Semantic Clarification of the Representation of Procedures and Diseases in SNOMED CT Stefan Schulz Medical Informatics, Freiburg University Hospital (Germany)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Complex Occurrents in Clinical Terminologies Stefan Schulz, Kornél Markó Department of Medical Informatics, Freiburg University Hospital, Germany Boontawee.
Advertisements

KR-2002 Panel/Debate Are Upper-Level Ontologies worth the effort? Chris Welty, IBM Research.
Archetypes in HL7 2.x Archetypes/Structure in HL7 Version 2.x Andrew McIntyre Medical-Objects 10 th HL7 Australia Conference,
Consistent and standardized common model to support large-scale vocabulary use and adoption Robust, scalable, and common API to reduce variation in clinical.
Copyright © 2001 College of American Pathologists Pseudophakic corneal edema Sample Hierarchy for Corneal Edema Idiopathic corneal edema Phakic corneal.
Ontological analysis of the semantic types Anand Kumar MBBS, PhD IFOMIS, University of Saarland, Germany. BIOMEDICALONTOLOGYBIOMEDICALONTOLOGY.
Copyright © 2001 College of American Pathologists Sample Hierarchy for Nasal Septoplasty Hair bearing flap to eyebrow Repair of eyebrow Operation on eyebrow.
ECO R European Centre for Ontological Research Ontology-based Error Detection in SNOMED-CT ® Werner Ceusters European Centre for Ontological Research Universität.
Catalina Martínez-Costa, Stefan Schulz: Ontology-based reinterpretation of the SNOMED CT context model Ontology-based reinterpretation of the SNOMED CT.
A Description Logics Approach to Clinical Guidelines and Protocols Stefan Schulz Department of Med. Informatics Freiburg University Hospital Germany Udo.
INTRODUCTION TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Massimo Poesio LECTURE 4: Semantic Networks and Description Logics.
SNOMED CT’s Ontological Commitment Stefan Schulz University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany Ronald Cornet Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Towards a Computational Paradigm for Biological Structure Stefan Schulz Department of Medical Informatics University Hospital Freiburg (Germany) Udo Hahn.
FMA: a domain reference ontology Comments on Cornelius Rosse’s talk Anita Burgun WG6 meeting, Rome 29 Apr- 2 May 2005.
The Meaning of Part (Discussion) Anand Kumar MBBS, PhD IFOMIS, Department of Medicine, Univ. of Saarland, Germany. BIOMEDICALONTOLOGYBIOMEDICALONTOLOGY.
Werner Ceusters Language & Computing nv Ontologies for the medical domain: current deficiencies in light of the needs of medical natural language.
The Relevance of Ontologies in Biology and Medicine Stefan Schulz Freiburg University Hospital Medical Language and Ontology Group (MediLOG) Department.
Ontological Foundations for Biomedical Sciences Stefan Schulz, Kornél Markó, Udo Hahn Workshop on Ontologies and their Applications, September 28, 2004,
Copyright © 2001 College of American Pathologists Sample Hierarchy for Hepatitis Chronic viral hepatitis Chronic viral hepatitis C About SNOMED Relationships.
Ontology-based Convergence of Medical Terminologies: SNOMED CT and ICD-11 Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University.
The Meaning of Part Stefan Schulz Department of Medical Informatics University Hospital Freiburg (Germany) Ontology and Biomedical Informatics An International.
Standardization of Anatomy Parts and Wholes – From Function to Location Stefan Schulz Department of Medical Informatics University Hospital Freiburg (Germany)
The Foundational Model of Anatomy and its Ontological Commitment(s) Stefan Schulz University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany FMA in OWL meeting November.
Stefan Schulz Medical Informatics Research Group
A Case Study of ICD-11 Anatomy Value Set Extraction from SNOMED CT Guoqian Jiang, PhD ©2011 MFMER | slide-1 Division of Biomedical Statistics & Informatics,
SNOMED CT's Condition / Situation approach related to OGMS Stefan Schulz Medical University of Graz (Austria) ICBO 2013 Montreal OGMS Meeting.
The Ontology of Biological Taxa
Survey of Medical Informatics CS 493 – Fall 2004 September 27, 2004.
Stefan Schulz a,b, Boontawee Suntisrivaraporn c, Franz Baader c a Pontificial Catholic University of Paraná, Master Program of Health Technology, Curitiba,
A CompuGroup Software GmbH, Koblenz, Germany b IMBI, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany c Semfinder AG, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland d OntoMed Research.
A School of Information Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil b Medical University of Graz, Austria, c University Medical Center Freiburg,
WHO – IHTSDO: SNOMED CT – ICD-11 coordination: Conditions vs. Situations Stefan Schulz IHTSDO conference Copenhagen, Apr 24, 2012.
Ontological Foundations of Biological Continuants Stefan Schulz, Udo Hahn Text Knowledge Engineering Lab University of Jena (Germany) Department of Medical.
Ontological Analysis, Ontological Commitment, and Epistemic Contexts Stefan Schulz WHO – IHTSDO Joint Advisory Group First Face-to-Face Meeting Heathrow,
The ICPS: A taxonomy, a classification, an ontology or an information model? Stefan SCHULZ IMBI, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
The ICPS: A taxonomy, a classification, an ontology or an information model? Stefan SCHULZ IMBI, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Sharing Ontologies in the Biomedical Domain Alexa T. McCray National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health Department of Health & Human Services.
What do SNOMED CT Concepts Represent? Stefan Schulz University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany 31 July & 1 August 2009 Internationales Begegnungszentrum.
How much formality do we need ? Stefan Schulz MedInfo 2007 Workshop: MedSemWeb 2007 What Semantics Do We Need for A Semantic Web for Medicine? University.
Approach to building ontologies A high-level view Chris Wroe.
Detection of underspecifications in SNOMED CT concept definitions using language processing 1 Federal Technical University of Paraná (UTFPR), Curitiba,
Oncologic Pathology in Biomedical Terminologies Challenges for Data Integration Olivier Bodenreider National Library of Medicine Bethesda, Maryland -
Ontology Technology applied to Catalogues Paul Kopp.
International Workshop 28 Jan – 2 Feb 2011 Phoenix, AZ, USA SysML and Ontology in Biomedical Modeling Henson Graves Yvonne Bijan 30 January 2011.
SNOMED CT and Surgical Pathology
Revising the Anatomy Model to Improve Usability and Correctness
The “Common Ontology” between ICD 11 and SNOMED CT
Modeling the pharmacogenomics of depression
Stefan Schulz Medical Informatics Research Group
SNOMED CT and Surgical Pathology
Towards a Computational Paradigm for Biological Structure
The BioTop Family of Upper Level Ontological Resources for Biomedicine
Can SNOMED CT be harmonized with an upper-level ontology?
Text Knowledge Engineering Lab University of Jena (Germany)
February 17, 2017 Bruce Goldberg, MD, PhD
Observable entities and Clinical findings
Observable entities and Clinical findings
Ontological Foundations for Biomedical Sciences
Kin Wah Fung, MD, MS, MA National Library of Medicine, NIH
A Description Logics Approach to Clinical Guidelines and Protocols
Ontology.
Architecture for ICD 11 and SNOMED CT Harmonization
Harmonizing SNOMED CT with BioTopLite
Ontological analysis of the semantic types
Stefan SCHULZ IMBI, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
Organized by AMIA WG Formal (Bio)Medical Knowledge Representation
Ontology.
Animating the reference terminology – showing classifiers at work
A Description Logics Approach to Clinical Guidelines and Protocols
ICD10PCS to SNOMED standardization
Presentation transcript:

Semantic Clarification of the Representation of Procedures and Diseases in SNOMED CT Stefan Schulz Medical Informatics, Freiburg University Hospital (Germany) Udo Hahn Computational Linguistics Jena University (Germany) Jeremy Rogers Medical Informatics University of Manchester (UK)

Context: SNOMED CT (Clinical Terms) Comprehensive clinical terminology system Constructed by merging, expanding, and restructuring SNOMED RT and Clinical Terms Version 3 (former Read Codes). 364,000 concepts, 984,000 terms, 1.45 million defined relationships between concepts Government agreements in U.S. & U.K. Increasing interest into SNOMED CT in other countries

SNOMED CT OAV and DL notation Object – Attribute – Value (OAV) Triplets Objects and Values are SNOMED “concepts” Attributes are SNOMED “relations” SNOMED Concept 1SNOMED RelationshipSNOMED Concept 2 Renal glomerular diseaseis_aRenal disease Renal glomerular diseasehas_finding_siteKidney Glomerulumpart_ofKidney Syntax Semantics cf. Baader et al. Description Logics Handbook Description Logics (DL) representation: cf. Kent Spackman, AMIA 2002 Renal glomerular disease ⊑ Renal disease Renal glomerular disease ⊑  has_finding_site.Kidney Glomerulum ⊑  part-of.Kidney

Objective of this talk Ontological Inquiry of the representation of Processes in SNOMED CT Clarification of the meaning of the “relationship group” attribute in SNOMED CT „Process“ in the sense of Diagnostic or Therapeutic Procedures Pathological and Physiological Processes Removal of foreign body from stomach by incision

Hierarchichal Arrangement of Processes Removal of foreign body from stomach by endoscopy Removal of foreign body from stomach by incision Endoscopic Exploration Removal of foreign body Incision of Stomach Removal of foreign body Surgical Procedure ?? ???? Medical Procedure ?

Taxonomy of Processes: is-a relation between parent and child processes Parent and Child Processes Removal of foreign body from stomach by endoscopy Removal of foreign body from stomach by incision Endoscopic Exploration Removal of foreign body Incision of Stomach Removal of foreign body Surgical Procedure is-a ???? Medical Procedure is-a

Processes/ Subprocesses Removal of foreign body from stomach by endoscopy Removal of foreign body from stomach by incision Endoscopic Exploration Removal of foreign body Incision of Stomach Removal of foreign body Surgical Procedure Processes and Subprocesses is-a ???? Medical Procedure is-a

1. A (complex) process is subsumed by its subprocesses: Subprocesses do not exist simultaneously. An instance of Removal of foreign body from stomach by incision is first an instance of Incision of stomach and then becomes an instance of Removal of foreign body 2. Subprocesses are temporal parts of a (complex) process : A complex process can be aborted before completion. The complex process Removal of foreign body from stomach by incision can only be instantiated if the subprocesses have been completed. How to semantically relate processes with their subprocesses

Removal of foreign body from stomach Removal of foreign body from stomach by endoscopy Removal of foreign body from stomach by incision Endoscopic Exploration Incision of Stomach Surgical Procedure Theory 1: A (complex) process is subsumed by its subprocesses is-a

Theory 2: Subprocesses are temporal parts of a (complex) process Removal of foreign body from stomach by endoscopy Removal of foreign body from stomach by incision Endoscopic Exploration Removal of foreign body from Stomach Incision of Stomach Surgical Procedure is-a  has-part

Representation in SNOMED CT SNOMED ® Concept 1 SNOMED ® Relationship SNOMED ® Concept 2 RG Removal of Foreign Body from the Stomach by Incision Is ARemoval of foreign body from digestive system 0 Is ARemoval of foreign body from stomach 0 Is AIncision of stomach0 MethodRemoval - action1 Direct MorphologyForeign body1 MethodIncision - action2 Procedure siteStomach Structure2 …compatible with Theory 1

Removal of foreign body from stomach Removal of foreign body from stomach by endoscopy Removal of foreign body from stomach by incision Endoscopic Exploration Incision of Stomach Surgical Procedure Theory 1: A (complex) process is subsumed by its subprocesses is-a

Naïve DL Transcription RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomachByIncision  RemovalOfForeignBodyFromDigestiveSystem AND RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomach AND IncisionOfStomach AND  Method.RemovalAction AND  DirectMorphology.ForeignBody AND  Method.IncisionAction AND  ProcedureSite.stomachStructure …indistinguishable from “incision of foreign body and removal of stomach” ???

Relationship Groups in SNOMED CT SNOMED ® Concept 1 SNOMED ® Relationship SNOMED ® Concept 2 RG Removal of Foreign Body from the Stomach by Incision Is ARemoval of foreign body from digestive system 0 Is ARemoval of foreign body from stomach 0 Is AIncision of stomach0 MethodRemoval - action1 Direct MorphologyForeign body1 MethodIncision - action2 Procedure siteStomach Structure2

Nesting with relationship groups (RGs) in DL formalism RG1 RG2 Mix-up prevented. Compatible with which theory ? RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomachByIncision  RemovalOfForeignBodyFromDigestiveSystem AND RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomach AND IncisionOfStomach AND  RG.(  Method.RemovalAction AND  DirectMorphology.ForeignBody) AND  RG.(  Method.IncisionAction AND  ProcedureSite.stomachStructure)

Theory 2: Subprocesses are temporal parts of a (complex) process Removal of foreign body from stomach by endoscopy Removal of foreign body from stomach by incision Endoscopic Exploration Incision of Stomach Surgical Procedure is-a  has-part Removal of foreign body

Theory 2: Subprocesses are temporal parts of a (complex) process Removal of foreign body from stomach by incision Incision of Stomach  has-part Removal of foreign body Removal Foreign Body  method  direct morphology Incision Stomach Structure  method  procedure site  has-part.(  Method.Removal AND  DirectMorphology.ForeignBody)  has-part.(  Method.Incision AND  ProcedureSite.stomachStructure)

Nesting with relationship groups (RGs) in DL formalism RG1 RG2 RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomachByIncision  RemovalOfForeignBodyFromDigestiveSystem AND RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomach AND IncisionOfStomach AND  RG.(  Method.RemovalAction AND  DirectMorphology.ForeignBody) AND  RG.(  Method.IncisionAction AND  ProcedureSite.stomachStructure)

SNOMED relation groups can be re-interpreted as has-part RG1 RG2 RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomachByIncision  RemovalOfForeignBodyFromDigestiveSystem AND RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomach AND IncisionOfStomach AND  has-part.(  Method.RemovalAction AND  DirectMorphology.ForeignBody) AND  has-part.(  Method.IncisionAction AND  ProcedureSite.stomachStructure)

Difference between “X” and “X-Action” in SNOMED CT RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomachByIncision  RemovalOfForeignBodyFromDigestiveSystem AND RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomach AND IncisionOfStomach AND  has-part.(  Method.RemovalAction AND  DirectMorphology.ForeignBody) AND  has-part.(  Method.IncisionAction AND  ProcedureSite.stomachStructure)

Difference between “X” and “X-Action” in SNOMED CT RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomachByIncision  RemovalOfForeignBodyFromDigestiveSystem AND RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomach AND IncisionOfStomach AND  has-part.(  Method.RemovalAction AND  DirectMorphology.ForeignBody) AND  has-part.(  Method.IncisionAction AND  ProcedureSite.stomachStructure)

Conclusions Relationship groups in SNOMED CT may represent the mereological relation between procedures / actions / processes and their parts. Suggest: Rename the relationship group attribute RG by has-part or has-subprocess in these cases. Make a clearer distinction between atomic classes (such as IncisionAction) and those classes which have atomic classes as parts (such as IncisionProcess). The present names are misleading.

Semantic Clarification of the Representation of Procedures and Diseases in SNOMED CT Stefan Schulz Medical Informatics, Freiburg University Hospital (Germany) Udo Hahn Jena University, Language & Information Engineering (Germany) Jeremy Rogers Medical Informatics University of Manchester (UK)

Theory 1: Process is instantiated by its subprocesses P1P1 P2P2 P3P3 P4P4 P t P1P1 P2P2 P3P3 P4P4 P p P1P1 P2P2 P3P3 P4P4 P p P1P1 P2P2 P3P3 P4P4 P p P1P1 P2P2 P3P3 P4P4 P p      instance-of t1t1 t2t2 t3t3 t4t4 Acknowledgements: Boris Hennig, unpublished

Difference between “X” and “X-Action” in SNOMED CT RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomachByIncision  RemovalOfForeignBodyFromDigestiveSystem AND RemovalOfForeignBodyFromStomach AND IncisionOfStomach AND  has-part.(  Method.RemovalAction AND  DirectMorphology.ForeignBody) AND  has-part.(  Method.IncisionAction AND  ProcedureSite.stomachStructure)

P1P1 P2P2 P‘‘‘P1P1 P‘‘P2P2 P1P1 P‘P3P3 P2P2 P1P1 P P3P3 P4P4 t t1t1 t2t2 t3t3 t4t4 pppp is-a instance-of  has-part Theory 2: Subprocesses are parts of their parent processes

Removal of foreign body from stomach Removal of foreign body from stomach by endoscopy Removal of foreign body from stomach by incision Preparation for Endoscopy Introduction of Endoscope Exploration Removal of foreign body Extraction of Endoscope Preparation for Surgery Incision Exploration Removal of foreign body Closure t t Surgical Procedure Taxonomy of Processes: is-a relation between parent and child processes Parent and Child Processes

Removal of foreign body from stomach Removal of foreign body from stomach by endoscopy Removal of foreign body from stomach by incision Preparation for Endoscopy Introduction of Endoscope Exploration Removal of foreign body Extraction of Endoscope Preparation for Surgery Incision Exploration Removal of foreign body Closure t t Surgical Procedure Partonomy of Processes Processes and Subprocesses