Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, 2005. A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cosmic Rays and Space Weather
Advertisements

Solar System Science Flares and Solar Energetic Particles Terrestrial Gamma-Ray Flashes Cosmic-ray interactions with Earth, Sun, Moon, etc. Plans: Optimization.
NBYM 2006 A major proton event of 2005 January 20: propagating supershock or superflare? V. Grechnev 1, V. Kurt 2, A. Uralov 1, H.Nakajima 3, A. Altyntsev.
1 Belov A., Baisultanova L., Eroshenko E., Yanke V. (IZMIRAN, Russia), Mavromichalaki H. (Athens University, Greece), Pchelkin V. (PGI, Russia) Magnetospheric.
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE CRISM- 2011, Montpellier, 27 June – 1 July, Collaborators:
Investigation of daily variations of cosmic ray fluxes in the beginning of 24 th solar activity cycle Ashot Chilingarian, Bagrat Mailyan IHY-ISWI Regional.
Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
NMDB Kiel Meeting, 3-5/12/2008 On the possibility to use on-line one-minute NM data of NMDB network and available from Internet satellite CR data for.
The “solar flare” of 14th, July, Observation from the detector “L3+Cosmics” P. Ladron de Guevara on behalf of the L3+C collaboration. XXX REUNION.
Study of Galactic Cosmic Rays at high cut- off rigidity during solar cycle 23 Partha Chowdhury 1 and B.N. Dwivedi 2 1 Department of Physics, University.
Petukhov I.S., Petukhov S.I. Yu.G. Shafer Institute for Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy SB RAS 21st European Cosmic Ray Symposium in Košice, Slovakia.
Propagation Index and Short Wave Communications Rodney Wolfe N3XG.
Working Group 2 - Ion acceleration and interactions.
Towards a European Infrastructure for Lunar Observatories Bremen, Wednesday 23 rd March 2005 A 3D cosmic ray detector on the Moon X. Moussas University.
From Geo- to Heliophysical Year: Results of CORONAS-F Space Mission International Conference «50 Years of International Geophysical Year and Electronic.
Constraints on Particle Acceleration from Interplanetary Observations R. P. Lin together with L. Wang, S. Krucker at UC Berkeley, G Mason at U. Maryland,
Solar Energetic Particles -acceleration and observations- (Two approaches at the highest energy) Takashi SAKO Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory,
1 Interactive DataBase of Cosmic Ray Anisotropy (DB A10) Asipenka A.S., Belov A.V., Eroshenko E.F., Klepach E.G., Oleneva V. A., Yanke, V.G. IZMIRAN, Pushkov.
SHINE 2008 June, 2008 Utah, USA Visit our Websites:
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
CR variation during the extreme events in November 2004 Belov (a), E. Eroshenko(a), G. Mariatos ©, H. Mavromichalaki ©, V.Yanke (a) (a) IZMIRAN), ,
Ground Level Enhancement of May 17, 2012 Observed at South Pole SH21A-2183 Takao Kuwabara 1,3 ; John Bieber 1 ; John Clem 1,3 ; Paul Evenson 1,3 ; Tom.
Title Relativistic Solar Particle Events of 19 th Solar Cycle: Modeling Study Yu.V. Balabin, E.V. Vashenuyk, B.B. Gvozdevsky Polar Geophysical.
Ultimate Spectrum of Solar/Stellar Cosmic Rays Alexei Struminsky Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
On the probability of solar cosmic ray fluency during SEP event in dependence of the level of solar activity L.I. Dorman a,b, L.A. Pustil’nik a (a) Israel.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
1 20 January 2005: Session Summary SHINE 2006 Zermatt, Utah, 31 July - 4 August Invited Talks Riley: what was the Alfven speed in the corona at.
Cosmic Ray flux modulation in different timescales observed with the CARPET detector between 2006 and 2012 (CASLEO, 2550 m, Rc = 9.65 GV) J.-P. Raulin,
1 IGY The ALERT signal of ground level enhancements of solar cosmic rays: physics basis, the ways of realization and development Anashin V., Belov A.,
Operation of the Space Environmental viewing and Analysis Network (Sevan) in 24-th Solar Activity Cycle A. Chilingarian A. Chilingarian Yerevan Physics.
NMDB - the European neutron monitor database Karl-Ludwig Klein, for the NMDB consortium.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
Exploitation of Space Ionizing Radiation Monitoring System in Russian Federal Space Agency STRUCTURE OF THE MONITORING SYSTEM The Monitoring System includes.
Mapping high-latitude TEC fluctuations using GNSS I.I. SHAGIMURATOV (1), A. KRANKOWSKI (2), R. SIERADZKI (2), I.E. ZAKHARENKOVA (1,2), Yu.V. CHERNIAK (1),
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Japan, ICRC 2003 Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather By Lev Dorman for INTAS team (A. Belov, L. Dorman,,
20th ESA Symposium Lev Dorman (1, 2) for the Team (A. Belov, I. Ben Israel, U. Dai, L. Dorman,, E. Eroshenko, N. Iucci, Z. Kaplan, O. Kryakunova, A. Levitin,
Radiation Storms in the Near Space Environment Mikhail Panasyuk, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics of Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Russian Aviation and Space Agency Institute for Space Research NASA 2001 Mars Odyssey page 1 Workshop HEND Radiation environment on Odyssey and.
Daniel Matthiä(1)‏, Bernd Heber(2), Matthias Meier(1),
Athens University – Faculty of Physics Section of Nuclear and Particle Physics Athens Neutron Monitor Station Study of the ground level enhancement of.
ENERGY ESTIMATION OF THE INTERPLANETARY PLASMA DURING STRONGEST GEOMAGNETIC STORMS OF THE CURRENT 24 SOLAR CYCLE ON MARCH 2015 The geomagnetic storms.
Cosmic rays - Venusian atmosphere interactions during different periods of solar activity Cosmic Rays as an agent for space weather at Venus Interactions.
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
Understanding SEP properties through Neutron Monitor data modeling Neutron Monitor Network: a tool for revealing the relativistic SEP properties Ground.
1 TEMPERATURE EFFECT OF MUON COMPONENT AND PRACTICAL QUESTIONS OF ITS ACCOUNT IN REAL TIME Berkova 1,2 M., Belov 1 A., Eroshenko 1 E., Yanke 1 V. 1 Institute.
It is considered that until now in the 24th cycle of solar activity 2 ground level enhancements of solar cosmic rays (GLEs) are registered: on May 17,
29 ICRC, Pune, India, 2005 Geomagnetic effects on cosmic rays during the very strong magnetic storms in November 2003 and November 2004 Belov (a), L. Baisultanova.
The ICME’s magnetic field and the role on the galactic cosmic ray modulation for the solar cycle 23 Evangelos Paouris and Helen Mavromichalaki National.
GLOBAL SURVEY METHOD: WHAT DO NEUTRON MONITORS SEE? Belov A.1, Eroshenko E.1, Abunin A. 1, Abunina M. 1, Yanke V. 1, Oleneva V.1, Mavromichalaki H.2, Papaioannou.
Title Relativistic Solar Cosmic Ray Dynamics in Large Ground Level Events E.V. Vashenuyk, Yu.V. Balabin, B.B. Gvozdevsky Polar Geophysical Institute Apatity,
1 Temperature effect of the muon component of cosmic ray and practical possibilities of its accounting Berkova M., Belov A., Smirnov D., Eroshenko E.,
Extreme Event Symposium 2004 MAGNETOSPHERIC EFFECT in COSMIC RAYS DURING UNIQUE MAGNETIC STORM IN NOVEMBER Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
GLOBAL SURVEY METHOD: WHAT DO NEUTRON MONITORS SEE? Belov A.1, Eroshenko E.1, Abunin A. 1, Abunina M. 1, Yanke V. 1, Oleneva V.1, Mavromichalaki H.2, Papaioannou.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Effects of January 2010 stratospheric sudden warming in the low-latitude ionosphere L. Goncharenko, A. Coster, W. Rideout, MIT Haystack Observatory, USA.
A New Solar Neutron Telescope working at the International Space Station K. Koga, T. Goka (PI), H. Matsumoto, T. Obara, O. Okudaira (JAXA) Y. Muraki (Nagoya)
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
Radio Wave Propagation
Paul Evenson University of Delaware
GROUND-LEVEL EVENT (GLE)
A Relation between Solar Flare Manifestations and the GLE Onset
Early Alert of Solar Radiation Hazard
Development of a GLE Alarm System Based Upon Neutron Monitors
Antarctica and the Global Neutron Monitor Network
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS
. Multipoint, galactic cosmic ray observations associated with a series of interplanetary coronal mass ejections: the case study of June 2015 A. Papaioannou1,
NMDB - the European neutron monitor database
Presentation transcript:

Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G. Yanke (a).  Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation RAS (IZMIRAN), , Troitsk, Moscow region, RUSSIA  Nuclear and Particle Physics Section, Physics Department, Athens University Pan/polis-Zografos Athens, GREECE. rus-eroshenko E-abs2-SH15-poster

Abstract  Unexpectedly giant proton event toward the end of solar cycle was recorded on 20 January 2005 by the worldwide network of neutron monitors. The GLE was associated with the flare X7.1 on 20 January in AR720 (N12 W58) started at 6:36 UT and occurred on the background of relatively quiet geomagnetic activity. The flux of the first relativistic protons reached Earth at 6:50 UT by very narrow beam and had a very hard spectrum. The peak of the CR variations reached several thousands of percentages at southern polar stations.  The characteristics of the cosmic ray energy spectrum, anisotropy, differential and integral fluxes as well, were obtained by the data from about 40 neutron monitors using anisotropic and compound models of solar cosmic ray variations.

One of the greatest GLE Fig. 1. Relative count rate variations at some neutron monitors during the greatest GLEs.

Large and long anisotropy in GLE69 Fig. 2. The visual anisotropy in CR variations at four NMs: CAPS-Cape Shmidt, MCMD-McMurdo, NAIN, THUL-Thule. Fig.3. GLE 69 as observed on subpolar NMs McMurdo and Thule. At the first 40 minutes the great anisotropy is evident, but in fact the enhancement at McMurdo significantly exceeds that at Thule even in 10 hrs after the onset.

Data and Method: GLE model Solar Cosmic Ray Variations : where are the coupling coefficients Variations of the solar CR flux Consequently: Contribution of the isotropic part of the SCR spectrum Contribution of the anisotropic part of the SCR spectrum axis-symmetric anisotropy function

Energy spectrum changes Fig.4. Spectra of the solar CR during the first and second 5-minute intervals after the onset. The first particles came from the Sun by the narrow beam and had very hard spectrum with an index In some minutes after the onset a spectrum of the solar CR jumped to become soft and during the next 5 hours its index changed only within the range. In the first 5- minute interval high energy particles dominated in the flux whereas just before the 7:00 UT the number of low energy particles essentially enhanced.

Mean Flux and Energy Spectrum Fig. 5. Behavior of the power law energy spectrum index together with the mean (averaged by the all directions) particle flux with 1 GeV energy..

Upper Proton Energy Fig. 6. Behavior of the upper energy Eu, obtained by model (circles) and observed by neutron monitors (triangles). Only in the first minutes the model selects sufficiently high upper energy, after this the modeling Eu is small and underestimated. On the other side, it is a real reflection of the small contribution of the high energy particles (>3GeV) in the observed GLE.

Maximal, Minimal and Mean Fluxes Fig. 7. Behavior of the minimal, maximal and mean fluxes of solar CR with 1 GeV energy. Anisotropy decreases quickly at the first time, but it remains sufficiently noticeable during many hours after the onset..

Differential Fluxes Fig. 8. Behavior of differential fluxes of solar cosmic rays with different energies. Simultaneous maximum in broad energy range testifies the arrival of all energies at the same time in the first minutes.

Integral Fluxes Fig. 10. Behavior of integral fluxes of solar protons with different energies by the satellite observations (GOES measurement ). Fig. 9. Integral fluxes of solar CR of different energies obtained from the NM data using the GLE model. The fluxes of 300 and 100 MeV are the extrapolation, but there is a good agreement for maximal flux >100 MeV with the satellite observations. 20 January 2005, UT

Anisotropy and source location Fig.11. Behavior of the solar CR anisotropy magnitude and coefficient n, characterizing a width of angular distribution of anisotropic flux.. Fig.12. Behavior of latitude and longitude of maximum solar particle flux.

Angular distribution Fig. 13. Angular distributions at 3 first 5-min intervals and half an hour later.

Longitudinal distribution Fig. 14. Longitudinal distributions in 3 first intervals and on the late phase of GLE in geographic coordinates. At the beginning the beam is very narrow and then quickly widens. Later the anisotropy changes by a complicated way. In a whole the wide angular distribution is characteristic for the late phase, but model selects sufficiently often also a narrow beam even in 8-9 hours after the onset

Conclusions  The record enhancement in the counting rate at some southern polar NMs on 20 January 2005 ranges this event among the greatest GLEs. Nevertheless, high energy particles (>3 GeV) turned out to be of much less amount than in 1956 and 1989 events.  The first particles came by very narrow beam and had a very hard spectrum. Already in some minutes after the onset the spectrum became soft and kept its form during the several hours with index  The solar CR flux was anisotropic not less than 11 hours. The changes of anisotropy parameters along the time seems to be related to the variability of the interplanetary magnetic field.  It is possible and necessary to improve the obtained results.