Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.
Response to Intervention: Creating a Systematic Response.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
RTI & MTI: Building the Foundation TTSD RTI Site Visit October 21, 2008.
OrRTI – Oregon’s Response to Intervention Initiative Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education June 21, 2006.
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
RtI in Monroe County That Was Then…This is Now Monroe County ISD Michelle Brahaney, Assistant Superintendent for Special Education and Early Intervention.
May Dr. Schultz, Dr. Owen, Dr. Ryan, Dr. Stephens.
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level “I think what makes a difference for our kids is that they graduate with a sense of place: high school,
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Oregon’s Initiatives & Grants  Roadmap  Action  Responsibility Nancy Latini, Ph.D. Oregon Department of Education 2008.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
Student Support Team (SST) Training A Humanware Strategic Plan Activity Cleveland Metropolitan School District 1.
Response to Intervention USING RTI FOR NONACADEMIC INTERVENTIONS: PART II.
Tigard-Tualatin Spring site visit overview April 23, 2008.
CENTENNIAL PUBLIC SCHOOL RtI 101 Slides adapted from the NE RtI Consortium.
Response to Intervention
Systems Requirements for RTI The nuts and bolts that hold it all together!
RTI: How do we make all the pieces fit into the puzzle? Lynn Wallasky and Marnie Zabel.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
1. We can teach all children effectively 2. Intervene early 3. Use a continuum model of service delivery 4. Use a problem-solving method to make decisions.
Instructional Leadership and Reading First Component 3-Part B Sara Ticer, Principal, Prairie Mountain School District Support for Instructional Leadership.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Effective Teaming Using Data to Guide Actions Sally Helton & Lisa Bates B ehavior and I nstructional S upport E ffective.
Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Foundations and Critical Features of Successful R.T.I. Implementation Erin Lolich, OrRTI project Dean Richards, OrRTI project Tigard-Tualatin School District.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
John Fuller Elementary School Pine Tree Elementary School &
RTI in Tigard-Tualatin School District: Effective Behavior & Instructional Support (EBIS) National SEA Conference on SLD Determination April 20, 2006 Erin.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Secondary Systems Overview What to Know Before Venturing Out of Bounds OrRTI Project January 15, 2009.
Problem Solving and RtI ASCA Conference Denver, 2007 Rich Downs School Counseling Consultant Student Support Services Project Florida Department of Education.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
Response to Instruction: Creating a Systematic Response.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
EBIS Effective Behavior & Instructional Supports Tina Rodriguez June 23, 2013.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
RTI Readiness Conference: Intensive Levels of Assistance Kira Florence Jonathan Potter University of Oregon.
 October 29,2009. Define Response to Intervention Provide an overview of EBIS implementation Learn about TTSD’s history, demographics, program and outcomes.
RTI 101 Jon Potter Dean Richards Oregon RTI Project.
1 Response to Intervention Background and Laws Gaynard Brown Paul Bunyan Special Education Co-op Director.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
1 Implementing RTI in Tigard- Tualatin School District OSEP Leadership Conference March 30, 2005 Carol Sadler, Ph.D
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Response to Intervention Report to the State Board of Education May 20, 2010 Rob Saxton, Dan Goldman & Erin Lolich.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
RTI Readiness Conference: Intensive Levels of Assistance
Response to Intervention in Illinois
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support

A Quick Review: Core Principles of RTI  We can teach all children  Intervene early  Use a multi-tiered model of service delivery  Use a problem-solving method within the multi-tiered model  Use research-based, scientifically validated interventions/instruction, to the extent available  Monitor student progress to inform instruction  Use data to make decisions  Use assessment to screen, diagnose and monitor RtI: Policy Considerations and Implementation, National Association of State Directors of Special Education, 2005

TTSD Demographics  17 Schools, 12,000+ students 10 elementary, 3 middle, 2 high, 1 charter, 1 alternative  Special Programs participation 1,200 Special Education (10%) 1,800 English Language Learners (15%) 1,500 Talented and Gifted (12%)  Socio-economic status Title 1 in 6 elementary schools Free/Reduced ranges from 7% to 58%

7 pilot elementary schools implement EBS Board adopts EBS district- wide: 5 more schools implement Remaining (2) schools implement; ongoing training & leadership EBIS OSEP Grant: Reading & Special Education initiatives incorporated 2001 Secondary School focus utilizing Title IVa 2003 TTSD Develops the RTI Technical Assistance Manual for ODE ODE Contracts with TTSD to Train 23 School Oregon Districts to Develop & Implement RTI EBS/EBIS Implementation Timeline

Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems 1-5% 5-10% 80% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive District-Wide Systems for Success

ALL STUDENTS RECEIVE QUALITY BEHAVIOR AND ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION AND SUPPORT All Students Are Screened for Additional Instructional Needs (Fall, Winter & Spring DIBELS, IDEL, OAKS, ODRs, etc.) Small Group Interventions are designed by teacher teams with EBIS support Interventions are further individual- ized EBIS EARLY IDENTIFICATION PROCESS Tigard-Tualatin School District, Tigard, Oregon TEAMWORK TIMELINES: EBIS teams meet fall, winter & spring to review data and make decisions about school-wide progress. EBIS teams/Grade level teacher teams meet monthly to review data, plan and adjust interventions. DECISION RULES: 80% Decision Rule: If 80% of students are not meeting benchmarks, review core program(s). 20% Decision Rule: Students below the 20 th percentile in academic skills and/or with chronic behavior needs* are placed in small group interventions. Individualize Instruction Rule: When students fail to progress after two (2) consecutive small group interventions, move to the individual level. Refer for Special Education Evaluation Rule: When students fail to progress after one individually designed intervention. Change Small Group or Individual Interventions Rule: When progress data is below aimline on three (3) to four (4) consecutive days, or when eight (8) data points produce a flat or a decreasing trendline. *More than 5 absences or more than 3 counseling or discipline referrals in a 30 day period

Daisy participates in the general curriculum EBIS Team reviews screening data and places Daisy in group intervention Daisy isn’t doing well Daisy improves Daisy improves EBIS Team determines individually designed intervention Resumes general program Daisy doesn’t improve Daisy doesn’t improve Special Education referral is initiated Daisy probably recycles Daisy may recycle Intervention is intense and LD is suspected Improvement is good and other factors are suspected as cause How RTI Works from a Student Perspective

EBIS is a structured, systematic process featuring…  Team membership  School wide planning  Identifying the 20% group  Monthly meetings  Individualizing interventions  Referral to special education  Reread Overview of EBIS (pages 1-3)pages 1-3

Team membership  Principal Leadership*  Classroom Teachers*  Title I Specialist/Reading Coach*  School Counselor*  Learning Specialist  ELL Teacher  Classified Staff *Essential team members

School-wide Planning: Is the core program meeting the needs of 80% of the students? Academic data to review three times/year:  DIBELS Data Reports Program Effectiveness  Student Achievement on OAKS-% below, at, exceeding benchmark  Sub-test performance, especially for students falling below benchmark levels  PET-R Planning & Evaluation Tool for School-wide Planning Behavior data to review three times/year:  SET-EBS School-wide Evaluation Tool  Office Discipline Referral trends Who (grade, gender, ethnic group) What Where When  Attendance trends

If the 80% Criterion is not being met: Options to consider …  Literacy: 90 minutes of reading daily? Protected allocated reading time each day? Skill grouping by class or grade? Core and supplemental programs implemented with fidelity? More professional development needed?

Change options continued...  Math: Skill grouping by class or grade? Identifying and emphasizing specific strands? Adequate allocated time for instruction each day? Fluency issues, e.g., facts?  Behavior: Is the school-wide program fully implemented?  Identifying and teaching to a small, clear set of rules?  Reinforcement systems in place?  Data being used for program/activities planning?  Systems for correction in place?

Decision Rules  Kindergarten (page 5)page 5 AND  Grades 1-5 (page 6)page 6  Activity: 10 minutes Review in school teams Write down on a sticky: 1 thing you liked and one question that you need answered

Planning for the 20% Level Students Step 1: In fall, winter and spring, the EBIS team (or representatives) meet with grade level teachers to identify students needing supplemental instruction based on rules:  Complete the EBIS Group Intervention and Planning Form (page 4)page 4  Design group interventions  Academics & Behavior: see protocols (pages 21-26) Academics & Behavior: see protocols (pages 21-26)  Plan progress monitoring (use prescribed guidelines)

Selecting Interventions  Resources ns/science_research.pdf ns/science_research.pdf  Considerations Research base Logistics Cost Training Fidelity

Planning for the 20% cont.  Activity: 30 minutes  Review and discuss the Group Intervention and Planning Form and Academic and Behavior Protocols  Record questions and comments

Monthly team meetings Step 2: EBIS teams convene monthly to evaluate the progress of all students involved in interventions to:  Analyze aimlines and/or trendlines, and :  Modify intervention when 4 data points fall below the aimline. Use the Options for Change Worksheet (pg. 20), note change, modify aimline, and implementpg. 20  If data is highly variable, maintain current intervention for another month to establish a trendline  Follow guidelines for progress monitoring  Activity: 10 minutes  Review Option Worksheet  Write down questions

An example...

Monthly meetings continued... If progress trend continues to fall below aimline for two consecutive intervention periods, individualize the student’s program

Individualizing Reminder/Decision Rules: 2 unsuccessful group interventions…  Case Manager is assigned and:  Completes the EBIS Action Plan (page 16)page 16  Monitors the intervention and progress monitoring  Is responsible for reporting on progress at the next monthly meeting and making sure paperwork is complete  Cumulative file review is completed by team using the Individual Problem Solving Worksheet (pages 12-15)pages  Complete a Functional Behavior Assessment if needed

Individualizing continued...  If this level of individually-designed intervention is not successful, a special education referral is made.  The referral form should be accompanied by the Student Intervention Profile (page 7) and the Individual Problem Solving Worksheetpage 7

Parent Participation  EBIS meeting invitation (pages 8-9)pages 8-9  Developmental History (pages 10-11)pages  RTI pamphlet**  En español**

Daisy participates in the general curriculum* EBIS Team reviews screening data and places Daisy in group intervention* Daisy isn’t doing well Daisy improves Daisy improves EBIS Team determines individually designed intervention* Resumes general program* Daisy doesn’t improve Daisy doesn’t improve Special Education referral is initiated* Daisy probably recycles Daisy may recycle Intervention is intense and LD is suspected Improvement is good and other factors are suspected as cause RTI and Parent Participation*

Activity: 20 minutes  Review the Student Intervention Profile and the Individual Problem Solving Worksheet  Discuss and write down questions

Bottom Line … Teams review data monthly, and determine based on decision rules, if the student should:  Continue in the current intervention  Return to the core program  Have the intervention revised  Move to the individualized level  Be referred for special education

Team Structures … Let’s talk about some ideas!!!

All K-5 students are tested with DIBELS. Other data is gathered (academic, behavior, attendance) EBIS Team reviews data with each grade level teacher team to identify lowest 20%. Interventions and progress monitoring are planned by team and teachers, and implemented by teachers for 3-4 weeks. EBIS and teachers review intervention progress Revise and implement 2nd group intervention, monitor progress EBIS Team uses Problem Solving format to explore alternative explanations for lack of progress, develops individualized intervention Special Education referral is initiated + Progress - Progress Continue intervention for another cycle and monitor progress Resume general program Intervention is so intense, LD is suspected Now, what does the team think? Improvement appears related to other factors The Flow of EBIS Teamwork at Metzger Elementary From: Effective Behavior and Instructional Support: A District Model for Early Identification and Prevention of Reading and Behavior Disabilities, Sadler & Sugai, 2006, in press. Do not use without permission from author

EBIS TEAM Meets weekly Includes principal, counselor, literacy specialist, special education, ELL specialist, and teacher representatives from each grade level Monitors all students in small group and individual interventions Oversees RTI fidelity and makes referrals to special education GRADE LEVEL TEAMS Meet monthly Plan, implement and monitor interventions for 20% group, with EBIS team support EBS TEAM Meets Twice Monthly Plans & implements school-wide supports INDIVIDUAL STUDENT CASE MANAGEMENT Implements and progress monitors students in intensive interventions (RTI process) Example Team Structure: Tualatin Elementary School CONTENT AREA TEAMS Meet Monthly Recommend curriculum and instructional improvements across all content areas: Reading/Language Arts, Math, Science, and Behavior

Process Checks/Accountability  The Role of the Learning Specialist (page 17)page 17  Checklist for LD eligibility report **  Team Implementation Checklists Gauging EBIS Implementation (page 18)page 18 Assessing and Planning EBIS team process (page 19)page 19  EBS School Wide Evaluation Tool (SET, site visit)  Planning & Evaluation Tool for Reading (PET-R)  Summative data analysis

Continued: Fidelity Checklists  10 minute activity: In teams, review the checklists we’ve provided and decide what you still need. If a program does not have a fidelity checklist developed, you may opt to create your own.

Outcomes Trends in TTSD identification rates  Students who reach formal referral nearly always turn out to be eligible.  Prior to EBIS, very few students were qualified before 3 rd or 4 th grade.

Identifying LD Earlier in TTSD Kindergarten00 First Grade812 Second Grade1949

Referral to Special Education  From EBIS Referral Packet  From Parents  Other than LD

Treasure Hunt: 15 minutes  With a partner, answer the following: What are acceptable and unacceptable roles for special education staff? How often are parents informed/included in the EBIS process? How often are students progress monitored? Name 2 reading and 2 behavior interventions used in TTSD.