Helios Plaza Houston, TX Advisor - Dr. Hanagan Kevin Zinsmeister Structural Option.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASHA National Office Building 2011 AE Senior Thesis Ryan Dalrymple 5 th year Structural Option BAE/MAE Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby Photo Courtesy of Boggs.
Advertisements

The Optimus Signature Boutique Offices, India AE Senior Thesis 2013 Punit G. Das | Structural Option Faculty Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan.
Fraser Centre State College, PA Tyler Strange Structural Option Consultant: Dr. Thomas Boothby April 13, 2011 Tyler StrangeStructural Option Fraser Centre.
Carl Hubben – Structural Option Ae senior thesis Office Building-G EASTERN UNITED STATES.
A Medical Office Building For The Primary Health Network Daniel Goff I Structural Option Dr. Thomas Boothby l Faculty Advisor Sharon, Pennsylvania Source:
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Biomedical Research Building Joshua Zolko, Structural Option.
Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
The University Sciences Building Northeast, USA Final Presentation Chris Dunlay Structural Option Dr. Boothby.
Pennsylvania College Of Technology Dauphin Hall Williamsport, Pennsylvania Aubert Ndjolba Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Thesis Advisor: Dr.
Crocker West Building State College, Pa Eric M. FosterStructural OptionSpring 2009.
Daniel Bellay Lancaster County Bible Church Structural Option Lancaster County Bible Church.
3711 Market Street 3711 Market Street Philadelphia, PA Zachary Yarnall l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Professor.
Courtesy of Holbert Apple Associates Georgia Avenue Building Introduction Statistics Gravity System Lateral System Problem Statement & Solution.
Samuel M. P. Jannotti Structural April 14, 2008 American Eagle Outfitters Quantum III: South Side Works.
George Read Hall The University of Delaware
UNC Imaging Research Building UNC Imaging Research Building Chapel Hill, NC Daniel R. Hesington, LEED AP l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring.
Rockville Metro Plaza II Rockville Pike John Vais | Structural Option PSU AE Senior Thesis 2014 Faculty Advisor – Dr. Hanagan Rockville, Maryland
Hershey Research Park Building One Jonathan Krepps Structural Option Senior Thesis 2013 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Introduction Connected to existing Benton Hall via skywalk Size: 103,154 SF above grade on 4 levels 82,661 SF below grade parking on 3 levels Cost: $23,651,159.
Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option Office Building Washington, DC Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option.
GARY NEWMAN STRUCTURES OPTION ADVISOR: DR. HANAGAN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION SPRING 2008.
AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS Quantum II Corporate Headquarters Michael Sandretto Spring – 2007 Structural Option.
Southeast View of IRMC West View of IRMC. Presentation Outline Introduction Existing Structure Thesis Goals Structural Depth Lighting Breadth Conclusion.
BRYAN DARRIN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION MILLENNIUM HALL DREXEL CAMPUS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
Structural System Redesign Existing Conditions Proposal Gravity Design Lateral Design Cost Comparison Schedule Impact Conclusions.
Final Thesis Presentation Washingtonian Center Lee ResslerApril 15, 2008 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Memari.
Duquesne University Forbes Expansion
SEAN BEVILLE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. BOOTHBY APRIL 13, 2009 TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER “STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL.
Lancaster, PA Courtyard by Marriott Danielle Shetler - Structural Option Senior Thesis - Spring 2005.
Gateway Plaza Wilmington, DE Elizabeth Hostutler Structural Option.
300 North La Salle Liam McNamara BAE / MAE Senior Thesis April 13 th, 2010.
Mathew Nirenberg AE Senior Thesis Structural Option.
1.  S.T.E.P.S.: Science, Technology, Environment, and Policy Building  Education, laboratory, and research  Owner: Lehigh University  Location: Bethlehem,
Seth M. Moyer Office Buildin g Sayre, PA Structural OptionAdvisor: Dr. Thomas E. Boothby.
Tom yost BAE/MAE - structural option granby tower norfolk, virginia senior thesis presentation 14 april 2008 introduction overview proposal goals depth.
The Towers at the City College of New York Robin Scaramastro - Structural Option - Advisor: Dr. Memari Senior Thesis Final Presentation – Spring 2007.
URS – ARENA DISTRICT OFFICE BUILDING DAVID LEE STRUCTURAL OPTION.
Lexington II at Market Square North, Washington D.C. Alexis Pacella – Structural Option.
Reinsurance Group of America (RGA) Global Headquarters Natasha Beck Structural Option Faculty Advisor: Heather Sustersic Images courtesy of Gensler & Tom.
Mountain Hotel Urban Virginia Senior Thesis 2013 Faculty Advisor: Professor Kevin Parfitt Benjamin Borden Structural Option.
Howard County General Hospital Patient Tower Addition Columbia, MD Kelly M. Dooley Penn State Architectural Engineering Structural Option.
Ryan Pletz Structural Dr. Hanagan The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis April 14, 2008.
Welcome to Daniel Painter’s Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis Presentation of Two Freedom Square April 16, 2003 Pennsylvania State University.
Jonathan Goodroad Structural Option 2005 Thesis Penn State AE Delaware State University Administration and Student Services Building.
T IMOTHY H P ARK – S TRUCTURAL O PTION. Building Summary Current Systems Proposal Description Gravity Lateral Other Structural Factors Breadth Options.
Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.
Oklahoma University Children’s Medical Office Building Oklahoma City, Oklahoma AE Senior Thesis Final Report April 14, 2014 Jonathan Ebersole Structural.
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
Justin Purcell Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions 151 First Side Pittsburgh, PA.
Park Potomac Office Building “E” Kyle Wagner l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Prof. Kevin Parfitt.
Eastern USA University Academic Center Alexander AltemoseIStructural Option.
SteelStacks Performing Arts Center Sarah Bednarcik | Structural BAE/MAE Faculty Advisors: Dr. Linda Hanagan & Dr. Ali Memari Spring Thesis 2013Bethlehem,
Chagrin Highlands Building One Beechwood, Ohio Branden J. Ellenberger - Structural Option Senior Thesis 2004.
Michael A. Troxell Structural Option Senior Thesis 2006 The College of Business Administration Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona.
Biobehavioral Health Building The Pennsylvania State University Daniel Bodde Structural Option Advisor – Heather Sustersic.
THE NORTHBROOK CORPORATE CENTER Redesign of the Lateral Load Resisting System.
John Pillar Hampton Inn & Suites National Harbor, Md Advisor: Dr. Memari Distinguished Speaker Series, Spring 2007.
William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio Michelle Benoit Senior Thesis Presentation Spring 2007 Structural Option.
Hunter Woron Spring 2012 Structural Professor Parfitt.
Hyatt Regency Pittsburgh International Airport Hiro McNulty Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Spring 2006.
R. Bryan Peiffer– Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Three PNC Plaza, Pittsburgh Pa.
Pearl Condominiums Philadelphia, PA
North Shore Equitable Building
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Introduction James W. & Frances G. McGlothlin Medical Education Center
TOWERS CRESCENT BUILDING B Mike Synnott Structural.
Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Nathan E. Reynolds Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt Structural Option The Pennsylvania State.
North Shore at Canton The Pennsylvania State University
Project: 250 West Street, Columbus, Ohio
Presentation transcript:

Helios Plaza Houston, TX Advisor - Dr. Hanagan Kevin Zinsmeister Structural Option

Helios Plaza General Information Located in Houston, Texas’ Energy Corridor Management District Headquarters for BP’s IST and Energy Trading Divisions Composed of Offices, a Conference Center, and Trading Floors Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions 195’ 355’ 135’ 60’ 297.5’57.5’ Rough Footprint of Building: 195’ x 355’ Overall Building Height of 113’ Typical Story Height of 15’

Helios Plaza General Information Project Team Owner – BP Architect – Gensler CM – Bovis Construction Ltd Structural – Walter P. Moore & Associates, Inc. MEP – I.A. Naman + Associates, Inc. Exterior View of Southeast Corner Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions

Helios Plaza Existing Gravity System Two main systems employed One-way pan joist concrete system for majority of building Square concrete columns used for support Post-tensioned girders used in long span situations Floor Plan at Trading Floor Level Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions Floor Plan One Level Above Trading Floor Composite Deck with steel framing members for trading floors Concrete filled circular HSS columns used for support Castellated wide flanges used in long span situations One-way concrete pan joists Void Space One-way concrete pan joists Composite deck on steel frame

Helios Plaza Existing Lateral System Lateral loads mainly resisted by ordinary concrete moment frames Moment connected HSS Members resist lateral loads in trading areas Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions View of Trading Floor From Level Above3-D Representation of Lateral System

Helios Plaza Proposal Goals 1.Reduce the overall building weight 2.Eliminate the controlling seismic base shear in the East-West direction 3.Minimize floor plan impacts 4.Design aesthetically compatible braces 5.Reduce the construction schedule 6.Determine if foundation savings will offset increased steel structure cost Proposed Solution Switch concrete superstructure to steel superstructure Design braced frames to resist lateral loads Maintain existing column layouts Maintain existing steel portions of building Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions Tools Computer Modeling RAM for gravity design ETABS for lateral design confirmation Revit for architectural rendering Design Guides Vulcraft deck catalog AISC Steel Construction Manual AISC Seismic Design Guide

RAM Model Deck Choice Vulcraft 1.5 VL with 3 ¼” LWC topping for 2 hour fire rating 10’ and 9’ spans for unshored construction 37 psf self-weight Helios Plaza Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions

3 rd Floor Plan Typical Bay Framing Plan 30’ 10’ Helios Plaza Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions

Typical Elevation Column Design Column splices occur every other level for construction purposes W14 shapes used for first two floors W12 shapes mainly used for remaining floors Columns initially designed for gravity load only Columns checked for combined axial and bending load in ETABS after lateral loads determined Helios Plaza Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions

East-West Frames Brace Design East-West Frames Braces designed by hand using AISC Seismic Provisions Guide as a reference Initially designed with strength based on wind story shear forces Once braces designed, preliminary building weight tabulated and new seismic story shears calculated New seismic forces reduced, but still control for some levels Braces redesigned in East-West direction for seismic provisions Helios Plaza Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions Seismic Forces OriginalRedesign LevelWeight (k)F x (k)Shear (k)Weight (k)F x (k)Shear (k) roof lower roof Total

North-South Frames In Plan Brace Design North-South Frames Preliminary sizes worked in strength design Wind serviceability controls final design Braces increased in size, but not enough stiffness achieved Two interior x-braced frames added to limit roof deflection Allowable Deflection: H/400= 3.39” Preliminary Brace Design Deflection:=3.94” Final Brace Design Deflection= 3.24” Helios Plaza Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions

Frames In Plan Brace Design Building Torsion Relative stiffness of frames computed for load distribution Helios Plaza Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions 1000 k Load In Y-Direction Frame∆K (k/in)K relative K relative (%) A C D K N Total k Load In X-Direction Frame∆K (k/in)K relative K relative (%) A B Total Frame 1 Frame 7A Frame 7B

Non-Eccentric Connection Layout Steel Connection Area of Interest Interface of braces, columns and beams Designed for as many shop fitted connections as possible Helios Plaza Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions Issues Long welds necessary for non-eccentric connection Gusset plate approximately 2’x3’-6”

Interior Brace Location Floor Plan Impact Brace Locations Only exterior braces in the East-West direction Two interior braces in the North-South direction Interior braces located in minimal impact areas Occur at the edges of the trading floor where only one levels floor plan is impacted X-bracing used to limit number of bays impeded Helios Plaza Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions

Interior Brace Location Floor Plan Impact Brace Locations Only exterior braces in the East-West direction Two interior braces in the North-South direction Interior braces located in minimal impact areas Occur at the edges of the trading floor where only one levels floor plan is impacted X-bracing used to limit number of bays impeded Helios Plaza Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions

Similar Interior View Interior Rendering Helios Plaza Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions

Detailed Cost Breakdown Helios Plaza Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions Foundation Cost Breakdown Existing Structure Cost Breakdown DescriptionCost Concrete $ 1,733, Formwork $ 2,128, Reinforcement $ 509, Steel Members $ 1,345, Decking $ 169, Total $ 5,887, Redesign Cost Breakdown DescriptionCost Wide Flange Members $ 3,402, Braces and HSS Members $ 922, Shear Studs $ 50, Decking $ 805, Concrete (including formwork and reinforcement) $ 976, Fireproofing $ 709, Total $ 6,866, Foundation Savings Concrete (CY)Formwork (SFCA)Cost Original Design $ 319, Redesign $ 280, Savings $ 39, Summary Increase in cost: $ 979, Foundation reduction not enough to offset increase in superstructure cost Majority of cost increase due to fireproofing

Schedule Impact Helios Plaza Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions Redesign 4 crews typically used for most tasks Crew sizes generally based on 2 crane assumption Total number of construction days: 143 Total Savings 51 days of schedule 31 working days 992 man hours Existing Structure Broken down into three sectors for construction 8 crews typically used for most tasks Total number of construction days: 194

Conclusions Helios Plaza Project Overview Existing Structural Conditions Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Steel Connection Design Architectural Breadth Cost and Schedule Conclusions Goals met: 1.Reduce the overall building weight 36% reduction in weight 2.Eliminate the controlling seismic base shear in the East-West direction Seismic base shear smaller than wind base shear, but seismic forces still control design of several floors 3.Minimize floor plan impacts Two interior bays impeded Large gusset plates could use reduction 4.Design aesthetically compatible braces Similar cross-sections blend well with existing architecture 5.Reduce the construction schedule 51 days of schedule saved 6.Determine if foundation savings will offset increased steel structure cost Foundation savings account for only $ Recommendations: Switch to chevron bracing to achieved more efficient brace connections; or, Switch brace connections to slotted welds Recommendations

Helios Plaza Acknowledgements A Special Thanks To: BP David Kinnaird – Coordinator Gensler Rives Taylor – General Consulting Walter P. Moore & Associates, Inc. Dennis Wittry – Project Document Delivery The AE Faculty Friends and family for their continued support Project Overview Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Architectural Breadth Steel Connection Design Cost and Schedule Conclusions

Helios Plaza Questions/Comments Project Overview Proposal Gravity Redesign Lateral Redesign Architectural Breadth Steel Connection Design Cost and Schedule Conclusions Thank You Any Questions/Comments?