1 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Procedures The process of producing the Review of Particle Physics.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Rare B Decays Chris Parkes SUPA Postgraduate Lectures Introduction Radiative decays b  s  b  d  Electroweak Penguin b  sl + l - Rate Forward backward.

Advertisements

CERN, October 2008PDG Collaboration Meeting1 The CKM Quark-Mixing Matrix Revised February 2008 A. Ceccucci (CERN), Z. Ligeti (LBNL) and Y. Sakai (KEK)

Summary of Results and Projected Sensitivity The Lonesome Top Quark Aran Garcia-Bellido, University of Washington Single Top Quark Production By observing.

Herwig++ Particle Data1 Particle Data for Herwig++ Peter Richardson Durham University.

August 19, IUPAP C11 Vera Lüth Chair of C11 International Union of Pure and Applied Physics Commission of Particles and Fields.

WebKDD – Future Directions. Research directions Forum directions.

April 2005RPT Workshop1 Preparing a Successful RPT Application Gail M. Dummer, KIN Suzanne Wilson, TE.

B-factories Legacy Book 11st Meeting, SLAC, Oct 2009 Section Editors BaBar: Name Belle: Name Theory: Name Section Title B-factories Legacy Book Meeting.

ATLAS Authorship Policy R. Voss Physics Department, CERN IUPAP C11 ICHEP’04, Beijing, China, August 18, 2004.

Top Quark Physics: An Overview Young Scientists’ Workshop, Ringberg castle, July 21 st 2006 Andrea Bangert.

Patrick Janot Introduction  TLEP / FCC-ee u Physics, Experiments, Detectors break-out session l Conveners: Alain Blondel, Patrick Janot è Follows six.

Proceedings and Report of the Expert Meeting: Arrangements Proceedings and Report of the Expert Meeting: Arrangements.

M. Barnett – Nov Summary, Budget and Personnel Issues.

1 M. Barnett – November 2010 November 2010 Particle Data Group Particle Data Group Now 53 years.

LHeC beyond science Alessandra Valloni WHAT IF YOU DIGIT “LHeC” ON GOOGLE…? Many papers and presentations…

Monte Carlo Particle ID Numbers Computer Readable Files Palm Particle Data Book Tom Trippe PDG Collaboration Meeting November 13, 2004.

WELCOME Mrs. Szymanski Science Room Teacher for lesson plans and rubrics.

P Spring 2003 L12Richard Kass The properties of the Z 0 For about ten years the Z 0 was studied in great detail at two accelerator complexes: LEP.

1 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Five-Year Plan and PDG Deliverables and Prioritized List.

1 Conservation Kihyeon Cho April 5, 2011 HEP. What is the world made of? What holds the world together? Where did we come from? the smallest things in.

M. Barnett – Sept Summary, Budget and Personnel Issues.

1 M. Barnett – October 2012 DOE Review Budget and Related Issues.

European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Session 26: Quality Issues in Census « Rome, 10 July 2008 « Quality Assurance and Control Programme.

M. Barnett – Nov Welcome. Service to Physics Community Review of Particle Physics In Berkeley: Education/Outreach Programs (separate staff) Census/Survey.

P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.

Gauge bosons (W/Z) A report to the PDG Advisory Committee, LBNL, 24 September 2006 Carlo Caso & Atul Gurtu INFN, Genova TIFR, Mumbai (Encoders/Overseers)

Reading and Writing Research Reports Reporting research results has a few basic components: 1) What has the author(s) read that prompted the research ?

1 M. Barnett – October Pages per kg.

CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 6, 2015 Required Elements of the NSF Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.

1 M. Barnett – October 2008 DOE Review 2006 Report Recommendations from the 2006 report. Many recommendations have been implemented, and are not listed.

Gauge bosons (W/Z) A report to the PDG Advisory Committee Carlo Caso & Atul Gurtu INFN, Genova TIFR, Mumbai (Encoders/Overseers)

Gauge bosons (W/Z) A report to the PDG Advisory Committee, CERN, 11 October 2008 Carlo Caso *, Atul Gurtu, Martin Grünewald INFN, Genova, TIFR, Mumbai,

Comments to P. Zyla presentation on the RPP production It seems that one of the crucial item in the RPP production cycle was and is repeatedly missed:

Patrick Janot Coordination of “Experimental Studies”  Initiating the design study … 30 April 2014 FCC-ee Physics Coordination meeting 1.

1- 2 /2  1- 2 /2 u c dsb A 3 (1-  -i  ) - A 2 t d, s b b V td,V ts B Oscillations A 3 (  i  ) A 2 1 V tb c,u B decays b V ub,V cb Wolfenstein parametrization.

Neutrinos September PDG advisory committee Maury Goodman for The neutrino group.

M. Barnett - December 2005 Particle Data Group Introduction Michael Barnett December 6, 2005.

FSU Experimental HEP Faculty Todd Adams Susan Blessing Harvey Goldman S Sharon Hagopian Vasken Hagopian Kurtis Johnson Harrison Prosper Horst Wahl.

Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.

DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #3 June 17, 2014  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.

Frank and Collider Physics May 29, When Frank was a graduate student – May 29, 2015J. Pilcher2 A remarkable time for the Standard Model.

Monte Carlo Particle ID Numbers Computer Readable Files PDA Particle Data Book Applications Tom Trippe PDG Collaboration Meeting September 22, 2006.

Appendix 3: The Standard Report From the Church Vitality Survey This Standard Report is produced for each church or church group that completes the Church.

Peer review in the era of LHC experiments Experimental particle physics as a Big Science paradigm Rüdiger Voss Physics Department CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.

Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.

Status of Quarkonium DataBase J. Castillo, R. Granier de Cassagnac, G. Martinez, S. Porteboeuf, F. Prino. Retequarkonii Thematic Day IPN - 9th February.

SECTION BYLAWS APROVAL PROCESS Five Easy Steps. Step 1: Collect Data Obtain Template from SWE Communities Professional Section Bylaws Community Collegiate.

50th Anniversary of the Particle Data Group Also celebrating the 75 th Birthday of Matts Roos 80 th Birthday of Art Rosenfeld.

0/8 HyperNews for ATLAS Status and expectations Applications Area meeting, February 1, 2006 Traudl Kozanecki.

The two-Higgs-doublet model implementation in MadGraph v4 Michel Herquet In collaboration with Simon de Visscher and the MG/ME development team Center.

Intae Yu Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea Tevatron B Physics KISTI, August 24 th, 2009 B Physics Analysis and Plan at SKKU.

1 M. Barnett – November 2010 Budget and Related Issues.

1 George Lafferty University of Manchester Charm 2006: International Workshop on Tau-Charm Physics June , Beijing Tau Physics from the B Factories.

1 Interactions Kihyeon Cho March 29, 2011 HEP. What is the world made of? What holds the world together? Where did we come from? the smallest things in.

Conservation Laws Monte Carlo Particle ID Numbers Computer Readable Files Palm Particle Data Book Tom Trippe PDG Advisory Committee Meeting November 14,

Report from SuperB Proto-Speakers Bureau Popat Patel SuperB Workshop-Elba 25 June

Discussion 5: Selecting Spokespeople Stefan Söldner-Rembold and Chang Kee Jung September 24, 2014 Fermilab, iiEB meeting.

LEP DATA PRESERVATION 11 years of data taking 4 Experiments Large Luminosity ~1200 Scientific Papers ALEPH Raw data 5 Terabytes DST 800 Gigabytes Mini.

1 M. Barnett – October 2008 Education and Outreach An extensive and diverse program.

How to Develop and Write a Research Paper.

PAM 2017 Training: Antitrust Handbooks

March 6, 2006　Shinhong Kim Workshop poster.

The two-Higgs-doublet model implementation in MadGraph v4

Aim: How can we describe Fundamental Particles?

P Spring 2002 L13 Richard Kass The properties of the Z0

Gwyn P. Williams and Kim Kindrew Pizza Seminar, September 18, 2013

CONVENTIONAL CHARMONIA

Databases WOW!! A database is a collection of related data.

Physics 4 – April 18, 2019 Agenda:

Item 9 Validation in UOE data collection

Presentation transcript:

1 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Procedures The process of producing the Review of Particle Physics

2 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Literature Search Complete Literature Search by two people of 20 journals (650 papers per edition predominantly from PL, PRL, PR and EPJ) Enter Literature search results in database Distribute assignments of papers to Encoders and Overseers Procedures

3 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Encoding Each Paper Read Carefully by Two People: by encoder and by overseer Encoder and Overseer initiate data entry Encoding data entered into database: Sections have very different formats Create new sections, delete sections, reorganize/combine sections Procedures

4 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Reviews Write/edit Reviews describing content of and/or problems in a given section Referee each review and note (3-5 referees) Place reviews into system so can produce book and web versions Procedures

5 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Final processing Edit all sections for consistency, errata, quality, etc. Request Verification of every entry from each experiment Enter corrections/changes from Verifications Calculate Averages, Fits and Best Limits. Many of these are unique by section Prepare Summary Table Prepare Conservation Laws table (with impact on Listings and Summary Table) Procedures

6 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Production Post Listings and Reviews on web Produce 1344-page book of Summary Tables, Listings, Reviews Produce web versions of everything in book Produce 320-page Booklet with Summary Tables and abridged version of reviews Procedures

7 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Quality Assurance The HEP Community and many others depend on us for accuracy and integrity

8 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review  All reviews have 3-5 referees.  Every item of data that is entered is checked by the experiments (700 people help).  PDG Advisory Committee reviews all PDG operations We strive to only report what is a fair consensus of the community. E.g.- For the growing B sections, the three encoders are from Belle, BaBar, and Tevatron. We invite comments from the collaborations on many sections. We organize mini-workshops when we need to consider expanded and improved coverage of a section (such as D mesons, B mesons, neutrinos, tau leptons, CKM, extra dimensions,....) Quality Assurance

9 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Hiroaki Aihara – Chair (U. of Tokyo) Gustaaf Brooijmans (Columbia) Patrick Janot (CERN) Deborah Harris (Fermilab) Gilad Perez (Stony Brook) PDG Advisory Committee

10 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Chosen by Director of LBNL Physics Division (James Siegrist) except for CERN member (who is chosen by the CERN Director General) PDG Advisory Committee Hiroaki Aihara – Spokesperson of Belle Gustaaf Brooijmans –Young Experimentalist in ATLAS Patrick Janot – CERN, CMS Experiment Deborah Harris – Project Manager of MINERvA. Also in: NuTeV, MINOS Gilad Perez – Outstanding young Theorist

11 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Peter ZerwasPersis Drell Taka KondoDieter Schlatter Michael TurnerPaul Langacker Michel della NegraMark Wise Jonathan Dorfan Stephen Ellis Ann KernanChris Quigg Lincoln WolfensteinMike Whalley Gary Feldman Jonathan Rosner Rudiger Voss Fred Gilman Distinguished Members of Past Advisory Committees

12 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Workshops lead to improved coverage Neutrino CKM D Meson  lepton Extra-dimensions Statistics Vital PDG Workshops Constraints on deviations from Newton’s gravitational force law

13 M. Barnett – September 2008 DOE Review Coordination with working groups at LEP, Tevatron and B-factory on: Electroweak fits, B lifetimes, B mixing, V cb and V ub top quark mass, etc. PDG role in: CKM workshops (CERN 2002, Durham 2003, San Diego 2005) Statistics workshops, etc. Collaboration with Working Groups