Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4, 2014 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
To response to litigation, thirty Minnesota Cities were directed to perform antidegradation reviews or Loading Assessments for two time periods: (1) (1)
To response to litigation, thirty Minnesota Cities were directed to perform antidegradation reviews or Loading Assessments for two time periods: (1) (1)
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
SLIDE 1 Sustainable Stormwater Management May 6, 2015 Blue Highways: Transportation and Stormwater Management in Virginia Ginny Snead, PE Richmond Office.
Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.
Update on the District of Columbia’s Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) for the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) November 18, 2010.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Local Government Advisory Committee March 14, 2014.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee February 27, 2014.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Update on the Development of EPA’s Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Virginia’s Watershed Implementation Plan Russ Perkinson Potomac Roundtable October 8, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Delaware.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Updating Background Conditions and BMP Efficiencies Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Update on USEPA Rulemaking for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Utilities Department January 26, 2010 Utilities Department.
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
URBAN STORMWATER: A PERFECT STORM FOR CHANGE Jon M. Capacasa Director, Water Protection Division EPA Region III.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Caroline County Pilot Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Katheleen Freeman, AICP, Director Caroline County Department of Planning & Codes Leslie Grunden,
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Milestones, Progress and the Mid-point Assessment APPROACHING 2017 James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager Department of Environmental Quality.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
MACo Winter Conference
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Chesapeake Bay Program
Watershed Implementation Plan
Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
2018 BMP Verification Assessment
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
Presentation transcript:

Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,

 What are the 2-year milestones and evaluation?  How we conducted evaluation  Evaluation results 2

 Milestones comprise: ◦ Numeric: translate practices into load reductions and compare to long-term trajectories ◦ Programmatic: Actions to build capacity to achieve necessary implementation levels  : Did jurisdictions and federal agencies achieve their commitments set 2 years ago?  : Are commitments strong enough to keep jurisdictions and federal agencies on track to have: ◦ All practices in place by 2025 to achieve clean water in Bay ◦ Practices in place by 2017 to achieve 60% of necessary reductions compared to

 State WIP leads  Sector experts ◦ Agriculture ◦ Urban/Stormwater ◦ Wastewater ◦ Trading/Offsets/Growth ◦ Modeling ◦ Local Engagement  Bay Grant project officers  Senior Managers 4

 Majority of programmatic milestones were achieved ◦ Some important milestones missed, e.g. permit reissuance  For , the trajectory and pace of implementation to meet 2017 goals gets steeper in many instances. There are good commitments, more needs to be done to build necessary capacity  Enhanced implementation rates and new, innovative tools are needed to meet the challenges ahead of us 5

6 Blue arrows – Milestone targets Green arrow – actual progress Orange arrow – reflect being “on track” to 2017

7

Blue arrows – Milestone targets Green arrow – actual progress Orange arrow – reflect being “on track” to 2017

Strengths Continued upgrades to Blue Plains WWTP; will have enhanced nutrient removal in place by October 2014 Shortfalls Did not complete citywide online stormwater tool by 2013 Issues to Address Increase implementation of tree plantings and redevelopment projects at 1.2 inch retention standard to meet Urban Stormwater projections

Blue arrows – Milestone targets Green arrow – actual progress Orange arrow – reflect being “on track” to 2017

Strengths Implemented revised agricultural nutrient management regulations and homeowner fertilizer act Doubled Bay Restoration Fund fee—funds to complete ENR upgrades at 67 major and 5 to 10 minor wastewater treatment plants by 2017 Shortfalls Phosphorus Management Tool regulations not completed as specified; committed to implementing in 2014 Issues to Address Issue remaining, expired MS4 permits and construction general permit by agreed upon schedule

Blue arrows – Milestone targets Green arrow – actual progress Orange arrow – reflect being “on track” to 2017

Strengths Committed to performing 450 agricultural compliance inspections and 100 compliance actions during the milestone period Shortfalls Did not meet 2013 reduction targets in agriculture and did not meet implementation targets for critical BMPs the Commonwealth is relying on heavily to meet nutrient and sediment reduction targets Issues to Address Increase progress in agriculture and stormwater to get on track to meet nitrogen targets for 2015, with focus on highest priority water quality BMPs

Blue arrows – Milestone targets Green arrow – actual progress Orange arrow – reflect being “on track” to 2017

Strengths Launched the Virginia Enhanced Conservation Initiative; $4.8 million in cost-share funds and reimbursing farmers up to 100% to install stream fencing systems Approved bond authorization including $101 million to fund grants for wastewater plant upgrades and up to $75 million for Combined Sewer Overflow control projects Shortfalls Did not issue 10 remaining, expired Phase I MS4 permits—not on track to have practices in place by 2025 to meet TMDL allocations for stormwater within Phase I localities Issues to Address Demonstrate more aggressive implementation of BMPs to manage stormwater, including infiltration and filtration

Strengths Developed the planning tool Bay Facility Assessment Scenario Tool (BayFAST) to allow federal agencies to estimate current loads and pollutant reductions from various BMP scenarios Shortfalls EPA deferred revisions to national stormwater rule; alternatively will develop proposals to strengthen stormwater program in Issues to Address Improve BMP progress reporting by federal facilities through BayFAST in

17