilot and controller acceptability Need for agreed standards for interoperability Need for a clear implementation plan Need for improved exchange of information