Planning for the future of our district Core strategy options Presentation to C4B Associates February 2010

What this presentation will cover Why produce a Local Development Framework (what is it ?) Key Issues for us to address Development Requirements Options we have assessed How did we assess the Options What we concluded Options for consultation How we will consult What happens next

Why produce an LDF (what is it)? A statutory function for districts and unitaries only Sets out the ‘blue print’ for how our district will develop Responding to community priorities and needs Dealing with local challenges – affordable housing, traffic congestion Delivering our role in wider partnerships – eg Canterbury Partnership A new approach to plan preparation – options

Creating a Vision Strategic vision to 2026 – local partnership’s work and South East Plan Focus on Canterbury city as Regional Hub Creating sustainable communities – development in accessible areas, meeting housing needs, protecting and enhancing open space Developing the economy – encouraging inward investment and promoting opportunities for business, making the most of opportunities from local education institutes Enhancing the appeal of our district for visitors and residents alike – culture, retail, sport and leisure Improving our green economy – sustainability of our developments, encouraging business involved in environmental technology Infrastructure linked to new developments (tackling congestion)

Economic Development approach 40 hectares of business land to be allocated (includes Little Barton Farm) Little Barton Farm (as Local Plan); or alternatively provision of similar amount of business land (possibly in smaller mixed use sites) at Canterbury Policy to support extensions of current sites

Core Policies relating to Economic Development Protection and management of existing sites and clusters Allocation of new sites and floor space + delivering mixed use developments Support for knowledge-based businesses (environmental technologies: research and development: high tech manufacturing: cultural and creative industries) Support for delivery of digital infrastructure

District housing requirements to ,200 (from South East Plan, majority to be at Canterbury) Existing housing supply (already agreed /allocated sites and planning consents) ……… 6,184 ____ Leaving residual requirement ………. 4,016 (Number of houses to be found)

District housing requirements to 2026 Potential breakdown of the remaining 4,016 houses Urban sites within the towns Canterbury 1000 Herne Bay/Whitstable 500) ………. 1,500 Outside Urban Areas ……… 2,516 (District wide) Overall 70% (of the 10,200 homes) on brownfield sites

Which development options have we looked at? Option 1 – Infill in the city centre. This is likely to deliver approx units (and is applicable to all options) Option 2 – Within urban boundaries of Canterbury and coastal towns. This is likely to deliver approx 1500 units in total Option 3a – Canterbury - urban extensions (dispersal) Option 3b – Canterbury - urban extension (single site) Option 3c – Canterbury - urban extensions (supplemented by development at Herne Bay) Option 4 – Herne Bay and Whitstable - urban extensions Option 5 – Larger well serviced villages around Canterbury (possible extended village option) Option 6 – Dispersed across district (urban areas and villages) Option 7 – New (free-standing) settlement

Option 3a: Canterbury – urban extensions (dispersal)

Option 3b: Canterbury - urban extension (single large site)

Option 3c: Canterbury – urban extensions (supplemented by development at Herne Bay)

Option 4: Herne Bay and Whitstable - urban extensions

Option 5: Larger, well-serviced villages around Canterbury (possible extended village option)

Option 6: Dispersed across district (urban areas and villages)

How did we assess them ? Performance against government policy and South East planning framework Sustainability Appraisal (social, environmental, economic factors) Market Feasibility Assessment - the need to capitalise on developments to provide infrastructure Conclusions from previous Inspectors’ Reports and Development Appraisals (eg: “Greater Sturry”) Other key studies ongoing – Transport Assessment, Flooding

What we concluded Most appropriate options, for further testing and consultation, is a mix of the following, - Option 1: infill in city centre - Option 2: within urban boundaries of Canterbury, Herne Bay and Whitstable - Option 3c: large urban extension at Canterbury and limited development around Herne Bay - Option 5: Minor infill in larger, well served rural villages this would be our ‘menu’ from which we would (after consultation) choose the preferred option - to go forward to next stage

Options for consultation

Why south and west Canterbury ? Best fit with SE plan –at or adjacent to urban centres –reinforces role of regional hub Good access to facilities and work Sufficient scale to provide for future community, open space, social facilities Avoids constrained parts of City, on North and east side Avoids habitat designations / sensitive landscapes

Proposed Core Strategy timetable StageDate Consultation: development optionsJan/Mar 2010 Consultation: preferred option and core policiesAutumn 2010 Consultation: Submission to Government versionSummer 2011 Submission to GovernmentAutumn 2011 ExaminationEarly 2012 Inspector’s ReportSummer 2012 Adoption2012 What happens next ?

Any Questions ?