Implementation of Evidence-Based Models: Improving Processes Jeanne L. Obert, MFT, MSM Executive Director, Matrix Institute UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Practice of Evidence Based Practice … or Can You Finish What You Started? Ron Van Treuren, Ph.D. Seven Counties Services, Inc. Louisville, KY.
Advertisements

Implementation of MST in Norway Iceland June 2008 Bernadette Christensen Clinical Director of the Youth Department Anne Cathrine Strütt MST Consultant.
Dissemination of Evidence-based Practices (EBPs) in Substance Abuse Treatment The Matrix Model Of Intensive Outpatient Treatment Jeanne Obert, MFT, MSM.
Ensuring Quality Services and the Protection of Patients’ Welfare A GPS for quality care. Jeanne L. Obert Executive Director Matrix Institute on Addictions.
The Community Engagement Studio: Strengthening Research Capacity through Community Engagement Consuelo H. Wilkins, MD, MSCI Executive Director, Meharry.
Implementing Illness Management & Recovery in Rural Kentucky Jeff Drury, Ph.D.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Our Mission Community Outreach for Youth & Family Services, Inc. is dedicated to improving the quality of life for both the youth and adult population.
Regional Conference to End Homelessness Norfolk, VA March 2012 Prepared by: Housing Innovations.
Implementing Evidence-Based Practice in Massachusetts: The Provider Perspective Elizabeth Funk, M.B.A. President/CEO, Mental Health & Substance Abuse Corporations.
Motivational Interviewing to Improve Treatment Engagement and Outcome* The effect of one session on retention Research findings from the NIDA Clinical.
Treatment of Methamphetamine Dependence: Does Treatment Work? Mary Lynn Brecht, Ph.D. Richard A. Rawson, Ph.D Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human.
3-1 Lori L. Phelps California Association for Alcohol/Drug Educators, 2013.
CDI: Quality Services, Better Outcomes Conference Lynda Wilson Director, Barnardo’s Northern Ireland Julie Healy Programme Manager.
Daniel Flynn 1, Mary Kells 1, Mary Joyce 1&2, Catalina Suarez 1&2 1. Health Service Executive 2. National Suicide Research Foundation The National Dialectical.
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
Diffusion of research in practice in Substance Abuse Treatment: A knowledge adoption study of gender sensitive treatment Deborah Rugs, Ph.D. Holly Hills,
Evidence-Based Research Findings on Substance Use Disorders Homeless Families – February 8, 2007 Joan E. Zweben, Ph.D. Executive Director The 14 th Street.
Research Strategies to Test Behavioral/Psychotherapy Treatments for Substance Use Disorders: Several Examples Richard A. Rawson, Ph.D UCLA ISAP Cairo,
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs (ISAP). CSAT MTP Project Goals: To study the clinical effectiveness of the Matrix Model To study the clinical.
Participant Choice – Access to Recovery as a Voucher Service Delivery Model Presented to National Summit on Prisoner Re-Entry Sponsored by the White House.
Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. Karen A. Blase, Ph.D. National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute Implementing Innovations.
Effective and Scientific Implementation of EBP Initiatives in Community Corrections: Motivational Interviewing, Progression Matrix, and B.SMART, Chad Dilworth.
Welcome to the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) Top 10 Strategies for Ensuring a Successful Start November 3, 2008.
The Transformation Center Helping Good Ideas Travel Faster Cathy Kaufmann, MSW Executive Director, OHA Transformation Center.
1 From Evidence to Action Replicating and Adapting Evidence-Driven Interventions at the Local Level Shannon Thomas Ryan David Lewis-Peart.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
NIDA/SAMHSA Blending Initiative Overview. Advances in science are giving us a broad range of promising options for treating substance use disorders, BUT.
Implementation Strategy for Evidence- Based Practices CIMH Community Development Team Model Pam Hawkins, Senior Associate Association for Criminal Justice.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Joe Vesowate Assistant Commissioner.
Allison Metz, Ph.D., Karen Blase, Ph.D., Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Rob Horner, Ph.D., George Sugai, Ph.D. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
Greenberg&Cohen EBCRP Methamphetamine: Understanding the Influence of Violence in Treatment Planning and Recovery Judith Cohen, PhD Rivka Greenberg, PhD.
Harold I Perl, PhD Center for the Clinical Trials Network National Institute on Drug Abuse NIATx Summit and SAAS National Conference Boston, MA July 13,
The CPGTSP: Yesterday and Today Michael D. Campos, PhD UCLA Gambling Studies Program OPG Summit March 8, 2011.
Implementation Science and the Adoption of Practice in Addiction Treatment Harold I Perl, PhD Center for the Clinical Trials Network National Institute.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Implementation Science Vision 21: Linking Systems of Care June 2015 Lyman Legters.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Perspectives on Impact Evaluation Cairo, Egypt March 29 – April 2, 2009 Presented by: Wayne M. Harding. Ed.M., Ph.D., Director of Projects, Social Science.
Implementation of Evidence-Based Models: Improving Processes Jeanne L. Obert, MFT, MSM Executive Director, Matrix Institute UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
MIA: STEP Toolkit Overview. NIDA-SAMHSA Blending Initiative 2 What is an MI Assessment?  Use of client-centered MI style  MI strategies that can be.
Integrating Services Research into CTN Clinical Trials: The Devil is in the Details Harold I Perl, PhD Center for the Clinical Trials Network National.
EMPIRICALLY-SUPPORTED TREATMENTS FOR STIMULANT DEPENDENCE RICHARD A. RAWSON, Ph.D. UCLA INTEGRATED SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRAMS (ISAP) October 9, 2004.
Elizabeth WellsDennis Daley School of Social WorkWestern Psychiatric Institute University of WashingtonUniversity of Pittsbu rgh Supported by Grants #
Technology Transfer in the Innovation Process CSAT Workforce Development Committee October 20, 2009 Heather Gotham, Ph.D. Evaluator, Mid-America ATTC Laurie.
Maria E. Fernandez, Ph.D. Associate Professor Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences University of Texas, School of Public Health.
SW-PBIS Cohort 8 Spring Training March Congratulations – your work has made a difference Cohort 8.
Missouri’s State and Provider Partnership Terry Morris Missouri Division of Alcohol & Drug Abuse August 2008 Advancing Recovery in Missouri.
Readiness and Implementation of the GAIN and 7 Challenges At NorthKey Community Care.
California Addiction Training and Education Series Jeanne L. Obert, MFT, MSM Executive Director, Matrix Institute on Addictions Methamphetamine Behavioral.
Training Community Treatment Providers in Research Interventions for Women with Addictions and PTSD Gloria M. Miele, Ph.D. Training Director, CTN Long.
California Implementation of Functional Family Therapy (FFT) California Institute for Mental Health (CiMH) Todd Sosna Ph.D., Senior Associate, Center for.
Karen A. Blase, PhD, Allison Metz, PhD and Dean L. Fixsen, PhD Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Richard Rawson, Ph.D. Rachel Gonzales, Ph.D. Funded by: California Alcohol and Drug Programs CalOMS Training for.
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
TRANSDISCIPLINARY FOUNDATION II: TREATMENT KNOWLEDGE Contributor: Lori Phelps Lori L. Phelps California Association for Alcohol/Drug Educators, 2015 Chapter.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
1 Center Mission Statements SAMHSA ? CSAT Improving the Health of the Nation by Bringing Effective Alcohol and Drug Treatment to Every Community CMHS Caring.
Implementation and Sustainability in the US National EBP Project Gary R. Bond Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center Lebanon, NH, USA May 27, 2014 CORE.
Evidence Based Psychotherapies in the VA Claire Collie, Ph.D. Local Evidence Based Psychotherapy Coordinator Durham VAMC.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
© 2012 Behavioral Tech KEY COMPONENTS IN DBT IMPLEMENTATION: A SURVEY FROM THE GROUND UP Linda A. Dimeff, Ph.D. 1, Andre Ivanoff, Ph.D. 2, 3, & Erin Miga,
1 Organizational Readiness Jan M. Markiewicz, M.Ed. National Center August 13, 2007.
Group Health’s experience September 24, 2015| Kathryn Ramos Implementing CDSME in an integrated health care system.
Adoption of Motivational Interviewing/Motivational Enhancement Therapy Joseph Guydish PhD, Sarah Turcotte Manser MA, Martha A. Jessup RN PhD, Barbara Tajima.
Sandra F. Naoom, MSPH National Implementation Research Network Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill.
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
Measurement of Implementation Components Ten Years After a Nationwide Introduction of Empirically Supported Programs Society for Prevention Research,
Presentation transcript:

Implementation of Evidence-Based Models: Improving Processes Jeanne L. Obert, MFT, MSM Executive Director, Matrix Institute UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs

History of Matrix Model Clinical Services 1984 – Adult Intensive Outpatient Treatment Program began in Los Angeles – The Matrix Model San Bernardino County program begins with 60% of clients abusing methamphetamine 1990 – Became affliated with UCLA First Adolescent Treatment Program started at YMCA in Ontario, CA Rick Rawson left – CSAT MTP began 2000 – Officially became totally nonprofit 2005 – 5 Clinical Sites in the Greater Los Angeles Area

Matrix Institute is committed to: Improving the lives of individuals and families affected by alcohol and other drug use through: Treatment Education and Training Research and Grants

MATRIX MODEL AN ORGANIZED COLLECTION OF SELECT EVIDENCE- BASED INTERVENTIONS  Cognitive- Behavioral  Motivational Interviewing  Contingency Management  Family Therapies

Defining Features of Matrix Model Treatments Comprehensive, manual-driven program with simple, well-organized instructions. Developed from grassroots, clinical program with empirically-based interventions added where they seem to work. Patient handouts accompany each session and patient workbook contains written and illustrated concepts.

Methamphetamine Spreads from San Bernardino County and Hawaii

Treatments Available Medical & Behavioral Drug Classes Sedatives Stimulants Opioids Alcohol Medical Treatments –Sedatives –Opioids –Alcohol Behavioral Treatments –Sedatives –Stimulants –Opioids –Alcohol

Richard Rawson Ph.D. U.C.L.A. Integrated Substance Abuse Programs (I.S.A.P.) Funded by the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment The CSAT Methamphetamine Treatment Project A Multi-site Trial of a Manualized Psychosocial Protocol for the Treatment of Methamphetamine Dependence

Goals of the Methamphetamine Treatment Project To study the clinical effectiveness of the Matrix Model To compare the effectiveness of the Matrix model to other locally available outpatient treatments To establish the cost and cost effectiveness of the Matrix model compared to other outpatient treatments To explore the replicability of the Matrix Model and challenges involved in technology transfer

MTP Study Conclusions Treatment for MA dependence associated with improvements in many domains including drug use, MJ use, mood, income Matrix treatment results in longer retention, more sessions attended, more treatment completers, more MA-negative UA’s, longer periods of MA abstinence * Except for drug court site

Law Enforcement Officials in 500 US Counties asked “What is your primary drug problem? National Association of Counties

Matrix Model Evidence-Based Treatments delivered within Individual Sessions Early Recovery Groups Relapse Prevention Groups Family Education Group 12-Step Meetings Social Support Groups Relapse Analysis Urine Testing

The Dilemma How to Disseminate the Information ? Continuum Speed Effectiveness Train-the-Trainer(s) Model Highly-Selective Highly-Intensive Training Model

Stages of Adaptation* Step I - Exposure (to new ideas) Step 2 - Adoption (formal decision to try change) Step 3 - Implementation (provider tests use of innovation) Step 4 - Practice (incorporation of innovation into regular use) * D. Simpson, 2002

Step 1 – Exposure (to new ideas) CSAT STUDY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 3-day trainings with all sites together bi-annually On-site visits and consultations at start-up MATRIX COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER One 2.5 day core workshop limited to 30 participants with a Matrix-experienced trainer Key Supervisors identified and scheduled for further training Manuals available with recommendation for training

Step 2 – Adoption (formal decision to try change) CSAT STUDY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Site adoption occurred through RFP process Individual therapist chosen at site was voluntary (Post study recommendation: Hold retreat with all participants held at start-up to establish good working relationships) MATRIX COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Returning workshop participants will recommend (or not) adoption Selection of Key Supervisor will help actualize organizational commitment (Future? Meet with key program administrators and leaders prior to commitment)

Matrix Model Key Supervisor Strong champion who can serve as a change agent/purveyor in the adoption process Serves as a liaison between Matrix and adopting program Helps educate staff and administrators about new program Clinical leader who knows the Model well and can help others learn

Characteristics of Ideal Key Supervisor Respected clinical leader who is both credible to clinicians and savvy about organizational dynamics Possess excellent communication and clinical skills Committed to actively working to implement the Matrix Model with fidelity and good effect

Step 3 – Implementation (provider tests use of innovation) CSAT STUDY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Sites supported by weekly supervision calls Sessions were audio-taped and tapes were centrally reviewed and feedback given Semi-annual training meetings were conducted MATRIX COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Key Supervisors will have access to a list-serve where experienced clinicians and those just beginning can share information Conference calls will be held for requested supervision Conferences will be available for Key Supervisors to receive ongoing training and support.

Step 4 - Practice CSAT STUDY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Data collected Fidelity monitoring occurred Innovation did not continue past study period in community sites MATRIX COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Training and support will be available for monitoring fidelity Central outcome and process data banks will be available Referral network of sites using MM will be supported

Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature 2005

Steps 5 and 6* Step 5 – Innovation (Should occur only after practice has been implemented with fidelity. “Innovation” should not be a way to escape the scrutiny of fidelity checks.) Step 6 - Sustainability (Ongoing efforts to replace skilled practitioners and others with well-trained staff. Ensure long-term survival and continued effectiveness despite inevitable external and internal changes.) * Fixsen, Naoom, Blasé, Friedman and Wallace, Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature, 2005

Policy Recommendations ( University of South Florida, Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature) Encourage program-centered service delivery rather than practitioner- centered. (Use of manuals aids this process.)

Policy Recommendations Invest in development and use of implementation strategies and methods that are grounded in research and elaborated through accumulated experience. (Similar to recent investments made in information systems.)

Policy Recommendations Develop funding strategies to support implementation of evidence- based programs Start up costs Purveyor support (Change agents and/or organizations) Adequate funding for services Ongoing support of infrastructure for sustainability